Page 98 of 180

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:56 pm
by Scotty
RIP sig. I honestly think you were good, or at least town-centric. :sigh:

So glorf. You have used the argument "I don't know why anyone would view me as bad because I'm obviously good" twice now. That's like walking into McDonalds, standing in the line for 10 minutes without saying anything, tapping your foot and going, "Well? Why is my food not out yet?"

What makes you so obviously civ, Glorf?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:59 pm
by juliets
MovingPictures07 wrote:Go ahead, DH, vote for me.

I don't have the time or energy to defend myself. It's boring anyway.

I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
I just don't understand what you're doing MP, if you're a civ at least don't vote for yourself jeez. Which makes me think you're not.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:00 pm
by Scotty
juliets wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Go ahead, DH, vote for me.

I don't have the time or energy to defend myself. It's boring anyway.

I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
I just don't understand what you're doing MP, if you're a civ at least don't vote for yourself jeez. Which makes me think you're not.
Does he have a history of voting himself in blatant rebellion, and if so, do you know of his alignment in those games?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:01 pm
by Turnip Head
juliets wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Go ahead, DH, vote for me.

I don't have the time or energy to defend myself. It's boring anyway.

I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
I just don't understand what you're doing MP, if you're a civ at least don't vote for yourself jeez. Which makes me think you're not.
He's dune-a it beffure-a es ceef. Beddeee-a MP feeghts teel hees dyeeng breet. Du yuoo reelly theenk he'd let doon teemmetes leeke-a thees? He-a vuoold et leest geefe-a zeem un ooppurtooneety tu boos zeem.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:05 pm
by juliets
So TH you're saying he's more likely to vote himself as a civ, did I understand you correctly?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:07 pm
by MacDougall
Calling it now. MP/Nero/Zebra were a team.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:07 pm
by Turnip Head
juliets wrote:So TH you're saying he's more likely to vote himself as a civ, did I understand you correctly?
I beleeefe-a su. I'm nut seyeeng I leeke-a hees tecteecs, boot ceefiliuns eren't knoo fur ecteeng reshunelly. Bork bork bork!..

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:09 pm
by Enrique
Turnip Head wrote:
juliets wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Go ahead, DH, vote for me.

I don't have the time or energy to defend myself. It's boring anyway.

I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
I just don't understand what you're doing MP, if you're a civ at least don't vote for yourself jeez. Which makes me think you're not.
He's dune-a it beffure-a es ceef. Beddeee-a MP feeghts teel hees dyeeng breet. Du yuoo reelly theenk he'd let doon teemmetes leeke-a thees? He-a vuoold et leest geefe-a zeem un ooppurtooneety tu boos zeem.
Him?

Also this is really funny.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:09 pm
by juliets
Thanks TH.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:10 pm
by Enrique
No actually that doesn't make sense why would Z replace H.

Zim?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:10 pm
by Turnip Head
MovingPictures07 wrote:I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
Yuoo sculded Metelmersh fur thees in Errested Defelupment. Um de hur de hur de hur. Vhy is it ookey vhee yuoo du it noo?

leenki: Yes heem

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:12 pm
by Tangrowth
juliets wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Go ahead, DH, vote for me.

I don't have the time or energy to defend myself. It's boring anyway.

I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
I just don't understand what you're doing MP, if you're a civ at least don't vote for yourself jeez. Which makes me think you're not.
I have my reasons. :mafia:

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:13 pm
by Tangrowth
MacDougall wrote:Calling it now. MP/Nero/Zebra were a team.
Ha! If you think I would ever give up as a baddie, by all means. My play this game has been way too careless for that.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:14 pm
by Tangrowth
Turnip Head wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I just voted for myself. Have fun wasting a lynch. :beer:
Yuoo sculded Metelmersh fur thees in Errested Defelupment. Um de hur de hur de hur. Vhy is it ookey vhee yuoo du it noo?

leenki: Yes heem
Different circumstances. Not to say I'm absolved from a bonehead move, because I won't argue against that.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 3]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:15 pm
by Turnip Head
Golden wrote:And I'll probably have to do it soon.

Interested in input on voting Floyd or Equivocate. Not going to vote Bubbles.

