Page 79 of 126
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:35 pm
by Epignosis
The writing style sounded like Spacedaisy.
Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:38 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 am
It was eighteen pages of reading dictionary definitions and debating what "is" means and now I think you're both bad.
Calling it now.
One of Epi and Kyle is bad.
But I think Epi is good so...
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:43 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
colonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:43 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:04 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:12 pm
colonialbob wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:25 am
I like the people on JJJ much more, so I'm swtiching over.
JJJ
Post 3302.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:17 am
also i put my vote back on jay. his ISOs don't sway me much. That's exactly what I'd expect him to do as scum. It's exactly what he always says players, town or scum, should do in the face of pressure. I don't feel like his mesk vote came from a place of sincerity and prior to today I got very little sense that he was trying to solve the game in any capacity.
Post 3287.
My bad, guys. Sloonei voted Jimmy before Bob.
This doesn't look good for Bob.
Bob already mentioned that twice but apparently nobody actually reads what he says
Patience, young grasshopper. I have now read all of your defenses.
Which now makes me torn on whether to buy you or Sloonei.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:46 pm
by Sloonei
Buy me, I'm right
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:47 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:45 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:02 am
Took a quick review of EoD3:
- Speedchuck looks off for jumping on Wilgy to save himself nstead of Jay. Could see a Jay/Speed team-up.
I ended up jumping back on Jay to save myself. So I think it cancels out.
Why not on Jay?
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:49 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:57 am
LC is an odd case right now. Still want to gutread him as good. I'm interested in thoughts about how he handled Eloh's read a few posts ago, as well as his readlist that (lol) put Jack as number 1 scumread right before the lynch.
His vote on JJJ, even as he said, looks like posturing but he hasn't taken advantage of it. I think that goes for a lot of current things LC is doing. They look like convenient town or scum tells, but then he keeps hanging lampshades on them. The level of self awareness is throwing me for a wine spiral.
"Actually, my vote on JJJ was worthless"
"I don't know why you're defending me Eloh"
"readlist with Jack as bad RIGHT BEFORE jack dies"
Feels weird. Super honest with a smashing of wine. I keep writing "gut says town" on this post but I'm not sure what my gut says beyond "Urgh I feel terrible."
I feel you. And I think he is being doing it on purpose to makes us confused and avoid being both lynched and NK'd. But that's also something a civ would do. Especially a seasoned civ who is probably more interested in Chicka Chicka so he would come here just to troll us.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:51 pm
by Sloonei
I could see an argument for LC being bad but I'm not fully convinced yet.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:52 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:24 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:31 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:29 am
GTH whenever anyone sees this:
Malakim
Kylemii
Cbob
LC
because my vote is probably going to one of these, and I'm thinking it's one of the first two.
Bad
Bad
Bad
Civ
Whi id bob bad?
Because "I don't know, please leave me alone" is not usually an accepted answer in GTH exercises.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:54 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:46 pm
Buy me, I'm right
The last time I did you left me alone voting for Bob while you went and voted for Mesk.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:59 pm
by Sloonei
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:54 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:46 pm
Buy me, I'm right
The last time I did you left me alone voting for Bob while you went and voted for Mesk.
Only because no one else was joining us.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:09 pm
by Marmot
Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:03 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:36 am
A NEW DAY
Jack of hearts has been nightkilled.
It is now Day 5. You have ~24 hours to lynch someone.
First of all, that is a bit shocking as there was suspicion on jack. Second, 5:36am!? Marmot, you need to get your internal clock fixed buddy. Now I will have to vote like 7-8 hours before the lynch is over!!
Sorry about that. Things are a little busy on my end,
and I didn't want to push the result back anymore than it had been.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:14 pm
by speedchuck
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:24 pm
do you feel bad about placing a vote on malakim, speedchuck? why or why not?
Nah. He's been here what, 2 in-game days? That's long enough.
Oh, sorry, I didn't call it.
Malakim.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:20 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Malakim hasn't logged in since saturday afternoon. I may have pissed him off in my argument with him.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:21 pm
by dunya
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:14 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:24 pm
do you feel bad about placing a vote on malakim, speedchuck? why or why not?
Nah. He's been here what, 2 in-game days? That's long enough.
Oh, sorry, I didn't call it.
Malakim.
do you feel his lack of contributions aren't more along the lines of of overwhelmed townie?
What are your reasons for voting for malakim?
