The Syndicate

guys please believe me he's using the same tactics that he's used on all of the other forum-based games i've played, there was never any restaurant I swear I am only a humble headshop owner never food, only huge water pipes and hookahs (for tobacco use only) I would never get into the food business I still have a scar on my hand from my first job at Wendy's years ago I don't want to experience that again

ok so maybe I do know him IRL but he's some local weed smoking loser who wanted to use it as a stepping stone for more dangerous drugs and he came into my store one day asking for one of those weird pipes that you don't use for tobacco but other drugs (that I don't know about I only sell things for tobacco use) and he called my water pipes bongs which would imply that they are used for illegal drugs so of course I told him to get out and he gave me this weird look and said 'you'll regret this'

I haven't seen him IRL since but he's been e-stalking me since and you know druggies they can get real crazy real fast

Guys, if you have anon game related wall of text to post, can you please put it in green?

When you are in "Full Editor"mode, you will see a button called "OT". That will color your text green. This way people with limited game time don't have to read posts not related to the game.

Thank You

S~V~S wrote:Guys, if you have anon game related wall of text to post, can you please put it in green?

When you are in "Full Editor"mode, you will see a button called "OT". That will color your text green. This way people with limited game time don't have to read posts not related to the game.

Thank You

but these posts are related to the game, we're in the same game together

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Made wrote:Why did the chicken cross the road????

Made wrote:Shit, wrong thread

I really enjoyed this. But why am I on your list?

Made, you cast a mystery vote for me, but you never answered my question.

Boulders wrote:hookahs (for tobacco use only)

Let's lynch this guy.

Boulders wrote:ok so maybe I do know him IRL but he's some local weed smoking loser who wanted to use it as a stepping stone for more dangerous drugs and he came into my store one day asking for one of those weird pipes that you don't use for tobacco but other drugs (that I don't know about I only sell things for tobacco use) and he called my water pipes bongs which would imply that they are used for illegal drugs so of course I told him to get out and he gave me this weird look and said 'you'll regret this'

I haven't seen him IRL since but he's been e-stalking me since and you know druggies they can get real crazy real fast

You doth protest too much.

Boulders wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Guys, if you have anon game related wall of text to post, can you please put it in green?

When you are in "Full Editor"mode, you will see a button called "OT". That will color your text green. This way people with limited game time don't have to read posts not related to the game.

Thank You

but these posts are related to the game, we're in the same game together

We're all in the game together, but if I start talking about a conversation I had with someone unrelated to THIS thread, it would be off topic. Please help us out here, OK?

Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.

a2thezebra wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.

Do you think they have BTSC?

this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

weed smokin loser? never touched the stuff. i'm a businessman. if i did drugs, i'd do pure coke. but i don't. not my style. adrenaline's my drug. making decisions. that's a drug that'll fuck you down. not up, but down. if it fucked you up, then what? that means you came out of it losing. i don't lose. thing is, i win. potassium wouldn't know what winning was if he won it from one of his "tobacco" magazine sweepstakes. dude's a vindictive mess. see, i took over his bar. that was 6 years ago. i don't drink. i just decide who does. i'd stop gio after half a shirley temple. guy's not cut out for it. just like running a bar. that takes courage. lotsa danger in the biz. sketchy patrons, illegal alien prosties, prior owners w/ connections to reddit cyberstalking gangs... point is, not your daddy's car rental. not gonna call gio a loser. he's got his goons. fine, i got mine. i've offered a fair fight. no litigation, just fists. i offered litigation AND fists. no dice. stubborn, in denial vengeful SLUG. i think gio's probably a civvie. yeah, he's weird. but i say, "let him yap!" it's all the more material to establish myself. i'm in this game to win. i know my goons. you know yours. i admit my gio vote was premature. i'm thinkin nutella. fella had a weak response to my expose. seems a bit suss to me, but what do i know? i'm just a successful bar owner. sabotage? can't hurt me. i been thru it. i always come out on top. i always get fucked down. if you don't buy it, grill me. today i'm charcoal.

It isn't censorship, it's a site standard we use to help each other out. And it is rude to refuse to accomodate others. Just sayin.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.

Do you think they have BTSC?

Either that, or they planned to fuck with us from the beginning when they signed up.

skycatguylover98 wrote:this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

Tell me that isn't the pun that I think it is.

a2thezebra wrote:

skycatguylover98 wrote:this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

Tell me that isn't the pun that I think it is.

these aren't the puns you're looking for

skycatguylover98 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

skycatguylover98 wrote:this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

Tell me that isn't the pun that I think it is.

these aren't the puns you're looking for

lmao

i'm just gonna vote for Boulders because regardless of anything else this whole schtick has become a bit annoying and it doesn't look like he's going to snap out of it

Voted Boulders. Nutella/lc don't have any votes, so voting him because he only seems interested in filling the thread with nonsense.

thanks guys and gals I really appreciate your support

Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

lol

a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'

S~V~S wrote:lol

I don't find this situation to be funny at all

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.

