Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Literally wrong.Golden wrote: There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed.
Thanks for reminding me who I wanted to ISO next.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
Some of them could actually be undercover cops, for all we know.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
How many undercover cops could there actually be?Golden wrote:Some of them could actually be undercover cops, for all we know.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
Probably a dutchieScotty wrote:How many undercover cops could there actually be?Golden wrote:Some of them could actually be undercover cops, for all we know.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
Like, there aren't even that many arrested parties + cops alive, are there? Some of these people are actually scum from a separate world and don't seem to have a grasp on this game. Like that Prisoner who just voted you because 'nub Golden'
D...Dad?!Prisoner 813142 wrote:Scotty you say? Where is that little bugger? I'm an excellent jusge of Scotty's alignment. I'm his father after all. He used to be terrible at being evil but he came around just as I retired after learning that my long lost twin brother was an international man of mystery.Quin wrote:Voted for Scotty, btw.
Let's talk, Quin. Click here.Quin wrote:
I wouldn't trust the motivations of any of us, until our actions indicate that we are trustworthy. As for me, I need to figure the outside world out, so I will refrain from posting until I have read some.Scotty wrote:How many undercover cops could there actually be?Golden wrote:Some of them could actually be undercover cops, for all we know.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
Like, there aren't even that many arrested parties + cops alive, are there? Some of these people are actually scum from a separate world and don't seem to have a grasp on this game. Like that Prisoner who just voted you because 'nub Golden'
Yeah, that doesn't look good for me in relation to Fuzz. He totally slipped my mind when looking at all the post counts.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Checking Scotty's interactions with Fuzz:
The latter sentence here confuses me. If you specifically remember that Fuzz mislynch in your first online Mafia game, then wouldn't that make you more conscious of Fuzz afterword and not less?Spoiler: show
Anyway, that exchange is all Scotty said about Fuzz prior to his lynch, and Scotty had a decent number of posts. His reaction to the mafia flip:
Ehh. Almost forcibly jubilant. I'm not great at reading into that type of thing, but this post doesn't do wonders for me.Spoiler: show
-----------------
Scotty's a viable team mate of Fuzz. They didn't really interact much at all except in that goofy exchange above. I could see that as being the result of unconscious avoidance, something Fuzz took note of and tried to amend -- but it comes out awkwardly.
No need for name calling. There are many reasons for being locked up, doesn't mean we are all "bad."Scotty wrote:How many undercover cops could there actually be?Golden wrote:Some of them could actually be undercover cops, for all we know.Scotty wrote:Some of these guys aren't even playing for the hometeam. Some of these people are actually prisoners. I don't like this.
Look, if you're gonna vote for a player today, at least give them a reach around first.
Like, there aren't even that many arrested parties + cops alive, are there? Some of these people are actually scum from a separate world and don't seem to have a grasp on this game. Like that Prisoner who just voted you because 'nub Golden'
What's the matter? Huh? What's wrong? You don't like that? You gonna cry? Huh? You gonna cry?Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
I don't trust the 2 that have voted for Golden. Or the guy that voted for me.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I gotta run. Those of you who are sold on Golden as the warden should say why, because I have no idea.
I doubt there will be tears.Prisoner 813142 wrote:What's the matter? Huh? What's wrong? You don't like that? You gonna cry? Huh? You gonna cry?Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Hello, Scott. I know I've been away for a long time. I haven't called or written or given any outward indication that I value you, but I want you to know that I've changed. I apologize for killing that therapy group we were in back in the 90s. That was poor judgment on my part. Come here and give your old man a hug!Scotty wrote:D...Dad?!Prisoner 813142 wrote:Scotty you say? Where is that little bugger? I'm an excellent jusge of Scotty's alignment. I'm his father after all. He used to be terrible at being evil but he came around just as I retired after learning that my long lost twin brother was an international man of mystery.Quin wrote:Voted for Scotty, btw.
You're on your civilian game, that's great.Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Yes it does.Prisoner 483934 wrote:You're on your civilian game, that's great.Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Doesn't make you a civilian yo.
Time to feed you a little bit of NO!Golden wrote:Yes it does.Prisoner 483934 wrote:You're on your civilian game, that's great.Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Doesn't make you a civilian yo.
Time to feed you a little bit of YES!Prisoner 483934 wrote:Time to feed you a little bit of NO!Golden wrote:Yes it does.Prisoner 483934 wrote:You're on your civilian game, that's great.Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Doesn't make you a civilian yo.
In prison this would count as disrespect, and me and my boys would find you in the mess hall brother.Golden wrote:If the 14 of you actually account for 14 votes, that would be massively unbalanced. I'm guessing that you don't.
