Re: Rocky and Bullwinkle - The Legend of Frostbite Falls [Da
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:44 am
I saw Turnip Head with the devil!Turnip Head wrote:Epignosis wrote:She's fooled me once in three years.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
I saw Turnip Head with the devil!Turnip Head wrote:Epignosis wrote:She's fooled me once in three years.
No you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I saw Turnip Head with the devil!Turnip Head wrote:Epignosis wrote:She's fooled me once in three years.
So she's only fooled you once before so therefore she's good. Fantastic.Epignosis wrote:All right, that's fair enough.a2thezebra wrote:A civilian that you refuse to explain why you think they are a civilian. Right. I'm open to changing my mind, but I can't change my mind on my own. I need help. I asked for yours and you told me to go ahead and lynch her. I'm engaging with you because you're online at the moment and you're talking to me. If you want me to look at other options, what other options would you recommend I look at and why?Epignosis wrote:Knock yourself out. You'll only be lynching a civilian if you don't change your mind.a2thezebra wrote:Haha, okay. I'll see what I can do.
I would recommend you disengage from me and look at other options.
In case you don't know, I am married to Elohcin. She's not bad. She's fooled me once in three years. The end.
I don't like relying on that, because she has become a better player, but I'll not see her lynched over bullshit. So yeah, I'm sticking my neck out for her. Civilians need to recognize that I'm good, she's good, and I get the impression that someone else know she's good, and I also believe someone else knows I'm not a killer.
Now then. Is my shit together or is my shit together Mr. Peabody?
I surely did not.Turnip Head wrote:No you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I saw Turnip Head with the devil!Turnip Head wrote:Epignosis wrote:She's fooled me once in three years.
You're welcome. What are your thoughts at the moment?indiglo wrote:Thank you.a2thezebra wrote:nijuukyugou.indiglo wrote:Also, who is "Blooper" that MP mentioned?
Sloonei remains my number one suspect. Read what I wrote, if you didn't.a2thezebra wrote:So she's only fooled you once before so therefore she's good. Fantastic.Epignosis wrote:All right, that's fair enough.a2thezebra wrote:A civilian that you refuse to explain why you think they are a civilian. Right. I'm open to changing my mind, but I can't change my mind on my own. I need help. I asked for yours and you told me to go ahead and lynch her. I'm engaging with you because you're online at the moment and you're talking to me. If you want me to look at other options, what other options would you recommend I look at and why?Epignosis wrote:Knock yourself out. You'll only be lynching a civilian if you don't change your mind.a2thezebra wrote:Haha, okay. I'll see what I can do.
I would recommend you disengage from me and look at other options.
In case you don't know, I am married to Elohcin. She's not bad. She's fooled me once in three years. The end.
I don't like relying on that, because she has become a better player, but I'll not see her lynched over bullshit. So yeah, I'm sticking my neck out for her. Civilians need to recognize that I'm good, she's good, and I get the impression that someone else know she's good, and I also believe someone else knows I'm not a killer.
Now then. Is my shit together or is my shit together Mr. Peabody?
What other options would you recommend I look at and why?
Blooper is good. I won't be voting for HER.indiglo wrote:Now "Blooper" has voted without posting... so has he also been either seduced or narratored? He hasn't been scrooched, because Llama said that means no posting, no votes, no night power... so it has to be 1 of the 2... or just an honest vote with no post. Which is weird? But maybe not for him?
Epignosis wrote:I saw Turnip Head with the devil!Turnip Head wrote:Epignosis wrote:She's fooled me once in three years.
@HOST I don't think this was answered. Just wondering if I can get some clarification-Thanks!Scotty wrote:Hey @Host!
Does the narrator have to decide whether he wants to direct someone's lynch vote before the lynch ends?
And if Boris dies, does that mean the other Mafia receive the kill in a line of succession, or is Mafia just permanently handicapped? Bc that would be lolz
He would have to vote that way in the poll. It would be a visible vote.indiglo wrote:@ llama - Narrator - Can direct either a lynch vote, or a night action of another player.