Do you think they have BTSC?

I do not own a single bitcoin (assuming that is what you mean)

Boulders wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'

The previous two votes for you are policy lynch votes, meaning they made no indication that they are even suspicious of your alignment yet voted for you anyway because they don't like the content of your posts. That's a policy lynch. The only other vote for you comes from the one you claim has been "e-stalking" you. I don't know what's going on but like I said, I don't like the smell of it.

linki -

BTSC stands for "Behind the Scenes Contact" meaning if you had BTSC with Skyguy then you would most likely be baddies together, or the immortals.

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

a2thezebra wrote:

Boulders wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'

The previous two votes for you are policy lynch votes, meaning they made no indication that they are even suspicious of your alignment yet voted for you anyway because they don't like the content of your posts. That's a policy lynch. The only other vote for you comes from the one you claim has been "e-stalking" you. I don't know what's going on but like I said, I don't like the smell of it.

trust me I don't like being voted on for baseless claims either

Boulders wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Boulders wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'

The previous two votes for you are policy lynch votes, meaning they made no indication that they are even suspicious of your alignment yet voted for you anyway because they don't like the content of your posts. That's a policy lynch. The only other vote for you comes from the one you claim has been "e-stalking" you. I don't know what's going on but like I said, I don't like the smell of it.

trust me I don't like being voted on for baseless claims either

Reminds me of your vote for Long Con yesterday.

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

I am an admin running a game. I am here alot.

Nothing I could say will change your mind. So why bother?

*Waits for LC to call me defensive*

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

This is a weird unnecessary post Zebra. Why you picking on SVS so much?

Black Rock, what do you make of Scotty being nightkilled?

Typhoony wrote:Voted Boulders. Nutella/lc don't have any votes, so voting him because he only seems interested in filling the thread with nonsense.

I am voting for Typhoony, this post/vote doesn't sit right with me.

S~V~S wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

I am an admin running a game. I am here alot.

Nothing I could say will change your mind. So why bother?

Because you know that isn't true. Way to make this about me and you when it's really just about you. Have you given up playing the game at all just because I suspect you? Why do you insist that everything revolves around my initial suspicion of you from your association with Scotty? If someone tunnels the shit out of me that doesn't make me give up and stop contributing to the scum-hunting effort, and I don't think it's like you to do this either. You're using the implication that you are Scotty's teammate to pretend that all suspicion against you only derives from that when you and everyone else knows that that isn't the case.

If you really believe that nothing you could say will change my mind, why do you continue to focus only on what I'm doing and who I'm voting for as opposed to the many other things currently going on in the game that you could be focusing on instead? Even if your completely baseless and downright insultingly hypocritical claim that I'm not listening to what you're saying was true, (which it isn't) that just means that it makes even less sense to act the way you've been acting. Most of what you've said today could've been said in red or blue font and that's a little unnerving, you know?

skycatguylover98 wrote:this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

weed smokin loser? never touched the stuff. i'm a businessman. if i did drugs, i'd do pure coke. but i don't. not my style. adrenaline's my drug. making decisions. that's a drug that'll fuck you down. not up, but down. if it fucked you up, then what? that means you came out of it losing. i don't lose. thing is, i win. potassium wouldn't know what winning was if he won it from one of his "tobacco" magazine sweepstakes. dude's a vindictive mess. see, i took over his bar. that was 6 years ago. i don't drink. i just decide who does. i'd stop gio after half a shirley temple. guy's not cut out for it. just like running a bar. that takes courage. lotsa danger in the biz. sketchy patrons, illegal alien prosties, prior owners w/ connections to reddit cyberstalking gangs... point is, not your daddy's car rental. not gonna call gio a loser. he's got his goons. fine, i got mine. i've offered a fair fight. no litigation, just fists. i offered litigation AND fists. no dice. stubborn, in denial vengeful SLUG. i think gio's probably a civvie. yeah, he's weird. but i say, "let him yap!" it's all the more material to establish myself. i'm in this game to win. i know my goons. you know yours. i admit my gio vote was premature. i'm thinkin nutella. fella had a weak response to my expose. seems a bit suss to me, but what do i know? i'm just a successful bar owner. sabotage? can't hurt me. i been thru it. i always come out on top. i always get fucked down. if you don't buy it, grill me. today i'm charcoal.

I really don't appreciate you bringing IRL stuff in here, you made me do it which caused all these other (originally) kind people to turn against me. Once again you manipulate people into hating me why do I even try having fun on the internet anymore I know you'll always come around and have me be the first to be kicked out...

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Black Rock, what do you make of Scotty being nightkilled?

I was surprised and I think someone is trying to frame his suspects. I was also suprised by SVS so quick to point the finger at me.

I'm at work on my phone so I'm trying to keep the shorts because I hate typing on my phone

Black Rock wrote:

Typhoony wrote:Voted Boulders. Nutella/lc don't have any votes, so voting him because he only seems interested in filling the thread with nonsense.

