Re: Clue: The Movie [Day 2]
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:06 pm
I was out drinking. Give me a few minutes and I'll get the night post up.
why?MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, surprised that Blooper got lynched after all. Makes me nervous, actually...
You two crack me up. lolS~V~S wrote:No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincereEpignosis wrote:Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.
Can you imagine if we had dinner together?S~V~S wrote:No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincereEpignosis wrote:Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.
I am sure it would be a lovely experience, i am probably about your Moms age, and i knit and make a killer authentic lasagna. I make a charming dinner guest.Epignosis wrote:Can you imagine if we had dinner together?S~V~S wrote:No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincereEpignosis wrote:Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.
We would probably, then, bitch each other out about lasagne techniques.S~V~S wrote:I am sure it would be a lovely experience, i am probably about your Moms age, and i knit and make a killer authentic lasagna. I make a charming dinner guest.Epignosis wrote:Can you imagine if we had dinner together?S~V~S wrote:No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincereEpignosis wrote:Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.
I just find it odd that no one really commented on my thoughts about her all this time and then all of a sudden she gets three votes when it comes right down to it.Bass_the_Clever wrote:why?MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, surprised that Blooper got lynched after all. Makes me nervous, actually...
I have Sicilian grandmother techniques. Hard to beatEpignosis wrote:We would probably, then, bitch each other out about lasagne techniques.S~V~S wrote:I am sure it would be a lovely experience, i am probably about your Moms age, and i knit and make a killer authentic lasagna. I make a charming dinner guest.Epignosis wrote:Can you imagine if we had dinner together?S~V~S wrote:No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincereEpignosis wrote:Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.
![]()
I can't argue until I've tasted! I do make my pasta from scratch though.S~V~S wrote:I have Sicilian grandmother techniques. Hard to beat
It doesnt make sense, but neither does voting MR again to me. SVS voting him or trying to I find strange also. If sabie voted 2nd for the guy before she was taking suspicion, it makes no sense that they were teammates. Blooper as MP pointed out spent a lot of time trying to convince people MR was suspicious, but then sabie vote him 2nd before she received any votes making him the vote leader. So either bloop didn't want to vote right after a teammate for MR or she thought the tides were turning against sabie. All of these votes came in within minutes of each other, so idk.Epignosis wrote:The END? She voted third. You were 10th, MP was 11th, she was 12th. There were two votes after that!Bass_the_Clever wrote:I voted ninja blooper because of the way she hope on the Sabie vote at the end. It seemed like something a baddie would do to gain civvie cred.
It isn't odd at all.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, that's really odd. RIP S~V~S. That sucks.
Yes.Bass_the_Clever wrote:does a lynch count as an attempt on someones life?
Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
Yeah, I just went back and looked. So either the cook served blooper last night or the chief switched the lynch is what I am guessing.Epignosis wrote:Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
Well you think someone switched it?Epignosis wrote:Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
I don't think "SOMEONE" switched it. Come on man.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well you think someone switched it?Epignosis wrote:Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
Imma need you to spell that out for me like this is the Tufts Spelling Bee.Epignosis wrote:I don't think "SOMEONE" switched it. Come on man.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well you think someone switched it?Epignosis wrote:Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
lol. I was just making sure.Epignosis wrote:I don't think "SOMEONE" switched it. Come on man.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well you think someone switched it?Epignosis wrote:Not complicated. So far people haven't been reading the roles. This is textbook business.Hedgeowl wrote:Wait, what? RIP SVS.
Yeah, the fact that people followed me was strange, the fact that they were getting the facts wrong was even stranger. Civvies not paying attention or baddies looking to slide by?nijuukyugou wrote:RIP SVS!
Wow. Did NOT realize people were gonna come after me like that. MP, you're even pointing out the weirdness that these people suddenly come out the woodwork to "agree" with you and muddling the so-called facts (e.g., saying I voted for sabie "at the end." No. Did not happen. I voted for her third out of five people, after discussing and logically changing my mind, with plenty of time to save her had she been my teammate. I'm tired of repeating myself). What are you thinking now, Mr. Sock?
