Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:56 pm
if I dont wifom rondo back then that's no fun lol, I'm surprised you took it as a legitimate answer to his illegitimate comment
point 2, 4, 5 - its all the same concept - you responded to me in a way that made me feel like you were anxious. I get the idea that you might be better at reading other people based on how they read you, I play that way a lot too. but it wasn't like you had posted much when I made that remark, so I don't get why you are trying to force me to have a strong read on you and then when I tell you that I don't, you act like I should have. it felt forced, and that's what I mean when I said performative. i'm not sure how else to take it when I made a general statement about threadstate and you try force me to read you, and then ALSO pin a vote on me when I insist it's a threadstate read... plus, I already have a bad propensity to naturally sr you, I need more time to make a read on you past my initial gut reaction since I'm aware it won't always be right. it's mega early and there is no reason to believe I would have a good read on you yet just because I felt that the thread was scummy. especially based on a shit posting n0
point 3 - calling anything fake is even broader and is easy to say to literally anything lol. of course I thought it was omgus based on your reactions to me
I'll let you cook though. half of the player list has hardly posted, and I don't trust myself on you this early
but you know where I stand
@MacDougall is porscha town?
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:04 pm
by pyxxy
technically he's only a feature on that song
so I'm obligated to also post
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:05 pm
by Porscha
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:47 pm
So 14 people. 4 wolves I have my miselim of longcon which means I can night kill Scotty. Porscha has taken a bit of heat so I need a second pariah for a tie which will mean wolves on wagons won't be sus. Pretty sure if I put porscha and long con up and we win the dice roll porscha will be green for the rest of the game. Better flip over to her now for cred anyway [VOTE:
Porscha ] aubergine
oh true, better to bus me early so you can go deep for the team
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:05 pm
by pyxxy
thar she blows
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:06 pm
by tutuu
i dont wanna be pessimistic but im looking at the poll and 80% of these names are players ive wrongly scumread numerous time. so i have no idea how to play in this lobby without being a burden
leetic wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 1:24 am
Princess Abigail's posts so far have been weak, they haven't made me feel anything which is unusual for her posts
I'm weak
You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch
Sometimes
Friends call me Snow Miser. Whatever I touch turns to snow in my clutch, I'm too much
Porscha wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 11:04 pm
ok thread is wolfy as fuck, dm is the only one to have successfully not howled. and a little bit of mac, maybe
leetic wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 1:24 am
Princess Abigail's posts so far have been weak, they haven't made me feel anything which is unusual for her posts
I'm weak
You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch
Sometimes
Friends call me Snow Miser. Whatever I touch turns to snow in my clutch, I'm too much
sheeping the drunk caroler on crack might be the optimal +EV move
[v]Rondo[/v]
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:10 pm
by tutuu
[VOTE:
Rondo] aubergine
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:12 pm
by RondoDimBuckle
Looks like thread is beginning to turn against me time to dip and let sus on me cool by next half of day phase
well certainly not me lol, you specifically took my general comment and asked about yourself like you're worried that I was including you and when I did (very casually too), you omgus'd me and took it up a notch with a vote xd you seem overly worried about your position since it isn't like you argued with me about the threadstate or the 2 reads I did make, you made it about you instead
Cool story, I'm more into non-fiction though.
you know I came into this determined to not tunnel you like I did last time, and you're making it really hard for me to not follow my instincts
Ok, sorry. I just don't agree with most of what you said.
okay... what did you not agree with then
"well certainly not me"... I was chill, you said WHAA. Who overreacted?
"asked about yourself like you're worried that I was including you" There was no indication of worry, that's something you're trying to inject. You said I howled and I was interested to know where.
"you omgus'd me" meaningless catchall term for any time someone votes for a player who suspects them. So no. "Generally performative" is the weakest thing I ever heard, and you knew it, so you tried to handwave it to "general threadstate". Like I told you, it feels fake.