Open to people giving me short and sharp reasons for other options.
Thees pust mekes me-a theenk Guldee is bed. Bork bork bork! Vhet keend ooff inpoot is he-a luukeeng fur re-a: a Fluyd oor Iqooeefucete-a lynch? Vhet inpoot cuoold unyune-a pusseebly hefe-a oon ieezeer ooff zeem? He-a ves luukeeng fur feleedeshun fur a lezy fute-a.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:16 pm
by DharmaHelper
Yall remember when MP said he was Tyler Durden lmao

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:17 pm
by Tangrowth
DharmaHelper wrote:Yall remember when MP said he was Tyler Durden lmao
I am Jack's suicidal tendencies.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:19 pm
by MacDougall
MovingPictures07 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Calling it now. MP/Nero/Zebra were a team.
Ha! If you think I would ever give up as a baddie, by all means. My play this game has been way too careless for that.
Counterpoint, as Mafia you are a gambitty, bussy, lie face machine of lies.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:21 pm
by Tangrowth
MacDougall wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Calling it now. MP/Nero/Zebra were a team.
Ha! If you think I would ever give up as a baddie, by all means. My play this game has been way too careless for that.
Counterpoint, as Mafia you are a gambitty, bussy, lie face machine of lies.
Fair enough. :mafia:

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:22 pm
by Golden
Yep, I was looking for validation for a lazy vote. Too true.

But my situation at that point of yesterday was that I was being quite literally the least lazy I've ever been in my life.

What exactly do you want from me, TH, on a day when I couldn't participate? What do you think my better approach could be, when everyone who I had suspicion of had given me a defence that I had no time to investigate? Should I have simply pretended they gave no defence and voted for them anyway? I would have been very upset with myself if I'd started a vote run on a contributing townie because I had to vote so early and wasn't able to substantiate my suspicion.

I was looking for views on the non-participant options, but I got none at all. Just Mac snapping at me for answering a question that could have been directed at anyone.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 3]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:23 pm
by bea
Matt wrote:Observe...
MacDougall wrote:
bea wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
bea wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Okay Lorab is probably not here but bea appeared to totally ignore the fact that I eyeballed her so that's a point against her.
Nope. I saw it. I noted it.

I was waiting for something to be able to respond to from you.

You eye me because of tone? Um...sorry? IDK how my tone here is different from any other time I play. Today is a day off so I happen to be around a bit more than normal....outside of that, I've got nothing.
So you saw it but didn't comment ergo you ignored it?

Seems more like you didn't want to confront me about it. Hoped it'd just go away.
If there's one thing I do know about you Mac it's that you don't just go away. ;)

Like I said. You didn't give me anything to respond to so I didn't
Sorry you disliked my tone.
Didn't I?
After this, the conversation ends and never picks back up. Mac continues to "suss" bea but doesn't push her at all. Note what bea says to Mac before Mac says "Didn't I?" and the conversation ends forever...

She says "If there's one thing I do know about you Mac it's that you don't just go away. ;) " That looks like bea saying "Hey teamie, stop", especially with the wink.

I also strongly believe this post...
bea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.

Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.

Lots to think about and little time for posting. :(
I always worry that my
...to be an accidental btsc slip.

"...little time for posting. :( " feels like a clear end to that post.

Hrm.
No matt. I don't have bts with mac. I don't have bts with anyone. I had been posting in pieces and parts and had a half formed thought I didn't backspace. I was on my phone. No tabs black TS background. Absolutely no way for me to have accidently eff up bts codes. Just for you matt. That whole day, I drove from home to the store in central phx - then out to 32nd st./thomas then back to the store then to 51st and Mohave then back to the store then back to 32nd st/thomas then worked a shift at my store. Literally in my car the whole time. You know phx a little more than most peeps on this site. Can you see me tab switching and doing crazy shit like that from my phone during all that traffic? Being on one site was dangerous enough.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:23 pm
by MacDougall
Hosts: Is there any particular reason you've allowed players to survive this long without mod-killing them ie. Floyd, Equivocate, Bass...

I kind of don't think MP would self vote as a civilian in this situation. Surely a civilian with no interest in the game just takes throws at the stumps even with all time apathy.

That being said... Golden thought Zebs was Ghul, what if it's MP?

U Ghul MP?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:25 pm
by Turnip Head
Golden wrote:Yep, I was looking for validation for a lazy vote. Too true.

But my situation at that point of yesterday was that I was being quite literally the least lazy I've ever been in my life.

What exactly do you want from me, TH, on a day when I couldn't participate? What do you think my better approach could be, when everyone who I had suspicion of had given me a defence that I had no time to investigate? Should I have simply pretended they gave no defence and voted for them anyway? I would have been very upset with myself if I'd started a vote run on a contributing townie because I had to vote so early and wasn't able to substantiate my suspicion.

