Game Over! Monty Python and the Holy Grail

[thellama73]

But feel free to suspect me all you want now or in the future; you'll just be wrong.

I don't suspect you right now, and I heavily appreciate your input. But I can never trust you because you are so skilled at being a baddie.

[Made]

I'm not assuming that, which is why I said it looked like you had BTSC, not it looks like you are mafia. Still, if you're going to take that route, what evidence can we ever use to lynch somebody? It is a more reasonable assumption to make that "X has BTSC, so is probably mafia" than "X has BTSC, but we don't know anything about the mafia this game, so let's leave him alone." In a game with so little information, we have to make a few reasonable assumptions.

At risk of being lynched, your point is strong, and i acknowledge it.

[Made]

Note, I acknowledge that, Assuming your memory is correct (which i don't think it is), That i make sense to be suspect as it's currently the best lead. But, Juliets should be able to quickly say otherwise. Maybe it even her who asked the question and you missed it ( considering it was pretty much us three)

[Tangrowth]

But feel free to suspect me all you want now or in the future; you'll just be wrong.

I don't suspect you right now, and I heavily appreciate your input. But I can never trust you because you are so skilled at being a baddie.

I wouldn't ask for anything different.

[Tangrowth]

Made, do you find anyone suspicious right now?

[Marmot]

Seems like the nudgers chatroom was a bit more exciting than the winkers chatroom if you know what I mean.

Maybe I'll just make the reasonable assumption that llama and MP are throwing Made under the bus right now.

[Enrique]

Well, given we are running blind, is that bad of an idea? We don't know the roles, we don't know the teams. We are gonna lynch someone after all, doesn't it make the most sense to lynch someone who isn't contributing?

It's a terrible idea.

Those who participated are a microcosmic snapshot of the entire game. I would bet my last coconut (and therefore have to walk or take the bus with S~V~S ) that a bad guy was an eager participant in the quiz hoping to bring home a benefit for the team.

While we must acknowledge the possiblity of mafia teams, I agree. Mafia being on two seperate teams/evenly split between teams (which is probably more likely anyways) is more likely anyways.

See, this is something I hadn't really thought of, but I think you might be wrong. Or not. I don't know. I'm bringing this up but I want the thread to help me figure this out. If you had BTSC, would you have encouraged your teammates to vote for the same option as you, or the opposite? It makes sense they would want to win a challenge together. It also makes sense they would keep their eye on as many people as possible. Right? I don't know. I'm leaning towards they'd vote together, to be honest, which would mean one team had more baddies than the other (and no I won't make this a team loyalty thing, I have no idea who any of my teammates' roles are).

Not sure how I feel about anyone using non-participants or anything in the BTSC as an actual way to suspect anyone -- seems to me that regardless of the alignment, anyone would have wanted to help contribute to their team winning.

I completely agree with you here that everyone would want to help their team win regardless of alignment, and I am not in favor of *GASP* going after non-participants.

HOWEVER

There was one interesting post in the Nudger chatroom that seemed to me to indicate that a certain someone had BTSC with a player on Winker team. It might have been a slip, it might have been nothing. I intend to follow it if nothing better comes along.

See? This is the kind of thing I was aiming for. We don't know the roles so BTSC isn't really indicative of alignment, but... let's definitely keep it mind. I don't know what else to add or whether I should encourage you to say who. Mafia is really tricky like that, especially when you don't know the roles

Enrique, I'm not sure I understand; you seem to be saying conflicting items. First, you say we have nothing better to judge players by than what occurred during the contest, and you imply that non-participants seem like the best choice, and then you post that most recent post which doesn't seem to say much of anything at all ("I don't know about their roles, but you can at least count on them to be around" regarding high posters).

To me, it kind of comes across like you're either trying too hard or maybe I just misunderstand you.

So tell me: Do you think those who are "not contributing" are worthy of a vote today or not?

