The Syndicate

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:32 pm**

Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:24 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:07 pm @Creature why are you voting TonyStarkPrime? yout vote gave me sheepy vibes
is there a reason why you wanna get a big wagon running? why so eager?
I voted TonyStarkPrime for reactions.

Big wagons cause more infospreading because it puts someone in spotlight, making that person squirm more while also making others need to justify their stances around said person.

sounds reasonable, I like this thinking even if it risks mislynches

[mention]Epignosis[/mention] just wanted to be sure there is no convenience or sheeping in that vote. Some people might do so for chainreactions.

I don't mind the wagon on Timmer tho.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:40 pm**

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:32 pm sounds reasonable, I like this thinking even if it risks mislynches

Not if you keep an eye for the deadline and keeps the wagon on someone you scumread.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:40 pm**

like this:

[VOTE: timmer] aubergine

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:56 pm**

[VOTE: Rej] aubergine

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:57 pm**

Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:40 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:32 pm sounds reasonable, I like this thinking even if it risks mislynches
Not if you keep an eye for the deadline and keeps the wagon on someone you scumread.

interesting, gotta keep my eye on you, gotta learn alot from you

I will go sleep now see ya later

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:31 pm**

Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:24 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:07 pm @Creature why are you voting TonyStarkPrime? yout vote gave me sheepy vibes
is there a reason why you wanna get a big wagon running? why so eager?
I voted TonyStarkPrime for reactions.

Big wagons cause more infospreading because it puts someone in spotlight, making that person squirm more while also making others need to justify their stances around said person.

I doubt you'll be making Tony squirm.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:49 pm**

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:32 pm
sounds reasonable, I like this thinking even if it risks mislynches

@Epignosis just wanted to be sure there is no convenience or sheeping in that vote. Some people might do so for chainreactions.

I don't mind the wagon on Timmer tho.

To be clear, you are still voting for me because I wasn't helpful enough in helping you understand the pages that you yourself had already read? Cool

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:54 pm**

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:32 pm
sounds reasonable, I like this thinking even if it risks mislynches

@Epignosis just wanted to be sure there is no convenience or sheeping in that vote. Some people might do so for chainreactions.

I don't mind the wagon on Timmer tho.

Also, since you know that you and I aren't teammates and that is the starting point for Epig's vote etc., you are saying that despite knowing that the reasons behind these other votes are incorrect, you are fine with letting a bad case ride, because, again, you don't like that I didn't help you understand the pages that you had already read?

So, by that rationale, if you are fine with letting a case that you and I both know is wrong ride, you would be ok with that same case turning onto you? Since that case is that we are teamies?

[VOTE: Vote: Rej] aubergine

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:54 pm**

Oh, I don't have to type the word vote, I see. Awkward.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm**

Whee.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm**

And Epig, I'd like to hear a reply from you about my response to your "why did he comment on that?" case, please.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:26 pm**

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.

What do you make of it? What do you make of sig’s meta explanation?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:31 pm**

I do not agree with Owner’s grievance against Tony, but I think she looks very town because of it.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm**

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.

Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:32 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:10 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:52 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:57 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:32 pm This looks boring.
Wanna play chess?
1. d4
2. d5
chess inside mafia? that's nice.
Long con wants to divert the attention elsewhere though..

I clicked on Michelle’s name because she’s one of a few who I have not played with before. This is her only on-topic post. It’s super cherrypicked and a little arbitrary.

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm**

timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm And Epig, I'd like to hear a reply from you about my response to your "why did he comment on that?" case, please.

It's late and I'm having bourbon and watching Mike Trout.

Can you simplify your question please?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:38 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm And Epig, I'd like to hear a reply from you about my response to your "why did he comment on that?" case, please.
It's late and I'm having bourbon and watching Mike Trout.

Can you simplify your question please?

Me no read Day 0.
Day 1 start.
1 post made.
Me read that.
Me comment on that.

You.
Why he comment on that.

Now you go.
Where at now.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm**

And I'm jealous of both the bourbon and watching Mike Trout. I'm stuck at work...

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm**

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.

I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm**

it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:42 pm**

timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:38 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm And Epig, I'd like to hear a reply from you about my response to your "why did he comment on that?" case, please.
It's late and I'm having bourbon and watching Mike Trout.

Can you simplify your question please?
Me no read Day 0.
Day 1 start.
1 post made.
Me read that.
Me comment on that.

You.
Why he comment on that.

Now you go.
Where at now.

Oh. The timing thing. I find it mildly suspicious still, but it's circumstantial. The conversation it generate in the very least was worth something.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:43 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.

I'm telling you, I don't know what it is, but Boston has Masahiro Tanaka's number.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.

Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm**

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm

Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?

