Re: STAR WARS Mafia [Day 9]
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:40 pm
Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
There's the other issue... that Matt brought up too. Which has played a part in my thinking...Spacedaisy wrote:Ok... I tried to look at the benefits you put forward here Mac, I really did. And I seriously entertained the idea, as much as I ever have before. Here is my hang up though. You are putting forward two benefits to keeping her around:
1. She may draw the Empire NK because they will fear her, thus sparing a civ
2. She may use her own kill to take out who is suspected as Empire.
Now here are my issues with these two things:
1. Who stands to gain the most from leaving her until the next day lynch? The empire, because she clearly is going to be one of the biggest vote earners, since she is even now on the chopping block. This could potentially buy them another day, I doubt they would use their kill on her unless she really has their number and they think there is a real chance she will kill them. That's a pretty big assumption in my book. Too big to risk a civ loss on.
2. This idea depends upon two things. First, if we can trust her (a confirmed baddie) to do what she says and use it to take out empire. And second, that she actually has an accurate knowledge of who the Empire is. For all we know she could be suspecting the wrong people.
We also have to take her at her word when she says she is the last one on her team. This could be an attempt to stall her own impending death by another cycle and hopefully buy another teammate an extra day.
All of this stuff requires we trust someone who has outed herself as bad. As nice as the idea to use her for our own purposes sounds, I have no reason to trust her enough to risk doing it. it comes down to vote a confirmed baddie or an unknown. I have to vote the confirmed baddie.
Voting zebra
Linki: I see I'm not alone in my assessment of this situation. Good to know.
Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
Congrats.Bullzeye wrote:Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.MacDougall wrote:Congrats.Bullzeye wrote:Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
How petulant of you. You'd be horrible to play Monopoly with.Bullzeye wrote:I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.MacDougall wrote:Congrats.Bullzeye wrote:Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
If that were the case she wouldn't have wasted a get out of the lynch free card on the last cycle I wouldn't think. I could be wrong but it's a risk I'm willing to take. More than lynching an unknown just out of fear of that possibility anyway.MacDougall wrote:There's the other issue... that Matt brought up too. Which has played a part in my thinking...Spacedaisy wrote:Ok... I tried to look at the benefits you put forward here Mac, I really did. And I seriously entertained the idea, as much as I ever have before. Here is my hang up though. You are putting forward two benefits to keeping her around:
1. She may draw the Empire NK because they will fear her, thus sparing a civ
2. She may use her own kill to take out who is suspected as Empire.
Now here are my issues with these two things:
1. Who stands to gain the most from leaving her until the next day lynch? The empire, because she clearly is going to be one of the biggest vote earners, since she is even now on the chopping block. This could potentially buy them another day, I doubt they would use their kill on her unless she really has their number and they think there is a real chance she will kill them. That's a pretty big assumption in my book. Too big to risk a civ loss on.
2. This idea depends upon two things. First, if we can trust her (a confirmed baddie) to do what she says and use it to take out empire. And second, that she actually has an accurate knowledge of who the Empire is. For all we know she could be suspecting the wrong people.
We also have to take her at her word when she says she is the last one on her team. This could be an attempt to stall her own impending death by another cycle and hopefully buy another teammate an extra day.
All of this stuff requires we trust someone who has outed herself as bad. As nice as the idea to use her for our own purposes sounds, I have no reason to trust her enough to risk doing it. it comes down to vote a confirmed baddie or an unknown. I have to vote the confirmed baddie.
Voting zebra
Linki: I see I'm not alone in my assessment of this situation. Good to know.
What if she's intentionally getting herself lynched?
I once sold all my properties to my brother for £1 because I owned a fair portion of the board but had no money and our dad was probably going to win if I didn't and he was gloating a lot. So yeah. Forced a stalemate where neither of them could win in the end.MacDougall wrote:How petulant of you. You'd be horrible to play Monopoly with.Bullzeye wrote:I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.MacDougall wrote:Congrats.Bullzeye wrote:Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
In the UK, you have the NHS. Do you have this Community Chest card?Bullzeye wrote:I once sold all my properties to my brother for £1 because I owned a fair portion of the board but had no money and our dad was probably going to win if I didn't and he was gloating a lot. So yeah. Forced a stalemate where neither of them could win in the end.MacDougall wrote:How petulant of you. You'd be horrible to play Monopoly with.Bullzeye wrote:I just hope that I do get lynched so you can see you were wrong and put so much force and effort into being wrong.MacDougall wrote:Congrats.Bullzeye wrote:Go for it. It will be fun. A civ will die, but you'd make some people happy.Russtifinko wrote:Hmmm...I'm tempted to vote Bullz because shenanigans. Also we can just lynch zebra tomorrow. Also I LOVE Canuck's posts today.
