Page 88 of 186

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:07 pm
by Gunther
Okay, what the hell did Indiglo do to the thread. The power of Christ compels you! The power of Christ compels you!

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:07 pm
by Epignosis
Can we get a mod? Clean up on aisle indiglo! Just go in and remove the first and last spoiler tags and that should work. I would do it myself, but I don't want to get MP'd. :puppy:

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:08 pm
by indiglo
^^ Does that post look weird to anyone else?


Linki~

Ok, apparently yes. :haha: WTF???

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:10 pm
by Gunther
Indiglo writes posts that mess up the thread. Scotty don't!

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:10 pm
by Sloonei
whoa

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:11 pm
by Epignosis
indiglo wrote:^^ Does that post look weird to anyone else?


Linki~

Ok, apparently yes. :haha: WTF???
It's a known spoiler tag issue. I initially had the same problem when I was previewing my response to Chronos and you- had to take out one of the spoiled portions.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:11 pm
by indiglo
See, what did I say? I am quite a character.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:12 pm
by indiglo
Epignosis wrote:
indiglo wrote:^^ Does that post look weird to anyone else?


Linki~

Ok, apparently yes. :haha: WTF???
It's a known spoiler tag issue. I initially had the same problem when I was previewing my response to Chronos and you- had to take out one of the spoiled portions.
Aha! Well, I'd fix it myself, but you know... no editing. And I don't want the hammer.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:13 pm
by Spacedaisy
Fixed. That was crazy, I've never seen that before, though clearly others have...

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:15 pm
by Epignosis
I've got stuff to do now. When I come back, DDL... Ima go straight TJ Eckleburg on yo ass. :eye:

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:16 pm
by Tangrowth
Yeah, you can't use more than one set of spoiler tags in one post, otherwise the system can't handle it. It becomes confused because if you start with an activation, then ANOTHER activation, before the first activation can be closed with the / spoiler, the website doesn't know what to do with it, and so it pukes.

Also, when you use spoiler tags, it's heavily recommended to make sure everything is surrounded in quotes first. I've gotten in a habit of highlighting everything I want to spoil, clicking "Quote", then clicking "Spoiler", because otherwise it's very hard to read on the black/lucid lime background.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:17 pm
by Tangrowth
I should clarify:

You can use more than one set of spoiler tags in a post, but only if they're completely separated. You can't have a set of spoilers within another set of spoilers.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:17 pm
by Rachel Green
@Epig, I stand by my accusation homie, Ive grown to know cops by smell thanks to years in the hoosegaw. But I'm going to move on to Enrique/BoomsLang now. No worries.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:19 pm
by indiglo
Thanks! Sadly, no one else will ever get to see how weird that looked.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:23 pm
by Tangrowth
indiglo wrote:Thanks! Sadly, no one else will ever get to see how weird that looked.
Oh, it's happened a handful of other times, so no worries. :P

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:33 pm
by Scotty
indiglo wrote:Thanks! Sadly, no one else will ever get to see how weird that looked.
Did It look like this?
Spoiler: show
Image[/quote]

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:35 pm
by Gunther
Okay Scotty, just zip it.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:37 pm
by sig
Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:38 pm
by Sloonei
Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:17 pm
by Nerolunar
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:18 pm
by Golf
"Long Con has been arrested; he was Crew, a member of The Sockfaced Famiglia."

Plus he just died because he derp'd.

You guys sure pick your silly topics, for a mafia playing bunch. Image

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:22 pm
by Nerolunar
There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:31 pm
by Gunther
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.
I believe we call them "seemers" around here. Pesky little bastards.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:32 pm
by Chuck
Sloonei wrote:
Prisoner 331347 wrote:This one has spent much time trying to catch up with current events. I do not like the results of the most recent days. Not one bit.

In looking at the most recent lynch, I cannot help but think that there may be something in the case made against this agleaminranks. This indiglo character pointed out a handful of inconsistencies amongst agleaminranks' posts, and concluded that he must be bad. I am inclined to agree the case against this agleaminranks looks somewhat damning from a typical civilian perspective, though I am not inclined to agree that inconsistency is the tell sign of a cop in disguise.

That being said, this one thinks that the people who sided with this agleaminranks fellow in the late hours of Day 4 are of suspicion. Hypothetically, a cop would be aware that agleaminranks was a mafia member, and expressing sympathy for him looks quite good to civilians in the wake of the revealing of his identity. It would be a daring place for a bad guy to hide, but a practical one for someone looking to stay active and yet outside of the crosshairs. We will be examining them closely before deciding upon a vote.
Who are some living/unarrested players whose names stand out to you in all this?
This one is suspicious of Turnip Head, who seemed to express sentiments (read: "a good read") on agleaminranks, only to flip his stance to "uneasy" once more voices began to place their votes. Additionally thellama, as they had been claiming to read agleaminranks as a civilian from the beginning.