"you seem overly worried about your position" Again, there's no point in this game where I have "seemed overly worried" about anything. I know this is true because I'm not worried at all. This is you trying to make me appear to exhibit negative qualities that aren't real.
"it isn't like you argued with me about the threadstate or the 2 reads I did make, you made it about you instead" This is how I play. This is how I interact with the game, at least in the early stages.
That's what I didn't agree with.
if I dont wifom rondo back then that's no fun lol, I'm surprised you took it as a legitimate answer to his illegitimate comment
Don't be surprised, because I didn't, and it's weird that you'd frame the conversation that way. You said I overreacted to Rondo's post, when your reaction was WHA and mine was considerably less "over" and quite less reactionary. This is the reason these answers are being discussed, you are the first one to bring up the idea of either of us taking Rondo seriously. What's going on here?
point 2, 4, 5 - its all the same concept - you responded to me in a way that made me feel like you were anxious. I get the idea that you might be better at reading other people based on how they read you, I play that way a lot too. but it wasn't like you had posted much when I made that remark, so I don't get why you are trying to force me to have a strong read on you and then when I tell you that I don't, you act like I should have. it felt forced, and that's what I mean when I said performative. i'm not sure how else to take it when I made a general statement about threadstate and you try force me to read you, and then ALSO pin a vote on me when I insist it's a threadstate read... plus, I already have a bad propensity to naturally sr you, I need more time to make a read on you past my initial gut reaction since I'm aware it won't always be right. it's mega early and there is no reason to believe I would have a good read on you yet just because I felt that the thread was scummy. especially based on a shit posting n0
Ok, that's fair. It's text-based, and we're disagreeing on perceived tone. I always think I sound pretty chill, but I get that doesn't come across the same for everyone. Carry on.
point 3 - calling anything fake is even broader and is easy to say to literally anything lol. of course I thought it was omgus based on your reactions to me
Of course you thought that, even though I gave the reason when I voted you, and it wasn't because you suspect me. I get suspected plenty. I can handle it. I'm not an OMGUSer. That's not how I deal with suspicion. I'm voting you because I think you're bad, for the reasons I stated.
I'll let you cook though. half of the player list has hardly posted, and I don't trust myself on you this early
but you know where I stand
I appreciate that. And yeah, there's a lot of time left in the day. Who even worries about votes this early, right?
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:14 pm
by tutuu
Scotty is usually a lot more energetic than this
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:16 pm
by Porscha
I dont know how anybody is reading rondo with any seriousness right now
you know I came into this determined to not tunnel you like I did last time, and you're making it really hard for me to not follow my instincts
Ok, sorry. I just don't agree with most of what you said.
okay... what did you not agree with then
"well certainly not me"... I was chill, you said WHAA. Who overreacted?
"asked about yourself like you're worried that I was including you" There was no indication of worry, that's something you're trying to inject. You said I howled and I was interested to know where.
"you omgus'd me" meaningless catchall term for any time someone votes for a player who suspects them. So no. "Generally performative" is the weakest thing I ever heard, and you knew it, so you tried to handwave it to "general threadstate". Like I told you, it feels fake.
"you seem overly worried about your position" Again, there's no point in this game where I have "seemed overly worried" about anything. I know this is true because I'm not worried at all. This is you trying to make me appear to exhibit negative qualities that aren't real.
"it isn't like you argued with me about the threadstate or the 2 reads I did make, you made it about you instead" This is how I play. This is how I interact with the game, at least in the early stages.