Hedge, you point out my MR vote, and I'll be honest - I forgot about sabie voting for MR in the first poll and didn't think that through when I was posting earlier (I had just spent an hour and half catching up with DW and was both a little brain-dead and needing to leave by 7 to be where I needed to be tonight on time. Excuses, excuses). However, I stand by thinking his behavior/voting patterns have been suspicious and blendy - he voted Epi with no explanation Day 1, then seems inclined to agree and vote with Epi for SVS, then turns around and votes Canuck with no previous inclination towards her, nor an explanation of his own to back it up. Perhaps he's busy. Perhaps he's playing an unconventional baddie game as his teammate votes for him. Perhaps he's Boddy. But he's definitely acting suspicious.
I hope I survive long enough to think about this and see what others have to say, as well as look at others, too. Also, voting gnocchi because I made a batch last week and it. Was. AWESOME.
They are, but they've both posted now barely and haven't come back.Mongoose wrote:I have a hangover from sleeping too much.
Aren't those both new players? They'll come back to the sweet lure of mafia.
YES...everyone come to the exciting Raeford, North Carolina!!!Mongoose wrote:Whoa lynch switch?
Also, can we have a Mass Mafia Meetup soon please? I've loved everyone I've met IRL to absolute pieces.
Personally, I think Bass's vote was stranger for getting the facts "mixed up," and then when it was indicated that no, I didn't "hop on" in the end as stated, (s)he (sorry Bass, I'm not sure of your genderMovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, the fact that people followed me was strange, the fact that they were getting the facts wrong was even stranger. Civvies not paying attention or baddies looking to slide by?nijuukyugou wrote:RIP SVS!
Wow. Did NOT realize people were gonna come after me like that. MP, you're even pointing out the weirdness that these people suddenly come out the woodwork to "agree" with you and muddling the so-called facts (e.g., saying I voted for sabie "at the end." No. Did not happen. I voted for her third out of five people, after discussing and logically changing my mind, with plenty of time to save her had she been my teammate. I'm tired of repeating myself). What are you thinking now, Mr. Sock?
Hedge, you point out my MR vote, and I'll be honest - I forgot about sabie voting for MR in the first poll and didn't think that through when I was posting earlier (I had just spent an hour and half catching up with DW and was both a little brain-dead and needing to leave by 7 to be where I needed to be tonight on time. Excuses, excuses). However, I stand by thinking his behavior/voting patterns have been suspicious and blendy - he voted Epi with no explanation Day 1, then seems inclined to agree and vote with Epi for SVS, then turns around and votes Canuck with no previous inclination towards her, nor an explanation of his own to back it up. Perhaps he's busy. Perhaps he's playing an unconventional baddie game as his teammate votes for him. Perhaps he's Boddy. But he's definitely acting suspicious.
Oh, y'all should totally come to Raeford. It's an experience. I'll make gnocchi for everyone!
I hope I survive long enough to think about this and see what others have to say, as well as look at others, too. Also, voting gnocchi because I made a batch last week and it. Was. AWESOME.
What I'm thinking now is that I don't believe you're bad, and that I look forward to hunting alongside you again, assuming we both survive the night.![]()
What did you think of the votes made against you? Like, does any of them stick out as particularly suspicious? I have my thoughts, but curious to see if you agree.
It was, but Bass voted first for sabie, so unless he thought she would be safe it was a ballsy move. Mongoose would be the other possiblity as she did not vote sabie, but i have a terrible time reading her and shes been pretty busy recently.nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I think Bass's vote was stranger for getting the facts "mixed up," and then when it was indicated that no, I didn't "hop on" in the end as stated, (s)he (sorry Bass, I'm not sure of your genderMovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, the fact that people followed me was strange, the fact that they were getting the facts wrong was even stranger. Civvies not paying attention or baddies looking to slide by?nijuukyugou wrote:RIP SVS!
Wow. Did NOT realize people were gonna come after me like that. MP, you're even pointing out the weirdness that these people suddenly come out the woodwork to "agree" with you and muddling the so-called facts (e.g., saying I voted for sabie "at the end." No. Did not happen. I voted for her third out of five people, after discussing and logically changing my mind, with plenty of time to save her had she been my teammate. I'm tired of repeating myself). What are you thinking now, Mr. Sock?
