The Syndicate

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:I am neither a baddie nor an admitted one. Conceding my lynch is not the same thing. I want to concede my lynch because my lynch is inevitable after your analysis of my behavior with Nerolunar, and it might as well happen now since MP has asked for a replacement and can't get one. However, I am pro-town. If days often negate themselves gloriously in very "ethical" absolutes, forget understanding careless killings if for inside - within all silly alignment negotiations is no man allocated to ending idiotic wastes - a sunken portrait regurgitates open tangents, owning what not favors opiate, reminded may your every nanobot tighten its rectum endlessly. Run until no albatross nannies! Don't dispute, obey! Never tell look every town and not you, one not ever convince Odin not violently, instead nihilism castrates everyone. Yonder often undermines omens, to hell! Exit recklessly without integrity...some eternity..

You are saying a whole bunch of nothing and trying to get us to believe there is meaning appropriated to it.

Okay Mac, next time you put a ton of effort into trying to co-operate with other people I'm just going to call it a whole bunch of nothing. If you think that's unfair, I'll just quote this post and show it to you.

This post, is a whole bunch of nothing, all your other posts... are not. All your other posts... are cooperation. This post, is a smokescreen. This post at best is a riddle that we're not meant to be able to solve.

But I solved it.

Did you though?

a2thezebra wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Enrique wrote:Winning strategy: respond to every post with "what do you mean by that?" or "you're not saying anything."

What do you mean by that?

You're not saying anything.

a2thezebra wrote:When you say that I'm not having an open mind because I'm not considering objectively false interpretations, and you see TH's point when there is none, you make it pretty easy for me to misunderstand you. That is assuming that you are in fact not siding with him. I mean do you not have any opinion whatsoever on what I just pointed out in the post you're responding to here? Is the only thing you have to say really just trying to make sure that I don't think you're on his side? You realize that that's going to have the opposite effect when you have no comment on his shady content, right?

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

Golden wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:When you say that I'm not having an open mind because I'm not considering objectively false interpretations, and you see TH's point when there is none, you make it pretty easy for me to misunderstand you. That is assuming that you are in fact not siding with him. I mean do you not have any opinion whatsoever on what I just pointed out in the post you're responding to here? Is the only thing you have to say really just trying to make sure that I don't think you're on his side? You realize that that's going to have the opposite effect when you have no comment on his shady content, right?

I have had PLENTY of comment on his shady content. I've provided six explanations for it, each of which I see as viable.

I just asked you, by the way, how is it backwards. You haven't answered me. You haven't told TH what you mean either. What do you mean? How has he got it backwards?

All I see is you tunnelling into a single possible conclusion you have drawn from disparate facts, that you think makes sense but that to me is nothing more than a wild theory, even accounting for TH's odd behaviour.

If you (and Enrique) can't accept that simply at face value other people can disagree with you about how damning the evidence is, and that other people do not see it as objective proof that TH is bad, I can't do anything about that. That doesn't mean I'm siding with him. That just means I've made my position very clear about how closed-minded your theory is and why, and if you can't see that I can do this without rejecting the possibility that your theory is right... I mean I don't know where else to go honestly.

a2thezebra wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

Start trying to co-operate with people and conceal your own frustrations as much as you possibly can, that should get you lynched pretty easily.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

Start trying to co-operate with people and conceal your own frustrations as much as you possibly can, that should get you lynched pretty easily.

Pffft... I think I know how to get myself lynched pretty easily.

Golden wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

You will not get my vote tomorrow. I want you in the game.

Enrique wrote:Winning strategy: respond to every post with "what do you mean by that?" or "you're not saying anything."

Golden wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

STOP SAYING WORDS

I am going to be lynched tomorrow, not you. I have to go first!!!!!!!

Start trying to co-operate with people and conceal your own frustrations as much as you possibly can, that should get you lynched pretty easily.

Pffft... I think I know how to get myself lynched pretty easily.

Why not claim cop and red peek on the real cop?

Dom wrote:

Black Rock wrote:

Dom wrote:

Black Rock wrote:I would have liked to vote for Dom, as he sounds like baddie Dom to me, but I guess I'll vote for Nero. If you're right Enrique, then I will help keep him alive. I do not think he's bad.

BR, I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around this post. You will help keep who alive? Who don't you think is bad?

Matt. Sorry I went to bed before this post

It's okay.. I thought you were saying Nero and got really confused.

Black Rock wrote:I agree Epig would rather save his team then throw them to the wolves. As a teammate he actively tries to give you advice to survive. He's more loyal team first kinda guy. I enjoy being on his team.

I agree with this 100%, but I'm not sure why Epig's actions are relevant in a game where he is hosting.

Additionally, MP, I don't like your claim that you're playing your town meta. That pinged me. I'm not reading either town or your baddie persona that I associate you with (at least internally-- however wrong I may be). I am seeing something in between. Maybe you're not Nero's teammate (there is some evidence to point to that), but I'm not thinking you are civ.