Woah tons of linki, posting anyway

I'm saying, and this has been my point from the beginning, that the game just started. I'm not gunning as hard after low-posters as some would make me out to be, and I'm the first to actually get any serious lynch talk going, I'm not looking for an easy target. If I do end up voting for a low poster, think of it as being as meaningful to me as a random day 1 vote. If we don't have any names by the time the poll is over then there's not much else I can do.

MORE LINKI

How is literally all we have right now whether someone has vibes about what went on in chatrooms? What about the thread?

I covered that. If somebody finds anything, that's great, but all I saw for all of day 0 was silliness. There were no agendas to push and hardly anything game related to discuss.

Why aren't you in favor of it?

Not feeling it today. I don't think we are any more likely to fnd a baddie in a non-participant than anywhere else, and I would rather go by actual pings if we have them. There has been a lot more posting than on most Day 0s even if most of it has been off topic, so we have little excuse for randomizing or going after low posters in my opinion.

Interesting. I was only in the chatroom for like less than a minute, lol, so I can't say I know what you're talking about, but that's intriguing. I presume you don't want to elaborate on it just yet or else you would have in that post anyway?

I'll elaborate. I'm not scared. Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

To me, this looked like a slip, indicating that he knew what the other team was up to, followed by an attempt to cover it up.

Bonus, if we lynch Made and I am right, we can narrow down his teammate to one of the six or seven people active in the Winker chat.

Oh man, Made is just... from what I gathered reading Misfits Mafia, he's not slipping, that's just the way he walks All the constant hinting at being bad for that payoff. It was kinda amazing to watch.

But, I don't know. It's a valid observation.

There are still almost 48 hours, Enrique, I'm not sure why you think all we have to base informed votes off of equals what's in the chatrooms.

Frankly, I'm going to be basing my vote on what goes on in the thread, like in every other game ever.

Linki with Llama

Yeah, and how do you do that without any discussion? We're starting this from scratch right now.

ntereting that several people say we have "nothing to go on." I think nine pages by the beginning of day one is a lot to go on.

Do you mean Day 0? If so, read above. If not, well, that's us right now talking about it.

Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

few things wrong with that.

1. someone said something to the tune of "you would know" right after I said that, which is why i said I wouldn't actually know.

2. from what i understand, implying i do know what the other team was doing probably would be considered BTSC.

3.You're assuming their are only Mafia Teams.

Yeah well I'm saving this post for future reference

LINKI AGAIN HERE WE GO. ONE DAY I WILL BE ABLE TO HIT SUBMIT.

Damn it, MP, whenever you agree with me this much you always turn out to be bad. I really hope you are not though, because you are such a great thread partner to bounce ideas off of. :P

There's a solid difference between agreeing and buddying.

I heavily value your input regardless of my alignment, but I tend to suck up to you as a baddie. I am not sucking up. If you had said you wanted to lynch non-posters I would have grilled you for it.

Besides, I've been bad statistically way too many times, especially in full games. I love being a baddie, but even I'm sick of it right now.

But feel free to suspect me all you want now or in the future; you'll just be wrong.

Well that was an early and unnecessary WIFOM. I probably would've just shrugged off llama's "accusations," but alright! You do you.

I posted nothing on topic on Day 0, the OT day. We should lynch me just for that...

Linki: lol, meta talk already

Well here I'm trying to keep a balance. I acknowledge day 0 was all OT, but it did give us an idea of who was around, right? I'm not gunning after anyone, take it easy.

Plus you're not in the poll

MORE LINKI

Alright finally nothing that concerns me. Honestly, not looking at Made, and think llama being suspicious of him is valid. Less certain about MP, but whatever, SUBMIT.

[Mongoose]

Damn it, MP, whenever you agree with me this much you always turn out to be bad. I really hope you are not though, because you are such a great thread partner to bounce ideas off of. :P

Except that one time the three of us had Ultimate Mexican Standoff Triumvirate Fest 2013 in Daisy's Game. We all ended up good but we were all ready to stake our lives on the fact the other two were bad. Never know what's up with y'all and it looks like it's headed that way this game as well.

