Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
That's a joke you missed out on. If you ever think I'm threatened, you don't know me.MacDougall wrote:You sound threatened. Why would you feel threatened?Epignosis wrote:I am superior to you. And I want you lynched.MacDougall wrote:
Still the same boring townie I always seem to be. My only proper mafia-aligned games in recent memory were the champs tournament finale and RYM 82.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you a member of mafia Jay?
That was contextually intentional.Turnip Head wrote:woahMetalmarsh89 wrote:topnotch cumhunter
But there aren't any boring townies in this game.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Still the same boring townie I always seem to be. My only proper mafia-aligned games in recent memory were the champs tournament finale and RYM 82.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you a member of mafia Jay?
No, you sound threatened still. I can sense it in you.Epignosis wrote:That's a joke you missed out on. If you ever think I'm threatened, you don't know me.MacDougall wrote:You sound threatened. Why would you feel threatened?Epignosis wrote:I am superior to you. And I want you lynched.MacDougall wrote:
Still want you lynched. My case on you was independent of this SK bullshit.
You have one vote on you. You don't need to be this desperate.Epignosis wrote:
Posting this for posterity.
Maternal mafia instincts engage!Elohcin wrote:I did it! I caught up!
This is what I see, an observant Epi. Not a bad or SK Epi.Epignosis wrote:
I'm up against people I don't know shit about dude. I don't agree that I've been gentler and cuddlier, though. I'd say observant.
All that said, I am voting Mac. His reaction to all this SK stuff reads to me like a child who got caught stealing candy from the pantry and he's blaming it on his brother.
Epignosis wrote:I've seen her. He's not that lucky.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You're a lucky man.Russtifinko wrote:I know, right?!?
(P.S. I've got a girlfriend, who's Swedish (than that?). So I might be biased.
KIDDING RUSS! She's a sweet gal. I got to talk to her a good deal. She's here right now, matter of fact.
KIDDING AGAIN!
OMG I love Joking Epi.Also, why isn't Rico on your list any more?RadicalFuzz wrote:The person who notices that you only list 5 Mafia to "round it out" when supposedly listing the entire remaining Mafia. A team of 7, one being killed, should make 6. But you, for some inexplicable reason, think that there are 5 Mafia remaining.Epignosis wrote:Who are you?RadicalFuzz wrote:Why aren't I in your Mafia list?Epignosis wrote:So my Mafia include Mac, bcornett24, Russtifinko, Black Rock and espers to round it out.
You have tabs open asking what scum and godfathers are.MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?
Oh, I didn't see the other arrow until I opened the full image.MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?
Not even so much as a giggle?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Mac, I know you're having fun but now you're distracting from the hunt. Players who don't know you are going to be forced to judge you, and I doubt that will end well.
Huh? I missed one vote. I'm still suffering the consequence because I screwed up my punishment, not because I missed voteS. I subbed in near the end of LC's lynch and I had no idea what was going on the game. He's dead. What would you like me to, tell you if he sounded bad before he was lynched? He's bad, he was lynched and we were told so. I don't really understand this at all.Epignosis wrote:I must say I am increasingly suspicious of Black Rock, and I'll tell you why.
Her husband got lynched and was bad, yet she's missing votes and coming in here talking about Roxy being the serial killer. She lives with LC. She has heard him speak in real life all the time, knows his tone, has witnessed his ruses, and should have a solidi(ish) view of what he would do or would not. I'm just seeing no effort on that front, and if Black Rock is civilian, then I think her involvement would be more valuable than it is.
I currently have three, and I have just closed two. How do you play mafia without multiple tabs open?MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?
Black Rock wrote:I currently have three, and I have just closed two. How do you play mafia without multiple tabs open?MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?
I deserve to die for being a bad punished lady.
I have been paying attention to my own things and don't know either well. I could put a pressure vote on but it wouldn't be real. I don't have any real opinion of them.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:A few of us have been talking about making espers and/or Diiny dead for a while now, and both of them have remained essentially silent on the matter (I see no reason to assume a silencer is in play). Pressure votes please if you haven't already joined a bandwagon.
