Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Is there a tell Miranda has, or a meta thing, that makes it obvious to you that she may be bad? Because the way you word this, "if not Miranda", sounds almost as if you also think she may be bad?
Miranda started playing WW this year? Or last year's end. So still more on the new player side, self proclaimed Bad liar. I think when I wolfed with them their tone eas good~ , but then as villager I think the differences were there mostly in the way they involve themselves.
Yeah, sadlyNeon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:10 amBut y tho?santygrass wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:30 pm Hi, I claim slank D1 cover.
I have ONE (1) read and that is Neon = Town and not much else
By odds alones its unlikely that they are both w/w , and to that I'll add Sporty just mentioning PSV early when they could say that PSV hasnt posted enough instead.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:50 amSpoiler: show
No, not explicitly, but by trusting their read on someone else, you kinda did implicity put a town read on ONE or both of them. Either on Sporty, cause you trust their read, or on PSV, becasue you have reason to trust Sportys read of them. Especially based on a tell that according to Sporty, didn't happen once for five days?
What if they're both bad? What if Sporty is wolfy, and is pocketing PSV with their "currently" town read?
I might feel this more if Sporty hadn't put in that 'once it took five days' caveat.
I've been in a similar situation myself recently, and if the SDN folk all "meh" this, I won't worry about it. But for now, it looks a bit fishy to me.
I am understanding. It just seems premature; us from TS have to rely initially on your reads of each other to an extent, and this seems perhaps a bit too easy of a clear from you.santygrass wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:56 amBy odds alones its unlikely that they are both w/w , and to that I'll add Sporty just mentioning PSV early when they could say that PSV hasnt posted enough instead.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:50 amSpoiler: show
No, not explicitly, but by trusting their read on someone else, you kinda did implicity put a town read on ONE or both of them. Either on Sporty, cause you trust their read, or on PSV, becasue you have reason to trust Sportys read of them. Especially based on a tell that according to Sporty, didn't happen once for five days?
What if they're both bad? What if Sporty is wolfy, and is pocketing PSV with their "currently" town read?
I might feel this more if Sporty hadn't put in that 'once it took five days' caveat.
I've been in a similar situation myself recently, and if the SDN folk all "meh" this, I won't worry about it. But for now, it looks a bit fishy to me.
I have wolfed (It was a cult but eh, same thing) with both Sporty and PSV as scum, and what Sporty did most was say 'Eh I'm still looking' or similar statements, because they value the tell and even as a wolf would'nt want to fake it imo.
And I did say I was putting PSV as town, so you are not understanding me or not reading me
Her only posts are asking why she's being voted for. That's not enough for me to form a read on her. Regardless, Neon explicitly said that she believed if miranda was village, that a wolf was already on her. I wanted specifics because that's a vague statement.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:46 amIs there a tell Miranda has, or a meta thing, that makes it obvious to you that she may be bad? Because the way you word this, "if not Miranda", sounds almost as if you also think she may be bad?
Mother, when will the lies stop?SportPonies wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 9:09 pm Hello Syndicate users,
I am Sporty. This is my fifth WW game and I favor highposters.
santygrass wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:56 amBy odds alones its unlikely that they are both w/w , and to that I'll add Sporty just mentioning PSV early when they could say that PSV hasnt posted enough instead.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:50 amSpoiler: show
Might have quoted the wrong post here. I agree with Sporty/PSV not being W/W.
No way sporty comes out of the gate calling out one of her packmates. One way or the other.
No, not explicitly, but by trusting their read on someone else, you kinda did implicity put a town read on ONE or both of them. Either on Sporty, cause you trust their read, or on PSV, becasue you have reason to trust Sportys read of them. Especially based on a tell that according to Sporty, didn't happen once for five days?
What if they're both bad? What if Sporty is wolfy, and is pocketing PSV with their "currently" town read?
I might feel this more if Sporty hadn't put in that 'once it took five days' caveat.