[S~V~S]

Roxy cleared the room 8 seconds ago, so i can't check exactly who asked if i knew something...

She cleared it about 40 minutes ago, I checked when i got home. I just looked in there now to see if you had been in there since she cleared it, and you had not.

I am going to go BOTD right now. TBH, you caught my eye with the "joke" about lynching a no show Nudger. Then you third point implying you had civ BTSC right after your other points struck me s rather flailish. Plus this, but why would you lie about such a thing?

[Tangrowth]

Seems like the nudgers chatroom was a bit more exciting than the winkers chatroom if you know what I mean.

Maybe I'll just make the reasonable assumption that llama and MP are throwing Made under the bus right now.

Uh, what?

So let me get this straight:

- You must think Made is bad if you think he is being thrown under the bus.
- You must think both llama and I are his teammates for saying such a statement.

Was that supposed to be in sarcastic orange or are you going to contribute by making sweeping statements without backing them up at all? I don't understand.

Linki

[DisgruntledPorcupine]

I'd like to take a moment to remind everyone not to discuss possible roles in the game thread. There's been nothing too bad but a few close-ish posts. Thank you.

[Tangrowth]

Enrique, thanks for elaborating. I understand what you were trying to say better now.

Damn it, MP, whenever you agree with me this much you always turn out to be bad. I really hope you are not though, because you are such a great thread partner to bounce ideas off of. :P

Except that one time the three of us had Ultimate Mexican Standoff Triumvirate Fest 2013 in Daisy's Game. We all ended up good but we were all ready to stake our lives on the fact the other two were bad. Never know what's up with y'all and it looks like it's headed that way this game as well.

Ugh, that was absolutely dreadful. I'd like to avoid that ever again if possible.

[Enrique]

I don't think Made is hinting at civvie BTSC tbh, unless I missed something. I don't think he has BTSC at all.

Probably not where my vote is going.

[Marmot]

Seems like the nudgers chatroom was a bit more exciting than the winkers chatroom if you know what I mean.

Maybe I'll just make the reasonable assumption that llama and MP are throwing Made under the bus right now.

Uh, what?

So let me get this straight:

- You must think Made is bad if you think he is being thrown under the bus.
- You must think both llama and I are his teammates for saying such a statement.

Was that supposed to be in sarcastic orange or are you going to contribute by making sweeping statements without backing them up at all? I don't understand.

Linki

I don't know what happened in your chatroom. I'm trying to figure out from your statements, but it is not clear to me, or I missed the point somewhere. Would you mind cluing us in on where the heck this all came from? Nothing Made has said has given me an indication that he has BTSC.

So, to add to my previous statement, I've got nothing. You are correct.

[Enrique]

I'd like to take a moment to remind everyone not to discuss possible roles in the game thread. There's been nothing too bad but a few close-ish posts. Thank you.

Hold up, no speculation at all? How long does this last? The whole game? Damn, hosts, you're crazy.

So what happens when someone dies and we can't discuss a possible killing role?

(The scenario above is hypothetical I'm not speculating about the roles)

[Dom]

@Hosts: Are the chatrooms there to stay? Do Winkers and Nudgers have BTSC, or is this over?

Also, Made. Voting the non-participants is what we used to do back in the glory days of LP Survivor hosted by my dear friend Bullzeye. Of course it's not the same here given that there's probably specific roles we should be trying to lynch, but, our info is limited enough that lynching inactive users may not be a terrible idea. It's a silly game after all, we're all running blind

Buuut there's definitely space for suspicious behavior in chatrooms. So, I don't know, I'll hear you guys out if you think anybody deserves death more than others or if there was some rolehinting going on or whatever. I have no problem going with the flow on this one.

I miss LP Survivor <3

LoRab and DD's John Hughes Mafia on LP.

I effed that up too.

[Tangrowth]

I'd like to hear from juliets and see what she's thinking right now.

Linki with MM: This is Llama's original post on the matter; does it help?

Why aren't you in favor of it?

