Death Note Mafia [END]

#3851

I didn't include "player" in line 5 because I'm not sure it makes sense, let's keep spitballing. Otherwise this is updated.

1) ...that ~~~ when Snowman ~~~~ the game ~~~ adds the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKE)

2) Are these win conditions the only secrets beyond what is being revealed? (NRSYBLF)

3) Not quite. (OSTZCMG)

4) There are some role secrets that even the players who were given these roles did not receive in their role PM. (PTUADNH)

5) Another role will elucidate this ~~~~e~, but only once this note has been fully solved and the next secret is triggered. (QUVBEOI)

6) Without further ado, what follows is Snowman's real win condition. (RVWCFPJ)

7) Secret win condition: (SWXDGQK)

8) You do not need all detectives dead to win the game. (TXYEHRL)

9) Because you are so greedy, you really only talk about Kira to exploit him for your own financial gain. (UYZFISM)

10) If you lead at least three lynches throughout the game and successfully lynch your target, you can win with any team. (VZAGJTN)

11) To lead a lynch successfully, you must: (WABHKUO)

12) (1) build an argument as to why your lynch target is a baddie (without bringing role ~~~i~~ ~~l~~), (XBCILVP)

13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ you ~~~~~d, (YCDJMWQ)

14) (3) Be one of the first five players to vote for that person, and, (ZDEKNXR)

15) (4) Get that player lynched. (AEFLOYS)

16) If your first attempt fails, you can still lynch that player in subsequent periods, so long as you satisfy the first two criteria. (BFGMPZT)

17) It does not matter what alignment or role your lynch target is. (CGHNQAU)

18) Completion of this puzzle triggers the secret event. (DHIORBV)

19) Good luck! (EIJPSCW)

#3852

FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:I feel the bracket for 12) has something with "without hinting, outing or something Snowman would not have been allowed to do, even as a baddie".
But hinting can't work here, nor can outing. I thought about those

Second to last word in the bracket could be outing.

#3853

I'll take two more letters.

#3854

13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player FOR THE REASONS you ~~~~~d, (YCDJMWQ)

#3855

#3856

Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:I feel the bracket for 12) has something with "without hinting, outing or something Snowman would not have been allowed to do, even as a baddie".
But hinting can't work here, nor can outing. I thought about those
Second to last word in the bracket could be outing.

Oh, sorry. Didn't get it

#3857

We need to choose really carefully these two letters. Lines 12 and 13 need the most work.

linki: I was thinking R too

#3858

#3859

FZ. wrote:13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player FOR THE REASONS you ~~~~~d, (YCDJMWQ)

nice, could be. reasons you argued?

#3860

#3861

I'll take R and C since I don't want to double up on two from the same player. You folks cool with that?

#3862

Or if you'd rather have R and S, or S and C, let me know instead.

#3863

Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player FOR THE REASONS you ~~~~~d, (YCDJMWQ)
nice, could be. reasons you argued?

Yep!

#3864

C would let us confirm "adds" in the first line and would have give us "O" for line 12, so I really like that choice.

#3865

Fine. But S is better.

linki: we need R

linki: fine

Just let me post already!

#3866

S is pretty good too, you're right. I don't care

#3867

Meh, I'll give you all three. But these will literally be the last letters you get.

#3868

13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player FOR THE REASONS you stated, (YCDJMWQ)

#3869

I think S would help a lot.

#3870

Updated Snowman's Note (Final Part) -- FINAL UPDATE:

