The Syndicate

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:47 pm**

What do you mean, my number is up? I am definitely not bad, Dom.

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:29 pm**

S~V~S wrote:What do you mean, my number is up? I am definitely not bad, Dom.

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:45 pm**

Instead of being all cryptic like, lay it all out, Dom.

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:52 pm**

S~V~S wrote:Instead of being all cryptic like, lay it all out, Dom.

Like you have?

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:07 pm**

Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Instead of being all cryptic like, lay it all out, Dom.
Like you have?

When I suspected people, yes. I laid it out.

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:13 pm**

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Instead of being all cryptic like, lay it all out, Dom.
Like you have?
When I suspected people, yes. I laid it out.

WEll, I just think that you've been leading everyone astray. IDK I suck this game

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:27 pm**

What? I haven't led anything since BF, and thank jeebus for that, yah?

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:30 pm**

Well I am really surprised with this result. I really thought he was bad. RIP BWT.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 12:16 am**

Oh my gosh. I'm so terribly surprised. My heart was plucked out right before my very eyes.

Oh whatever. I thought it was clever.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:05 am**

The L?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:15 am**

I don't understand why it's common practice to act surprised when lynching a civ. Trying to make it look like an accident does NOT make it alright. In a righteous society anyone who lynches anyone would be categorically lynched.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:23 pm**

Ok so that sucks. Do we have any ideas what to do next?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:26 pm**

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Ok so that sucks. Do we have any ideas what to do next?

I trust no one but Canuck.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:31 pm**

Vompatti wrote:I don't understand why it's common practice to act surprised when lynching a civ. Trying to make it look like an accident does NOT make it alright. In a righteous society anyone who lynches anyone would be categorically lynched.

Unless you are surprised because you thought for sure that player was bad.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:33 pm**

Dom is there a reason you can share that you trust Canuck that much? I'd like to mark her off my possibilities list.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:42 pm**

Dom wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:Ok so that sucks. Do we have any ideas what to do next?
I trust no one but Canuck.

While I do understand the fact that she sounded sincere, I found the fact that she was going to follow MY vote to be very provoking. However, I also find it unlikely she would have openly said so if she were bad. So I do not actively suspect her. I realize that there may be reasons why you can't say why you feel as you do, but more than any other game I have played with you, I so wish I could get in your head this game.

I think later, after walking the dog (YAY SPRING

) and cleaning a bit, I will probably post my list.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:48 pm**

Black Rock wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I don't understand why it's common practice to act surprised when lynching a civ. Trying to make it look like an accident does NOT make it alright. In a righteous society anyone who lynches anyone would be categorically lynched.
Unless you are surprised because you thought for sure that player was bad.

That's a strange thought to have because the roles are randomized and there are generally less baddies than goodies.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:12 pm**

rezz please

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:34 pm**

juliets wrote:Dom is there a reason you can share that you trust Canuck that much? I'd like to mark her off my possibilities list.

If you trust me, you can trust Canuck.

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:Ok so that sucks. Do we have any ideas what to do next?
I trust no one but Canuck.
While I do understand the fact that she sounded sincere, I found the fact that she was going to follow MY vote to be very provoking. However, I also find it unlikely she would have openly said so if she were bad. So I do not actively suspect her. I realize that there may be reasons why you can't say why you feel as you do, but more than any other game I have played with you, I so wish I could get in your head this game.

I think later, after walking the dog (YAY SPRING ) and cleaning a bit, I will probably post my list.

More than... Shaw shank?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:44 pm**

So dom who si your top suspect ?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:47 pm**

Dom, I just trusted you in Shawshank, wrong as I may have been. I thought i knew where you were coming from, even if I was very, very wrong~ here I don't know where you are coming from. I thought you would understand the way I am playing my game more so than most people, so it confuses me that you are misunderstanding me so much.

I guess I am trying to figure out exactly what I did to give you the consistent feel that I am bad. There must be a specific thing I did for you to react this way, and I don't know what it is, I guess.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:51 pm**

Bass_the_Clever wrote:So dom who si your top suspect ?

TBH I don't know. I don't trust anyone but Canuck and can't seem to get a footing in the game anymore.

S~V~S wrote:Dom, I just trusted you in Shawshank, wrong as I may have been. I thought i knew where you were coming from, even if I was very, very wrong~ here I don't know where you are coming from. I thought you would understand the way I am playing my game more so than most people, so it confuses me that you are misunderstanding me so much.

I guess I am trying to figure out exactly what I did to give you the consistent feel that I am bad. There must be a specific thing I did for you to react this way, and I don't know what it is, I guess.

I can't remember anymore, if I'm honest with you.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:52 pm**

Though, you are a liar.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:52 pm**

Remember that tale you came up about being allowed to post despite being silenced?

False.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:56 pm**

I don't think she was lying about that. The host even reaffirmed it in the thread. Besides, why would she lie about something so trivial?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:02 pm**

Then why couldn't I post at all despite being cursed?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:02 pm**

Dom wrote:Then why couldn't I post at all despite being cursed?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:05 pm**

Ask me a yes or no question when night is over Dom. I'm not sure if the baddies will silence me again but I think there's a chance they will. We'll put this to the test.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:09 pm**

Turnip Head wrote:Ask me a yes or no question when night is over Dom. I'm not sure if the baddies will silence me again but I think there's a chance they will. We'll put this to the test.

Well, I really want to lynch you for saying that.

The baddies have no silencer. They have a doctor. That doctor may "drug" people, no?
How are you going to control who is drugged, tH?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:10 pm**

I'm not but they've been pretty predictable lately.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:12 pm**

And the baddies do have a silencer Dom. The Strangler. :P

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:21 pm**

blindfaeth wrote: rezz please

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:33 pm**

Dom wrote:Remember that tale you came up about being allowed to post despite being silenced?

