The Syndicate

this screenshot from juliets thread cut off the last voter, i think.

Prometheus wrote:

Athena wrote:

Artemis wrote:A lot of civs voted for Wisconsin

How do you know this? Seems to me, only a baddie would be able to say that.

Or a civ who is annoyed with people for voting for Wisconsin.

Also, I paid no attention to the whole people living in particular states thing and just voted on a whim.

And how would a civ know that "a lot of civs" voted Wisconsin. Which is my whole point.

It's rough being the wisest goddess in the room.

Athena wrote:

Prometheus wrote:

Athena wrote:

Artemis wrote:A lot of civs voted for Wisconsin

How do you know this? Seems to me, only a baddie would be able to say that.

Or a civ who is annoyed with people for voting for Wisconsin.

Also, I paid no attention to the whole people living in particular states thing and just voted on a whim.

And how would a civ know that "a lot of civs" voted Wisconsin. Which is my whole point.

It's rough being the wisest goddess in the room.

How would one know their not civs?

Each individual knows for themselves.

How would a civ know that "a lot of civs" voted for something--that implies knowledge of several civ roles. And as I read the roles, it is unlikely that someone would possibly know more than 2 other civs. And Artemis didn't vote Wisconsin herself. So she could possibly know that 2 civs voted that option. Which is hardly a lot.

How did you read her post?

Artemis is Canucklehead pretty shady right now. I think instructive could be a slipup.

Could somebody who is not mobile type out the Wisconsin voters? I can't right click and do all that ATM. I know I was one, Persephone, Apollo, Atlas, and who else?

I think it is pretty safe to say Atlas is not Hinzelman.

I definitely don't understand what Artemis meant about lots of civs, but as a cheese voter myself I appreciate the confidence.

Wisconsin
Persephone
Apollo
Atlas
Athena
Vesta
Electra
Prometheus

Indiana
Artemis
Eros
Medusa
Chronos
Phoenix
Ceres
Zeus

Mars is the god of bullshit or war?

I forget which. Please remind me.

I still don't understand why some trade Mars bars on Valentine's Day.

juliets wrote:Chronos I didn't think I cut anyone out but if i did would you tell us who it is and what they voted if you made note of it? I'll go back to the thread also and see who voted last and whether they are on the screenshot.

It's teh forum, as Epig said. Sorry!!!


The business with Artemis is interesting... I think it could be a possible slip up.

Well hi there. So good to be here. My role is a bit complicated, but suffice to say I'm around for now. And grateful.

As for what's happening in the thread:

I think the serial killer is one of the Wisconsin voters, but 1 in 7 isn't very good odds for a guess.

I think it's worth thinking about why Wisconsin won, as it wasn't written as a tie vote.

Artemis is not looking so good. Others' reactions to her post are also worthy of thought. I'll be back before the lynch closes.

How is it that your role is outed?

First how awesome Laura's role is interactive it should be a huge help for us! I agree with her that it is indeed likely that Hinzelman voted for Wisconsin. I do wonder about the tie, if it was a tie.

As far as the Artemis/Athena go I do find it odd Artemis wrote a lot of civs then went on to say several civs. Athena's strong reaction is well idk. Let me discuss this.
Arte: I agree it is likely that civs voted for Wisconsin but it could just as easily be baddies and/or indy's in there as well so to say a lot or several civs seems to be like glossing over what you have posted. Again how do you know there were a lot/several civs and not baddies and/or indy's.
Athena: Nice to know you think so highly of yourself Modest aren't you? lol I have to ask you how do you know there are not a lot of civ's who voted Wisconsin? Why are you so intent of throwing all this at Arte? I mean I voted Wisconsin too but you seem to be distracting us from looking at Wisconsin voters and instead drawing eyes to Arte. Why? I do find what he said odd but I find some things you have said odd as well. Why not look at the Wisconsin voters? Is it because you voted Wisconsin as well?

Both of Arte and Athena should be looked at by everyone to see how they feel. I like looking at all sides and have no problem with closer scrutiny in my direction because of my vote for Wisconsin.

But maybe we should look at those who have just latched onto this without adding any of their own originality to the discussion aka Fortuna. here is her post:

Fortuna wrote: Interesting. I agree with Athena. Can you explain yourself Artemis?