He's one of my suspects too, so if no one else wants to park on Wilgy, I may be inclined to follow you with a malakim vote but I didnt want to rush into it without giving him a chance to get settled and tell us stuff so we can judge him more fairly. His contributions so far haven't sat well with me. I was in the same boat but felt it necessary to share my thoughts on everything as I went along. He was a lot more reserved.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:21 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
I do feel sorry a little but I also feel a sense of "what the hell am I supposed to do" when the guy reacts so badly to being voted in a mafia game.
If he is actually legit pissed off this could be a matter to consider, though.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:23 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Imo if our killer role is alive and active he should be shooting the likes of INH and Sig. And Malakim, should he not come back.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:23 pm
by speedchuck
Malakim's "Janitor?" comment has no alignment relevance for a few reasons:
1. It's not a part of the scum roles.
2. Genuine confusion is a great way to seem town, but if given the opportunity, mafia can use it. This was an opportunity.
3. Malakim thought that maybe the 3P role janitored the kill.
Heck, I also didn't know if the nightkills would be janitored until one happened. I suspected, but I didn't scour the OP. I respect Malakim enough to assume that, when replacing in as scum, he can fake confusion well enough. Especially when it is applied to mechanics that genuinely hasn't looked at.
I wouldn't say it's a scumtell either. Just a big ol' nothing
linki: I'll get to that
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 2]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:24 pm
by Sloonei
colonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:05 am
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:28 am
What do people think about Sloonei? GTH's, cases, whatever.
Lean town. From what little exposure I have seems like town Sloonei, I like the questions and prodding people. Not enough reads or firm statements that I recall to make me really solidify the town read though.
I went back to pull out a Specific Thing from Bob's ISO but this caught my eye because it has my name in it so I want to harp on it briefly. This is the sort of wishywashy early read that I usually am suspicious of. He sets me up as a town read but then makes sure to leave the door open for a case to be made against me. I get bad vibes from this because I'm getting bad vibes from everything he's posting. Now onto what I actually set out to do...
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:26 pm
by speedchuck
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:21 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:14 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:24 pm
do you feel bad about placing a vote on malakim, speedchuck? why or why not?
Nah. He's been here what, 2 in-game days? That's long enough.
Oh, sorry, I didn't call it.
Malakim.
do you feel his lack of contributions aren't more along the lines of of overwhelmed townie?
What are your reasons for voting for malakim?
He's one of my suspects too, so if no one else wants to park on Wilgy, I may be inclined to follow you with a malakim vote but I didnt want to rush into it without giving him a chance to get settled and tell us stuff so we can judge him more fairly. His contributions so far haven't sat well with me. I was in the same boat but felt it necessary to share my thoughts on everything as I went along. He was a lot more reserved.
I'm voting him for lack of contributions? News to me. I thought I was voting him based on vote placement. His contributions aren't really lackluster, it's the direction that bothers me.
"That's long enough" is referring to me not feeling bad about lynching someone who just replaced in.
Granted, it's daystart, my vote is prone to move. We'll see.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:28 pm
by speedchuck
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:23 pm
Imo if our killer role is alive and active he should be shooting the likes of INH and Sig. And Malakim, should he not come back.
I probably would have shot Dunya. "STOP POSTING SO MUCH I'M TRYING TO HUNT."
But no really, if you're out there, pls kill INH. We can't read anything whatsoever into a missing player. Sig at least has some posts, same for Malakim.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:29 pm
by Long Con
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:49 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:57 am
LC is an odd case right now. Still want to gutread him as good. I'm interested in thoughts about how he handled Eloh's read a few posts ago, as well as his readlist that (lol) put Jack as number 1 scumread right before the lynch.
His vote on JJJ, even as he said, looks like posturing but he hasn't taken advantage of it. I think that goes for a lot of current things LC is doing. They look like convenient town or scum tells, but then he keeps hanging lampshades on them. The level of self awareness is throwing me for a wine spiral.
"Actually, my vote on JJJ was worthless"
"I don't know why you're defending me Eloh"
"readlist with Jack as bad RIGHT BEFORE jack dies"
Feels weird. Super honest with a smashing of wine. I keep writing "gut says town" on this post but I'm not sure what my gut says beyond "Urgh I feel terrible."
I feel you. And I think he is being doing it on purpose to makes us confused and avoid being both lynched and NK'd. But that's also something a civ would do. Especially a seasoned civ who is probably more interested in Chicka Chicka so he would come here just to troll us.

No, seriously, I am not doing anything on purpose. I would so much rather have just been right about everything. And we both know that there's not that much going on in CC123, that I would need to *focus* there and have this be my side game to troll. Mountain Mafia was very exciting to start, after having only CC123 for so long.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:30 pm
by dunya
Have you played with malakim before, speedchuck?