I've been in a similar situation myself recently, and if the SDN folk all "meh" this, I won't worry about it. But for now, it looks a bit fishy to me.
I have wolfed (It was a cult but eh, same thing) with both Sporty and PSV as scum, and what Sporty did most was say 'Eh I'm still looking' or similar statements, because they value the tell and even as a wolf would'nt want to fake it imo.
And I did say I was putting PSV as town, so you are not understanding me or not reading me
If I recap your ISO, it is
**Formatting fixed now?**Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:50 amsantygrass wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:56 amBy odds alones its unlikely that they are both w/w , and to that I'll add Sporty just mentioning PSV early when they could say that PSV hasnt posted enough instead.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:50 amSpoiler: show
Might have quoted the wrong post here. I agree with Sporty/PSV not being W/W.
No way sporty comes out of the gate calling out one of her packmates. One way or the other.
No, not explicitly, but by trusting their read on someone else, you kinda did implicity put a town read on ONE or both of them. Either on Sporty, cause you trust their read, or on PSV, becasue you have reason to trust Sportys read of them. Especially based on a tell that according to Sporty, didn't happen once for five days?
What if they're both bad? What if Sporty is wolfy, and is pocketing PSV with their "currently" town read?
I might feel this more if Sporty hadn't put in that 'once it took five days' caveat.
I've been in a similar situation myself recently, and if the SDN folk all "meh" this, I won't worry about it. But for now, it looks a bit fishy to me.
I have wolfed (It was a cult but eh, same thing) with both Sporty and PSV as scum, and what Sporty did most was say 'Eh I'm still looking' or similar statements, because they value the tell and even as a wolf would'nt want to fake it imo.
And I did say I was putting PSV as town, so you are not understanding me or not reading me
I'm not convinced, but if nothing else this push seems very townSeanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:56 amI'm not convinced, but if nothing else this push seems very townSeanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
There is still plenty of time left today for you to come around or for me to be proven wrong.All the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
I guess I wasn’t clear; I had no issue with Sportyor their read. I was more questioning Santys clearing someone based on a third party qualified read.Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 am**Formatting fixed now?**Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:50 amsantygrass wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:56 amBy odds alones its unlikely that they are both w/w , and to that I'll add Sporty just mentioning PSV early when they could say that PSV hasnt posted enough instead.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:50 amSpoiler: show
Might have quoted the wrong post here. I agree with Sporty/PSV not being W/W.
No way sporty comes out of the gate calling out one of her packmates. One way or the other.
No, not explicitly, but by trusting their read on someone else, you kinda did implicity put a town read on ONE or both of them. Either on Sporty, cause you trust their read, or on PSV, becasue you have reason to trust Sportys read of them. Especially based on a tell that according to Sporty, didn't happen once for five days?
What if they're both bad? What if Sporty is wolfy, and is pocketing PSV with their "currently" town read?
I might feel this more if Sporty hadn't put in that 'once it took five days' caveat.
I've been in a similar situation myself recently, and if the SDN folk all "meh" this, I won't worry about it. But for now, it looks a bit fishy to me.
I have wolfed (It was a cult but eh, same thing) with both Sporty and PSV as scum, and what Sporty did most was say 'Eh I'm still looking' or similar statements, because they value the tell and even as a wolf would'nt want to fake it imo.
And I did say I was putting PSV as town, so you are not understanding me or not reading me
Might have quoted the wrong post here. I agree with Sporty/PSV not being W/W.
No way sporty comes out of the gate calling out one of her packmates. One way or the other.
I'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
How did you make the neon signs?Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
Neon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:06 amI can't do mathsJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:05 pm
Everyone's post cap for Day 1 is 150 more than your number shows on this list. I will provide the actual caps in the first post of the thread.
Numbers is villains!Use the advanced editor, then there is a buttom that looks like a star (it is the left-most on the bottom row of buttons for me, but it might be different depending on OS and device? idk)Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:13 amHow did you make the neon signs?Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
Use the advanced editor, there is a blue button with white text that says "vote".Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:16 am How do I make votes appear here?