You find town boring?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Still the same boring townie I always seem to be. My only proper mafia-aligned games in recent memory were the champs tournament finale and RYM 82.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you a member of mafia Jay?
Did you explain what prompted this? cos it has to have been posted for a reason.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Wait, can I even win this game?
Yes I did.motel room wrote:Did you explain what prompted this? cos it has to have been posted for a reason.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Wait, can I even win this game?
Ahh I see.RadicalFuzz wrote:Also a post got eaten. I agree that drawing the immediate conclusion of "that extra tab increases the likelihood that he is Mafia" is illogical. I have a tab on the first page of any game I'm actively posting in. At the moment I also have two open for the sock game that recently concluded as well. Tab count, similar to post count, does not a Mafia make.
Motel, he already did. He was penalized for non-participation, and in the rules it states that players in that category can't win the game.
Righty-o.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Yes I did.
I PM'd the hosts about it, and the benevolent sockfaces said that since it was unavoidable and I gave prior warning to my absence, my non-participation will not be counted as such.
So if my alignment wins, I will still win.
To culturemotel room wrote:Ahh I see.RadicalFuzz wrote:Also a post got eaten. I agree that drawing the immediate conclusion of "that extra tab increases the likelihood that he is Mafia" is illogical. I have a tab on the first page of any game I'm actively posting in. At the moment I also have two open for the sock game that recently concluded as well. Tab count, similar to post count, does not a Mafia make.
Motel, he already did. He was penalized for non-participation, and in the rules it states that players in that category can't win the game.
Righty-o.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Yes I did.
I PM'd the hosts about it, and the benevolent sockfaces said that since it was unavoidable and I gave prior warning to my absence, my non-participation will not be counted as such.
So if my alignment wins, I will still win.
That kinda brings up a cultural diff I've noticed. Over here you guys pile all kinds of info into your posts so they're these massive walls that fire reads and replies everywhere, where as (not always though) in RYM i feel like if someone puts two separate cases or points in a single post I'm suspicious of them because I feel like they're trying to slip a fake one through with a good one or that there's some kind of misdirection going down. Give a real thought its due and give it its own space to breathe.
To culture -
still don't how to feel about this.Epignosis wrote:You heard me.motel room wrote:Two SK kills, no nightkill?Epignosis wrote:Not surprised with any of that.
The scum don't kill every night ya fucken.motel room wrote:still don't how to feel about this.Epignosis wrote:You heard me.motel room wrote:Two SK kills, no nightkill?Epignosis wrote:Not surprised with any of that.
Yes, but you pointed an exception. Based on another player's active abilities.Epignosis wrote:"Nah, that takes me back to "dead is dead". Dead can't decide for the living anymore, unless they could decide before dying."Ricochet wrote:How is that in any way the same case? The BTSC gain was a "new action" and the cast vote continuation is an exception from the rule that dead players don't get to vote anymore. It doesn't prove any rule that it must be specified that dead players cannot vote anymore. That's just logical.Epignosis wrote:Epignosis wrote:Correct.Long Con wrote:Night 1 - Death of the Firstborn: "If Moses chooses the Death of the Firstborn, Death gains permanent BTSC with the first dead person. This person is still dead, but can cast a vote. This person cannot cast a vote if Death dies." Metalmarsh (Samson), got the ability to vote and make it count. Also shared Death's win condition?
In fact, the example only that roles normally don't have to specify if the player needs to be alive for an action to be completed. It's just logical that, should the player die, the action won't be completed anymore. Any specification is an exception. Lack of any specification means no exceptions are made.
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, you're saying dead can't influence a game. You of all people should know that's not the case.
And even if that's not what you are saying, others have said it explicitly.