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 2]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:38 pm
by Sloonei
For anyone who cares, my biggest hang up regarding the cbob/Jay pairing is this conversation that they carried out over the final hours of Day 2:
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:30 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:17 am
Elohcin's rainbow and dialogue with Sloonei
Sloonei's questions here were reasonable -- Elohcin voiced in vague terms that the high posters seem civ and that she'd be willing to vote for a low poster. The contents of the rainbow list don't align with that much. A change of heart is fine, but I don't know if that's even what happened in Eloh's head -- the progression is unclear. The names in the rainbow almost appear randomized. I'm surprised to see myself rated well given my own slow start, and I have no idea why Mesk is so high. I don't know why the low posters are split between yellow and orange. I don't know why the high posters Sloonei and Quin are orange. When given an opportunity to expand on these things, she just said
"relax" and restated the general purpose of a rainbow list.
Elohcin, you need to talk more about what's going on there.
So then if he was right on all that why did he drop the vote when Epi said the read/case was bad? What made him swap his vote?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:40 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:30 am
So then if he was right on all that why did he drop the vote when Epi said the read/case was bad? What made him swap his vote?
Let's ask Sloonei:
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:25 pm
Putting a vote on sprityo because I want to hear from him. I'm going out for a bit, will be back before the deadline.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:16 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:34 pm
Sloonei
I don't feel you are genuine, and I think your go at Eloh was a try to score an easy lynch that people would find agreeable even if the result was no good.
Nope. I wanted you to share your thoughts on her, then I moved off.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:43 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:30 pm
I don't want to be on Eloh come day end. It could go on Sloonei.
I advise against this.
I could go back to Eloh.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:51 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:48 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:16 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:34 pm
Sloonei
I don't feel you are genuine, and I think your go at Eloh was a try to score an easy lynch that people would find agreeable even if the result was no good.
Nope. I wanted you to share your thoughts on her, then I moved off.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:43 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:30 pm
I don't want to be on Eloh come day end. It could go on Sloonei.
I advise against this.
I could go back to Eloh.
Uh-huh.
You negated my BTSC theory, but I still see in-thread evidence that coild to against her. In the absence of strong suspects, I'm not eliminating her from suspicion.
In the absence of strong suspects, I can get behind the idea of lynchig a low poster.
It appears the influence Epi had over his vote switch relates to content separate from Elohcin's rainbow list -- instead it relates to the meta discussion pertaining to her behavior when she has BTSC. This strikes me as consistent with the notion that she could still warrant a vote given the other reasons Sloonei's stated suspicion exists.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:34 am
Moreover I think the low-poster lynch strategy is ideal under these conditions.
Explain please. I'm also curious why you're defending somebody you didn't seem to be fully onboard with as town.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:42 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:34 am
Moreover I think the low-poster lynch strategy is ideal under these conditions.
Explain please. I'm also curious why you're defending somebody you didn't seem to be fully onboard with as town.
This has been the fastest-paced side mission I've ever seen here. The only competition that comes to mind at the moment is Economics, and I believe that had 48 hour days. This environment is a challenging one for a mafia team to handle, and with that in mind I believe there's a better chance of finding them among the low-posters than there would be in some other randomly selected game. Consider the present wagons, that dynamic, and sprityo's recent conduct in this thread and I think it's the best decision right now.
I'm not fully on board with Sloonei as town. I don't care. This is EOD, and the point is to make the best vote I can make. I think there's more reason to view him as a civilian than there is for sprityo. I think there's more reason to view Jack as a civilian too.
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:46 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:42 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:34 am
Moreover I think the low-poster lynch strategy is ideal under these conditions.
Explain please. I'm also curious why you're defending somebody you didn't seem to be fully onboard with as town.
This has been the fastest-paced side mission I've ever seen here. The only competition that comes to mind at the moment is Economics, and I believe that had 48 hour days. This environment is a challenging one for a mafia team to handle, and with that in mind I believe there's a better chance of finding them among the low-posters than there would be in some other randomly selected game. Consider the present wagons, that dynamic, and sprityo's recent conduct in this thread and I think it's the best decision right now.
I'm not fully on board with Sloonei as town. I don't care. This is EOD, and the point is to make the best vote I can make. I think there's more reason to view him as a civilian than there is for sprityo. I think there's more reason to view Jack as a civilian too.
Ok, the first part is pretty good logic. I can follow that.