Hedge, you point out my MR vote, and I'll be honest - I forgot about sabie voting for MR in the first poll and didn't think that through when I was posting earlier (I had just spent an hour and half catching up with DW and was both a little brain-dead and needing to leave by 7 to be where I needed to be tonight on time. Excuses, excuses). However, I stand by thinking his behavior/voting patterns have been suspicious and blendy - he voted Epi with no explanation Day 1, then seems inclined to agree and vote with Epi for SVS, then turns around and votes Canuck with no previous inclination towards her, nor an explanation of his own to back it up. Perhaps he's busy. Perhaps he's playing an unconventional baddie game as his teammate votes for him. Perhaps he's Boddy. But he's definitely acting suspicious.
Oh, y'all should totally come to Raeford. It's an experience. I'll make gnocchi for everyone!
I hope I survive long enough to think about this and see what others have to say, as well as look at others, too. Also, voting gnocchi because I made a batch last week and it. Was. AWESOME.
What I'm thinking now is that I don't believe you're bad, and that I look forward to hunting alongside you again, assuming we both survive the night.![]()
What did you think of the votes made against you? Like, does any of them stick out as particularly suspicious? I have my thoughts, but curious to see if you agree.) waffled back and said "oh no, those other votes that were REALLY at the end were strange, too!" Seems like a way to rouse more suspicion for me while being able to easily double back if (s)he's wrong. What are you thinking?
Also I was the one that pointed out that sabie didn't explain her vote.Hedgeowl wrote:It was, but Bass voted first for sabie, so unless he thought she would be safe it was a ballsy move. Mongoose would be the other possiblity as she did not vote sabie, but i have a terrible time reading her and shes been pretty busy recently.nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I think Bass's vote was stranger for getting the facts "mixed up," and then when it was indicated that no, I didn't "hop on" in the end as stated, (s)he (sorry Bass, I'm not sure of your genderMovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, the fact that people followed me was strange, the fact that they were getting the facts wrong was even stranger. Civvies not paying attention or baddies looking to slide by?nijuukyugou wrote:RIP SVS!
Wow. Did NOT realize people were gonna come after me like that. MP, you're even pointing out the weirdness that these people suddenly come out the woodwork to "agree" with you and muddling the so-called facts (e.g., saying I voted for sabie "at the end." No. Did not happen. I voted for her third out of five people, after discussing and logically changing my mind, with plenty of time to save her had she been my teammate. I'm tired of repeating myself). What are you thinking now, Mr. Sock?
Hedge, you point out my MR vote, and I'll be honest - I forgot about sabie voting for MR in the first poll and didn't think that through when I was posting earlier (I had just spent an hour and half catching up with DW and was both a little brain-dead and needing to leave by 7 to be where I needed to be tonight on time. Excuses, excuses). However, I stand by thinking his behavior/voting patterns have been suspicious and blendy - he voted Epi with no explanation Day 1, then seems inclined to agree and vote with Epi for SVS, then turns around and votes Canuck with no previous inclination towards her, nor an explanation of his own to back it up. Perhaps he's busy. Perhaps he's playing an unconventional baddie game as his teammate votes for him. Perhaps he's Boddy. But he's definitely acting suspicious.
Oh, y'all should totally come to Raeford. It's an experience. I'll make gnocchi for everyone!
I hope I survive long enough to think about this and see what others have to say, as well as look at others, too. Also, voting gnocchi because I made a batch last week and it. Was. AWESOME.
What I'm thinking now is that I don't believe you're bad, and that I look forward to hunting alongside you again, assuming we both survive the night.![]()
What did you think of the votes made against you? Like, does any of them stick out as particularly suspicious? I have my thoughts, but curious to see if you agree.) waffled back and said "oh no, those other votes that were REALLY at the end were strange, too!" Seems like a way to rouse more suspicion for me while being able to easily double back if (s)he's wrong. What are you thinking?
Thank you for explaining your MR vote. I was shocked when SVS voted him again as well, but considering she was civ and sabie didnt follow her vote, maybe just forgetful as well. Idk. MR seems like the least likely candidate in my book, so i dont get the continued suspicion there at all.
Sorry for not knowing your gender! I got confused by your avatarBass_the_Clever wrote:Also blooper I was wondering do you know how you survived being lynched ?
Indeed. Like, 99% sure.MovingPictures07 wrote:Mostly?