This one is also slightly suspicious of Epignosis and a2thezebra, though less so than the aforementioned, as they have expressed their dissatisfaction with the nature of the vote and the logic against the case for agleaminranks' badness. I am more inclined to believe they were genuinely frustrated civilians.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:33 pm
by Chuck
Ah, editing by way of another post: Nerolunar is one name I would like to toss into the suspicious ring, for similar reasons as Turnip Head.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:33 pm
by Sloonei
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
But what is the evidence that Long Con is the undercover cop?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:39 pm
by Sloonei
Prisoner 331347 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Prisoner 331347 wrote:This one has spent much time trying to catch up with current events. I do not like the results of the most recent days. Not one bit.

In looking at the most recent lynch, I cannot help but think that there may be something in the case made against this agleaminranks. This indiglo character pointed out a handful of inconsistencies amongst agleaminranks' posts, and concluded that he must be bad. I am inclined to agree the case against this agleaminranks looks somewhat damning from a typical civilian perspective, though I am not inclined to agree that inconsistency is the tell sign of a cop in disguise.

That being said, this one thinks that the people who sided with this agleaminranks fellow in the late hours of Day 4 are of suspicion. Hypothetically, a cop would be aware that agleaminranks was a mafia member, and expressing sympathy for him looks quite good to civilians in the wake of the revealing of his identity. It would be a daring place for a bad guy to hide, but a practical one for someone looking to stay active and yet outside of the crosshairs. We will be examining them closely before deciding upon a vote.
Who are some living/unarrested players whose names stand out to you in all this?
This one is suspicious of Turnip Head, who seemed to express sentiments (read: "a good read") on agleaminranks, only to flip his stance to "uneasy" once more voices began to place their votes. Additionally thellama, as they had been claiming to read agleaminranks as a civilian from the beginning.

This one is also slightly suspicious of Epignosis and a2thezebra, though less so than the aforementioned, as they have expressed their dissatisfaction with the nature of the vote and the logic against the case for agleaminranks' badness. I am more inclined to believe they were genuinely frustrated civilians.
I am interested in Turnip Head. I've been wanting to call him a scum read all game but I haven't seen him do anything that's highly alarming. At the moment I don't think anyone knows what he's thinking. Makin' me uneasy.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:40 pm
by Golf
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:43 pm
by Rachel Green
Just read through Enrique... yeah, his posts around the Fuzz lynch are highly suspicious. Voted him for no reason, bailed as soon as it became a thing, but it's his immediate post-lynch result posts that are ping-y. He calls the lynch bullshit, but also reminds people that he was the first Fuzz voter, in back to back posts.

I'd be fine with voting Boomslang.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:50 pm
by Golf
I still don't get how, even with Boomslang replacing and not showing up much, everyone's thoughts on end of Day 2 Enrique went whoosh.

Did Golden the Warden hunt or tempvoted Enrique/Boomslang, as he said he would?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:09 pm
by Matt
I don't really know what's going on, all the prisoners are a blur, and blah.

Going ika again.

In case peeps didn't realize, ika's bestie Silverwolf has voted him now, too. :)

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:09 pm
by Sloonei
Enrique got lumped in with Sig and Quin at the end of Day 2, and since those other two were both here at the time, they attracted most of the attention. Then Long Con and Gleam got in the way of anyone doing anything about it.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:22 pm
by Nerolunar
Sloonei wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
But what is the evidence that Long Con is the undercover cop?
I don´t know, its not my theory. I believe LC was the role he was revealed to be when he died. A crew member I think?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:27 pm
by S~V~S
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:30 pm
by Sloonei
Nerolunar wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
But what is the evidence that Long Con is the undercover cop?
I don´t know, its not my theory. I believe LC was the role he was revealed to be when he died. A crew member I think?
Whose theory is it? They should get in here and explain it.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:38 pm
by Chuck
Could someone update this one on the case on ika? Surfing back, he and the Silverwolf have been tight as twine since early on. I see a serious gang against him on the second day, only to have Fuzz come in and blow his own brains out, so to speak.

This one wonders what Silverwolf's position is as well, and if the change of heart is a method of distancing. :eye:

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:40 pm
by chaindeath
12 it would seem is the number of pages chaindeath can read before his eyes glass over and he cannot get any useful information from the game's forum. He is going to eat and play some BOI and come back in an hour or two. :burger:

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:41 pm
by ika
Prisoner 331347 wrote:Could someone update this one on the case on ika? Surfing back, he and the Silverwolf have been tight as twine since early on. I see a serious gang against him on the second day, only to have Fuzz come in and blow his own brains out, so to speak.

This one wonders what Silverwolf's position is as well, and if the change of heart is a method of distancing. :eye:
Nah. shes jsut having a paranoia going on

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:49 pm
by Sloonei
chaindeath wrote:12 it would seem is the number of pages chaindeath can read before his eyes glass over and he cannot get any useful information from the game's forum. He is going to eat and play some BOI and come back in an hour or two. :burger:
The most valuable thing you can respond to imo is Scotty's ISO when you get back. Please and thank you.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:50 pm
by Chuck
This one is tentatively voting for Turnip Head.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:03 pm
by sig
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:06 pm
by Scotty
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.
:suspish:

Why didn't you out your role when we tried to lynch you twice?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:08 pm
by S~V~S
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.
When? When he was lynched? Why would anyone think that before he was lynched? Perhaps Nero can explain this for me, becasue I am still confused about this.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:11 pm
by sig
Scotty wrote:
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.
:suspish:

Why didn't you out your role when we tried to lynch you twice?
I'm not saying anyone should out there role and who is to say I didn't leave a crumb trail. :P
Of course thinking about it more if LC wasn't Crew I'd think the real Crew member would speak up.
Also him dying as a prisoner probably means he wasn't the seemer. Which isn't helpful.