You come across as defending Sloonei though. I'd prefer you spend your time convincing me Sprit is bad.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:55 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:46 am
You come across as defending Sloonei though. I'd prefer you spend your time convincing me Sprit is bad.
sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:43 pm
*vote Nutella*
I want to hear more of what LC has to say because he has my ear
From Nutella i haven’t picked up
icy *anything* over the course of checking in throughout today
sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:45 pm
I also lean trusting on jack and speed so I like the Nutella lynch
Reads exist, vaguely, and a vote is attributed to two other people. Indeed, the most substantive reasoning offered for the nutella vote is that other people voted for nutella. If we perceive her as a civilian, it's not ideal that he placed the responsibility for his vote in their laps.
~~~
His posts are generally explorations of things and less about
takes on people. It's the kind of look I would associate with manufactured effort.
~~~
sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:46 pm
Well you can expect more of me not being here.
I’m stepping away for the night.
Do what you wish, I don’t care
I don't know what this is. He didn't lead the tally and still felt it was so awful that he'd received votes that he couldn't bear to stay. I question the sincerity.
In it they discuss between themselves the theories surrounding myself and sprityo (now dunya) at the time. The two of them initiated and carried out this conversation by their own volition, to discuss their opposing viewpoints about two players who are probably both town, I now realize. My question is whether or not this looks like two scum partners dancing around each other to look authentic and create some post-mortem separation, as that is what I'd have to read it as if I'm to believe cbob is town.
I'd like to hear thoughts on this, and it's really the most critical point in my read of colonialbob at this stage.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 2]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:41 pm
by Kylemii
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:00 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:17 pm
When J³ made his "farewell I'm dying" post it read as sincere to me too. I wasn't actually convinced we'd done the right thing until he flipped Choco Hills like 3 hours later.
Time to play an Epi.
What is the point of those sentences? You already explained your votes. So now you're just being dramatic. I don't like it.
Not everything has to have a purpose. I was just painting the whole picture.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:43 pm
by dunya
what time is eod here now? I'm getting really confused.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:43 pm
by Kylemii
Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:48 am
Good morning. I still have two pages to read, but so far, people are coming around to LC as a possible baddie. I seem to remember someone else thinking LC could be bad. Oh yeah...it was me!
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:02 am
we're best friends and he's invited to my wedding.
Put us up in a hotel with a kitchen and I'll make your cake!
Well now I have an incentive to actually get married
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:47 pm
by Sloonei
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:43 pm
what time is eod here now? I'm getting really confused.
you should be able to set the page and poll to display your local time in the user control panel, i think
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:51 pm
by Sloonei
I'd want malakim to say more things before I commit to lynching him. I've eased off the town read I was giving him earlier because I didn't like the strength of the case being made against him and still have reservations about the notion that "Jay saved Dom" on Day 3, but overall I don't really have much reason to stand in the way of a case against him if I don't read his confusion about the janitored nightkills as being a town-indicator.
Kyle is a good tinfoil suspect but I'd want a substantive case against him before I consider a vote. If I had time to do that today, I would. I think we could get some good discussion going about him. By "we" I again mean "you all".
Ditto for Long Con. I am presently more inclined to vote LC than Kyle.
Last but not least, anyone who doesn't vote colonialbob is literally the Grinch.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:54 pm
by Sloonei
oh and dunya's voting for wilgy. That's an interesting one. There's been some discussion about him, but I came out of my Jayread feeling like he and wilgy were too strongly opposed to each other to be teammates, though that's not a read I made with great confidence. Care to rehash anything or add anything new to the case, @[mention]dunya[/mention]
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:54 pm
by speedchuck
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:30 pm
Have you played with malakim before, speedchuck?
Once, in SF2 mafia. He was scum. I correctly suspected him for a lot of the early game and a couple of the other scum members later, but I was on top of my town game in that game. Then inactivity happened, town never got anywhere, and I got killed.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:55 pm
by speedchuck
I could feel Malakim, Kylemii, and an inactive. Buuuut I'm still not doing in-depth stuff like Sloon and Dunya are doing. And Kylemii.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:16 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:43 pm
what time is eod here now? I'm getting really confused.
It should be about noon in your timzone I think
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:18 pm
by dunya
Jay, Kyle, INH and Malakim.
That would be amusing.
Sloonei: sure, I'll go through why Wilgy again in a summary shortly
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:18 pm
by Epignosis
INH
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:19 pm
by dunya
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:16 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:43 pm
what time is eod here now? I'm getting really confused.
It should be about noon in your timzone I think
omg, Marmot <3 <3 <3 <3

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:22 pm
by speedchuck
I could definitely follow this by dayend. I have no reason not to.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
by Sloonei
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
by Kylemii
My focus today will be on cbob, sig, Quin, LC in that order.