I didn't play the tutorial level.
I am a doctor of numbers. I find you to be a villain.Zenge wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:20 amNeon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:06 amI can't do mathsJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:05 pm
Everyone's post cap for Day 1 is 150 more than your number shows on this list. I will provide the actual caps in the first post of the thread.Numbers is villains!
If my vote were a joke, you'd know. Every vote of mine has a reason.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
The only thing that was true there is that she is Sporty. This being her fifth WW game and loving high posters were aggressively lies. I’m 76% sure she’s vig shot people for high posting.Neon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:00 amOh we are gonna be best friendsSportPonies wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 9:09 pm Hello Syndicate users,
I am Sporty. This is my fifth WW game and I favor highposters.
I asked you to explain your vote. I am willing to work with you, but right now this seems one sided since when you have asked me to explain, I have done so. Please show me the same courtesy.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:25 amIf my vote were a joke, you'd know. Every vote of mine has a reason.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
I believe you're misrepresenting so please show your work.
I don't need meta to try and form reads on people. I'm going to ask you something point blank again. Are you village reading Dennis? If so, tell me exactly what's he's done that's outside of his wolf range. I want Dennis to bring the energy I saw him fluffing with yesterday.
Do you agree that Miranda's wagon is suspicious and that it happened too quickly?
What exactly are you calling OMGUS?
I am neither scumreading or townreading Dennis.
Actually this is sort of hypocritical on review. Falcon votes me immediately after this. They’re tasking issue with my saying I’m uncomfortable with how fast the three votes seemed to pile onto Miranda, and not asking each of the voters for the reasons for their votes.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:32 pmWell, I s'pose you could ask those voting Miranda as to their reasons...but you're not doing that.Zenge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:28 pmIt just felt like a lot piling onto one person in a very short amount of timeAnimal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
Why?
I already answered in this very post that you quoted.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:34 amI asked you to explain your vote. I am willing to work with you, but right now this seems one sided since when you have asked me to explain, I have done so. Please show me the same courtesy.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:25 amIf my vote were a joke, you'd know. Every vote of mine has a reason.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
I believe you're misrepresenting so please show your work.
I don't need meta to try and form reads on people. I'm going to ask you something point blank again. Are you village reading Dennis? If so, tell me exactly what's he's done that's outside of his wolf range. I want Dennis to bring the energy I saw him fluffing with yesterday.
Do you agree that Miranda's wagon is suspicious and that it happened too quickly?
What exactly are you calling OMGUS?
I am neither scumreading or townreading Dennis.
I believe Miranda's wagon likely has AI info.
I think the highlighted text makes it very clear what I'm calling OMGUS.
In Midwife’s defense she has a pretty unique play style and cadence that can come off as stiff, and at times people, especially people who aren’t used to playing with her, find it extremely Wolfy despite it being NAI.
Sorry, I think you need to be yeeted. I feel like you're deliberately talking past me.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:39 amI already answered in this very post that you quoted.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:34 amI asked you to explain your vote. I am willing to work with you, but right now this seems one sided since when you have asked me to explain, I have done so. Please show me the same courtesy.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:25 amIf my vote were a joke, you'd know. Every vote of mine has a reason.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 amIf I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
I believe you're misrepresenting so please show your work.
I don't need meta to try and form reads on people. I'm going to ask you something point blank again. Are you village reading Dennis? If so, tell me exactly what's he's done that's outside of his wolf range. I want Dennis to bring the energy I saw him fluffing with yesterday.
Do you agree that Miranda's wagon is suspicious and that it happened too quickly?
What exactly are you calling OMGUS?
I am neither scumreading or townreading Dennis.
I believe Miranda's wagon likely has AI info.
I think the highlighted text makes it very clear what I'm calling OMGUS.