Not feeling it today. I don't think we are any more likely to fnd a baddie in a non-participant than anywhere else, and I would rather go by actual pings if we have them. There has been a lot more posting than on most Day 0s even if most of it has been off topic, so we have little excuse for randomizing or going after low posters in my opinion.

Interesting. I was only in the chatroom for like less than a minute, lol, so I can't say I know what you're talking about, but that's intriguing. I presume you don't want to elaborate on it just yet or else you would have in that post anyway?

I'll elaborate. I'm not scared. Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

To me, this looked like a slip, indicating that he knew what the other team was up to, followed by an attempt to cover it up.

Bonus, if we lynch Made and I am right, we can narrow down his teammate to one of the six or seven people active in the Winker chat.

Also, I never said I am voting for Made. I just thought he made an intriguing and possibly plausible observation, though I did provide a counterargument.

[Made]

Made, do you find anyone suspicious right now?

The only thing that rubbed me the wrong way was BWT's lack of participation during the game. he was there for 2 mintues before the game, but didn't post questions in chat or answer in the thread. He said he had dinner in 2 mintues, around question 7 or 8 so it may be excusable, but still. Most i got.


Also llama called me an idiot



linki

Oh man, Made is just... from what I gathered reading Misfits Mafia, he's not slipping, that's just the way he walks All the constant hinting at being bad for that payoff. It was kinda amazing to watch.

<3 (but seriously tho, saying shit like that'll get me lynched, so don't)
linkie

Nothing Made has said has given me an indication that he has BTSC.

TL:DR
I said something along the lines of, wow, getting the script was smart, chances are the other team doesn't have any,
(note this part is disputed) Then someone said you would know
then i denied i would know

linki
Thanks for not wanting to murder me just yet MP.

[Tangrowth]

Oops, pronoun fail. I just thought LLAMA made an intriguing and possibly plausible observation (about Made)*

If that wasn't already clear.

Linki lol

[Enrique]

Seems like the nudgers chatroom was a bit more exciting than the winkers chatroom if you know what I mean.

Maybe I'll just make the reasonable assumption that llama and MP are throwing Made under the bus right now.

Uh, what?

So let me get this straight:

- You must think Made is bad if you think he is being thrown under the bus.
- You must think both llama and I are his teammates for saying such a statement.

Was that supposed to be in sarcastic orange or are you going to contribute by making sweeping statements without backing them up at all? I don't understand.

Linki

I don't know what happened in your chatroom. I'm trying to figure out from your statements, but it is not clear to me, or I missed the point somewhere. Would you mind cluing us in on where the heck this all came from? Nothing Made has said has given me an indication that he has BTSC.

So, to add to my previous statement, I've got nothing. You are correct.

I think "throwing under the bus" usually refers to two teammates getting rid of a third to make their lives easier. In this case, no one would be talking about Made without llama, so it's not really valid But is Made being tag-teamed? I don't think so. I think llama's sharing with us everything he's got and MP is just reacting. I don't see any of those three being in a team together.

linki @ Made: No, just the opposite. You play a weird game, friend. I'm just pointing out, I don't think it relates to your alignment

[S~V~S]

Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

few things wrong with that.

1. someone said something to the tune of "you would know" right after I said that, which is why i said I wouldn't actually know.

2. from what i understand, implying i do know what the other team was doing probably would be considered BTSC.

3.You're assuming their are only Mafia Teams.

Enrique, i was referring to point 3 of this post. That was how I read this; "And even if I do have BTSC, maybe there is civ BTSC" . I don't know any other way to read this.

Linki, and there he goes again. Implying BWT is suspect for a challenge related issue.

[Tangrowth]

Made, do you really think a baddie would not contribute though? For one, it would likely help them out (baddies love benefits, right?) and for two it gives them civvie cred for "helping the civvies".

It's a game of WIFOM I don't even want to touch, frankly. I think any votes made off of whether someone would have participated more or less in the contest are very logically unsound, personally.