So what was interesting? What do YOU think about what Arte said? What Athena said? You have just jumped in on this but yet added nothing yourself if it is so interesting I would think you would tell us what is so interesting.

Sure baddies will say "There are a lot/several civs who voted X" I have seen it happen but I have also seen players like Fortuna latching on without putting themselves out there in the limelight like Athena did. I am going to be very interested to see what happens with these three as this day progresses.

Why would someone insanify my Mom Ceres? I do not remember anything in her posts but perhaps I should read back she may have struck someones nerve. It does seem as if she is saying she thinks Poseidon is Mr Stone because of how Mr Stones picture was added late and that Poseidon had shown up late as well. They both showed up around the same time - is this right Mother? I also think she is saying Arte is a smooth tongued poster.

Prometheus' seeming to defend Arte pinged me slightly.

Still watching Apollo who has quieted down a bit today - but so did I because of rl. So yes I am still a bit suspicious of him from day 1.

Eros post about Mars has me wondering what you mean. Explain please. Some might say that post of yours is bullshit as you do not explain what makes it bullshit. lol

Gosh we are so lucky to have so much to discuss. It will hopefully lead to a better lynch than the last one.

I will be in and out today to discuss.

Eros wrote:Mars is the god of bullshit or war?

I forget which. Please remind me.

I still don't understand why some trade Mars bars on Valentine's Day.

I don't know what Eros nincompoop on verticity forced vote perhaps? And I straitlaced know what the Laura thing is about significative so I'll just sit back and keep Alice Grego.

And soundminded still stlgirl suspect phr Artemis.

Persephone wrote:First how awesome Laura's role is interactive it should be a huge help for us! I agree with her that it is indeed likely that Hinzelman voted for Wisconsin. I do wonder about the tie, if it was a tie.

As far as the Artemis/Athena go I do find it odd Artemis wrote a lot of civs then went on to say several civs. Athena's strong reaction is well idk. Let me discuss this.
Arte: I agree it is likely that civs voted for Wisconsin but it could just as easily be baddies and/or indy's in there as well so to say a lot or several civs seems to be like glossing over what you have posted. Again how do you know there were a lot/several civs and not baddies and/or indy's.
Athena: Nice to know you think so highly of yourself Modest aren't you? lol I have to ask you how do you know there are not a lot of civ's who voted Wisconsin? Why are you so intent of throwing all this at Arte? I mean I voted Wisconsin too but you seem to be distracting us from looking at Wisconsin voters and instead drawing eyes to Arte. Why? I do find what he said odd but I find some things you have said odd as well. Why not look at the Wisconsin voters? Is it because you voted Wisconsin as well?

Both of Arte and Athena should be looked at by everyone to see how they feel. I like looking at all sides and have no problem with closer scrutiny in my direction because of my vote for Wisconsin.

But maybe we should look at those who have just latched onto this without adding any of their own originality to the discussion aka Fortuna. here is her post:

Fortuna wrote: Interesting. I agree with Athena. Can you explain yourself Artemis?

So what was interesting? What do YOU think about what Arte said? What Athena said? You have just jumped in on this but yet added nothing yourself if it is so interesting I would think you would tell us what is so interesting.

Sure baddies will say "There are a lot/several civs who voted X" I have seen it happen but I have also seen players like Fortuna latching on without putting themselves out there in the limelight like Athena did. I am going to be very interested to see what happens with these three as this day progresses.

Why would someone insanify my Mom Ceres? I do not remember anything in her posts but perhaps I should read back she may have struck someones nerve. It does seem as if she is saying she thinks Poseidon is Mr Stone because of how Mr Stones picture was added late and that Poseidon had shown up late as well. They both showed up around the same time - is this right Mother? I also think she is saying Arte is a smooth tongued poster.

Prometheus' seeming to defend Arte pinged me slightly.

Still watching Apollo who has quieted down a bit today - but so did I because of rl. So yes I am still a bit suspicious of him from day 1.

Eros post about Mars has me wondering what you mean. Explain please. Some might say that post of yours is bullshit as you do not explain what makes it bullshit. lol

Gosh we are so lucky to have so much to discuss. It will hopefully lead to a better lynch than the last one.