Fixed it. 9 votes that [probably] don't belong to civs.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 9 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
Yes. It's why I figure that can't be that they each have a vote that counts as one.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 8 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
All the more reason I'd argue to my fellows to consolidate our effort.Golden wrote:Yes. It's why I figure that can't be that they each have a vote that counts as one.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 8 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
There are enough prisoners to outnumber the amount of players, so I have my doubts that their votes count at all.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 8 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
Guys are we going to let these new fish disrespect us like this? I didn't bust out of the slammer for this nonsense.Quin wrote:There are enough prisoners to outnumber the amount of players, so I have my doubts that their votes count at all.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 8 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
Have you met MovingPictures07 before?Golden wrote:If the 14 of you actually account for 14 votes, that would be massively unbalanced. I'm guessing that you don't.
Do you mind if I answer this in a few hours? I'm at uni and my lecture is about to start, plus I'm on my phone which is awful enough to type with.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Checking Quin's interactions with Fuzz:
I'm not a fan of this post for a couple of reasons:Spoiler: show
1. Quin backed off of an assertion that I think is sometimes agreeable (blatantly strange behavior is often a towntell) and I don't know why he felt this compulsion to change his mind.
2. This sort of dialogue with a confirmed baddie is a bit suspicious at face value. It's tame, it's safe, and most importantly it features the impression of distance (Fuzz challenging a Quin point) but without any sort of actual accusation.
It's easy to look at a post like this and come to an immediate negative stance. Quin staunchly defended a confirmed baddie. That doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing though, because in my experience when a player is this dead wrong on a read it usually is reflective of genuine wrongness. On the occasion it is indeed maliciously-motivated, it tends to come from players who have a special knack for WIFOM (like MacDougall for example). I don't know that I'd associate Quin with that type of player, though I acknowledge that I haven't played with him. I'd like to hear what Sloonei thinks of this specific thought given his experience playing with Quin.Spoiler: show
Again a strong pro-Fuzz stance is asserted. The same principles apply. By this point it appears a Fuzz lynch was well in hand? Please correct me anyone if I am mistaken. If that's the case, then one could argue that Quin didn't want to make the always-suspicious late-phase pile-on vote for a team mate. However, it is at least consistent with Quin's prior defensiveness of Fuzz and I don't think that assumption should be automatic.Spoiler: show
I'll look at one post-Fuzz-lynch post too here. Given that Quin was so incorrect about Fuzz, I think there's value in checking his reaction to the baddie flip. He stood by his guns and a little frustration showed through the cracks too. At least in terms of tone, I am not perturbed.Spoiler: show
---------------
The first post is the worst of it that I can see. However, I am not overwhelmingly sold on a Quin lynch. His defenses of Fuzz do not bear the standard appearance of a mafia-mafia interaction. It's possible, but it's atypical.
So... laze around and then fuck up the lynch? No, thanks, I've waited too long to get out of the clink to waste my time messing the outside world up. I'll be reading back through the game tonight and tomorrow to try to offer some actual assistance.Prisoner 277058 wrote:I'm just gonna say this. Fellow prisoners, we've got a lot of power in our hands. I'm going to suggest that we let these law abiding citizens figure out the hard stuff, and then we swing in with our big muscles and take out whoever.
How 'bout no!Golden wrote:Time to feed you a little bit of YES!Prisoner 483934 wrote:Time to feed you a little bit of NO!Golden wrote:Yes it does.Prisoner 483934 wrote:You're on your civilian game, that's great.Golden wrote:Oh great, the prisoners are going to break out and lynch me.
Fucking fantastic.
There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed. Everyone who knows me knows it.
Doesn't make you a civilian yo.
Scott, you just don't get it, do you? Your father is back and all you can do is worry about these silly details. It reminds me of the time you kept challenging me on my plan to kill your uncle in an easily-escapable trap. Bad guys don't ask questions. They just frickin' do stuff. You might be a civvie after all. Clearly you've lost your touch since that whole losing your hair incident.Scotty wrote:So let's do a little summary here.
There are currently 5 prisoners that we know are part of the mafia families (6, if you count dead LC). That leaves 8 prisoners without an apparent win-con or motive, that [probably] can vote in this lynch.
Does that not bother anyone else?
Will we be toasting to good or evil?thellama73 wrote:I for one welcome our jailbird colleagues and invite them to join me in a drink.
This is what I'm thinking. If I get to the end and no one's asked it yet, I'll ask the hosts this question.Golden wrote:If the 14 of you actually account for 14 votes, that would be massively unbalanced. I'm guessing that you don't.
Yes?Prisoner 813142 wrote:Will we be toasting to good or evil?thellama73 wrote:I for one welcome our jailbird colleagues and invite them to join me in a drink.
I saw what time the poll closes, and I will not be out of town yet! So I shall indeed be here for poll close. 
I would love a real drink... All these years drinking prison pruno :shudders: I've forgotten what real liquor tastes like.thellama73 wrote:I for one welcome our jailbird colleagues and invite them to join me in a drink.
This would be ironic but maybe true. However, all these prisoners talking are confusing me.Turnip Head wrote:I don't think these prisoners escaped. I think we joined them, and now we're all in Hell.