Linki again

[thellama73]

interesting that several people say we have "nothing to go on." I think nine pages by the beginning of day one is a lot to go on.

Do you mean Day 0? If so, read above. If not, well, that's us right now talking about it.

No, I mean Day 1. It is now Day 1. The beginning of Day 1. So we have nine pages of material to work with at the start of Day 1.

I don't think Made is hinting at civvie BTSC tbh, unless I missed something. I don't think he has BTSC at all.

Why not? That's a strange conclusion to come to, especially from someone who thinks we have nothing to go on.

Also llama called me an idiot

I call everyone an idiot. Don't take it personal.

[Enrique]

Made, also, I'm pretty sure BWT posted at least one answer for your team in the thread. Participation in the challenge isn't really indicative of anything, anyway. At least he was there

linki @ llama: You said it yourself. We have several pages to work with now

[thellama73]

Maybe I am just bad at reading new people who have a different style than I am used to, but the new people seem very suspicious to me.

[Tangrowth]

Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

few things wrong with that.

1. someone said something to the tune of "you would know" right after I said that, which is why i said I wouldn't actually know.

2. from what i understand, implying i do know what the other team was doing probably would be considered BTSC.

3.You're assuming their are only Mafia Teams.

Enrique, i was referring to point 3 of this post. That was how I read this; "And even if I do have BTSC, maybe there is civ BTSC" . I don't know any other way to read this.

Linki, and there he goes again. Implying BWT is suspect for a challenge related issue.

For the record, that's how I read it as well.

I think implying BWT is suspect for a challenge related issue is clearly very illogical. Is it a move a baddie Made would make, in combination with Llama's observation? Very possible. But is it also possible he could be made into an easy target today and he really is a civvie? I can see that as well.

Therefore, I'm not entirely sure what I think of Made just yet, though I do think observations made about him have been valid.

[Tangrowth]

Maybe I am just bad at reading new people who have a different style than I am used to, but the new people seem very suspicious to me.

You think Dana seems suspicious as well? Why?

[S~V~S]

Also llama called me an idiot

I call everyone an idiot. Don't take it personal.

Sometimes he calls them even worse things~ as someone who knows

[Tangrowth]

Oh, and I suppose add Enrique to that list as well.

I was getting pinged by Enrique a bit earlier, but his posts since have satisfied me, and I'm inclined to think he's genuinely attempting to scum hunt. Definitely have my eye on him though.

[Made]

Made, do you really think a baddie would not contribute though?

I really don't, which is why i wasn't going to mention it until you asked......motherfucking linki.... for the record Mp's post was a linki for me...

[Made]

Made, do you really think a baddie would not contribute though?

I really don't, which is why i wasn't going to mention it until you asked......motherfucking linki.... for the record Mp's post was a linki for me...

The Other MP post...

[Enrique]

Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

few things wrong with that.

1. someone said something to the tune of "you would know" right after I said that, which is why i said I wouldn't actually know.

2. from what i understand, implying i do know what the other team was doing probably would be considered BTSC.

3.You're assuming their are only Mafia Teams.

Enrique, i was referring to point 3 of this post. That was how I read this; "And even if I do have BTSC, maybe there is civ BTSC" . I don't know any other way to read this.

Linki, and there he goes again. Implying BWT is suspect for a challenge related issue.

This is actually a post I paid a lot of attention to, SVS. I don't think that's what Made was going for, tho. I don't know. I'm not claiming to know exactly what he is or what he means.

linki @ MP: Well that's a great way to bring up another name for discussion. Dana has hardly been here. I don't think llama was talking about her, and honestly I have no idea why he would. Aren't all her posts apologizing for messing up the poll?

[Marmot]

I'd like to hear from juliets and see what she's thinking right now.

Linki with MM: This is Llama's original post on the matter; does it help?

Why aren't you in favor of it?

Not feeling it today. I don't think we are any more likely to fnd a baddie in a non-participant than anywhere else, and I would rather go by actual pings if we have them. There has been a lot more posting than on most Day 0s even if most of it has been off topic, so we have little excuse for randomizing or going after low posters in my opinion.