What information would you get from a miranda village flip? What info would you get from a miranda wolf flip?
Why did you quote Neon? Also, if you don't have a read on Dennis, why is me pressuring him an issue?
He said "no u" immediately after so I presumably have his attention. That's a sign of a success.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:46 amSorry, I think you need to be yeeted. I feel like you're deliberately talking past me.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:39 amI already answered in this very post that you quoted.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:34 amI asked you to explain your vote. I am willing to work with you, but right now this seems one sided since when you have asked me to explain, I have done so. Please show me the same courtesy.Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:25 amIf my vote were a joke, you'd know. Every vote of mine has a reason.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:10 amI'm not. I'm just recapping your ISO. Did you not fluff into your Dennis vote?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:04 amAll the fluff was from D0. I don't know why you're acting like I've been wasting D1 avoiding any solving.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:53 am
If I recap your ISO, it is
*fluff* then
a vote on Dennis, whom you likely don't know and some people from TS have expressed suspicion on, but IMO they look fine thus far.
A weird post saying that the first thing that probably actually matters (the 3-vote wagon) wasn't important.
then a lot of questions that don't seem to be designed to go anywhere and hedgy non-takes where you comment on things but the comments are all "This isn't AI" or "that's not enough to form a read".
This looks like an archetype wolf entrance into the game.
Which people from TS said Dennis was an issue before my vote? And are you confidently saying he's village when he's barely posted any content? Why does my familiarity with Dennis matter?
Where did I say that any wagon doesn't matter?
You're selectively reading and misinterpreting because the people I said were NAI have posted minimal to zero content. Either you're TMIing them or you're stumbling whole making up reasoning to push me that a full lie. I'm wondering if it's a roundabout way to protect Dennis.
Don't remember, don't know what this question does to further our conversation though unless you think I'm lying.
My point is that while I could see someone familiar with Dennis possibly seeing something meta-related to justify suspicion at this point, I don't think someone not familiar with Dennis would. If you are seeing something, then please share with the class. If not, it seems like an opportunistic vote.
You didn't say exactly that, but this post IMO feels like discouraging discussion about the first real thing that happened:
Is this OMGUS I see?Animal Midwife wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:27 pm3 out of 24 votes is hardly anything to get worked up about especially with over 47 hours left.
I believe you're misrepresenting so please show your work.
I don't need meta to try and form reads on people. I'm going to ask you something point blank again. Are you village reading Dennis? If so, tell me exactly what's he's done that's outside of his wolf range. I want Dennis to bring the energy I saw him fluffing with yesterday.
Do you agree that Miranda's wagon is suspicious and that it happened too quickly?
What exactly are you calling OMGUS?
I am neither scumreading or townreading Dennis.
I believe Miranda's wagon likely has AI info.
I think the highlighted text makes it very clear what I'm calling OMGUS.
What information would you get from a miranda village flip? What info would you get from a miranda wolf flip?
Why did you quote Neon? Also, if you don't have a read on Dennis, why is me pressuring him an issue?
You didn't say anything about Dennis, aside from ask me about them. Unless if your reason was "I want Dennis to bring the energy I saw him fluffing with yesterday." which... uhh... you think a naked vote is going to have that sort of effect on anyone?
I don't know what info Miranda's wagon has, but I am shit sure it has info.
You literally asked me to! you asked me to provide receipts, I provided receipts. You're just asking for busy work as a distraction, or what?
Don't put words into my mouth, please. I pointed out that your vote on Dennis could be opportunistic. This has been explained. Why are you trying to go in circles? Just to obfuscate my points?
You quoted one person. You 've been saying, even in this post, TSers plural. Outside of that, you also misrepresented because your claim was that I opportunistically jumped on "TSers were throwing around suspicion." I voted before Neon did; the only person that you can quote suspecting him.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 9:00 am I'm not going to talk to someone who asks me to provide evidence that TSers were sussing Dennis, then asks why I provided evidence that TSers were sussing Dennis after I provide evidence that TSers were sussing dennis, then claims I didn't provide evidence that TSers were sussing dennis.