...s~zs ~~s ~~~~ R~~~lz~ ~~rs s~d ~zld ~~s z~r~ s~d dw~rsd~~d ~~ rd~qds ~~~ ~~~c~s~~~r. ~pc r~cqc ~~l ~~l~~r~~lq r~c ~ljw qc~pcrq zcw~l~ ~~~r ~q zc~l~ pc~c~jc~? ~lq ~r~q~. Pd~~~ w~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~p~ pdwp ~r~j pd~ l~w~~~~ sd~ s~~~ c~r~j pd~~~ ~~~~~ z~z j~p ~~~~~r~ ~j pd~~~ ~~~~ L~. ~~j~cz~ ~j~z rd~~ z~p~d~~~z ~cd~ ~~~~z~, wp~ j~~~ j~~z ~cd~ ~j~z c~~ wzz~ ~p~~~ ~j~qz~ ~~~ ~cz ~zs~ ~z~~z~ d~ ~~d~~z~z~. Qc~~~~~ z~l~~~l ~~~, q~~~ z~~~~q~ c~ ~~~q~~~'~ l~~~ qc~ w~~~c~c~~. L~~~~~ p~~ ~~~w~~~~~: Q~~ ~~ ~~l ~ww~ sdd ~wlw~l~~w~ ~ws~ l~ ~~~ lzw ~s~w. S~~rlj~ p~l r~~ j~ ~~~~~p, p~l ~~rccp ~~cp ~r~~ rs~l~ ~z~r ~~ ~~~c~z~ ~zd w~~ p~l~ ~~~ wz~r~~zrc ~rz~. ~~ ~~~ ~~q~ qj ~~q~j j~~~~ ~~ds~~~ j~~~~w~~~j j~~ wqc~ qd~ ~~ss~~~~~~~~ ~~ds~ ~~~~ jq~w~j, ~~~ sqd ~~d ~~j~ qd~ j~qc. ~d ~~ps p ~~crw ~jrr~~~~j~~~, ~dj ~j~~: (~) p~wzr ~~ ~~~~~s~~ ~~ ~c ~~~ ~c~~ z~~q~ ~~~~s~ w~ ~ p~rrws (~w~~c~~ ~~w~~w~~ ~czs c~~w~~ ~~zs~), (~) p~~~~~pr ~~ ~r~~~ ~~~rr ~~~r~ c~~lr~~ ~~ ~~~r s~~ ~~~~ c~~lr~ s~~ ~~r ~r~~~~~ l~~ ~~~~rq, (~) ~q ~zq ~r ~~q r~d~~ r~~q ~~~~qd~ ~~ ~~~q r~d ~~~~ ~qd~~z, ~zp (~) rp~ ~sl~ ~wljpc wj~~sp~. Sp ~~~~ ps~cd ~dd~wzd p~s~c, ~~~ ~~~ cds~~ ~~~~r dr~d z~~~~~ s~ c~lc~~~~~d z~~s~~c, c~ ~~~q ~c ~~~ c~dscp~ dr~ ps~cd d~~ ~~sd~~s~. Rc ~~~~ w~c ~jcc~~ ~qjc j~rpw~~wc ~~ ~~~~ ~~d~ ~~wlq cj~p~c r~. ~w~~~~~qw~ w~ ~pq~ ~c~~~~ ~zq~~~z~ ~p~ ~~~z~~ ~d~~~. ~~~~ s~jr!

#3871

DharmaHelper wrote:13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player FOR THE REASONS you stated, (YCDJMWQ)

nice.

#3872

Shall you do the honors, TH?

#3873

Ricochet wrote:Shall you do the honors, TH?

Um, you can have this one if you want :P or if not I can do it, but I'm taking a quick break.

#3874

Turnip Head wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Shall you do the honors, TH?
Um, you can have this one if you want :P or if not I can do it, but I'm taking a quick break.

OK, just give me a few minutes.

#3875

12) (1) build an argument as to WHY your lynch target is a baddie (WITHOUT BRINGING ROLE o~~i~~ ~~le~), (XBCILVPOED)

#3876

5) Another role will elucidate THIS ~~~~e~, but only once this note has been fully solved and the next secret is triggered. (QUVBEOIHWX)

#3877

1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt a~s~ the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

#3878

I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.

#3879

Hope this is good, please note that I added the new sequence in the brackets as R-S-C

1) ...that ~~t when Snowman ~~st the game ~~t a~s~ the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

2) Are these win conditions the only secrets beyond what is being revealed? (NRSYBLFTUE)

3) Not quite. (OSTZCMGUVF)

4) There are some role secrets that even the players who were given these roles did not receive in their role PM. (PTUADNHVWG)

5) Another role will elucidate this ~~~~e~, but only once this note has been fully solved and the next secret is triggered. (QUVBEOIWXH)

6) Without further ado, what follows is Snowman's real win condition. (RVWCFPJXYI)

7) Secret win condition: (SWXDGQKYZJ)

8) You do not need all detectives dead to win the game. (TXYEHRLZAK)

9) Because you are so greedy, you really only talk about Kira to exploit him for your own financial gain. (UYZFISMABL)

10) If you lead at least three lynches throughout the game and successfully lynch your target, you can win with any team. (VZAGJTNBCM)

11) To lead a lynch successfully, you must: (WABHKUOCDN)

12) (1) build an argument as to why your lynch target is a baddie (without ~~i~~i~~ ~ole o~~i~~ ~~le~), (XBCILVPDEO)

13) (2) convince at least three other players to vote for this player for the reasons you stated, (YCDJMWQEFP)

14) (3) Be one of the first five players to vote for that person, and, (ZDEKNXRFGQ)

15) (4) Get that player lynched. (AEFLOYSGHR)

16) If your first attempt fails, you can still lynch that player in subsequent periods, so long as you satisfy the first two criteria. (BFGMPZTHIS)

17) It does not matter what alignment or role your lynch target is. (CGHNQAUIJT)

18) Completion of this puzzle triggers the secret event. (DHIORBVJKU)

19) Good luck! (EIJPSCWKLV)

#3880

Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Mafia is in sign-ups now.