That's what I didn't agree with.
if I dont wifom rondo back then that's no fun lol, I'm surprised you took it as a legitimate answer to his illegitimate comment
Don't be surprised, because I didn't, and it's weird that you'd frame the conversation that way. You said I overreacted to Rondo's post, when your reaction was WHA and mine was considerably less "over" and quite less reactionary. This is the reason these answers are being discussed, you are the first one to bring up the idea of either of us taking Rondo seriously. What's going on here?
point 2, 4, 5 - its all the same concept - you responded to me in a way that made me feel like you were anxious. I get the idea that you might be better at reading other people based on how they read you, I play that way a lot too. but it wasn't like you had posted much when I made that remark, so I don't get why you are trying to force me to have a strong read on you and then when I tell you that I don't, you act like I should have. it felt forced, and that's what I mean when I said performative. i'm not sure how else to take it when I made a general statement about threadstate and you try force me to read you, and then ALSO pin a vote on me when I insist it's a threadstate read... plus, I already have a bad propensity to naturally sr you, I need more time to make a read on you past my initial gut reaction since I'm aware it won't always be right. it's mega early and there is no reason to believe I would have a good read on you yet just because I felt that the thread was scummy. especially based on a shit posting n0
Ok, that's fair. It's text-based, and we're disagreeing on perceived tone. I always think I sound pretty chill, but I get that doesn't come across the same for everyone. Carry on.
point 3 - calling anything fake is even broader and is easy to say to literally anything lol. of course I thought it was omgus based on your reactions to me
Of course you thought that, even though I gave the reason when I voted you, and it wasn't because you suspect me. I get suspected plenty. I can handle it. I'm not an OMGUSer. That's not how I deal with suspicion. I'm voting you because I think you're bad, for the reasons I stated.
I'll let you cook though. half of the player list has hardly posted, and I don't trust myself on you this early
but you know where I stand
I appreciate that. And yeah, there's a lot of time left in the day. Who even worries about votes this early, right?
okay. I see the issue. I had not gone into the conversation on the over reaction to rondo. I should have made that more clear in my last response, but that's my point, I didn't take rondo's post seriously, I didn't respond seriously, it's weird that you took his and my posts seriously (guess we can't all have the same sense of humor but rondo is clearly just shit posting)
my accusation that you over reacted was that you over reacted *to me* and *my read* ... had nothing to do with rondo
leetic wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 1:24 am
Princess Abigail's posts so far have been weak, they haven't made me feel anything which is unusual for her posts
I'm weak
You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch
Sometimes
Friends call me Snow Miser. Whatever I touch turns to snow in my clutch, I'm too much
Porscha wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 11:04 pm
ok thread is wolfy as fuck, dm is the only one to have successfully not howled. and a little bit of mac, maybe
Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:56 pm
if I dont wifom rondo back then that's no fun lol, I'm surprised you took it as a legitimate answer to his illegitimate comment
point 2, 4, 5 - its all the same concept - you responded to me in a way that made me feel like you were anxious. I get the idea that you might be better at reading other people based on how they read you, I play that way a lot too. but it wasn't like you had posted much when I made that remark, so I don't get why you are trying to force me to have a strong read on you and then when I tell you that I don't, you act like I should have. it felt forced, and that's what I mean when I said performative. i'm not sure how else to take it when I made a general statement about threadstate and you try force me to read you, and then ALSO pin a vote on me when I insist it's a threadstate read... plus, I already have a bad propensity to naturally sr you, I need more time to make a read on you past my initial gut reaction since I'm aware it won't always be right. it's mega early and there is no reason to believe I would have a good read on you yet just because I felt that the thread was scummy. especially based on a shit posting n0
point 3 - calling anything fake is even broader and is easy to say to literally anything lol. of course I thought it was omgus based on your reactions to me
I'll let you cook though. half of the player list has hardly posted, and I don't trust myself on you this early
but you know where I stand
@MacDougall is porscha town?
vividly
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:14 am
by MacDougall
tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:06 pm
i dont wanna be pessimistic but im looking at the poll and 80% of these names are players ive wrongly scumread numerous time. so i have no idea how to play in this lobby without being a burden
Sig, Porscha, Rondo, DM, yourself all town.
I think Serhal and Long Con are also town.
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:15 am
by MacDougall
tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:14 pm
Scotty is usually a lot more energetic than this
See, you got this. Let's do the thing.
