Re: Ancient Greece Mafia [Day 1]
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:21 am
I'm getting more MK vibes from Dunya's posts than FE. She seems more genuine and less sly.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
This is the first and only thing that made me raise my eyebrow to in regards to Golden.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:41 amYou don’t get it. I’m not defending myself. I’m trying to help you read me better.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:37 amNo man. That's not how this works. I made accusations of you and you tried to discredit me by claiming I misread you all the time. You have failed to show evidence of that. Evidence of me previously reading you well is not required here as I have a good amount of your own posts right here that speak for themselves so I don't need to point at any mystical ability to read you. This is not me making random gut reads on people and pointing at mystic Mac powers. This is you making posts, me finding them suspect, and me finding your reactions as supporting my perspective.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:31 amHa, well I didn’t remember that bit.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:27 amBro, I was scum in Talking Heads. Try again. If you're going to try to discredit my points because you feel there is a pattern to me incorrectly scum reading you as town so far you've only pointed at a game I was scum and a game you were indie.
Look, if you can name a time you’ve ever read me as bad and been right I’ll hand it to you. I don’t believe it exists. This is the reason I’m saying throw out your tellson me - but again you can only do what you’re comfortable doing.
I wouldn't ask of anyone to show evidence that they've caught you before to prove that they make good cases on you. Besides, and I will say it again, even if you HAVE evidence that I read you poorly consistently:
a) It's outdated, it's old
b) I put it to you, that the vast majority of anybody's reads are wrong
c) It's such a small sample size that the two immediate games that sprung to your mind, you were indie in one and I was scum in the other
Moving on. I've made my points. I hope people read them and comment. It would be a shame if they were skimmed.
Anyone who knows me well will probably be reading me as hard town by now. This playstyle does not exist on my baddie spectrum at all.
You can choose to do with it what you will but... if you don’t listen this time, please don’t forget. Remember next time.
One size fits all models are going to end with you losing this game.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:45 am Playing as Mafia 101
Professor Mac:
"Here are 5 common scum tropes that somehow always work on people:
Do you really think I would do X if I was bad?
Fuck this, I'm out
You never read me correctly
Would I have really bussed Steve in that situation?
This isn't my scum meta
Thanks for attending. You all get a c because I am a shit professor."
It read to me as Dunya looking for something to say rather than having something to say.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:49 amThis is a good point.
Dunno about Dunia's point. I thought it was pretty obvious what Dom was getting at. Really weak from Master Town Dunya tbh.
The former and the latter are the same in this paragraph.M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:57 am His defense posts are what smell like town Golden to me. They've got that super vindictive Golden is a town lawyer arguing his case in front of all of town feel to them. When Golden is bad and he's making a case or defending, he's more measured, like an incredibly rational evil lawyer that constantly makes sense. When he's town, he just passionately spews. The latter is what I'm seeing here.
So, question for you...MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:09 am
In case you didn't believe me about the Pingometer. I was even so excited about it I decided to all caps the title.
Feel like actually addressing my original post or ignoring it?sig wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:13 amDom wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:06 amlol
I'm supposed to derive meaning from a post that I pointed out had no meaning in the first place?
That's exactly my point. Sig had a nice way of saying absolutely nothing in multiple paragraphs. Shady.
How do you mean it?MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:22 amYou are a good player and I feel like you are playing with this post.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:25 amBoom! I win!
I have a long history of taking votes on day one when town. You're finding out why right now. My day one record when not town is substantially cleaner.
Oops, there I go talking about my own meta. I ping myself!![]()
In all seriousness though, why are you voting on such basic grounds? Don't you think it would be incredibly easy for me to have played a much cleaner game to date? My behaviour so far has been virtually asking for votes. Kyle even independent read me. Don't I strike you as an 'easy vote' right now?
I mean that in a bad way.
You can't criticize sig for being vague and then do the same. Just because you're using less words than he is doesn't mean it's any better.