Nope. Context is all still there and anyone who wants to check can do so. All I did was point out something that looked funny and you got mad. But that's okay. Looks like I'm surviving today anyway so we can do all this again tomorrow.MacDougall wrote:No, you exactly did take it out of context. Like dictionary definition did that.Bullzeye wrote: Linki - I didn't take anything out of context. It was at least 50% a joke too.
I don't think so but I would have to check to be certain and that would require a 5 hour drive.Epignosis wrote:
In the UK, you have the NHS. Do you have this Community Chest card?
Is it just me or is all this logic Spacedaisy makes here entirely reliant on her knowing Bullzeye isn't Empire?Spacedaisy wrote:Ok... I tried to look at the benefits you put forward here Mac, I really did. And I seriously entertained the idea, as much as I ever have before. Here is my hang up though. You are putting forward two benefits to keeping her around:
1. She may draw the Empire NK because they will fear her, thus sparing a civ
2. She may use her own kill to take out who is suspected as Empire.
Now here are my issues with these two things:
1. Who stands to gain the most from leaving her until the next day lynch? The empire, because she clearly is going to be one of the biggest vote earners, since she is even now on the chopping block. This could potentially buy them another day, I doubt they would use their kill on her unless she really has their number and they think there is a real chance she will kill them. That's a pretty big assumption in my book. Too big to risk a civ loss on.
2. This idea depends upon two things. First, if we can trust her (a confirmed baddie) to do what she says and use it to take out empire. And second, that she actually has an accurate knowledge of who the Empire is. For all we know she could be suspecting the wrong people.
We also have to take her at her word when she says she is the last one on her team. This could be an attempt to stall her own impending death by another cycle and hopefully buy another teammate an extra day.
All of this stuff requires we trust someone who has outed herself as bad. As nice as the idea to use her for our own purposes sounds, I have no reason to trust her enough to risk doing it. it comes down to vote a confirmed baddie or an unknown. I have to vote the confirmed baddie.
Voting zebra
Linki: I see I'm not alone in my assessment of this situation. Good to know.
You are pulling names out of a hat. You complained about there being no case on you but now you just named 7 players who you seem to have decided were scum based on 45 minutes of play. You can't be serious.Bullzeye wrote:Just in case there are weird unpredictable shenanigans and I do end up dead, I think I've left enough to show who I think should be lynched next. To summarise: Zebra, Mac, Faraday, Bubbles, Daisy, Canuck, Bass. In something possibly resembling that order. Obviously they can't all be bad but those are my suspects. Now I'm going to bed like I should have done 3 hours ago.
Okay sure lynch me tomorrow then if I don't die today. Your case on me is the most blatant baddie push I've ever seen. It is full of misrepresentations and lies. You've never even addressed the fact that your claims I tried to discredit things were super flawed. Every time I respond to you you ignore the bulk of what I've said, get mad, and find a new thing to accuse me of. You are bad. I have also listed people whose votes were shady, blendy, and who don't have civ-friendly approaches to this game. There really is no case on me other than that I slightly defended MP because I thought he was civ. There is nothing Empire about me. Now I'm seriously going to bed.MacDougall wrote:You are pulling names out of a hat. You complained about there being no case on you but now you just named 7 players who you seem to have decided were scum based on 45 minutes of play. You can't be serious.Bullzeye wrote:Just in case there are weird unpredictable shenanigans and I do end up dead, I think I've left enough to show who I think should be lynched next. To summarise: Zebra, Mac, Faraday, Bubbles, Daisy, Canuck, Bass. In something possibly resembling that order. Obviously they can't all be bad but those are my suspects. Now I'm going to bed like I should have done 3 hours ago.
We missed an Empire lynch here mein civilians.