I will be in and out today to discuss.

I have time for one post, so I will try to sum everything up in one.

I am purely speculating regarding the voters. I had momentarily forgot how dangerous that is in mafia, because then you are the first sacrificed offered up. I don't like to use precise words, so don't get hung up on "a lot" versus "several." I'd still use either today. To me, it doesn't make sense for baddies to vote Wisconsin any more than it would for civs to vote -- cause Hinzelmann is an SK. I don't think voting for a SK's homestate would be beneficial to baddies, but then again, that's mere speculation. It seems like the SK could come after us as much as the baddie contingents.

I do however think it's very plausible the SK could have safely voted for himself in amongst all those voters. It would be all too easy to hide. I think over time we can root Hinzelmann out of there, but I think purely voting Wisconsin voters tonight would be folly -- I think there's still far too many civs making up the makeup of that selection. That said, I don't have an info-gathering role or BTS to allow me to know who is who, so it's all raw data that I was simply trying to talk aloud and make sense of.

Artemis wrote:

Persephone wrote:First how awesome Laura's role is interactive it should be a huge help for us! I agree with her that it is indeed likely that Hinzelman voted for Wisconsin. I do wonder about the tie, if it was a tie.

As far as the Artemis/Athena go I do find it odd Artemis wrote a lot of civs then went on to say several civs. Athena's strong reaction is well idk. Let me discuss this.
Arte: I agree it is likely that civs voted for Wisconsin but it could just as easily be baddies and/or indy's in there as well so to say a lot or several civs seems to be like glossing over what you have posted. Again how do you know there were a lot/several civs and not baddies and/or indy's.
Athena: Nice to know you think so highly of yourself Modest aren't you? lol I have to ask you how do you know there are not a lot of civ's who voted Wisconsin? Why are you so intent of throwing all this at Arte? I mean I voted Wisconsin too but you seem to be distracting us from looking at Wisconsin voters and instead drawing eyes to Arte. Why? I do find what he said odd but I find some things you have said odd as well. Why not look at the Wisconsin voters? Is it because you voted Wisconsin as well?

Both of Arte and Athena should be looked at by everyone to see how they feel. I like looking at all sides and have no problem with closer scrutiny in my direction because of my vote for Wisconsin.

But maybe we should look at those who have just latched onto this without adding any of their own originality to the discussion aka Fortuna. here is her post:

Fortuna wrote: Interesting. I agree with Athena. Can you explain yourself Artemis?

So what was interesting? What do YOU think about what Arte said? What Athena said? You have just jumped in on this but yet added nothing yourself if it is so interesting I would think you would tell us what is so interesting.

Sure baddies will say "There are a lot/several civs who voted X" I have seen it happen but I have also seen players like Fortuna latching on without putting themselves out there in the limelight like Athena did. I am going to be very interested to see what happens with these three as this day progresses.

Why would someone insanify my Mom Ceres? I do not remember anything in her posts but perhaps I should read back she may have struck someones nerve. It does seem as if she is saying she thinks Poseidon is Mr Stone because of how Mr Stones picture was added late and that Poseidon had shown up late as well. They both showed up around the same time - is this right Mother? I also think she is saying Arte is a smooth tongued poster.

Prometheus' seeming to defend Arte pinged me slightly.

Still watching Apollo who has quieted down a bit today - but so did I because of rl. So yes I am still a bit suspicious of him from day 1.

Eros post about Mars has me wondering what you mean. Explain please. Some might say that post of yours is bullshit as you do not explain what makes it bullshit. lol

Gosh we are so lucky to have so much to discuss. It will hopefully lead to a better lynch than the last one.

I will be in and out today to discuss.

I have time for one post, so I will try to sum everything up in one.

I am purely speculating regarding the voters. I had momentarily forgot how dangerous that is in mafia, because then you are the first sacrificed offered up. I don't like to use precise words, so don't get hung up on "a lot" versus "several." I'd still use either today. To me, it doesn't make sense for baddies to vote Wisconsin any more than it would for civs to vote -- cause Hinzelmann is an SK. I don't think voting for a SK's homestate would be beneficial to baddies, but then again, that's mere speculation. It seems like the SK could come after us as much as the baddie contingents.

