The Syndicate

bet you played Shawshank, right?

bwt*

I did, yeah. Quite poorly but I played it. How come?

All caught up now, took way too long for me to find time to sit down and read pages. Haha.

I've got some suspicions, but I'll wait until the night post comes up to go through any of them.

I like the changeable vote thing. Wouldn't want to see it in every game, but in a zany one like this, it feels right.

FZ. wrote:Haha, why do we even bother voting. I really hope you are a civ, llama.

And that would be quite an interesting mafia game

I wouldn't hope that. It paints quite a target on him for baddies if that's the case. And if he's bad, based on the roles that can avoid lynches and how they can do it, he's likely vulnerable to the next lynch.

@boo: Will ties result in no lynch? Or will the lynch be randomized?

Mister Rearranger wrote:I like the changeable vote thing. Wouldn't want to see it in every game, but in a zany one like this, it feels right.

FZ. wrote:Haha, why do we even bother voting. I really hope you are a civ, llama.

And that would be quite an interesting mafia game

I wouldn't hope that. It paints quite a target on him for baddies if that's the case. And if he's bad, based on the roles that can avoid lynches and how they can do it, he's likely vulnerable to the next lynch.

@boo: Will ties result in no lynch? Or will the lynch be randomized?

Ties are broken by the Card Czar.

boo wrote: Ties are broken by the Card Czar.

Ooh, good to know.

Thanks!

:o

Are we going to see what card won?

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

I think Ronald Reagan was the card that won which I think is pretty funny.

Can I say which card I picked to win?

The card I picked to win I thought was funny.

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

RIP FZ, even though you suspected me, I appreciated your dedication to the game. This is exactly what I was talking about how the best participants always die first.

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

That's what she said.

Um, huh?

Hedgeowl wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

FZ was doing quite a bit of baddie hunting on day one so the mafia targeting her isn't really a surprise. She voted for llama but it looks like she would have switched her vote at the end (to me, I think) if anyone else had had enough vote to keep llama from getting the most.

Its kinda hard to tell who she actually found the most suspicious though.

And even though FZ is dead I would hope johns will still answer this for the rest of us....

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

Sorsha wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?


FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

FZ was doing quite a bit of baddie hunting on day one so the mafia targeting her isn't really a surprise. She voted for llama but it looks like she would have switched her vote at the end (to me, I think) if anyone else had had enough vote to keep llama from getting the most.

Its kinda hard to tell who she actually found the most suspicious though.

And even though FZ is dead I would hope johns will still answer this for the rest of us....

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

That's what she said.

S~V~S wrote:Um, huh?

That's what I said.

I'm fairly certain Elohcin is cursed. And I'm loving it.

S~V~S wrote:Um, huh?

It's a game mechanic. One of the roles does this i think.

Well played baddies... well played.

Brilliant :P

We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

Yeah, game over.

Sorsha wrote:Yeah, game over.

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3

Elohcin wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3

Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3

Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."

Well unless you are Doin' it in the butt, I don't think you get a say.

1. Doin’ it in the butt: Each night, you may pick one player who must quote another players post every time they post (which they must do at least 10 times) the following day. In each post, the person you picked must bold a part of the quote, and the first line of their post must be ‘That’s what she said.’ in bold, it must make some kind of sense. If they fail to comply, you get to choose who they vote for in the following 3 lynches. Once in the game, you may make another player buttsore, putting 5 votes on them. Kills on odd nights.

Hedgeowl wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3

Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."

Well unless you are Doin' it in the butt, I don't think you get a say.

1. Doin’ it in the butt: Each night, you may pick one player who must quote another players post every time they post (which they must do at least 10 times) the following day. In each post, the person you picked must bold a part of the quote, and the first line of their post must be ‘That’s what she said.’ in bold, it must make some kind of sense. If they fail to comply, you get to choose who they vote for in the following 3 lynches. Once in the game, you may make another player buttsore, putting 5 votes on them. Kills on odd nights.

So the same person who killed FZ is the one who gave this curse.

So who has a juvenile sense of humor and likes to kill the talkies?

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Heck, I'll take a two for one. I won't be with internet all day tomorrow so I have get my ten in asap.

4

thellama73 wrote:This is exactly what I was talking about how the best participants always die first.

That's what she said.

Elohcin wrote:
That's what she said.

That's what she said.

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.

I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

Was there a tie?

Sorsha wrote:Was there a tie?

Not an outright one but if the person who won the pen is envy submission used their +1 vote it could of forced the tie. This could indicate that the card czar broke the tie and the other one was bad or that no tie existed and he survived.

Wow, this is going to be very difficult to track people's votes when they can be forced to vote a certain way. And all the +1, ,+2, or +3 votes. This game may be stacked a little for the baddies.

The way you worded that post makes it sound like you thought/knew it was a tie.

And you are the second one to bring up the possibility of a tie in the lynch. And I find that weird... I have to look back and see who the other person was. I think it was MR. Yeah... It was MR.

Sorsha wrote:The way you worded that post makes it sound like you thought/knew it was a tie.

And you are the second one to bring up the possibility of a tie in the lynch. And I find that weird... I have to look back and see who the other person was. I think it was MR. Yeah... It was MR.

I initially felt very sure that it was a tie now that I see other possibilities it may not have been. I feel less confident that llama was the one with the overall highest vote including people's powers, but things are only going to get harder to read as people get "the shit buckets dumped on them" and other permanent +1 powers. Even though I am less confident than initially I still feel strongest about llama.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I did, yeah. Quite poorly but I played it. How come?

Based on that game, I am not surprised with JJ's play this game at all... you seem to be.

kneel4justice wrote: This SUCKS.

Were you that sure that FZ was good?

I am sorry I was scarce yesterday, I was concentrating on my other game after work.

I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing. Had i done as well as he and moved from a BTS into a non-BTS situation, I might have tried to look the same since several people were convinced he was a civ in that game, and I had a hell of a time lynching him.

But this could be my own bias~ I am ever paranoid Llama is throwing people under the bus lol.

FZ obviously touched a never somewhere. Don't feel bad, FZ~ someone obviously feared you, it's a mark of respect (or at least that's what I tell myself all the time).

And poor Eloh, what a tacky curse, lol. I find it odd that Eloh would be targeted, though. She had not really stood out to me at all.

Linki@ K4J~ yeah, this poll ends at a weird time for me, so I will not be around much either, although i did get caught up on my reading this AM.

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't have a grudge against you, I just think your bad, and this post does you no favors.
1. There was no tie (that we know about)
2. Even if there was a tie, and the card czar got to break it, how does me surviving it make me bad? That is a non-sequitur.

S~V~S wrote: I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing.

I was never "so sure." He was just my best guess on Day 1. His Day 2 posts have made me more confident that I was on to something though.

ebwop: I quoted the wrong post by John there. I meant to quote the one where he says I must be bad because I survived a lynch tie.

johns2jj wrote:

FZ. wrote:

johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.

What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.

That's what she said.
5

Sorsha wrote:Was there a tie?

That's what she said.

6