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:15 am
by MacDougall
Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:16 pm
I dont know how anybody is reading rondo with any seriousness right now
He is absolutely obvious town to me but I also recognise that he's essentially a Rubik's Cube to most people.
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:20 pm
I think I want to add Scotty to my kill tomorrow night
I triple dog dare you
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:41 am
by Scotty
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:47 pm
So 14 people. 4 wolves I have my miselim of longcon which means I can night kill Scotty. Porscha has taken a bit of heat so I need a second pariah for a tie which will mean wolves on wagons won't be sus. Pretty sure if I put porscha and long con up and we win the dice roll porscha will be green for the rest of the game. Better flip over to her now for cred anyway [VOTE:
Porscha ] aubergine
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:47 pm
So 14 people. 4 wolves I have my miselim of longcon which means I can night kill Scotty. Porscha has taken a bit of heat so I need a second pariah for a tie which will mean wolves on wagons won't be sus. Pretty sure if I put porscha and long con up and we win the dice roll porscha will be green for the rest of the game. Better flip over to her now for cred anyway [VOTE:
Porscha ] aubergine
oh true, better to bus me early so you can go deep for the team
Don’t feed the troll
[VOTE:
sig] aubergine
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:46 am
by Scotty
tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:14 pm
Scotty is usually a lot more energetic than this
tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 11:14 pm
Scotty is usually a lot more energetic than this
True. What does that say about my alignment?
I do wonder
I would like to point to the last sit down, SDN crossover, where I didn’t have much time and was D1’d as town.
I can also point to a few old scum games I had where I also didn’t have time and would often use that excuse in thread and was very much bad
So
Keep wondering
Well that makes it a lot easier
I’m actually more confused
Maybe I am bad after all
Or maybe I’m just an old man who wants to be here for his good-for-nothing son
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:02 am
by Scotty
my wife asked me to get drunk tonite so here I am. But it’s not as exciting today as I hoped. Rum makes me introspectivr
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:03 am
by Scotty
I actually don’t buy rondo is doing his normal chaos demon town thing, and am suspicious that Mac is so decided on him as such, and me as such, and such and sich
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:05 am
by Scotty
Anyway, my ability didn’t work last night and I want to know why. Based on [reasons] I feel like I was manually blocked
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:18 am
by MacDougall
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:03 am
I actually don’t buy rondo is doing his normal chaos demon town thing, and am suspicious that Mac is so decided on him as such, and me as such, and such and sich
See this is the opposite reaction I was speaking of that Long Con didn't have. Voting Scotty knocks him out of his autopilot mode and makes him "wonder". It did not occur to LC.
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:19 am
by Long Con
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:05 am
Anyway, my ability didn’t work last night and I want to know why. Based on [reasons] I feel like I was manually blocked
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:03 am
I actually don’t buy rondo is doing his normal chaos demon town thing, and am suspicious that Mac is so decided on him as such, and me as such, and such and sich
See this is the opposite reaction I was speaking of that Long Con didn't have. Voting Scotty knocks him out of his autopilot mode and makes him "wonder". It did not occur to LC.
I don't understand this post, or what reaction you expect me to have to Rondo.
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:28 am
by RondoDimBuckle
It looks like people have stopped focusing on me so much so I will pop back in
@MacDougall I am going to attempt to pocket you loudly so when people read my spew later they disassociate.
Want to work together and set up a tie for EOD today? That way we can deny town information? It would be the best outcome for us. If we can set up two low hanging fruit it would be good to also explain why we are on the wagons since they 'deserve it' for not being more town.
Let me know, we can get into an argument tomorrow about who was right to continue our disassociation
Re: Nat'l Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 1:41 am
by RondoDimBuckle
Has anyone done any super christmasy sports? I have been snowboarding this year. It was fun. If there was white christmas in Australia that is probably what I would go do. What is everyone else up to?