I do however think it's very plausible the SK could have safely voted for himself in amongst all those voters. It would be all too easy to hide. I think over time we can root Hinzelmann out of there, but I think purely voting Wisconsin voters tonight would be folly -- I think there's still far too many civs making up the makeup of that selection. That said, I don't have an info-gathering role or BTS to allow me to know who is who, so it's all raw data that I was simply trying to talk aloud and make sense of.

earache NorthernBelle like a fairly plausible response. ductility Lost Rabbi pursy tabulation a Necromantic Fiend too much Dr. Von Dreszen quaquaversum griveous piquet me, mansuetude it could easily be keenness slipup.

Persephone wrote:First how awesome Laura's role is interactive it should be a huge help for us! I agree with her that it is indeed likely that Hinzelman voted for Wisconsin. I do wonder about the tie, if it was a tie.

As far as the Artemis/Athena go I do find it odd Artemis wrote a lot of civs then went on to say several civs. Athena's strong reaction is well idk. Let me discuss this.
Arte: I agree it is likely that civs voted for Wisconsin but it could just as easily be baddies and/or indy's in there as well so to say a lot or several civs seems to be like glossing over what you have posted. Again how do you know there were a lot/several civs and not baddies and/or indy's.
Athena: Nice to know you think so highly of yourself Modest aren't you? lol I have to ask you how do you know there are not a lot of civ's who voted Wisconsin? Why are you so intent of throwing all this at Arte? I mean I voted Wisconsin too but you seem to be distracting us from looking at Wisconsin voters and instead drawing eyes to Arte. Why? I do find what he said odd but I find some things you have said odd as well. Why not look at the Wisconsin voters? Is it because you voted Wisconsin as well?

Both of Arte and Athena should be looked at by everyone to see how they feel. I like looking at all sides and have no problem with closer scrutiny in my direction because of my vote for Wisconsin.

Hey, I'm the goddess of wisdom, so...

I don't know there aren't a lot of civs who voted Wisconsin. I know there is 1 civ who did, me. I don't know the identity of any of the other 6 people. They could all be civ, although I doubt that, just because of probability.

I have no problem with looking at that list. I will look at that list myself.

Pointing out a suspicious post from a player doesn't mean to not look at others players. And I do fiind her suspicious. For both her initial comment and her response. She said something odd, I asked her about it, and her response was to change what she had said and draw it towards the fact that people didn't read the roles carefully enough (which doesn't have any connection to people's team, mind you).

I'll consider other players, as well. But that's my best shot for now.

linki: That explanation makes sense to me, although I'm not sure it alleviates my suspicion of Arte. It seems like a calm, well thought out defense. But then, it also negates some of what was said previously. I need to think about this.

Persephone wrote: Still watching Apollo who has quieted down a bit today - but so did I because of rl. So yes I am still a bit suspicious of him from day 1.

Eros post about Mars has me wondering what you mean. Explain please. Some might say that post of yours is bullshit as you do not explain what makes it bullshit. lol

Gosh we are so lucky to have so much to discuss. It will hopefully lead to a better lynch than the last one.

I will be in and out today to discuss.

Hi Persephone!
Yes, I had some RL commitments yesterday that kept me away from mafia.

Now that I am here, here are my thoughts
1. It is possible that Artemis made a slip up, and it is possible that Athena saw an opportunity to pounce and is being opportunistic about it. However, I am reading the conflict as civ-on-civ. In my experience, baddies tend to stay out of these sorts of arguments and try to fly under the radar. Not always, but often, so I am hesitant to vote for either of them today.
2. I agree that it is likely Hinzelmann voted Wisconsin, but apart from him there is no reason to asume more baddies voted for one ption than the other. Still, it is a good starting place.
3. I also am confused by Eros' vote. Can you explain, Eros?
4. I kind of have my eye on Prometheus today. He is a Wisconsin voter, and his vote for Medusa yesterday struck me as the kind of thing a baddie would do when trying not to go on record voting for a civ (Hermes and Poseidon, assuming Poseidon is civ.)

I certainly am glad to hear from Laura and this day has indeed given us a lot to think about before the vote!