#3881

12) (1) build an argument as to why your lynch target is a baddie (without ~~i~~i~~ Role oUTiNG ~~le~), (XBCILVPDEO)

#3882

thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.

Who do you think we should lynch?

#3883

1) ...that ~~t when Snowman ~~st the game ~~t also the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

#3884

1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

#3885

thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.

I agree, which is why I'm trying to talk about it. Did you read what I said about TH? Do you have any other player in mind for a lynch?

#3886

I think we only have line 12 left

#3887

Zomberella12 wrote:1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

makes no sense to me

#3888

Zomberella12 wrote:1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)

Its not when, there is no "E"

#3889

Can anyone post the previous part again, please?

#3890

Ricochet wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)
makes no sense to me

Yeah....

We also need one word in line 5

#3891

FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.
I agree, which is why I'm trying to talk about it. Did you read what I said about TH? Do you have any other player in mind for a lynch?

Not really, although it's tempting to look at other aggressive puzzle workers, since they are distracting from the real business at hand. I suspected Ricochet once. I can't remember why now.

#3892

1) ...that ~~t ~~~~ Snowman ~~st the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)[/quote]

Its not when, there is no "E"[/quote]

#3893

DharmaHelper wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:1) ...that NOt when Snowman LOst the game BUt aLsO the existence of secret win conditions. (MQRXAKESTD)
Its not when, there is no "E"

I think we've had that in there for a while, is it wrong? I want it to be wrong, because I want it to say

[you will learn] "...that not only Snowman lost the game but also the existence of secret win conditions"

#3894

Metalmarsh89 wrote:THE ROLE SECRETS BEING REVEALED TO YOU TELL THE ENTIRE STORY.
ARE THEY EVERYTHING?
NO, THEY ARE NOT. KEEP SOLVING THESE AND YOU CAN LEARN....

#3895

thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.
I agree, which is why I'm trying to talk about it. Did you read what I said about TH? Do you have any other player in mind for a lynch?
Not really, although it's tempting to look at other aggressive puzzle workers, since they are distracting from the real business at hand. I suspected Ricochet once. I can't remember why now.

Because you think I'm bad by default.

I got distracted by the puzzle, I admit, probably because I couldn't contribute at all yesterday, but right now it's 2am here, so I'll sum up my thoughts tomorrow.

#3896

Turnip Head wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:THE ROLE SECRETS BEING REVEALED DO NOT TELL THE ENTIRE STORY.
ARE THEY EVERYTHING?
NO, THEY ARE NOT. KEEP SOLVING THESE AND YOU CAN LEARN....

My bad.

#3897

Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.
I agree, which is why I'm trying to talk about it. Did you read what I said about TH? Do you have any other player in mind for a lynch?
Not really, although it's tempting to look at other aggressive puzzle workers, since they are distracting from the real business at hand. I suspected Ricochet once. I can't remember why now.
Because you think I'm bad by default.

I got distracted by the puzzle, I admit, probably because I couldn't contribute at all yesterday, but right now it's 2am here, so I'll sum up my thoughts tomorrow.

@ Llama, what's the rush? We still have one more day. Plus, the puzzle isn't nothing, it triggers an event/secret or whatever. Plus, it's fun.

#3898

Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I dislike this puzzle. No one is talking about who we should lynch, and I think that is a problem.
I agree, which is why I'm trying to talk about it. Did you read what I said about TH? Do you have any other player in mind for a lynch?
Not really, although it's tempting to look at other aggressive puzzle workers, since they are distracting from the real business at hand. I suspected Ricochet once. I can't remember why now.
Because you think I'm bad by default.

I got distracted by the puzzle, I admit, probably because I couldn't contribute at all yesterday, but right now it's 2am here, so I'll sum up my thoughts tomorrow.

@ Llama, what's the rush? We still have one more day. Plus, the puzzle isn't nothing, it triggers an event/secret or whatever. Plus, it's fun.

#3899

llama, I've been agreeing with Rico the entire game, so he doesn't really look that suspicious.

I need to sleep too. Same time here Rico. Tomorrow.

#3900

I want MP to check the puzzle. I wonder if we have something wrong and that's why we can't get the last little bit.