I think it's generous to say that it's full of opinions or anything besides fluff.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:31 amSig's post is full of opinions qualified by wishy washy nothing comments and consistently crafted to remain relatively non committal.
My posts are amazing and filled with great things, amazing things, the best things!![]()
Also I'll keep using words like odd or weird, things can be out of place and out of character, but that doesn't mean the person making the weird posts is more likely to be good or bad.
In regards to Turnip head, I found his random vote for MM weird, there's literally nothing else to add to that. It was a strange thing to do, but it seems NAI.
It’s optional.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:03 pm I didn't know we were supposed to read Sloonei's posts
I was more referring to the "placeholder" comment. Golden put a vote on me last night just to see the poll, so he says.
I'm gonna [VOTE: ColinIsCool] aubergine because he dropped this post and then left. The thread wasn't bustling with activity at the time, but there was enough going on that he could have offered a comment or two on something. I want Colin to say things when he has a chance.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:44 pm I should let you all know that I just started a new job so I have less time overall right now, and if it seems like I'm lurking, I more than likely just haven't seen the thread yet.
But like... your second paragraph is basically the same as Colin's postSloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:23 pmI'm gonna [VOTE: ColinIsCool] aubergine because he dropped this post and then left. The thread wasn't bustling with activity at the time, but there was enough going on that he could have offered a comment or two on something. I want Colin to say things when he has a chance.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:44 pm I should let you all know that I just started a new job so I have less time overall right now, and if it seems like I'm lurking, I more than likely just haven't seen the thread yet.
I woke up to ~300 new posts and I have some grown up things to take care of before I go to work today. I sense that I'll be playing from behind early in this game.
Yes. But I am voting for him because he did not offer any thoughts.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:26 pmBut like... your second paragraph is basically the same as Colin's postSloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:23 pmI'm gonna [VOTE: ColinIsCool] aubergine because he dropped this post and then left. The thread wasn't bustling with activity at the time, but there was enough going on that he could have offered a comment or two on something. I want Colin to say things when he has a chance.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:44 pm I should let you all know that I just started a new job so I have less time overall right now, and if it seems like I'm lurking, I more than likely just haven't seen the thread yet.
I woke up to ~300 new posts and I have some grown up things to take care of before I go to work today. I sense that I'll be playing from behind early in this game.
We found Quin, but Quin has not found himself.
My explanation came after Scotty addressed my concerns, and I was happy with his response.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:03 amThis post strengthens my suspicion of dunya. Votes for pressure don't have a lot of teeth when you explain them away as harmless prodders.dunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:01 amI dunno. I prodded Scotty for info on his personality both from Scotty and others, and backed it up with a vote. My vote and questioning his motives and sincerity has created discussion. This is a good thing. We have 48 hours; my vote's moving all over the place before I make a more informed Day 1 decision.
I agree in general, but that won't apply to Day 1. I have found through trial and error, the more questions you ask, the more content you produce, and the more difficult it is for scum to hide. Honestly, sometimes I don't care who is arguing about what even if I see it as two townies going at each other. Content is generated, people will leave trails, some may slip even if we can't see it immediately. The priority early on in the game is to get as many people talking as possible. That's how I play mafia, and that's why I can end up with a few hundred posts in one early phase.
I mean, I see what you're doing, but I'm not sure it's the best strategy. the top 3 posters at the time pinged you the most (Golden, MP and me). The more posts people have, the more pings you will naturally feel. that will leave lower posters in the safe zone.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:39 am I have been making a tally of my strong pings both positive and negative.
Golden is 2/6. (Positives left and negatives right)
Scotty is 1/0.
MP is 4/4.
Sig is 1/1.
Sloonei is 2/0.
Dunya is 1/2.
Speedchuck is 1/1.
Nova is 0/1.
Kyle is 0/1.
Dom is 1/0.
Choutas is 1/0.
No real pings from anyone else.
by means of surrender?
That is one means of defeat.dunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:53 pmby means of surrender?