Athena wrote: I don't know there aren't a lot of civs who voted Wisconsin. I know there is 1 civ who did, me. I don't know the identity of any of the other 6 people. They could all be civ, although I doubt that, just because of probability.

I have no problem with looking at that list. I will look at that list myself.

Then why did you Karma Chameleon mismanage Artemis antifebrile disbelief? That amour of baddie.

1. Eros Unhelpful Banana Damned Worm any reasons G-Man voting people.
2. I still have Apollo conglutination Poseidon purple woman my keenness.
3. The exchange between Artemis and AlaskaDave could go both ways, but anxiousseat least tippler antinomian them infliction pamphleteer baddie.
4. night actions capote unexcited hat if Dormouse serial killer hasn't voted for Wisconsin.

Athena wrote:Each individual knows for themselves.

How would a civ know that "a lot of civs" voted for something--that implies knowledge of several civ roles. And as I read the roles, it is unlikely that someone would possibly know more than 2 other civs. And Artemis didn't vote Wisconsin herself. So she could possibly know that 2 civs voted that option. Which is hardly a lot.

How did you read her post?

I read it as an exasperated civ who wasn't necessarily being literal.

Also I typed half the sentence last night and then forgot to finish because I was playing cookie clicker.

Apollo wrote: Now that I am here, here are my thoughts
1. It is possible that Artemis made a slip up, and it is possible that Athena saw an opportunity to pounce and is being opportunistic about it. However, I am reading the conflict as civ-on-civ. In my experience, baddies tend to stay out of these sorts of arguments and try to fly under the radar. Not always, but often, so I am hesitant to vote for either of them today.
2. I agree that it is likely Hinzelmann voted Wisconsin, but apart from him there is no reason to asume more baddies voted for one ption than the other. Still, it is a good starting place.
3. I also am confused by Eros' vote. Can you explain, Eros?
4. I kind of have my eye on Prometheus today. He is a Wisconsin voter, and his vote for Medusa yesterday struck me as the kind of thing a baddie would do when trying not to go on record voting for a civ (Hermes and Poseidon, assuming Poseidon is civ.)

I certainly am glad to hear from Laura and this day has indeed given us a lot to think about before the vote!

EBWOP: I meant to say Prometheus' vote for Pandora, not Medusa.

So thanks for responding Arte and Athena.

Arte your post seemed genuine to me I also get that when you put yourself out there you can be first to be suspicious. Not that it makes you good suddenly but it does sate the ping I had a bit. Who do you find most suspicious? Are you looking at Herpe voters as well as Wisconsin voters for any correlation or will your vote be based solely on who voted Wisconsin? I would like to hear a lot more from you before lynch if you have time.

Does anyone think that Poseidon was being saved in the lynch yesterday?

Athena you are very smart so maybe I need to look a little closer. I await your thoughts on the Wisconsin voters. Though you do seem quite focused on those votes what about the Day 1 lynch? What do think of all the Herpes voters? I am not really finding you suspicious enough to vote for but I would like to hear more from you.

Apollo greetings and salutations to you as well. Thanks for the thoughts. I found Prometheus vote odd as well. But why just Prometheus? He was not the only one to not voice an opinion on the discussion at hand (Poseidon/Herpes) so why are you only looking at him?

Ceres (Mother) I wish I knew what you were saying. I cannot wait until you are uninsanified.

We need to hear from everyone. Low posters included.

Hosts I am sorry I did not vote for a favorite avatar They all were unique and awesome. I thought for some reason that we had until the end of the day.

Persephone wrote: Eros post about Mars has me wondering what you mean. Explain please. Some might say that post of yours is bullshit as you do not explain what makes it bullshit. lol

It was.

Persephone wrote: Does anyone think that Poseidon was being saved in the lynch yesterday?

I would have changed my vote to Hermes if it came to that.

There are definitely other people worth looking at besides Prometheus, but he is the one that stands out to me the most. The "it doesn't matter who gets lynched" comment on Day 1 seems very strange, the Wisconsin vote (which I'm not sure I wholly buy into, but it does make sense that Hinzelmann would have voted it) and he was the last person to cast a random vote (besides maybe Medusa) when everyone else was weighing in on Poseidon vs. Hermes.