False.

No it wasn't. It happened twice. The host even corroborated his policy about that in the thread. He does not think it fair in cases of double targeting to make the target fail one or the other. So I was allowed to make the minimum number of post required by the non-silence curse (5 both times it happened to me, it happened TWICE). The first time, was only allowed to discuss the wonders of Epignosis. The second time I needed to post with a specific smiley,

. So Llama told me to post only OT for those 5 posts. I was not curses to post OT, only to use that smiley.

Here is Llamas post:

thellama73 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Host: What would happen if a player was simultaneously hit with a silence and a mandatory posting curse?
This particular host does not consider it fair to force a player to fail a curse simply because they were hit with a second curse at the same time.

Absolutely not lying, I swear it on the bears, Dom.

You also got a curse and a silence the same night?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:35 pm**

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:Remember that tale you came up about being allowed to post despite being silenced?

False.
No it wasn't. It happened twice. The host even corroborated his policy about that in the thread. He does not think it fair in cases of double targeting to make the target fail one or the other. So I was allowed to make the minimum number of post required by the non-silence curse (5 both times it happened to me, it happened TWICE). The first time, was only allowed to discuss the wonders of Epignosis. The second time I needed to post with a specific smiley, . So Llama told me to post only OT for those 5 posts. I was not curses to post OT, only to use that smiley.

Here is Llamas post:

thellama73 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Host: What would happen if a player was simultaneously hit with a silence and a mandatory posting curse?
This particular host does not consider it fair to force a player to fail a curse simply because they were hit with a second curse at the same time.
Absolutely not lying, I swear it on the bears, Dom.

You also got a curse and a silence the same night?

I did. I was told to not post at all.

Additionally, TH seems to know how to "drug" people.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:39 pm**

You got both a curse & a silence in one night; targeted by two people? What was the other thing you had to do, that you did not do, then?

I did not even have to ask Llama how to handle it, he just TOLD me. Plus he posted that ^^ in the thread.

And a bit confused about the drugging thing? You seem to be the one who knows about that. Can you explain?

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:40 pm**

What was the curse you got in addition to being silenced that you did not fulfill? Becasue I was not lying. I will swear it on anything you think has meaning to me, Dom.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:50 pm**

Not too many places left to go...

Clark St.
0
No votes

Wabash Ave.
7
Turnip Head (2), S~V~S (3), Bullzeye (4), juliets (5), Dom (6), Black Rock (8), Bass_the_Clever (12)
58%

22nd St.
1
Vompatti (9)
8%

The L.(Host/Mod/Dead/NP)
4
thellama73 (1), Epignosis (7), Metalmarsh89 (10), LizKeen (11)
33%

Total votes : 12

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:51 pm**

Day 9

You have 48 hours to lynch a baddie.
Send in PMs of any items you want to sell and at what price.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:55 pm**

Seriously, baddies?

I am out of this thread for today. I just can't.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:58 pm**

lolz gj baddies

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:01 pm**

Finally!

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:21 pm**

Rip Turnip Head. I can't say I'm surprised. You were a leader in the thread, thank you for that.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:05 pm**

Rabbit already voted, and I am going to follow his vote for Bullz

I think his case on Bullz was a good one. I considered self voting, but ultimately that would serve no purpose other than drama, lol. And I have done enough of that this game. Go civs

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:12 pm**

SVS why would you even think of self voting!? And I will probably follow you two in your vote.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:33 pm**

Turnip Head wrote:lolz gj baddies

Can you imagine what it's like seeing life from the other side?
Do you imagine darkened light, starless night? You might need a guide.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:01 pm**

That actually really surprised me tbh. :/

I'm so confused. I suck.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 10:44 pm**

Well that was an interesting night. I came upon some information that has given me some insight. It has also made me very wary of these early votes. I am not sure how to approach this without upsetting the thread... maybe I should think about it before saying more. This information has led me to believe Rabbit is wrong about Bullz. It has also changed my mind a little about Dom. To clarify that, I have been previously unsure about Dom but now I feel a bit better about him.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 12:29 am**

Epignosis wrote:

And the smile signals emptiness for me

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 12:46 am**

Black Rock wrote:Well that was an interesting night. I came upon some information that has given me some insight. It has also made me very wary of these early votes. I am not sure how to approach this without upsetting the thread... maybe I should think about it before saying more. This information has led me to believe Rabbit is wrong about Bullz. It has also changed my mind a little about Dom. To clarify that, I have been previously unsure about Dom but now I feel a bit better about him.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:39 am**

Black Rock wrote:Well that was an interesting night. I came upon some information that has given me some insight. It has also made me very wary of these early votes. I am not sure how to approach this without upsetting the thread... maybe I should think about it before saying more. This information has led me to believe Rabbit is wrong about Bullz. It has also changed my mind a little about Dom. To clarify that, I have been previously unsure about Dom but now I feel a bit better about him.

I have pretty much felt better about Dom since Epi flipped bad. My instincts have been totally derailed this game. I have reason to believe Rabbit is civ, and I think he likely voted early due to being silenced. I voted early since I trust him to the extent I trust anyone, and becasue TH being NK was pretty much the end of my game, tbh, and the point where I stopped caring.

I am sorry if you are wary of my vote. I have been nothing but 100% honest this game, which was an incredibly refreshing thing while it lasted. It turned out so badly that it is an experiment I will never try again, lol. But it is what it is.

The Syndicate

Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler Polls

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 8]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 9]