Mmmm yesS~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:15 amYeah. Creature voted for her 4 minutes after the day started, and when he did say why later, it was because she impressed him least on zero.Neon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:33 amCreature
Her posts were a bunch of “getting to know you” fluff, like almost everyone else’s. So not getting that.
Yay waking up to only 110 posts. Catching up.
santygrass wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:53 amMiranda started playing WW this year? Or last year's end. So still more on the new player side, self proclaimed Bad liar. I think when I wolfed with them their tone eas good~ , but then as villager I think the differences were there mostly in the way they involve themselves.
Rn I am poking there to see what happens since I haven't read almost anything from her.
Yeah, sadlyNeon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:10 amBut y tho?santygrass wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:30 pm Hi, I claim slank D1 cover.
I have ONE (1) read and that is Neon = Town and not much else
This is the correct interpretation of my meaning and I understood the thought behind your post so not sure why others aren'tAnimal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 7:46 amHer only posts are asking why she's being voted for. That's not enough for me to form a read on her. Regardless, Neon explicitly said that she believed if miranda was village, that a wolf was already on her. I wanted specifics because that's a vague statement.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:46 amIs there a tell Miranda has, or a meta thing, that makes it obvious to you that she may be bad? Because the way you word this, "if not Miranda", sounds almost as if you also think she may be bad?
Yo. I'm probably not safe or in bed. I mean I'm about to murder a Werewolf.Mayo the Mayo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:11 am Abigail,
It has been a trying night. My only comfort in those long hours was the knowledge that you were safely back at home.
Whilst I was in the depths of my despair, I had the most wonderful surprise!
As I am sure you must already be aware, mother has decided to come join me. I was worried she wouldn't recognize me. Time and distance have aged me nearly beyond recognition.
I could sense the trepidation in her face as she first looked upon me, and I must confess, the waters of my soul were near breaching the levees to my sanity when she at first seemed not to recognize my face. Alas, a mother's love does is not yet limited by spacial or temporal boundaries.
The wildlife here is wonderful, but I cannot shake the underlying sense of foreboding whenever I brave the wilderness. Abigail, I hear voices. I see visions.
Terrible visions.
Please keep me in your thoughts as you must know you are in mine.
-Mayo
PS Les voix disent bonjour à maman
Why would you do that to yourselfSeanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:23 amI am a doctor of numbers. I find you to be a villain.Zenge wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:20 amNeon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:06 amI can't do mathsJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:05 pm
Everyone's post cap for Day 1 is 150 more than your number shows on this list. I will provide the actual caps in the first post of the thread.
(for legal reasons, the ``villain'' accusation is not game-related... but also not personal.)
Mmm we are still gonna be best friends especially if I get shot for top postingZenge wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:29 amThe only thing that was true there is that she is Sporty. This being her fifth WW game and loving high posters were aggressively lies. I’m 76% sure she’s vig shot people for high posting.Neon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:00 amOh we are gonna be best friendsSportPonies wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 9:09 pm Hello Syndicate users,
I am Sporty. This is my fifth WW game and I favor highposters.
This is true. Also true is that my sus on dennis started as a jokeAnimal Midwife wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 9:07 amYou quoted one person. You 've been saying, even in this post, TSers plural. Outside of that, you also misrepresented because your claim was that I opportunistically jumped on "TSers were throwing around suspicion." I voted before Neon did; the only person that you can quote suspecting him.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 9:00 am I'm not going to talk to someone who asks me to provide evidence that TSers were sussing Dennis, then asks why I provided evidence that TSers were sussing Dennis after I provide evidence that TSers were sussing dennis, then claims I didn't provide evidence that TSers were sussing dennis.
Could you clarify the Sean village read to me? I'm not sure if I'm getting tilted.