Interesting. I was only in the chatroom for like less than a minute, lol, so I can't say I know what you're talking about, but that's intriguing. I presume you don't want to elaborate on it just yet or else you would have in that post anyway?

I'll elaborate. I'm not scared. Made said something along the lines of "I doubt the other team will be doing what we're doing" referring to our strategy. He immediately followed this up with a bunch of posts saying things like "not that I would know. Actually I have no idea what they're up to." and so on. Not exact wording as we're not allowed to paste from the chats and I don't remember the exact words anyway.

To me, this looked like a slip, indicating that he knew what the other team was up to, followed by an attempt to cover it up.

Bonus, if we lynch Made and I am right, we can narrow down his teammate to one of the six or seven people active in the Winker chat.

Also, I never said I am voting for Made. I just thought he made an intriguing and possibly plausible observation, though I did provide a counterargument.

Thank you. I did read Made's response to it, which doesn't completely gel with llama's. I do think this is worth looking into, even if it did only happen in the chatroom on Day 0. If I recall, juliets, BWT, and SVS were some of the other active players in your chatroom. Any input from them would be helpful.

@llama, if I'm allowed, I will make a list of active players from our chatroom, though I'm sure you can come up with some of them yourself.

Linki: Be careful when llama is cranky.

[Mongoose]

Also llama called me an idiot

I call everyone an idiot. Don't take it personal.

Sometimes he calls them even worse things~ as someone who knows

What the heck did he call you? That's some brass ... malls.

[Marmot]

Roxy cleared the room 8 seconds ago, so i can't check exactly who asked if i knew something...

She cleared it about 40 minutes ago, I checked when i got home. I just looked in there now to see if you had been in there since she cleared it, and you had not.

I am going to go BOTD right now. TBH, you caught my eye with the "joke" about lynching a no show Nudger. Then you third point implying you had civ BTSC right after your other points struck me s rather flailish. Plus this, but why would you lie about such a thing?

Okay, there is this from SVS, another inconsistency.

[Enrique]

MP, I just think llama's was a general statement about how new people can be hard to read.

@ metalmarsh: Well actually the only word we have on BWT is that he wasn't active on their chatroom.

I don't like pulling names out of thin air up for discussion like this tbh. Is there anything to discuss about Dana/BWT so far? I'd rather wait for them to show up now that the game started for real.

[Enrique]

I've hardly eaten all day and I really wanna go grab a sub but ughh I know there's gonna be so much to catch up on. Curse you mafia you're addictive as hell

[thellama73]

Maybe I am just bad at reading new people who have a different style than I am used to, but the new people seem very suspicious to me.

You think Dana seems suspicious as well? Why?

No, just Enrique and Made. I should have been more specific. Dana has not really been posting, so I have no read on her.

[Tangrowth]

Maybe I am just bad at reading new people who have a different style than I am used to, but the new people seem very suspicious to me.

You think Dana seems suspicious as well? Why?

No, just Enrique and Made. I should have been more specific. Dana has not really been posting, so I have no read on her.

Got it.

Isn't that always the conundrum though? The players with enough balls to actually attempt to hunt for baddies (or seem like they are as well) are the ones inevitably to attract attention, especially in the first few cycles.

I want to hear more from everyone on this matter. I'm pretty torn on Made right now.

[Enrique]

Oh, wasn't expecting that. Had you said something about me before, llama? I'm gonna go now real quick sorry if I seem distracted.

Also pfft, calling me "new"

[thellama73]

For the record, I saw nothing odd about BWT's behavior in the chat. He was not super active and took a while to catch up, but he did make an effort in the end. He is always fairly MIA these days.

[S~V~S]

MP, I just think llama's was a general statement about how new people can be hard to read.

@ metalmarsh: Well actually the only word we have on BWT is that he wasn't active on their chatroom.

I don't like pulling names out of thin air up for discussion like this tbh. Is there anything to discuss about Dana/BWT so far? I'd rather wait for them to show up now that the game started for real.