I did, I guess you hadn't caught up yet, but Scotty's explanation of how he felt left out when he joined sig's forum and was NK'd N1 was a personal experience that he didn't have to share and I believe he is talking from a genuine place when he says he does not want to vote any newcomers now.M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:26 amYou prodded me for info on Scotty, but it doesn't seem to me you've given it any thoughtful consideration.dunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:01 amI dunno. I prodded Scotty for info on his personality both from Scotty and others, and backed it up with a vote. My vote and questioning his motives and sincerity has created discussion. This is a good thing. We have 48 hours; my vote's moving all over the place before I make a more informed Day 1 decision.
So you're indie. Got itwolbre04 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:49 amThank you <3
Yeah that's pretty accurate. My first game of mafia ever on a forum was about five months ago, so I'm still learning steadily. I have never gotten mafia before but I won my second game ever as Serial Killer. I don't know if I can make a joke about the last sentence as it might be against the rules and I don't want to get killed immediately haha. But I don't really have a meta because I'm all over the placedunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:27 am @wolbre04, I look forward to seeing your reads!
also, do you think sig represented you accurately in the blurb below?
sig wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 2:52 pm Also wolbre and I are from the same original site, we've aldo played on mu once together. However, every game we've played together I've been mafia or independent so I never really bothered to learn his meta.
I don't believe he's ever been mafia and is still new to mafia as a whole compared to all of us, he's also deadily as an independent and in my opinion if he's one of those three trading guys he'll side with mafia for the lolz.
It's a bit of an inside joke. When me and Kyle first started playing, I scumread him the first two games we played together (1 game I got him lynched I think) because I thought he was building content with the player inquisitions and game mechanic questions. But that's just Kyle. (he also does it as scum to blend in naturally
Nice catch, but I wouldn't say it confirms anything at all.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:03 pmSo you're indie. Got itwolbre04 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:49 amThank you <3
Yeah that's pretty accurate. My first game of mafia ever on a forum was about five months ago, so I'm still learning steadily. I have never gotten mafia before but I won my second game ever as Serial Killer. I don't know if I can make a joke about the last sentence as it might be against the rules and I don't want to get killed immediately haha. But I don't really have a meta because I'm all over the placedunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:27 am @wolbre04, I look forward to seeing your reads!
also, do you think sig represented you accurately in the blurb below?
sig wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 2:52 pm Also wolbre and I are from the same original site, we've aldo played on mu once together. However, every game we've played together I've been mafia or independent so I never really bothered to learn his meta.
I don't believe he's ever been mafia and is still new to mafia as a whole compared to all of us, he's also deadily as an independent and in my opinion if he's one of those three trading guys he'll side with mafia for the lolz.
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:10 amMP said this about dunya and I find this interesting since it is virtually identical to the objection I just felt in my conversation with dunya.
So, the question is... to those that know dunya, is this our lack of knowledge of her? Dunya's questions *feel* hollow to me, is this me trying to project dunya onto sloonei or something?
Sloonei, actually, it's possible you are best placed to answer this. Interested in Choutas' view too.
Interesting - I think we meant two different things here.
D1 is purely conjecture on my part until someone does something overly messy to me, but Golden and Mac seem to be interested in leading the pack and being outspoken
how does my elaboration make you feel about me?M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:31 am I finally got it now when you just elaborated a bit to Scotty too, sorry.![]()
This all makes sense, thanks.
And re: calling me out, I was just getting confused between prodding and genuinely suspecting, but I have a better idea of what you mean now given your posts as well.
Wishful thinking on your part lmaosig wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:06 pmNice catch, but I wouldn't say it confirms anything at all.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:03 pmSo you're indie. Got itwolbre04 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:49 amThank you <3
Yeah that's pretty accurate. My first game of mafia ever on a forum was about five months ago, so I'm still learning steadily. I have never gotten mafia before but I won my second game ever as Serial Killer. I don't know if I can make a joke about the last sentence as it might be against the rules and I don't want to get killed immediately haha. But I don't really have a meta because I'm all over the placedunya wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:27 am @wolbre04, I look forward to seeing your reads!
also, do you think sig represented you accurately in the blurb below?
sig wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 2:52 pm Also wolbre and I are from the same original site, we've aldo played on mu once together. However, every game we've played together I've been mafia or independent so I never really bothered to learn his meta.