If the Narrator directs a lynch vote, would that be done via the thread? For example, would the directed party have to vote a particular way in the poll?
Or would the directing be done BTS? Whoever the directed party votes for in the poll/thread wouldn't really get the vote, it would secretly go elsewhere?
The lynch direct is a night action. The decision has to be made the night previous to the vote.Scotty wrote:@HOST I don't think this was answered. Just wondering if I can get some clarification-Thanks!Scotty wrote:Hey @Host!
Does the narrator have to decide whether he wants to direct someone's lynch vote before the lynch ends?
And if Boris dies, does that mean the other Mafia receive the kill in a line of succession, or is Mafia just permanently handicapped? Bc that would be lolz
I feel like I've been pretty non existent this game, which is frankly unlike me. I see I might be a deciding vote today, so let me get loaded on this bus and get back before eod in a bit.
You are also wrong.Epignosis wrote:Sloonei remains my number one suspect. Read what I wrote, if you didn't.a2thezebra wrote:So she's only fooled you once before so therefore she's good. Fantastic.Epignosis wrote:All right, that's fair enough.a2thezebra wrote:A civilian that you refuse to explain why you think they are a civilian. Right. I'm open to changing my mind, but I can't change my mind on my own. I need help. I asked for yours and you told me to go ahead and lynch her. I'm engaging with you because you're online at the moment and you're talking to me. If you want me to look at other options, what other options would you recommend I look at and why?Epignosis wrote:Knock yourself out. You'll only be lynching a civilian if you don't change your mind.a2thezebra wrote:Haha, okay. I'll see what I can do.
I would recommend you disengage from me and look at other options.
In case you don't know, I am married to Elohcin. She's not bad. She's fooled me once in three years. The end.
I don't like relying on that, because she has become a better player, but I'll not see her lynched over bullshit. So yeah, I'm sticking my neck out for her. Civilians need to recognize that I'm good, she's good, and I get the impression that someone else know she's good, and I also believe someone else knows I'm not a killer.
Now then. Is my shit together or is my shit together Mr. Peabody?
What other options would you recommend I look at and why?
This is still either a misinterpretation or a misrepresentation of what I said.S~V~S wrote:I went with Sloonei~ I thought his remark re thinking anyone with an opinion on FL's power was suspicious, but then thinking one of the people who said it was more suspicious than the other was fence riding. Not particularly seeing anything that has caught my eye more than that did. Although the way ELoh jumped at conclusion drawing from Epis post also got my eye.
If you're trying to save Sloonei why didn't you vote for eloh, who has more votes than you & tied with Sloonei, rather than yourself?MovingPictures07 wrote:STOP VOTING FOR SLOONEI
Vote for me instead.
Votes MP
Bullsuit. Who said I didn't care who I voted for? And how does any of this actually make me bad? You just make a sweeping generalization about what baddies do. That's nonsense.indiglo wrote:Nailed it Aesop! Hilarious!!
@ llama - Were there any missing PMs?
RIP Bwt, I suppose, right? Would he be modkilled straight away? Or are the baddies actually classy this game?
Atm, I'm going to place my vote on MP. He ran through yesterday, and un-informedly went ahead and entered into the fray of the main discussion / lynch competition going on. If you don't have time to catch up, I think rather than trying to come down on a side, it would be better to not cast your vote into the heated mix. (It wasn't really heated, but I'm hoping I am at least making somewhat sense.) So just a reminder - civ votes count, and we should be careful how we use them. (Except for sig's.) Only baddies (and sig, this game) don't care who they vote for, because any dead guy is ok for them.
Speculating on NKs is useless. Anyone could have killed anyone else in any game.Epignosis wrote:Upon seeing the kill, I was transported back to another llamagame, Frisky Dingo, in which the Mafia consciously took out people who were not participating or were not participating much.
The mafia team there consisted of Cookie, S~V~S, Russtifinko, Movingpictures07, and ika.
Only two of those are present here. You'd have to ask yourself if either of them would employ the same rationale for kills as before.