My focus will also apparently be on not getting lynched, I guess?
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
by speedchuck
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?
linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:33 pm
by Kylemii
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?
linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?
Right....
Malakim is probably below Sig and above Quin in that list order. I forgot cus Mal was one I didn't look into last night
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:35 pm
by Sloonei
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?
linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?
A variant of #3. I think INH is a perfectly valid suspect given that he has 0 posts and I counted the same number of direct references to him in Jay's ISO. But plopping votes on him early when there's plenty more substantive suspects to go after isn't my desired method of scum hunting, and I was hoping a harsh stance would provoke a strong reaction of Epi because he's a whirlwind of content when he gets going and it's fun.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:38 pm
by speedchuck
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:35 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?
linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?
A variant of #3. I think INH is a perfectly valid suspect given that he has 0 posts and I counted the same number of direct references to him in Jay's ISO. But plopping votes on him early when there's plenty more substantive suspects to go after isn't my desired method of scum hunting, and I was hoping a harsh stance would provoke a strong reaction of Epi because he's a whirlwind of content when he gets going and it's fun.
I'm sure Epi will join us. I'm just trying to ward off a semantic discussion of whether scumhunting is stifled by early votes on inactives or not. I am pretty sure Epi would be happy to oblige, but this thread is long enough.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 pm
by Sloonei
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:38 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:35 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:24 pm
Yuck

Is it that you townread INH?
That you think today is a bad day to lynch an inactive, and would rather wait for that coin flip at endgame?
Or that you think Epi having his vote on an inactive stifles discussion for some reason?
linki: what about malakim, Kylemii?
A variant of #3. I think INH is a perfectly valid suspect given that he has 0 posts and I counted the same number of direct references to him in Jay's ISO. But plopping votes on him early when there's plenty more substantive suspects to go after isn't my desired method of scum hunting, and I was hoping a harsh stance would provoke a strong reaction of Epi because he's a whirlwind of content when he gets going and it's fun.
I'm sure Epi will join us. I'm just trying to ward off a semantic discussion of whether scumhunting is stifled by early votes on inactives or not. I am pretty sure Epi would be happy to oblige, but this thread is long enough.
Care to reflect on
this?
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 pm
by Kylemii
I have a theory that with the events of this game so far, 2 no lynches, 2 failed kills, the death of jaggedJimmyJay, the levels of trust and amount of information inferences we've been able to make. I think those things would reasonably make Nadia members frustrated with this game as a whole and probably drop off in effort I think I've been seeing that with Quin, and also on some level Malakim
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:47 pm
by Sloonei
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 pm
I have a theory that with the events of this game so far, 2 no lynches, 2 failed kills, the death of jaggedJimmyJay, the levels of trust and amount of
information inferences we've been able to make. I think those things would reasonably make Nadia members frustrated with this game as a whole and probably drop off in effort I think I've been seeing that with Quin, and also on some level Malakim
I'd argue that the lack of deaths has inhibited the flow of information and resulted more chaos and uncertainty among townies than is usual. I don't think this would frustrate the bad boys and girls.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm
by Sloonei
Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.
He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:52 pm
by speedchuck
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:42 pm
Care to reflect on
this?
I suppose I already have. Just haven't posted anything.
It doesn't rule them out as teammates, but when I read it, it didn't seem like distancing. Cbob seems honest here in his question, and it doesn't really make JJJ look good at the time. I sense no planning or anything BTSC. Even if they were scum, this seems like an honest interaction. More likely if Cbob is town.
I'd certainly rather focus elsewhere today. Cbob is maybe my 5th or 6th most likely scumspect.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:54 pm
by Long Con
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm
Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.
He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.
Long history of calling out dunya as well.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:55 pm
by speedchuck
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm
Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.
He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.
It's probably the best point for Malakim, unless the kill was locked in early. With Jack's legacy post as is, in Malakim's spot, I wouldn't want the last thing an engaged and confirmed town said to be suspecting of me. WIFOM though, as well as the timing of the nightkill getting sent in. Malakim hasn't even been around. Just a thought.
I do remember jack being the only one after Quin. I should probably ISO jack's most recent day.
linki: I still think Dunya's town though.
Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 5]
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:56 pm
by speedchuck
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:54 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:49 pm
Another question for people who are good at analyzing this sort of thing: Why might Jack have been killed? He was still on a lot of people's radar and has been a controversial figure for much of the game.
He was after myself and Quin most recently, as well as malakim.
Long history of calling out dunya as well.
Also was after me. So obviously he could be wrong.