The Syndicate

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Scotty wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Roxy wrote:You are right scotty - I should not be surprised where you are concerned. You have already proclaimed JJJ not worth looking at.

Don't think I've forgotten about you.

You haven't answered why you were blatantly wrong.

You haven't posted since this post Friday afternoon.

I don't like your attitude. I think you are bad.

I am so happy you have not forgotten about me

And yes I will admit I have you confused with another player - but I am not sorry as I explained earlier my m,eds make my hed completely fuzzy so some things are bound to be mixed up by me.

Sorry I post when I can and when I feel up to it. I am not on YOUR timetable I am on my own schedule thank you very kindly

Yah I admit my attitude sometimes sucks especially when I don't feel good - but just know in advance I am sorry if I offend anyone with my attitude. I def do not mean to.

But maybe you can explain EXACTLY how my attitude makes me bad? Bc tbh I am unrecruited Neutral.

Roxy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Vote registered for Boomslang

Why? You haven't mentioned Boomslang in your posts since Day 5 at least.

I read his posts and I think he's on Team Uzzy.

I am quite surprised neither of you have commented on the drastic change in JJJ's game.

1.) What is the drastic change? Give me details. I'm starting to think you're making this up. If you're not then I'd like to state that you're making zero effort whatsoever to read my content through a non-baddie lens -- exactly the accusation you've [wrongly] applied to me w/r/t Boomslang and Bass.

2.) That you specifically elected to express "surprise" to these two people makes very little sense. After only you, Turnip has probably been my biggest detractor in this game so far. You literally couldn't pick a worse player to accuse of not commenting on me. Scotty and I have also engaged in quite a lot of dialogue and I don't think he has been inclined to read me positively or negatively. What was the purpose of this post Roxy?

Hi.
I was surprised bc they both have said negative things inre: You. I think the drastic changed happened just before 2 game days ago. You tone changed and the vibe you began putting off was nothing like the semi - neutral vibe you were giving previously.
I do not think I could have picked two better people to call out bc of their thoughts they had previously given - why not push harder on you? Just bc you were silenced should not have silenced their opinions imo.

Again, WHO are you talking about? And why call out 2 people (whoever that lucky 2nd contestant is), 1 of which was definitely a detractor of JJJ like he says, out of the blue for not "pushing harder"? Why not call DrWilgy out on doing the exact same thing to Sorsha? It sounds like you just really wanted JJJ killed, and tried to get some rallying support by reproaching some people that had called him out previously.

You can blame meds on your combative behavior all you want, but your accusations have lacked as much air as Tom Brady's footballs.
I once took Ecstasy in a London club, and while I danced with some people I really would have preferred not to dance with, I still knew what I was doing.

Can you lose some of these quotes bc I am not what quote you are responding to since you have quoted and highlighted more than one.

No need to compare to someone who is on ecstasy imo - what is the point of that?

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

If ya read DH's posts you would def know why

Roxy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

If ya read DH's posts you would def know why

lol

Predictable nub baddies are predictable, I see.

I am at a Labor Solidarity fest (lots of Billy Brag, multi Guthries and various versions of the Internationale). I will be home for the rest of the weekend later tonight.

Roxy wrote: Can you lose some of these quotes bc I am not what quote you are responding to since you have quoted and highlighted more than one.

No need to compare to someone who is on ecstasy imo - what is the point of that?

I'm responding to the highlighted portion. Here. Let me help you out.
And yes I will admit I have you confused with another player
I was surprised bc they both have said negative things inre: You.

Better?

In Re:ecstasy I'll give you that that is not a fair comparison. I'm not going to downplay whatever meds you are on, and know that I'm not trying to offend either. My comparison was more along the lines of: I have also been on drugs. And I was still in control of my faculties, even though it affected me in a way that made me feel weird. I still knew what I was doing.

I think you know what you are doing, and that's flinging baseless accusations at people. Whether or not that is your unrecruited neutral mindset or not is yet to be seen. It sure doesn't seem civ, that's for sure.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Wait, you think SVS is a baddie?

bea wrote:I'm not gonna lie. I'm happy no one is talking about Mr but it worries me too. I have played so badly. Why given my vote misses etc aren't I a point of conversation?

Did you try and kill DH last night?

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Wait, you think SVS is a baddie?