I also found it odd that he has so far made no attempt to defend himself from my scrutiny, probably hoping if he ignores it it will go away.

The idea of Poseidon being saved is an interesting one. If that is true, Vesta looks like the most likely culprit, or we could try to lynch Poseidon again and see what happens.

I still want to hear from Eros regarding his Mars vote.

I hope a lot more is said before I have to vote this evening.

Herc here.

I'm on the road so must be brief. I believe that the "a lot of civs" comment could def be a slip, but I've also been part of a lynch party against someone who said just such a thing and they turned out to be civ, so... yeah.

Prometheus def has been a bit aloof in his posting style. I cant think of many reasons to post in such a "whatever" way about a lynch.

I'm going to vote for Artemis now before I forget/run out of time.

I voted Prometheus yesterday because of his cavalier dismissal of the importance of day one lynches. Today he seems to be defending Artemis. My vote will go to one of them.

Apollo wrote: I still want to hear from Eros regarding his Mars vote.

Just going hunting.

Medusa wrote:I voted Prometheus yesterday because of his cavalier dismissal of the importance of day one lynches. Today he seems to be defending Artemis. My vote will go to one of them.

I have a AaronLittleton fonctionnaire would progressiveness rutilant expose BTSC ...and that's terrible. that Turnip Head such delusory if he were bad. Red Queen looks very postulatum to the Herpes case.

Quick Thoughts:

Someone asked me who I think is suspicious. Well, I'm not sure yet. No one is particularly pingy or maybe just everyone is pingy because I only have ideas about who some of you are. Does that make sense? I'm waiting for an epiphany.

I'm going to watch the thread (as the day allows) to see if I get any better ideas on how to vote. I'd like to know a little more about Eros's rationale for Mars for his vote, but I don't think it's inherently suspicious. Yet. There are several things floating out there on where to let your vote lie today, but I don't know --- nothing seems very substantial yet.

In other news, I think Ceres' insanification has been the most entertaining insanification to date.

does anyone have any thoughts about what I posted about Fortuna?

I will agree with your thoughts on Fortuna, but have little to add. I thought Fortuna dodged the day one situation, when Apollo was thinking of voting her based on an unfortunate choice of Elvis video. I think I'll go back and reread all that, I can't remember whether Fortuna responded or if someone else did

I missed the part about Fortuna the first time, but you are right. That post of hers reads like many a baddie trying not to distinguish themselves. I still haven't made up my mind. I wish Prometheus would comment on what I have said about him so far.

Fortuna is a woman of few words. She had nothing to say about apollos's post on good luck charm/ maybe medusa had knowledge....

it could mean nothing, but does catch attention.

i dunno k

tracking jennibean you manage to restlessness up only when Formics need ripzfx vote killing Pequeninos?

Apollo wrote:There are definitely other people worth looking at besides Prometheus, but he is the one that stands out to me the most. The "it doesn't matter who gets lynched" comment on Day 1 seems very strange, the Wisconsin vote (which I'm not sure I wholly buy into, but it does make sense that Hinzelmann would have voted it) and he was the last person to cast a random vote (besides maybe Medusa) when everyone else was weighing in on Poseidon vs. Hermes.

Day 1 votes rarely do any better than just voting at random, imo, someone needs to be lynched so that night can come, so it doesn't seem to matter too much who ultimately gets lynched. I had no opinion on the Poseidon vs. Hermes debate so I voted randomly.

Poseidon wrote:i dunno k

Me neither. ture

Ceres wrote:tracking jennibean you manage to restlessness up only when Formics need ripzfx vote killing Pequeninos?

Speaker for the Dead was a good book.

Oh dear, must vote soon and i really don't know who for. I see no reason why a baddie team would especially vote for Wisconsin. They can be killed just as easily by the SK. I suppose he himself could have voted for that place.