@Silver why are you lynching Ika?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:13 pm
by Scotty
Is it just me or does this post:
chaindeath wrote:12 it would seem is the number of pages chaindeath can read before his eyes glass over and he cannot get any useful information from the game's forum. He is going to eat and play some BOI and come back in an hour or two. :burger:
Look eerily similar in cadence and form to this post:
Prisoner 331347 wrote:Could someone update this one on the case on ika? Surfing back, he and the Silverwolf have been tight as twine since early on. I see a serious gang against him on the second day, only to have Fuzz come in and blow his own brains out, so to speak.

This one wonders what Silverwolf's position is as well, and if the change of heart is a method of distancing. :eye:
Both talk in 3rd person, both end in an emojI, 2 minutes apart. The only difference is, prisoner 331347 has already done more digging and hypothesizing than chaindeath has on the game.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:16 pm
by Scotty
sig wrote:
Scotty wrote:
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.
:suspish:

Why didn't you out your role when we tried to lynch you twice?
I'm not saying anyone should out there role and who is to say I didn't leave a crumb trail. :P
Of course thinking about it more if LC wasn't Crew I'd think the real Crew member would speak up.
Also him dying as a prisoner probably means he wasn't the seemer. Which isn't helpful.

@Silver why are you lynching Ika?
I thought it was quite obvious when his role was revealed after being modkilled that he is not a seemer.

Anyway, I didn't see LC as the seemer anyway. Was it just you positing that theory?

Are you saying you left a crumb trail? Are we playing that game right now?

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:16 pm
by Young Lady
nub LC

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:18 pm
by Scotty
Sig, is your crumb trail the scummy posts you made in the first few days, so that when you flip scum we can comb through all your posts and exclaim "aha! And here's another scummy thing he said!"

Because I don't like those kinds of breadcrumbs. They didn't come from any bread I'd eat.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:19 pm
by sig
Scotty wrote:
sig wrote:
Scotty wrote:
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:Could someone give me there take on Nero and LC's interaction? I'll highlight the few things I found strange later when I'm not doing school as well as finish my ISO of Nero.

So question if LC was a cop and the real role is alive does that mean Nero is a teammate and they planned it so we believe Nero had BTSC with LC when in fact he didn't? Or am I overthinking things.
Yes, you are overthinking.
Okay that doesn't make me think better of you then.
Sloonei wrote:Why is LC widely suspected of being the undercover cop?
I wouldn't say widely suspected, but I do think it is possibly.
S~V~S wrote:
Prisoner 740359 wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:There is a scumrole in the setup that can pose as another role when lynched.

Actually while we are on this topic, I mostly threw shade at Chaindeath at the time. My goal was not to defend LC, but I did notice Chaindeaths behavior. That was my first ping of him - he decided to vote for LC when the only thing LC had posted was his disagreement to the plan that everyone should be voted for, to trigger the traitors. Very weak reasoning from Chaindeath that he didn´t follow up on rubbed me the wrong way and still does.
Was Long Con's flip disputed (or hinted at "seeming" wrong) after he was arrested? A Crew should have been in BTSC with the Capo, right, so technically two players should have disputed (or hinted) at something being amiss.
He was revealed as Crew; why would his partners dispute that? Or am I foolishly missing some very basic thing here?
Long Con -- Crew -- Lynched - Day 3 -- Killed in a shooting as Prisoner 888206 - Day 5
I think he is trying to say if LC is Crew why didn't the people who had BTSC with him say anything or hint it when the LC might be undercover cop thing came up.
:suspish:

Why didn't you out your role when we tried to lynch you twice?
I'm not saying anyone should out there role and who is to say I didn't leave a crumb trail. :P
Of course thinking about it more if LC wasn't Crew I'd think the real Crew member would speak up.
Also him dying as a prisoner probably means he wasn't the seemer. Which isn't helpful.

@Silver why are you lynching Ika?
I thought it was quite obvious when his role was revealed after being modkilled that he is not a seemer.

Anyway, I didn't see LC as the seemer anyway. Was it just you positing that theory?

Are you saying you left a crumb trail? Are we playing that game right now?
Unless you're playing a different game?
:shrug:

linki: Nope not that since I won't flip scum.

Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:27 pm
by Rachel Green
Sometimes a strong set of baddies can push a thread into new directions and make people forget pings. Since some of us are seeing the game with new eyes we aren't beholden to that. I strongly think Enrique/BoomsLang is bad and needs to be lynched.