Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
lolzDharmaHelper wrote:Nothing, whats the MOTU with you?Snow Dog wrote:What's MOTU?S~V~S wrote:He had one in MOTU, i did not play that one, but I modded it.
Of course!Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezz please.
It was Zodac. And he had it in a game I played, I had the role, lol. I have to go look now.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Scroll waaaaaaaaaaaaaay up.juliets wrote:Well damn MM, I'm really sorry I voted for you. RIP.
I'm not sure i understand this tag team event.
linki: dh did you pick by PM? so whoever you picked has to be lucky enough to guess you picked them?
Damn you, I wanted Llama!DharmaHelper wrote:Picked my partner.
Also, RIP MM
I had to snatch you up quick.thellama73 wrote:Well nevermind. DH got there first. I am flattered, DH! I would be honored to partner with you.
Well don't I just feel like the prettiest girl at the ball?Snow Dog wrote:Damn you, I wanted Llama!DharmaHelper wrote:Picked my partner.
Also, RIP MM
Oh was that his secret? Funny i remeber many non lynches.S~V~S wrote:It was Zodac. And he had it in a game I played, I had the role, lol. I have to go look now.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Exactly what I was getting at, I think it's fair to say we now shouldn't assume anything if you or Llama were NK'edS~V~S wrote:I am not sure how he extrapolated that from that. I have been involved in way more civ Llama lynches than bad ones. This post just seemed like a really good way to set me up to be NKed & get llama blamed for it.Made wrote:Biggest ping so far. What are exactly are you trying to say here MMMetalmarsh89 wrote:So we should pay attention. If you are NK'd it will probably be llama's doing?S~V~S wrote:I tend to ignore Llamas humor though () and pay attention to his suspicions.
pinged. Sure suspicion isn't objective, but you can't say that something isn't suspicious just because a lot of things are also suspicious.Long Con wrote:It's only suspicious to you if you decide to think it's suspicious. Early votes are suspicious. We all know late votes are suspicious. Voting for someone who already has a vote is suspicious. Staying quiet and voting for someone who's not around much is suspicious. It's really ugly that you would try to pin suspicion on me for the timing of my vote, and then make a sweeping statement like this to make it seem normal.DharmaHelper wrote:Early voting is suspicious. We can argue this back and forth all we want but at the end of the day, early voting is suspicious.
I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Wait, why I am getting NKed now? What did I do?Made wrote: Exactly what I was getting at, I think it's fair to say we now shouldn't assume anything if you or Llama were NK'ed
He is hellatown and I am supatown. We are an amazing tag team.Made wrote: linki- well shit, rip MM. I still think DH is hellatown.
Ok what is AYBS?S~V~S wrote:I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Say what?Epignosis wrote:From the Card Czar:
Why do I hurt all over?
Submit your "white cards" by PM by the end of the Night.
Are You Being Served. I was:Snow Dog wrote:Ok what is AYBS?S~V~S wrote:I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Oh I played that. Got killed early so dont recall that role.S~V~S wrote:Are You Being Served. I was:Snow Dog wrote:Ok what is AYBS?S~V~S wrote:I had it in AYBS, I could not remember lol. OK, gotta check out this poll.Snow Dog wrote:Masters of the Universe?
He didn't have a tie decider there. I played it.
Captain Peacock
Inquires of someone, “Are you being served?” His target will be able to use his or her action again the next hour.
Inquires of someone, “Are you free?” If that person is a member of the staff, he will be told “I’m free!”
Whichever question he asks must not be asked again immediately after.
Decides all ties.
Linki, read the card czar role.
Regarding ties:
Send me a list of who should lose and who should win from top to bottom respectively (i.e., put yourself at the bottom). You can update this as you like.
I honestly would like to know why you think this.S~V~S wrote:I think you are more likely to be bad then boomslang.
Why did you say, "supposed play style"? The case against him has nothing to do with his play style and everything to do with his logic and inability to see the flaws in said logic.nijuukyugou wrote:Good thing I tried to read some on my phone before now, because holy shit 10 pages and broken internet on the computer at work. Done catching up.
As I was reading, I see the votes have changed around, and several have gone on to Boomslang that weren't there before. I've never played with him, so I don't know his supposed playstyle. I don't really know why others are voting for him other than he's acting weird. I'm also not too much getting the MM votes. I haven't seen the big pings that others seem to see, but it might also be that I can only hold so many players in mind at once.