Because you are telling us all about your meta.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:47 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:48 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:07 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:59 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:22 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:18 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:07 pm Also I labelled you as bad from your first post, what do you think about that?
You are mistaken. What did you see you thought was bad?
Hmm we'll see. I'm not really sure, I guess I felt something was off about your usual opening post. It felt kind of cold and distant rather than welcoming. A replica instead of the genuine thing. The heavy punctuation I think lol.
Nova, are you sure you're not thinking of some other post? This was my first post of the game (below). It has two periods and two commas. Is that heavy punctuation?

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 3:28 pm hi everyone, I'm here. Happy to see some friendly faces and welcome to the newcomers, I hope you enjoy the game.

That's the one! No mistake, it's you. I guess heavy punctuation might be an exaggeration, but the cold and distant feeling are still there. Maybe it's the lack of exclamation point lol. Gut feeling was that it is fabricated, I'm not getting your usual energy and enthusiasm. Feels like you're just replicating it to keep up with your usual opening posts.
This is all horseshit.

Rude.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:47 pm**

Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:46 pm Anyone up to try big wagons?

Sloonei

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 pm**

This Baltimore pitcher has pegged the home plate umpire. Twice.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm

Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.

I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:55 pm**

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm

Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.

There is also no part of this that is an accusation against you, to be clear.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:56 pm**

Ok Sloonei, I think I misunderstood. I'm off to bed.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:57 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:55 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm

This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.
There is also no part of this that is an accusation against you, to be clear.

How come?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:00 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:57 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:55 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm

Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.
There is also no part of this that is an accusation against you, to be clear.
How come?

Because that's not the rhetorical subject of this particular conversation.

There can be an accusation against juliets. I am not making one.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:04 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:30 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:25 pm
Someone else referring to your meta is not.
But, I don't think there's anyone called someone else playing this game.

get out.

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:33 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:20 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:19 pm Can someone summarize noteable events from D0 in one hunch?
It's only 4 pages to read...
I expect more help from a "fellow civillian".

....don't like this at all.

I think rej is more likely bad of the two.

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:43 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:26 pm[VOTE: nova] aubergine
Careful now.

Am I supposed to be scared of you?
Y'all newbies don't know that I could eat you for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:35 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:32 pm Go Sloonei!!

Oh, I thought you were asking Dom for a GTH read on me.

Town. That one post and his sonnet are the only two I can remember. His question for me felt nitpicky in a way that I appreciate.

And you didn't answer it.

[mention]Sloonei[/mention]

Creature wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:20 pm Okay, maybe something interesting might happen soon.

you know you have power in that right

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:33 pm Tag me when someone does something worth reading

[mention]MacDougall[/mention], everything I say is worth reading because I am the motherfucking monster.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:36 pm timmer's last post before this one quoted below was over three hours prior:

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:19 pm Can someone summarize noteable events from D0 in one hunch?
That's 3:19pm EST.

timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:20 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:19 pm Can someone summarize noteable events from D0 in one hunch?
It's only 4 pages to read...
That's 3:20pm EST.

Of all the things timmer could have commented on in that window, why that?

And then the punchline:

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:33 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:20 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:19 pm Can someone summarize noteable events from D0 in one hunch?
It's only 4 pages to read...
I expect more help from a "fellow civillian".

Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
This reeks of a teammate interaction to me.

"fellow civillian" really tips the hand tbh.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:48 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:07 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:59 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:22 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:18 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:07 pm Also I labelled you as bad from your first post, what do you think about that?
You are mistaken. What did you see you thought was bad?
Hmm we'll see. I'm not really sure, I guess I felt something was off about your usual opening post. It felt kind of cold and distant rather than welcoming. A replica instead of the genuine thing. The heavy punctuation I think lol.
Nova, are you sure you're not thinking of some other post? This was my first post of the game (below). It has two periods and two commas. Is that heavy punctuation?

juliets wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 3:28 pm hi everyone, I'm here. Happy to see some friendly faces and welcome to the newcomers, I hope you enjoy the game.

That's the one! No mistake, it's you. I guess heavy punctuation might be an exaggeration, but the cold and distant feeling are still there. Maybe it's the lack of exclamation point lol. Gut feeling was that it is fabricated, I'm not getting your usual energy and enthusiasm. Feels like you're just replicating it to keep up with your usual opening posts.
This is all horseshit.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:08 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:18 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:11 pm Attention everyone. I don't like Nutella.
I'm on the same bus. She a bad girl.
Hey buzz off. I'm seriously too occupied with real life to deal with being suspected for no reason. Kindly direct your bullshit elsewhere.