I don't believe he's ever been mafia and is still new to mafia as a whole compared to all of us, he's also deadily as an independent and in my opinion if he's one of those three trading guys he'll side with mafia for the lolz.
I did what?Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:25 amBoom! I win!
I have a long history of taking votes on day one when town. You're finding out why right now. My day one record when not town is substantially cleaner.
Oops, there I go talking about my own meta. I ping myself!![]()
In all seriousness though, why are you voting on such basic grounds? Don't you think it would be incredibly easy for me to have played a much cleaner game to date? My behaviour so far has been virtually asking for votes. Kyle even independent read me. Don't I strike you as an 'easy vote' right now?
Full stop the trireme.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:31 amNo to both. These are weak-ass reasons for any vote. This is basically the definition of confusing 'weird' with 'bad'. This is like a list of reasons for all the mislynches on sig, marmot and wilgy over the years.
I'm being 'sloppy' because I'm having fun, and my vote wasn't in the slightest bit random but was in fact very carefully considered. It just wasn't because I suspect sloonei.
Through it all, I challenge you to accuse me of lack of meaningful content, because I think you'll find I've already got more than most everyone else in the thread.
obvious that it was snarky, because I understood sig's post. I'm not saying it wasn't wordy or could have used some tightening up here and there, but we're not all wizards with our words.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:49 am Dunno about Dunia's point. I thought it was pretty obvious what Dom was getting at. Really weak from Master Town Dunya tbh.
Give me a ping in the negative please. If you can't think of something, take this copy of USA Today, read it on the pot, think a bit, and come back to me. There's gotta be something.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:39 am I have been making a tally of my strong pings both positive and negative.
Golden is 2/6. (Positives left and negatives right)
Scotty is 1/0.
MP is 4/4.
Sig is 1/1.
Sloonei is 2/0.
Dunya is 1/2.
Speedchuck is 1/1.
Nova is 0/1.
Kyle is 0/1.
Dom is 1/0.
Choutas is 1/0.
No real pings from anyone else.
While true, sig is willing to get dirty there. I don't feel like it's safe at all. Are there any posts he has made in this thread that make you feel he might not be a wolf in sheep's clothing?Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:18 am I agree on nova. But he’s also a newbie to me.
The difference of opinion I have is that I actually agree with nova. Sigs post was just a big no u and I don’t think it was a great post from sig either. But what’s the value in calling out the no u in question form? To me it’s like the old lawyer tenet ‘never ask a question you don’t know the answer to’. They’re probably amongst the safest questions asked in the thread.
"Everyone starts independent until given a reason to align with a particular platform"Golden wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:23 am Why? I was independently benign with no anti-town intent or conduct and playing the game with a particular angle which in that case was my win con. You were taken with aspects of my behaviour that I think could better be described as weird. You misread my angle. I don’t see the comparison as strange in the least.
I’m not saying I’m independent here - I’m town... what I’m saying is you get pinged by the behaviour of how you think I should act, but there’s history showing I don’t fit in a box.
sorry, I haven't really had time beyond addressing points directed towards me. This is a huge game and like I said, I'm travelling tomorrow till the 4th of May and today has been busy at work and getting ready for that trip. I haven't even finished catching up the last 5 pages yet (but close), but I have promised a rainbow list after I'm done.M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:28 am I was starting to feel a bit better about dunya, but as I continued to catch up, I realized that her question to content ratio is pretty lacking. Like, how does she even feel about anyone other than Scotty or Dom right now? And both of those seemed a bit forced to me.
that's not what i asked :/