I don't want to discuss Dana or BWT, I want to discuss Made

@Hedge~ what happens in the Mod forums stays in the mod forums

Linki X2, he meant new to us

[Tangrowth]

Oh, wasn't expecting that. Had you said something about me before, llama? I'm gonna go now real quick sorry if I seem distracted.

Also pfft, calling me "new"

That's why I originally thought he meant only Dana and Made, considering you've been playing mafia even as much as a couple of years longer than I have.

[Marmot]

10. What did God tell Arthur was so depressing?

The Psalms

@Enrique I would like 'active' to be defined then. He was active enough to know what was going on and answer the final question.

But I do realize that SVS was on her phone, making it difficult to follow. I guess that's why MP (or was it llama) is waiting to hear something from juliets.

Linki: You've got my input MP. My eyes are turned in that direction while I await juliets response. Also to note, we are allowed to change votes in this game, according to the Porcupine.

[thellama73]

Oh, wasn't expecting that. Had you said something about me before, llama? I'm gonna go now real quick sorry if I seem distracted.

Also pfft, calling me "new"

I know you have a long mafia history. I just meant new as in I have never played with you before, so I have no idea of what your typical behavior is.

I found it suspicious that you said "I don't think Made has BTSC." I don;t feel strongly enough about any player to make such a claim, not by a long shot, and your apparent certainty struck me as odd.

[Mongoose]

In response to some posts above:

I've voted no or low participants on Day 1 before, but I think it would be insanely ludicrous to do so in this game - way too much has happened. There's suspish a'plenty for those willing to comb through it.

Holy linki x7

[Made]

Oh, and I suppose add Enrique to that list as well.

I was getting pinged by Enrique a bit earlier, but his posts since have satisfied me, and I'm inclined to think he's genuinely attempting to scum hunt. Definitely have my eye on him though.

It's intresting, because i feel the opposite. When he was presenting his opinion earlier, I figured scum hunting, but once llama brought up the fact so many day 0 post existed, and Enri didn't drop it i took notice. (Given, he proved to be right? Logic for killing me was reasonable.)

linkie- Imo it was Juliet and myself posting question, and BWT, joining late catching up and by the time he caught up he had to go(after posting a responce or two, that i did miss). BWT said he "got and email and hop right in[to the chat room].")

linkie- Editing my first post because i think Enrique has an intresting point.....actually wait, where else are we going to find names. We have to kill someone.

linki- wait, is Enrique considered new? This could drastically effect how we should guage others reaction of Enrique's actions.

linki- I agree Mp, if i were mafia, if i learned anything from my first game, regardless of alignment not talking at the beginning of the game can take you a ways.

linki- SVS <3.... I should probably post this eventually...
linki- what MP said...
Linki- i think this is the post where i acknowledge BWT's input, and a reluctants to say his name in the first place... iunnno...
Linki- Llama's post is now acknowledged
Linki- I agree with mongoose..... I will never post this will I?

[Tangrowth]

I am always wary of games with changing votes, it makes me feel like it could benefit the baddies significantly. But thanks for highlighting that -- it's something to remember, especially since I am so used to votes being final.

I am waiting to hear from juliets -- I am curious about her thoughts regarding not only the chatroom but also the thread.

So much linki

[Made]

That was not that post, this is " MovingPictures07 wrote:Made, do you really think a baddie would not contribute though?


I really don't, which is why i wasn't going to mention it until you asked......motherfucking linki.... for the record Mp's post was a linki for me..."

pretend that was quoted, I just don't want to be linki trained again.

linki- Oh no.... I agree with Mp again, Not just because she would completely refute Llama's original point against me and someone can then call me "Floundering" or something.

[thellama73]

I am always wary of games with changing votes, it makes me feel like it could benefit the baddies significantly. But thanks for highlighting that -- it's something to remember, especially since I am so used to votes being final.

I solidly agree, which is why I never allow vote switching in my games.