Yes, but you pointed an exception. Based on another player's active abilities.Epignosis wrote:"Nah, that takes me back to "dead is dead". Dead can't decide for the living anymore, unless they could decide before dying."Ricochet wrote:How is that in any way the same case? The BTSC gain was a "new action" and the cast vote continuation is an exception from the rule that dead players don't get to vote anymore. It doesn't prove any rule that it must be specified that dead players cannot vote anymore. That's just logical.Epignosis wrote:Epignosis wrote:Correct.Long Con wrote:Night 1 - Death of the Firstborn: "If Moses chooses the Death of the Firstborn, Death gains permanent BTSC with the first dead person. This person is still dead, but can cast a vote. This person cannot cast a vote if Death dies." Metalmarsh (Samson), got the ability to vote and make it count. Also shared Death's win condition?
In fact, the example only that roles normally don't have to specify if the player needs to be alive for an action to be completed. It's just logical that, should the player die, the action won't be completed anymore. Any specification is an exception. Lack of any specification means no exceptions are made.
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, you're saying dead can't influence a game. You of all people should know that's not the case.
And even if that's not what you are saying, others have said it explicitly.
this is as much investment you are going to get out of me. I joined into the game late and in an impossible to catch up spot but was positive. Very nice of me. Then I was largely ignored. No one welcomed me. No one even tried to give me a summary I asked for. No one answered my question if there was a silencer. sorry if you guys wanted more out of me should have interacted with me sooner.Russtifinko wrote:It's not so much that you've voted for 4 civvies in 4 days that bothers me, personally. I don't really love that everyone you've voted for is dead, but it is still only 2 people so it's not totally damning yet.Matt F wrote:Before anyone else mentions it, yes, I've voted to lynch a civvie four days in a row now.
Sorry town
I think your Mac theory is completely cockamamie, and I HATE cockamamie theories, as Syndicate players know. However, I think a baddie you would be foolish to pursue it so forcefully and for so long (over 5 pages). I finished reading that exchange and found myself leaning more civ on you than before.
Also, for the record, I don't know Roxy the best, but all her posts have read absolutely classic Roxy to me. The devil-may-care, I-play-my-game-and-no-one-can-stop-me attitude, the tunneling on Matt F, and just general tone seem normal to me.
I suppose I get fingersplints defending her, but as far as I can recall, defending her is literally the only thing fingers has done all game. That looks increasingly shady to me as interesting things happen in thread.
If you all side towards me being bad you can remember when I am lynched and revealed as a civvie how jay several times tried to push the attention away from BR towards me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Y'all should take a side in the Roxy/Black Rock/fingersplints combat. I find fingersplints the most suspicious, due in part but not entirely to the content from llama that preceded her.
I have had on my computer for the syndicate about 8 tabs open for a month because I was hosting and I needed multiple areas at a time.MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?
MovingPictures07 wrote:A kill counts as a "power" or ability, just like any other role mechanic.Choutas wrote:Well for once it says "power" usually in mafiascum cannon law "power" and "kill" is two different words. Unless by "power" here you mean "powers and kills" which again this is a complete different planet and I still try to get my head around some of your stuff.Ricochet wrote:If by "his theory" you mean Girlfriend/Place theory, why is it "completely unprovable"? So far we've found out the only thing that would make it unlikely is if the SK was blocked from killing - which he obviously wasn't.Choutas wrote: Can you explain it with simple words? Your theory is completely unprovable tbh. There are two roles we have no idea what they do marked with question marks. I think it has do with these unknown roles and not by a townie role.
Plus, he's also right that, double-targetting aside (meaning the SK can't target the same player again on N5), the SK could take advantage of his role.
Why is your "something must be happening behind the [Secrets] roles" more "provable" than Mac's theory?
Mr Modman is "kill" another "power" ?
For example, for Girlfriend Is Better, it is irrelevant whether the role is targeted with a role check, a kill, or any other power; they all fall under the chance for duplication if not blocked.
Why is this enforced here?Ricochet wrote:Sorry, that should be - you're not allowed to target the same player on consecutive Nights.