+1Sloonei wrote:I was being jokey early. Most people were. I don't see this as a scum tell for anyone, ever. I am accusing your posts of being padded with fluff, like you were trying to appear present, but you never really comtributed anything on Day 1.
Now you've come out on Day 2 pointing fingers at the only person to have pointed fingers at you, without having read all of my posts, it seems. That is fishy behavior in my book.
These are easy ways for a mafia member to seem like they are genuinely engaged in the game. Softball suspicions.indiglo wrote:Interesting. My brain (without knowing this already) immediately went to: SVS and/or MoPi.Epignosis wrote:Upon seeing the kill, I was transported back to another llamagame, Frisky Dingo, in which the Mafia consciously took out people who were not participating or were not participating much.
The mafia team there consisted of Cookie, S~V~S, Russtifinko, Movingpictures07, and ika.
Only two of those are present here. You'd have to ask yourself if either of them would employ the same rationale for kills as before.
1) I got a slight ping off SVS for her less than OTT reaction to Zebra's poking. I would have expected civ SVS to react even more strongly. You thought her reaction was not OTT enough? Wow. I disagree. I also don't think civilian versus baddie S~V~S is as straightforward as strength of emotional reactions. I've seen a baddie S~V~S get upset.
2) I got a slight ping off MP for his rushed, un-informed vote Day 1. Why? You said this earlier too. You've yet to explain how it makes me bad; tell me more.
A) I could also see this NK being SVS because it is the gentlewomanly thing to do, and she likes for players to play a game. WIFOM. Useless.
B) I could also see it being a MoPi move because you could have done it quickly without thinking if you were in a rush. WIFOM. Also useless.
My only other thought was perhaps Boris is MIA and therefore didn't send in his kill, and BWT got modkilt. Would Llama do that so quickly though? Or would he give a player more time to check in first? (BWT never even got his role yet, so far as we can tell, right?)
Elo reading way into what Epi says seems to be a town tell to me. I'm backing off of her unless I have to vote her today to save me or Sloonei. I'd like to avoid that if possible.S~V~S wrote:I could go either way on Eloh, I felt pretty good about her, then she read waaaaaay into what Epi said, with that little canned commentary. With Indi chiming in right after. BUT tons of civ BTS in this game, so not sure this means much other than Eloh finds me hard to trust.
And wanting to make a tie on day one is not a baddie thing re MP. As the host of the legendary 4 or 5 way tie, I say this.
Why?Long Con wrote:There's no guarantee my vote will remain on Elohcin by the end of the lynch.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Who wants a CFD?
Let's CFD Epi, indiglo, or Long Con please.
Note that indi suddenly thinks that DrWilgy is seduced, after no particularly new illuminating information, and wants to move her vote from me -- coincidentally after zebra strongly town reads me and no one else seemingly is latching onto an MP vote.indiglo wrote:I have pretty much now convinced myself that Dr. Wilgy has been seduced. (You saucy player, you!) We will most likely be seeing some poorly shot sex video up on the internet before long.<---- me, not wanting to see said sex video
Anyway, it's making me want to move my vote off of MP to someone else. More reading and thinking to do.![]()
voting indigloSorsha wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Who wants a CFD?
Let's CFD Epi, indiglo, or Long Con please.
It's OK if you tell me that I'm ignoramoose or bad if I vote for someone, but you don't take heed of my comments similarly re: Sloonei?Epignosis wrote:
Well, I'll start my rebuttal thusly:
If you lynch Eloh, you're an ignoramoose. Or bad.
So don't do it.
She stuck her neck out for me, and I am now inclined to do likewise because I pay attention and know how to read.
If you need lynch me to discover we're not teammates, that's fine. Knock yourselves out. I'll lose the game, but I'll still Gilbert Gottfried the shit out of you.
MP is casting lazy votes and now suspects nijuukyugou. I don't like that. Switching my vote to MP.
Explain yourself now.Epignosis wrote:I'm going to come on out and defend her. I think she's good. If you lynch her, you're just going to look foolish.Long Con wrote:So we aren't supposed to lynch Eloh, and we aren't supposed to lynch Sloonei.
I would rather the civilians reevaluate.