Since, like, two Days ago, bro.

Ricochet wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Wait, you think SVS is a baddie?

Since, like, two Days ago, bro.

Sorry, I've been forgetting to write those in caustic cyan.

My real question is: why hasn't he voted for her yet??

Scotty wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Wait, you think SVS is a baddie?

Since, like, two Days ago, bro.

Sorry, I've been forgetting to write those in caustic cyan.

My real question is: why hasn't he voted for her yet??

I'm waiting until the train is fueled and ready to leave the station. She's bad but I'd be wasting my vote if you people didn't follow suit.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I might vote SVS.

Why?

Cuz you're supposed to lynch baddies.

Wait, you think SVS is a baddie?

Since, like, two Days ago, bro.

Sorry, I've been forgetting to write those in caustic cyan.

My real question is: why hasn't he voted for her yet??

I'm waiting until the train is fueled and ready to leave the station. She's bad but I'd be wasting my vote if you people didn't follow suit.

So you think the train will come eventually, but with someone else conducting? What if it just sits in the station all day?

Then you people are either on her team or completely disinterested in winning.

But votes are still changeable, yes? Why don't you just place it now since you're so confident, and change it later if you see fit?

This happens to me every damn game that I play with DH, but GODDAMN if his stubborn singlemindedness isn't niggling at the back of my brain. It's INSANE, because I really honestly truly don't see SVS as bad here.... so if I were to listen to DH it would be purely because of the force of his conviction and nothing to do with my own interpretation of SVS, which would be pretty lame mafia play....... but at the same time, I don't get what DH's game is if he doesn't actually have something on her.
The hunger is a possibility (though of course he can't admit to it)
A curse is a possibility (but that's a fucking long curse)
Info is a possibility (but I think a DH with info works much harder to substantiate a case. He has made a case on SVS, but since making it he's mainly resorted to blanket statements of her hardiness, instead of trying to actually argue..... which is a weak way to try and get info into the thread, and I think DH shares that opinion....)
A hunch/gut/intuition is a possibility (but in that case, why I am considering trusting DH's gut over my own?)


I dunno. I kind of just want to stick my fingers in my ears and not pay attention to this situation........

Scotty wrote:

bea wrote:I'm not gonna lie. I'm happy no one is talking about Mr but it worries me too. I have played so badly. Why given my vote misses etc aren't I a point of conversation?

Did you try and kill DH last night?

Nope. Only thing I tried to kill last night was my liver.

I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

Too many reasons to get into in thread :P

Suffice it to say I'm very tired of being shit on for imaginary reasons. Better to not play.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

Too many reasons to get into in thread :P

Suffice it to say I'm very tired of being shit on for imaginary reasons. Better to not play.

I'm sorry you feel that way.
I apologize if any of the shit is emanating from me. If so, please tell me. I don't like unintentionally shitting on people.

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

Too many reasons to get into in thread :P

Suffice it to say I'm very tired of being shit on for imaginary reasons. Better to not play.

I'm sorry you feel that way.
I apologize if any of the shit is emanating from me. If so, please tell me. I don't like unintentionally shitting on people.

No you're fine.

Probably voting Wilgy today unless anyone can give me a good argument for how he's not actually an Uzi recruit. In fact, that's where I'll stick my vote for now. Can always change it if necessary but I don't think I will at this point.

Hey look at that I voted SVS. I guess you all should too.

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

I think I hurt his feelings.

I believe we have a difference of opinion about how a past game was played. When he started accusing me of being bad, and using my reaction & calling it combative, I referenced Gotham, a game on RM. At that point he started saying he hated Mafia & was quitting, and over the next few days made some more remarks like, "Make my next to the last game a good one" etc. But I am fairly sure I am the meanie here.

He seems to think my recollection of that game and his are different. Could be. But in any case, he & Rey seemed to think my reaction to accusation (which was a total freak out meltdown) meant I was bad, and in fact I was a civ. My point was not to denigrate DH, but to say that his read of me is in error, and has been so historically in another game, Gotham.

I am sorry if I have singlehandedly driven him from Mafia by recalling what happened in a game differently than he does (and as far as I am concerned, i am misrepresenting nothing, I recall what I recall). But when he starts flinging that old "sher's defensive/comabtive" etc. when she's bad, it's bullshit and when I see bullshit I call it bullshit.

