Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Just wait 'til you screw one up with spoiler tags in it. That is a site to behold.ika wrote:omg......... thats so horendis.......
Elho/S~V~S, can you fix that?
Sorry for that, i dont try to get under peopels skin. i try to provoke reaction out of people and sometimes my quesitoning what i say can lead to that.Spacedaisy wrote:thellama73 wrote:I don't quite know what to make of Daisy's soliloquy towards Ika. I don't remember ever seeing her post that much at once. Maybe he's just gotten under her skin, which is understandable, but it seems like atypical behavior from her, and atypical behavior is always worth noticing.
That and the fact my husband has been bugging me to revert back to old Daisy mafia style. I'm trying my hand at it again, but it's been many years since I have been that player, so we'll see if I can keep it up.
Care to recite the old case or back it up with a vote?Dom wrote:Maybe ika. Maybe BWT. Maybe you!Matt wrote:Still haven't read the thread. Who's bad, Dom?
Where did i say DF was your temamate, quote me where i said that. i do not recall em every metioning DF at allDom wrote:Are you bad, Matt?Matt wrote:Maybe. But ika and BWT are drawing the heat currently? I should prolly catch up. So many pages thoDom wrote:Maybe ika. Maybe BWT. Maybe you!Matt wrote:Still haven't read the thread. Who's bad, Dom?
No, I wouldn't say ika is drawing heat. I'd say Ika is the radiator. BWT is because he contradicted himself when discussing a suspicion of me and then speculated that if I'm bad then DF is my teammate. He said, therefore, we should lynch DFaraday.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Just wait 'til you screw one up with spoiler tags in it. That is a site to behold.ika wrote:omg......... thats so horendis.......
Elho/S~V~S, can you fix that?
And very few people know how to fix it. I said BWT thought that.ika wrote:Where did i say DF was your temamate, quote me where i said that. i do not recall em every metioning DF at allDom wrote:Are you bad, Matt?Matt wrote:Maybe. But ika and BWT are drawing the heat currently? I should prolly catch up. So many pages thoDom wrote:Maybe ika. Maybe BWT. Maybe you!Matt wrote:Still haven't read the thread. Who's bad, Dom?
No, I wouldn't say ika is drawing heat. I'd say Ika is the radiator. BWT is because he contradicted himself when discussing a suspicion of me and then speculated that if I'm bad then DF is my teammate. He said, therefore, we should lynch DFaraday.
BWT?Dom wrote: I said BWT thought that.
A "site," you say?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Just wait 'til you screw one up with spoiler tags in it. That is a site to behold.ika wrote:omg......... thats so horendis.......
Elho/S~V~S, can you fix that?
Birdwithteeth-a player here?ika wrote:BWT?Dom wrote: I said BWT thought that.
The player, birdwithteeth.ika wrote:BWT?Dom wrote: I said BWT thought that.
So... you play via metaika wrote:WHat i was refering to and why is more accurate is that its not a "set in stone" thing. I dont use the same thing for every player, i acutal have very diffrent ones depednig on players.
silver for example i have a very spcific baseline on how to read her, alomost liek a checkbox thing. when she fills them in i town read her, when she doesnt i scum read her.
when i haev someone i dont know (like scotty) i use a generic basline of "is the person acting town or scum" and have sevral little things i look for.
using scotty as the example again, he has a lack of awareness and is carefree in posting. so if thats a consitent thing i see in him i would use that to arbirayl read him. if its jsut a "one game thing" i dont use it.
And i will be one of the most vocal people about this, its 100% faillable, its not a catch all of thing. i think there is an "optimal" way to play, but i mena, i dont follow it most of the time myself so im not one to impose it to everyone, but if someone jsut acts like a sith (zebra in heist) then i will kinda be like that to them
im just an agressive players so while i may sometimes be comming off as an "absolute" its just more of a playstle thing. i dont get swayed easy all the time
not entirely. i use meta more as a baseline.Dom wrote: So... you play via meta
null leaning town.Silverwolf wrote:Birdwithteeth-a player here?ika wrote:BWT?Dom wrote: I said BWT thought that.
What's your opinion of him BTW?
yes, his post are longwinded and low, but they are more to the point overallSilverwolf wrote:It's o.k. I'm mostly null on him which is why I asked.
Polo seems kind of townish-do you agree?
What about Epi? I have as null, but you have more experience with him.ika wrote:yes, his post are longwinded and low, but they are more to the point overallSilverwolf wrote:It's o.k. I'm mostly null on him which is why I asked.
Polo seems kind of townish-do you agree?
Didnt you read my list form ealier? gosh..... (jk lol)Silverwolf wrote:What about Epi? I have as null, but you have more experience with him.ika wrote:yes, his post are longwinded and low, but they are more to the point overallSilverwolf wrote:It's o.k. I'm mostly null on him which is why I asked.
Polo seems kind of townish-do you agree?
LOL-OK, sounds like we are on similar wavelengths so farika wrote:Didnt you read my list form ealier? gosh..... (jk lol)Silverwolf wrote:What about Epi? I have as null, but you have more experience with him.ika wrote:yes, his post are longwinded and low, but they are more to the point overallSilverwolf wrote:It's o.k. I'm mostly null on him which is why I asked.
Polo seems kind of townish-do you agree?
no but i have him as null too he seems, disintreted
Yes, this is acutaly one of the primary reason im town reading you, you are on the same wavelenth as me. normally when one of us is scum we tend to have diffrent views to fit our agendaSilverwolf wrote:
LOL-OK, sounds like we are on similar wavelengths so far
is it that you put yourself as scum?Epignosis wrote:I'm disinterested because I made a mistake in my spreadsheet.
spacedaisy will understand.ika wrote:is it that you put yourself as scum?Epignosis wrote:I'm disinterested because I made a mistake in my spreadsheet.
Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
Ah, I see you messed up your spreadsheet in a game in which you were bad and that aroused a lack of interest.Epignosis wrote:Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
wait are you serious?Scotty wrote:Ah, I see you messed up your spreadsheet in a game in which you were bad and that aroused a lack of interest.Epignosis wrote:Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
Yeah, I really did a number on that spreadsheet. It was ugly. I hated myself for weeks over it.Scotty wrote:Ah, I see you messed up your spreadsheet in a game in which you were bad and that aroused a lack of interest.Epignosis wrote:Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
Maybe.Dom wrote:wait are you serious?Scotty wrote:Ah, I see you messed up your spreadsheet in a game in which you were bad and that aroused a lack of interest.Epignosis wrote:Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
I don't even feel like "Fine." is a proper response to what I said.Scotty wrote:Maybe.Dom wrote:wait are you serious?Scotty wrote:Ah, I see you messed up your spreadsheet in a game in which you were bad and that aroused a lack of interest.Epignosis wrote:Fine.Long Con wrote:It can be upsetting to mess up a nice spreadsheet.
Then the link. Cray-zay.
You did not offend me ika, if you had I would have taken it up with a mod or privately. We are just playing a game, and I'm enjoying it.ika wrote:Sorry for that, i dont try to get under peopels skin. i try to provoke reaction out of people and sometimes my quesitoning what i say can lead to that.Spacedaisy wrote:thellama73 wrote:I don't quite know what to make of Daisy's soliloquy towards Ika. I don't remember ever seeing her post that much at once. Maybe he's just gotten under her skin, which is understandable, but it seems like atypical behavior from her, and atypical behavior is always worth noticing.
That and the fact my husband has been bugging me to revert back to old Daisy mafia style. I'm trying my hand at it again, but it's been many years since I have been that player, so we'll see if I can keep it up.
if i offended you sorry. if you likeyou can pm me psot game about it cus i feel like us going into it might be OTish
And I understand your baseline, but I still disagree with holding site Mods to a higher standard. But it's neither here nor there.Huh?Epignosis wrote:spacedaisy will understand.ika wrote:is it that you put yourself as scum?Epignosis wrote:I'm disinterested because I made a mistake in my spreadsheet.
Waiting for the punchEpignosis wrote:Joke
The heads of Long Con and Scotty
Silverwolf wrote:Also ika, explain your Space Daisy read? She's pretty null to me right now.
And why is Sorsha town? I don't even remember Sorsha.
He's one of the higher posters in the thread so far... How is that avoiding the thread?Silverwolf wrote:BTW-my vote on metalmarsh is because he's not doing anything productive at all and appears to be avoiding the thread.
In your experience does scum usually defend against day one bandwagons?Silverwolf wrote:This post is scummy due to the fact that it's an instant defense of the leading wagon.DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
How is DFs post filler when he is giving opinions on actual game events? What is your definition of filler? I usually think of filler as non-game related comments or commenting but not giving an opinion.thellama73 wrote:I'm thinking about either voting for the rotting corpse of Wilgy or for DFaraday.
This post seems like filler to me, and Wilgy so far has been gazonks with his whiffle posting, which is making me think he might be ignatz trillo.DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
Am I doing a good job of keeping up with the new slang?
I think at the time when she said that he was posting elsewhere.Sorsha wrote:He's one of the higher posters in the thread so far... How is that avoiding the thread?Silverwolf wrote:BTW-my vote on metalmarsh is because he's not doing anything productive at all and appears to be avoiding the thread.
How many games have you played with him before this one?
This^DFaraday wrote:So you agree with me, but you're voting me anyway. Okay.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Somehow I went to post before I finished my thought. Need more coffee still...birdwithteeth11 wrote:I agree with this. If Dom is doing something that someone feels is suspicious and pointed it out, then I must have missed it. I'll look back later and see if I can find it though.DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
That being said, if Dom is indeed bad, then this looks like someone trying to offer a subtle defense of a teammate without providing any legitimate backing to it.
I think I know where I'm putting a placeholder vote for now.
@bwtYes, as I explained in a previous post, I've seen it and done it myself as scum.Sorsha wrote:In your experience does scum usually defend against day one bandwagons?Silverwolf wrote:This post is scummy due to the fact that it's an instant defense of the leading wagon.DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
sorry I'm posting one response at a time and not multi-quoting, I'm at work and don't know when I'm going to have to drop my phone and look like I'm actually working. I don't want to have a big post just sitting there waiting for me to get back to it.
At the time of my vote, he had barely posted anything in this thread and it was all fluff. He was posting elsewhere. Since then, he's been posting a lot more which is why I moved my vote.Sorsha wrote:He's one of the higher posters in the thread so far... How is that avoiding the thread?Silverwolf wrote:BTW-my vote on metalmarsh is because he's not doing anything productive at all and appears to be avoiding the thread.
How many games have you played with him before this one?
Silverwolf wrote: Well, I can give you my honest opinion on it. I'm less inclined to care about my voting as town. As scum, I'm a lot more careful about it. So joining a bandwagon right away in a game, leans town for me as it promotes discussion and pressures someone that most likely needs it. This kind of pushing is townie to me. Now, if someone jumps on a major bandwagon with lame reasoning on someone who looks town or flips town, I'm gonna re-examine that a lot more closely next day.
The issue I had with your post is the fact that you started the day defending the leading wagon. It could be you honestly don't believe Dom is scum but I don't get that impression from you. You could be defending a teammate, possible. OR, you could be whiteknighting a wagon as scum which I have done before in past games. Usually in my opening statements because A) It's conversation that is easy to make and looks protown and/or B) I know the wagon is on town and it will give me town points going forward.
Due to your overall posting so far, I'm going with the later for now.