As for Sloonei, that was my big suspect. Does Sloonei give up when civilian? When bad? I don't know.
MP suspects nijuu. I don't. So MP has my vote now.
BULLSUIT.indiglo wrote:Linki - I thought I was a fast typer???![]()
@ Zebra:
I still can't shake my ping of MP. I understand exactly what you are saying about his play style, and so I'm conflicted about him. I'm also uncertain about DocW... if he were seduced, that would pretty much (nearly) guarantee MP is not baddie. However if he were "narratored", then it's still up for grabs. I do think it's odd that finally (after taking a little bit of heat and a couple votes) MP came in and tried to post some actual content, although it was unhelpful and not useful content (just IMO, no offense intended of course)... so that seemed just a touch convenient. Like, here's some real stuff... except that it's already useless, so we can't say he hasn't posted any content.
And beside that 1 ping I just don't feel a lot. That's my 1 thing right now, and I don't feel certain about it, yet there isn't really another place I feel comfortable putting my vote.
Now "Blooper" has voted without posting... so has he also been either seduced or narratored? He hasn't been scrooched, because Llama said that means no posting, no votes, no night power... so it has to be 1 of the 2... or just an honest vote with no post. Which is weird? But maybe not for him?
I am willing to look elsewhere, obviously. I understand what Epi is saying about Sloon, but I'm not certain it pings me as much as it pings him.
You're a good egg, Wilgy. I dunno what your alignment is this game, but you're swell.DrWilgy wrote:Because he is my friend and he doesn't feel well.
He has my vote till he feels better!
What happened? Why so involved?MovingPictures07 wrote:Who wants a CFD?
Let's CFD Epi, indiglo, or Long Con please.
Why so involved?Scotty wrote:What happened? Why so involved?MovingPictures07 wrote:Who wants a CFD?
Let's CFD Epi, indiglo, or Long Con please.
Linki: Jesus I missed so much linki
I do not think speculating on Nks are worthless. Yes, Mafia can kill anyone, but there has to be reason behind killing each one, and I don't think there is a lack of information that can ultimately pinpoint a baddie.MovingPictures07 wrote:Speculating on NKs is useless. Anyone could have killed anyone else in any game.Epignosis wrote:Upon seeing the kill, I was transported back to another llamagame, Frisky Dingo, in which the Mafia consciously took out people who were not participating or were not participating much.
The mafia team there consisted of Cookie, S~V~S, Russtifinko, Movingpictures07, and ika.
Only two of those are present here. You'd have to ask yourself if either of them would employ the same rationale for kills as before.
It's too WIFOMy on its own, especially this early. I think it's useless; that's my opinion. You're welcome to disagree.Scotty wrote:I do not think speculating on Nks are worthless. Yes, Mafia can kill anyone, but there has to be reason behind killing each one, and I don't think there is a lack of information that can ultimately pinpoint a baddie.MovingPictures07 wrote:Speculating on NKs is useless. Anyone could have killed anyone else in any game.Epignosis wrote:Upon seeing the kill, I was transported back to another llamagame, Frisky Dingo, in which the Mafia consciously took out people who were not participating or were not participating much.
The mafia team there consisted of Cookie, S~V~S, Russtifinko, Movingpictures07, and ika.
Only two of those are present here. You'd have to ask yourself if either of them would employ the same rationale for kills as before.
MovingPictures07 wrote:STOP VOTING FOR SLOONEI
Vote for me instead.
Votes MP
You want to be saved after telling people that you would rather die? Was that just a hollow jab?MovingPictures07 wrote:Elo reading way into what Epi says seems to be a town tell to me. I'm backing off of her unless I have to vote her today to save me or Sloonei. I'd like to avoid that if possible.S~V~S wrote:I could go either way on Eloh, I felt pretty good about her, then she read waaaaaay into what Epi said, with that little canned commentary. With Indi chiming in right after. BUT tons of civ BTS in this game, so not sure this means much other than Eloh finds me hard to trust.
And wanting to make a tie on day one is not a baddie thing re MP. As the host of the legendary 4 or 5 way tie, I say this.