Are you too busy to play at all or do you only get to suspect people for that reason?

timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:21 pm To comment on your post against me, Epig, you did see the part where I said I didn't read Day 0, right? And my post is the 2nd post of day 1, so... there was kind of literally exactly one post for me to comment on

Care to comment on literally anything else, or...?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:42 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:38 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:55 pm And Epig, I'd like to hear a reply from you about my response to your "why did he comment on that?" case, please.
It's late and I'm having bourbon and watching Mike Trout.

Can you simplify your question please?
Me no read Day 0.
Day 1 start.
1 post made.
Me read that.
Me comment on that.

You.
Why he comment on that.

Now you go.
Where at now.
Oh. The timing thing. I find it mildly suspicious still, but it's circumstantial. The conversation it generate in the very least was worth something.

Is rej or timmer more likely bad?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:05 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm

Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.

I noted that. fyi.

juliets-- pick two people you think are teammates, pls. [mention]juliets[/mention]

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm**

I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm**

Dom, I didn't answer your question because it seemed as though you were grilling me over a point that I did not make.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:12 pm**

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:20 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:02 am lynch

Oh boy this is a fun thing for my autocorrect to have jumped on
This feels awkward. It could be a neutral thing, but in my mind, it still warrants a vote.

[VOTE: TonyStarkPrime] aubergine

I don't understand this vote.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:15 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.

What Sloonei said.

I have no qualms with what you’re saying here I think it’s probably NAI with maybe a slight scum read on instinct. However a lot of syndicate players including in this game might have a different view and I want to know what they think.
Sig’s meta description I read similarly — NAI with a slight scum vibe. But I think “he described meta” is a lazy argument that takes some very broad points about the ways scum tends to defend themselves and fits it into a nice quantifiable package for easy handling by those who want a cheap argument.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.

You a Sox fan?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:21 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.

Sure.
I think the "fellow civillian" line was suspicious in its own right. What do you think? For me, it was very...

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm Dom, I didn't answer your question because it seemed as though you were grilling me over a point that I did not make.

...cool excuse you've used twice now.
I'm not interested in your dodges. I'm interested in answers.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:23 pm**

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm

Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.

Sure. Also meta. I feel like this is an unnecessarily defensive line from juliets. I’ll upgrade the read to “maybe not town”.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:23 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.
You a Sox fan?

I am

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:24 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.

Sloonei thoughts?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:26 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:23 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.
You a Sox fan?
I am

You a Patriots fan too?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:26 pm**

Spoiler: show

1. d4 d5
2. e4

So Long Con, haven’t seen you much yet this game. What are your thoughts thusfar?

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:28 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:04 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:43 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:26 pm[VOTE: nova] aubergine
Careful now.
Am I supposed to be scared of you?
Y'all newbies don't know that I could eat you for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

You're sweating. Relax.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:29 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:21 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sure.
I think the "fellow civillian" line was suspicious in its own right. What do you think? For me, it was very...

Fixed your image.

I don't know. It could be more like:

In all seriousness, the thing that grosses me out over that isn't "fellow civilian," but rather the existence of the quotation marks.

The entire exchange doesn't add up, and if timmer is innocent, Rej tipped his hand there.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:29 pm**

Wayward quote tags.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:21 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sure.
I think the "fellow civillian" line was suspicious in its own right. What do you think? For me, it was very...

Fixed your image.

I don't know. It could be more like:

In all seriousness, the thing that grosses me out over that isn't "fellow civilian," but rather the existence of the quotation marks.

The entire exchange doesn't add up, and if timmer is innocent, Rej tipped his hand there.

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:30 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:21 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sure.
I think the "fellow civillian" line was suspicious in its own right. What do you think? For me, it was very...

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm Dom, I didn't answer your question because it seemed as though you were grilling me over a point that I did not make.
...cool excuse you've used twice now.
I'm not interested in your dodges. I'm interested in answers.

We can be motivated to believe sig because he might be town. sig's reputation as an easy mislynch candidate is thoroughly documented. Tempering our natural inclination to suspect him for doing sig things on Day 1 feels more wise than jumping down his throat for doing sig things on Day 1.

I have not made an argument for or against the suspicion of sig for his preemptive meta defense. I don't care about it one way or the other. I don't think it makes him look bad, I think it makes him look like sig. I believe this now qualifies as an argument against the suspicion.
Dragomir brought up a point on Day 0. I provided an opposing viewpoint.

Why does this matter so much to you?

holy linki

Posted: **Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:31 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:23 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.
You a Sox fan?
I am
You a Patriots fan too?

Mostly a Tom Brady fan at this point. I don't care too much about football in general, but I grew up watching him and I can't look away now. Baseball's the only sport I follow closely these days.

The Syndicate

Girl Genius (END)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 0)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)

Re: Girl Genius (Day 1)