S~V~S wrote:MM, I am very very sorry. But if it is any consolation, the odds are high you got me NKed tonight.
I would love that ^_^juliets wrote:I'm picking Dom to be a tag team partner. Dom I hope you are ok with that.
RIP, my disagreeable aardvark. At least this night should be fun, what with the Cards Against Humanity and this mysterious tag-team. INH, as an olive branch, I'm going to send my tag your way.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezz please.
You have until the end of Day 2 to submit your entry for this.Epignosis wrote:From the Card Czar:
Why do I hurt all over?
Submit your "white cards" by PM by the end of the Night.
I believe I can chalk that comment up to seeing Eloh's reasoning that his "gameplay was weird." I was marathon reading about five or six pages this evening, so I might've attributed that one comment to several people's observations. Apologies if I was mistaken.Dom wrote:Why did you say, "supposed play style"? The case against him has nothing to do with his play style and everything to do with his logic and inability to see the flaws in said logic.nijuukyugou wrote:Good thing I tried to read some on my phone before now, because holy shit 10 pages and broken internet on the computer at work. Done catching up.
As I was reading, I see the votes have changed around, and several have gone on to Boomslang that weren't there before. I've never played with him, so I don't know his supposed playstyle. I don't really know why others are voting for him other than he's acting weird. I'm also not too much getting the MM votes. I haven't seen the big pings that others seem to see, but it might also be that I can only hold so many players in mind at once.
Can you see that you're mistaken now?nijuukyugou wrote:RIP MM/Mr. Humphries! Makes me want to go watch AYBS? Haven't watched it in ages.I believe I can chalk that comment up to seeing Eloh's reasoning that his "gameplay was weird." I was marathon reading about five or six pages this evening, so I might've attributed that one comment to several people's observations. Apologies if I was mistaken.Dom wrote:Why did you say, "supposed play style"? The case against him has nothing to do with his play style and everything to do with his logic and inability to see the flaws in said logic.nijuukyugou wrote:Good thing I tried to read some on my phone before now, because holy shit 10 pages and broken internet on the computer at work. Done catching up.
As I was reading, I see the votes have changed around, and several have gone on to Boomslang that weren't there before. I've never played with him, so I don't know his supposed playstyle. I don't really know why others are voting for him other than he's acting weird. I'm also not too much getting the MM votes. I haven't seen the big pings that others seem to see, but it might also be that I can only hold so many players in mind at once.
Picking partners...reminds me of school projects. I wouldn't mind being partnered with a Mongoose if she doesn't mind
I laughed, and it was out loud. Too funny!Epignosis wrote:Day 1: A 50-50 ChanceTriple H announced, “Now ladies and gentlemen, please welcome, our reigning champion, The Federal Case!”
A terrifying man in a red, white, and blue singlet with Barack Obama masks for shoulder plates ran down the runway, star-spangled bursts of pyrotechnics on both sides of him.
In the ring, he trash talked Metalmarsh89. “I’m gonna make you pay…your taxes!”
Picking someone who hasn't shown up yet. Brave.Long Con wrote:You and me, Lorab! Tag me in if you get into trouble!
RIP MM, if rez time comes around you will be first on the list - a Civvie that can choose to be unable to be nightkilled is a good Civvie to have aboard!
Hmm... or poorly thought through. Where is she?thellama73 wrote:Picking someone who hasn't shown up yet. Brave.Long Con wrote:You and me, Lorab! Tag me in if you get into trouble!
RIP MM, if rez time comes around you will be first on the list - a Civvie that can choose to be unable to be nightkilled is a good Civvie to have aboard!
I was going to pick Llama as well.DharmaHelper wrote:I considered kidnapping... I mean picking several partners (specifically Long Con, Made, and finally llama) I think I made the right choice.
Why did you pick him?Well, my top three candidates were you, Made and Llama. My thought process was as follows:Long Con wrote:I was going to pick Llama as well.DharmaHelper wrote:I considered kidnapping... I mean picking several partners (specifically Long Con, Made, and finally llama) I think I made the right choice.
I'm guessing not fun times.Long Con wrote:My prediction is that the tag team partners will be together on the next lynch poll, so we vote for two people, and then.... ???