If I knew it, sure. But my point was to show that you were presenting the idea of keeping her around as the really only civilian way to look at it, but you were ignoring some pretty big possibilities. If I were Empire, why would I spell out an Empire friendly plan. I could just as easily roll with a bullz vote. But I don't like the risk you were asking us to take. It's interesting that you want to paint me as bad for pointing out the holes in your plan.MacDougall wrote:Is it just me or is all this logic Spacedaisy makes here entirely reliant on her knowing Bullzeye isn't Empire?Spacedaisy wrote:Ok... I tried to look at the benefits you put forward here Mac, I really did. And I seriously entertained the idea, as much as I ever have before. Here is my hang up though. You are putting forward two benefits to keeping her around:
1. She may draw the Empire NK because they will fear her, thus sparing a civ
2. She may use her own kill to take out who is suspected as Empire.
Now here are my issues with these two things:
1. Who stands to gain the most from leaving her until the next day lynch? The empire, because she clearly is going to be one of the biggest vote earners, since she is even now on the chopping block. This could potentially buy them another day, I doubt they would use their kill on her unless she really has their number and they think there is a real chance she will kill them. That's a pretty big assumption in my book. Too big to risk a civ loss on.
2. This idea depends upon two things. First, if we can trust her (a confirmed baddie) to do what she says and use it to take out empire. And second, that she actually has an accurate knowledge of who the Empire is. For all we know she could be suspecting the wrong people.
We also have to take her at her word when she says she is the last one on her team. This could be an attempt to stall her own impending death by another cycle and hopefully buy another teammate an extra day.
All of this stuff requires we trust someone who has outed herself as bad. As nice as the idea to use her for our own purposes sounds, I have no reason to trust her enough to risk doing it. it comes down to vote a confirmed baddie or an unknown. I have to vote the confirmed baddie.
Voting zebra
Linki: I see I'm not alone in my assessment of this situation. Good to know.
Linki:
Wilgy: Uberscum.
I'm sorry MMMetalmarsh89 wrote:Ra ra ra
Rezz please.
Gotta gotta gotta gotta keep remind these live folks.a2thezebra wrote:I'm sorry MMMetalmarsh89 wrote:Ra ra ra
Rezz please.
It is my pleasure to join you in death.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Gotta gotta gotta gotta keep remind these live folks.a2thezebra wrote:I'm sorry MMMetalmarsh89 wrote:Ra ra ra
Rezz please.
Might, Might not, I dunno.Spacedaisy wrote:Hosts, would we be told if a team had been eliminated?
I note that was not part of the post if so...
My thoughts exactly Dom.Dom wrote:Would you look at that-- she lied about her role, and the team's not gone.
Someone should use the Tractor Beam to pull me out of the heavens and return me to the land of the living.Epignosis wrote:Chaching
Tractor Beam - Target a player on the poll, and the Tractor Beam will pull up to 3 votes off them. Cannot be used on yourself, and double effect on Jawas. One-time use only.
PM your bids to the hosts.
I'll leave that decision up to DH. He writes the posts.Spacedaisy wrote:Hosts, would we be told if a team had been eliminated?
I note that was not part of the post if so...
Thank the Jedi Lord. Let's head to the Cantina and have a drink on me.DharmaHelper wrote:The hosts have been eliminated.
There's a black guy in it that isn't Billy Dee Williams.DharmaHelper wrote:Sidenote, if anyone posts anything related to the Force Awakens before I go see it I will fuck you up.
Indeed. Sorsha for Crumb then?Dom wrote:Would you look at that-- she lied about her role, and the team's not gone.
Agreed.Russtifinko wrote:Goshdammit, I missed another poll. I am the worst. Good job getting Bib though.
Also, I second what DH said. No one should post anything about Force Awakens because there's a chance (however small) that I might read it.
Or that's what Zebra intended for us to think...DFaraday wrote:If the Hutt team isn't eliminated (and I doubt they are), it's just odd that Zebra would essentially destroy the Hutts' chances like that. But yeah, Sorsha is probably Crumb.
But THAT'S what Zebra wanted us to think...MacDougall wrote:Or that's what Zebra intended for us to think...DFaraday wrote:If the Hutt team isn't eliminated (and I doubt they are), it's just odd that Zebra would essentially destroy the Hutts' chances like that. But yeah, Sorsha is probably Crumb.
Heh. Yeah.Dom wrote:But THAT'S what Zebra wanted us to think...MacDougall wrote:Or that's what Zebra intended for us to think...DFaraday wrote:If the Hutt team isn't eliminated (and I doubt they are), it's just odd that Zebra would essentially destroy the Hutts' chances like that. But yeah, Sorsha is probably Crumb.