I am voting for Typhoony, this post/vote doesn't sit right with me.

thank you black rock

Black Rock wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

This is a weird unnecessary post Zebra. Why you picking on SVS so much?

It is neither weird nor unnecessary, and I am not picking on her. When is asking questions that have yet to be addressed yet alone answered by the person being asked ever unnecessary? What a weird, unnecessary post.

Black Rock wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Black Rock, what do you make of Scotty being nightkilled?

I was surprised and I think someone is trying to frame his suspects. I was also suprised by SVS so quick to point the finger at me.

I'm at work on my phone so I'm trying to keep the shorts because I hate typing on my phone

Since you never mentioned my name, I do not think it was you who did it.

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

I am an admin running a game. I am here alot.

Nothing I could say will change your mind. So why bother?

Because you know that isn't true. Way to make this about me and you when it's really just about you. Have you given up playing the game at all just because I suspect you? Why do you insist that everything revolves around my initial suspicion of you from your association with Scotty? If someone tunnels the shit out of me that doesn't make me give up and stop contributing to the scum-hunting effort, and I don't think it's like you to do this either. You're using the implication that you are Scotty's teammate to pretend that all suspicion against you only derives from that when you and everyone else knows that that isn't the case.

If you really believe that nothing you could say will change my mind, why do you continue to focus only on what I'm doing and who I'm voting for as opposed to the many other things currently going on in the game that you could be focusing on instead? Even if your completely baseless and downright insultingly hypocritical claim that I'm not listening to what you're saying was true, (which it isn't) that just means that it makes even less sense to act the way you've been acting. Most of what you've said today could've been said in red or blue font and that's a little unnerving, you know?

I am not focusing on you. I voted for someone without mentioning you, engaged in the Skyguy/Boulders thing. I did not bring you up. I am trying to talk about other things. When is the last time YOU talked about someone not me or Scotty?

Any you are WRONG. I would rather get lynched and DIE to prove you wrong becasue you are WRONG. So I don't really give a fuck at this point, lol.

It's liberating.

Black Rock wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Black Rock, what do you make of Scotty being nightkilled?

I was surprised and I think someone is trying to frame his suspects. I was also suprised by SVS so quick to point the finger at me.

I'm at work on my phone so I'm trying to keep the shorts because I hate typing on my phone

Why are you picking on her so much?

linki - When is the last time I talked about someone other than you or Scotty? Take a look at my ISO, believe me I've got you covered. You don't sound too liberated.

I never get overly engaged in being a civ unless I have identifiable civ teammates, like I did in LOST. So it will suck for my civ team if I die, but I would rather die & prove you wrong than have to deal with this constant poking.

Being suspected for ridiculous reasons sucks the fun right out of being a civ for me.

S~V~S wrote:I never get overly engaged in being a civ unless I have identifiable civ teammates, like I did in LOST. So it will suck for my civ team if I die, but I would rather die & prove you wrong than have to deal with this constant poking.

God I know that feeling SVS, being picked on constantly. I hope you survive this night

S~V~S wrote:I never get overly engaged in being a civ unless I have identifiable civ teammates, like I did in LOST. So it will suck for my civ team if I die, but I would rather die & prove you wrong than have to deal with this constant poking.

Who's poking who? I simply voted for you and you took that as an opportunity to "lol" about it, in the midst of a ton of other things going on more worthy of content that you could and would be providing. And why are you so dead set on proving me wrong? Why are you willing to hurt the civ cause just for the sake of that? You sound more like a baddie that's given up than a civvie who's given up, and you've only got one person voting for you today.

linki - "Ridiculous reasons"

You know what sucks the fun right out of being a civ for me? When I try to work with people and give them a chance to show me why I'm wrong yet they refuse to accommodate me in any way whatsoever. Like you said yourself, it's rude.

I have told you again and again and again and again and again that I do not suspect you just because of the potential Scotty connection yet you refuse to acknowledge that, which - if you don't want me to tunnel you if you are in fact civ - is the worst thing you could do.

a2thezebra wrote:

S~V~S wrote:lol

Delightful timing as always, S~V~S. Came to laugh at my vote for you when there's a gajillion other things you could be commenting on and probably would be commenting on if you were town? Do you not find those two policy lynch votes sandwiched together to be a bit strange? What are your thoughts on the more-and-more likely Boulders lynch?

a2thezebra wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.

I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.

this is exactly what's happening, at least on Boulders' end, he's just playing stupid about it. My vote might be "policy", but as someone who knows him outside of the game I see exactly what's happening and it's darn annoying... I don't even think he's bad because if he was he likely wouldn't be this obnoxious about things - maybe he rolled a role he thought was boring and decided to try and spice it up? If he doesn't end up lynched, more power to him, on the day that is today I just do not really care..

as far as me and typhoony's votes being placed at the same time... lol, I think if we were both baddies we would probably be a bit less conspicuous about voting and posting pretty much the exact same thing about a minute apart.

That's cool, I just don't like how you actually think that Boulders would NOT do this if we were bad yet you're voting for him anyway.