I do respect his gut, and he has been 100% correct on me in past games. But he is not in this one.

S~V~S wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I meant it when I said I'm done playing. I'm not going to do anything apart from cast my vote. Whenever I get around to doing even that.

I'm confused by this. Why are you "done playing"?

I think I hurt his feelings.

I believe we have a difference of opinion about how a past game was played. When he started accusing me of being bad, and using my reaction & calling it combative, I referenced Gotham, a game on RM. At that point he started saying he hated Mafia & was quitting, and over the next few days made some more remarks like, "Make my next to the last game a good one" etc. But I am fairly sure I am the meanie here.

He seems to think my recollection of that game and his are different. Could be. But in any case, he & Rey seemed to think my reaction to accusation (which was a total freak out meltdown) meant I was bad, and in fact I was a civ. My point was not to denigrate DH, but to say that his read of me is in error, and has been so historically in another game, Gotham.

I am sorry if I have singlehandedly driven him from Mafia by recalling what happened in a game differently than he does (and as far as I am concerned, i am misrepresenting nothing, I recall what I recall). But when he starts flinging that old "sher's defensive/comabtive" etc. when she's bad, it's bullshit and when I see bullshit I call it bullshit.

I do respect his gut, and he has been 100% correct on me in past games. But he is not in this one.

What feelings? I don't have those. I'm a sociopath who intentionally makes people cry because I enjoy being a bully.

I don't really want to talk about it period.

[ok]OK, but I felt that since you still seem upset about it, that I should stop pretending it is not happening. But consider it dropped [/ot]

Did the Doc announce his vote?

No but he often doesn't.

DharmaHelper wrote:Did the Doc announce his vote?

NOPE! Also he voted Tranq to start the day and didn't say why either. So...

Scotty wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Did the Doc announce his vote?

NOPE! Also he voted Tranq to start the day and didn't say why either. So...

Doesn't he usually have some kind of something to say? Like an OT monologue or something. Hm...

He posts alot of OT, but not always when he votes. If you are thinking he might be silenced, it is possible. Did he post at all since the night post?

No he has not.

While Wilgy silencing is possible, could it also be possible that he is just choosing to be silent himself with hope that this just blows over?
Even if he was silenced, why Tranq?

EBWOP: The proper grammar is 'even he were silenced'. my bad.

And why Lorab now?

Now nutella.

Whatever.

Wilgy, we get it. You want us to think you're silenced.

My vote still hasn't changed.

Rest in peace JJJ.

Does anyone have the poll results from Day 6?

Not sure if it matters in the big scheme, but if Wilgy is truly silenced today by the Assassin, then I have the late Dom in my sheets down to two possible roles: the War Monger or the Immortal.

Also, I'm not on the poll!

Ricochet wrote:Not sure if it matters in the big scheme, but if Wilgy is truly silenced today by the Assassin, then I have the late Dom in my sheets down to two possible roles: the War Monger or the Immortal.

same. My bet is on War Monger.

Ricochet wrote:Also, I'm not on the poll!

hilarious. Guess you must be the Immortal

Nah bitch Azura will probably put me down to sleep again tonight.

Wouldn't mind being recruited by Caelia or Ahriman camps, until that happens.

Cheeky monkey.

I'll probably stretch myself thin late tonight (although it's already late and I should go to sleep instead) and throughout tomorrow trying to do re-reads and pick a lead, which won't gel well with achieving results until the lockdown might happen, so for now I'm going to place a vote on Synonym. I don't approve of him leaving the "posting" part out of his participation equation ("reading and voting" isn't enough, that's for sure, and he knows better, too); it's been going for too long and I've seen better activity from him back on JTM. It's understandable if the catch-up is too much or the role madness too vast, but it's still no reason to simply say "I don't understand what's going on" and not adopt any participation tactic.

If he's been recruited, his team would probably profit a lot from him sidelining hard. Plus, if you'll recall, I had a nagging vibe that Russ's status, despite him wanting out since D2, was left afloat for Days until replacements were found, making me believe he's already been recruited and his role is not so easily discardable anymore (via modkill or such). Both these recruiting theories on Russ and on Syn could mean either civ or bad camp, but his sidelining and defeatist remarks make me lean on bad.

Also, where the hell has MM vanished?