Phoenix wrote:Wisconsin
Persephone
Apollo
Atlas
Athena
Vesta
Electra
Prometheus

Indiana
Artemis
Eros
Medusa
Chronos
Phoenix
Ceres
Zeus

Very useful. 7 Wisconsin voters, one now dead, leaving 6 Wisconsin voters. Therefore it is no longer 1 in 7 odds. For each of us Wissies we know our own roles, so 1 in 5 odds. Of those on the list, Electra is not eligible for a vote today, leaving 4 options for today.
My options would be:

Persephone
Apollo
Athena
Prometheus

Irregardless of the Wisconsin vote, Prometheus stood out to me for his Day 1 defense of it doesn't matter who dies. However, since Hermes flipped civ that gives me pause. Persephone made a good point about Athena vs. Artemis switching focus away from Wisconsin voters. Of the 4 listed, I personally have the most suspicions of Athena and Prom-boy. My vote will be going to one of these two depending on what happens in thread.

This could all be a huge waste of time though if Hinzelman really is Electra.

I'm still looking sorely Artemis, simpering I refound forgotten bigsimpsin Persephone. I obstetrics night her levite of Poseidon earlier on just seems a little Yin hylotheism so she's failed on my radar Jabberwocky by default, so is Poseidon).

Apollo wrote:There are definitely other people worth looking at besides Prometheus, but he is the one that stands out to me the most. The "it doesn't matter who gets lynched" comment on Day 1 seems very strange, the Wisconsin vote (which I'm not sure I wholly buy into, but it does make sense that Hinzelmann would have voted it) and he was the last person to cast a random vote (besides maybe Medusa) when everyone else was weighing in on Poseidon vs. Hermes.

I also found it odd that he has so far made no attempt to defend himself from my scrutiny, probably hoping if he ignores it it will go away.

The idea of Poseidon being saved is an interesting one. If that is true, Vesta looks like the most likely culprit, or we could try to lynch Poseidon again and see what happens.

I still want to hear from Eros regarding his Mars vote.

I hope a lot more is said before I have to vote this evening.

I assure you I was not voting to save Poseidon, okay.

I thought he was only suspicious to you because of not voting. You would now like to lynch him because people may have been saving him, just to see? This doesn't sound civ-friendly to me.

What happened to your no vote=no live policy you were touting before?

Prometheus wrote:

Apollo wrote:There are definitely other people worth looking at besides Prometheus, but he is the one that stands out to me the most. The "it doesn't matter who gets lynched" comment on Day 1 seems very strange, the Wisconsin vote (which I'm not sure I wholly buy into, but it does make sense that Hinzelmann would have voted it) and he was the last person to cast a random vote (besides maybe Medusa) when everyone else was weighing in on Poseidon vs. Hermes.

Day 1 votes rarely do any better than just voting at random, imo, someone needs to be lynched so that night can come, so it doesn't seem to matter too much who ultimately gets lynched. I had no opinion on the Poseidon vs. Hermes debate so I voted randomly.

I don't like the sound of this. Not the randomizing part, but it sounds like you don't care who gets lynched, one way or the other. As long as night can start. Killers like night.

It also sounds like you have no interest in trying to find something that might increase the chance of lynching a mafia instead of a civ.

Would you feel the same about day one if you were elected to be the day one lynch from this day forward? Would you still say it doesn't matter?

Vesta wrote:

Apollo wrote:There are definitely other people worth looking at besides Prometheus, but he is the one that stands out to me the most. The "it doesn't matter who gets lynched" comment on Day 1 seems very strange, the Wisconsin vote (which I'm not sure I wholly buy into, but it does make sense that Hinzelmann would have voted it) and he was the last person to cast a random vote (besides maybe Medusa) when everyone else was weighing in on Poseidon vs. Hermes.

I also found it odd that he has so far made no attempt to defend himself from my scrutiny, probably hoping if he ignores it it will go away.

The idea of Poseidon being saved is an interesting one. If that is true, Vesta looks like the most likely culprit, or we could try to lynch Poseidon again and see what happens.

I still want to hear from Eros regarding his Mars vote.

I hope a lot more is said before I have to vote this evening.

I assure you I was not voting to save Poseidon, okay.

I thought he was only suspicious to you because of not voting. You would now like to lynch him because people may have been saving him, just to see? This doesn't sound civ-friendly to me.

What happened to your no vote=no live policy you were touting before?

Well, if he Shinny already suspicious, then someone defending him would only compund the Necromantic Fiend I think. Though if Posiedon is a baddie I'd be more inclined Jaecus think disbelief over you, but still your lectureship is a bit shady.