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Golden wrote:No. What zebra said is this.

"I don't give a fuck if I was an inmate I was pro-town for my entire run and don't let anyone tell you otherwise"

I think she's just trying to convince us not to lynch her by using reverse psychology and pretending not to care...

This is bullshit, by the way. I've advocated my lynch more than anyone else, even though you've ignored it (which is shown by asking me if I'm conceding my lynch earlier when I had already said so directly multiple times to multiple people) so I am not pretending to not care. And that's not because I genuinely don't care, that's because I genuinely do. I want to be lynched tomorrow.

Enrique wrote:You close minded plebeians don't understand that facts are facts.

linki- Not the game, Mac. This conversation? Yes.

Enrique wrote:You close minded plebeians don't understand that facts are facts.

linki- Not the game, Mac. This conversation? Yes.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:You close minded plebeians don't understand that facts are facts.

linki- Not the game, Mac. This conversation? Yes.

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

Golden wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:You close minded plebeians don't understand that facts are facts.

linki- Not the game, Mac. This conversation? Yes.

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

Bullsuit

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Enrique wrote:Golden the way you're pushing the "WHAT DID YOU MEAN HE GOT IT BACKWARDS." Ugh.
Read the post she's quoting there it's not hard to unserstand.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Turnip Head wrote:This is how I have it backwards Golden. Let me know if it makes any sense to you.

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Nope...

One of you is probably Ghul. The other is Maroni.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Nope...

One of you is probably Ghul. The other is Maroni.

One of whom? Me and zebra?

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Nope...

One of you is probably Ghul. The other is Maroni.

One of whom? Me and zebra?

Yup

Turnip Head wrote:I'm really enjoying MovingMarmot07 this game.

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So I'm a baddie who put this nutso plan into action on Day 0 and put all my chips on Matt not claiming Batman.

Hot damn, I can't believe I even made it to Night 2!

I think you got that backwards.

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So I'm a baddie who put this nutso plan into action on Day 0 and put all my chips on Matt not claiming Batman.

Hot damn, I can't believe I even made it to Night 2!

I think you got that backwards.

Turnip Head didn't put his chips on Matt not claiming Batman. Matt claiming Batman would be a good thing for TH. Matt not claiming Batman (clearly) doesn't make a difference.

You don't want to understand Zebra and that is a problem.

Turnip Head wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Golden wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Zebra, how can something be indicative of baddie behavior if you can't identify a baddie motive for it?

Disingenuous behavior. Opportunistic behavior. Manipulative behavior. My entire civ game is based in looking for baddie behavior whether I can identify a motive or not. Don't even act like you don't know this or that you and everyone else doesn't do it either.

The irony that I even have to explain all that is that I gave a likely motive for your hinting at being Alfred. To pass as a confirmed civ role and cruise through the game! Golden responding mainly to Enrique instead of me because Enrique is less sure than I am about what the motive is pings me.

How would he successfully pass as a confirmed civ role? All it takes for it to fail was Matt to say 'I'm not Batman'. Of all the potential civilian roles to cruise through the game with, he would pick the one that could be obviously disproved?

You're not making any sense. Not only does his plan not fail if Matt says that he isn't Batman, Matt saying that he isn't Batman is his only chance of getting away with it. If Matt just happens to actually be Batman, then, and only then, his plan falls through completely.

I really don't think I'm the one who has this backwards.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Nope...

One of you is probably Ghul. The other is Maroni.

One of whom? Me and zebra?

Yup

Well, I don't know about zebra, but I think your prediction is wrong.

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:So we just lynch all the people asking to be lynched in this game?

We're bound to at least not lynch civilians that way. Civilians don't insist they should be lynched. Unless you're Roxy.

Unless you're me.

Nope...

One of you is probably Ghul. The other is Maroni.

One of whom? Me and zebra?

Yup

Well, I don't know about zebra, but I think your prediction is wrong.

I'm sure you're just going to be like "yeah you're correct" if I was.

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So I'm a baddie who put this nutso plan into action on Day 0 and put all my chips on Matt not claiming Batman.

Hot damn, I can't believe I even made it to Night 2!

I think you got that backwards.

Turnip Head didn't put his chips on Matt not claiming Batman. Matt claiming Batman would be a good thing for TH. Matt not claiming Batman (clearly) doesn't make a difference.

You don't want to understand Zebra and that is a problem.

Golden wrote:

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So I'm a baddie who put this nutso plan into action on Day 0 and put all my chips on Matt not claiming Batman.

Hot damn, I can't believe I even made it to Night 2!

I think you got that backwards.

Turnip Head didn't put his chips on Matt not claiming Batman. Matt claiming Batman would be a good thing for TH. Matt not claiming Batman (clearly) doesn't make a difference.

You don't want to understand Zebra and that is a problem.

Then why did zebra say ths plan failed if Matt actually was batman