I was looking for views on the non-participant options, but I got none at all. Just Mac snapping at me for answering a question that could have been directed at anyone.
I dun't understund vhy yuoo'd ixpect yuoo vuoold receeefe-a uny inpoot oon thet. Um de hur de hur de hur. Hoo cun unyune-a hefe-a un oopeeniun oon zee ebsentees? Vhet surt ooff feeoos vere-a yuoo luukeeng fur?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:25 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote:Yep, I was looking for validation for a lazy vote. Too true.

But my situation at that point of yesterday was that I was being quite literally the least lazy I've ever been in my life.

What exactly do you want from me, TH, on a day when I couldn't participate? What do you think my better approach could be, when everyone who I had suspicion of had given me a defence that I had no time to investigate? Should I have simply pretended they gave no defence and voted for them anyway? I would have been very upset with myself if I'd started a vote run on a contributing townie because I had to vote so early and wasn't able to substantiate my suspicion.

I was looking for views on the non-participant options, but I got none at all. Just Mac snapping at me for answering a question that could have been directed at anyone.
THIS MAN IS NOT A BAD MAN. HE IS A GOOD MAN. A GOLDEN MAN.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:26 pm
by Golden
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:Yep, I was looking for validation for a lazy vote. Too true.

But my situation at that point of yesterday was that I was being quite literally the least lazy I've ever been in my life.

What exactly do you want from me, TH, on a day when I couldn't participate? What do you think my better approach could be, when everyone who I had suspicion of had given me a defence that I had no time to investigate? Should I have simply pretended they gave no defence and voted for them anyway? I would have been very upset with myself if I'd started a vote run on a contributing townie because I had to vote so early and wasn't able to substantiate my suspicion.

I was looking for views on the non-participant options, but I got none at all. Just Mac snapping at me for answering a question that could have been directed at anyone.
I dun't understund vhy yuoo'd ixpect yuoo vuoold receeefe-a uny inpoot oon thet. Um de hur de hur de hur. Hoo cun unyune-a hefe-a un oopeeniun oon zee ebsentees? Vhet surt ooff feeoos vere-a yuoo luukeeng fur?
At this point I'd missed at least 20 pages of discussion, without even skimming. I had no idea if any of them might have re-emerged or been discussed.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:27 pm
by Golden
MacDougall wrote:Hosts: Is there any particular reason you've allowed players to survive this long without mod-killing them ie. Floyd, Equivocate, Bass...

I kind of don't think MP would self vote as a civilian in this situation. Surely a civilian with no interest in the game just takes throws at the stumps even with all time apathy.

That being said... Golden thought Zebs was Ghul, what if it's MP?

U Ghul MP?
Yeah, it could equally be MP I guess. He seems pretty keen we see his role before he otherwise dies, same behaviour as zeebs.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:27 pm
by MacDougall
Hey so all of the "Mac was bullshitting about his crumb" now have Dutch Turnip to contend with. Knock yourselves out.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:28 pm
by Golden
MacDougall wrote:Hey so all of the "Mac was bullshitting about his crumb" now have Dutch Turnip to contend with. Knock yourselves out.
Tulip Head?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:30 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Hey so all of the "Mac was bullshitting about his crumb" now have Dutch Turnip to contend with. Knock yourselves out.
Tulip Head?
:faint:

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 3]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:32 pm
by Turnip Head
Golden wrote:My vote is exactly what I've said it is today. I have not kept up with the thread on this day phase at all, and I can't justify voting for a participant, even one I suspect, when I can't do my due diligence.
Golden wrote:And I'll probably have to do it soon.

Interested in input on voting Floyd or Equivocate. Not going to vote Bubbles.

Open to people giving me short and sharp reasons for other options.
Golden wrote: I would have been very upset with myself if I'd started a vote run on a contributing townie because I had to vote so early and wasn't able to substantiate my suspicion.
Sumetheeng is ooffff ebuoot thees Guldee. I dun't knoo vhet it is boot sumetheeng's ooffff.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:35 pm
by Turnip Head
MacDougall wrote:Hey so all of the "Mac was bullshitting about his crumb" now have Dutch Turnip to contend with. Knock yourselves out.
I'm Svedeesh yuoo receest. Um de hur de hur de hur.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 pm
by MacDougall
Oh sorry

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 pm
by Golden
The only thing that's off is you've never seen me do a drive by because I've never had to before, so you have no precedent to compare it to.

It is not lost on me that there would come a point in this game that I would be suspected for, in essence, absenteeism. It wasn't lost on me when I made those posts yesterday, either. But there is literally no approach I could take to being absent that wouldn't draw someone's eyebrow because by definition it looks different to normal me.

Either you take my explanation at face value (and its the complete truth) or you don't, but there is nothing more I can say to it other than what I said both when you sussed me immediately after the vote and then sussed me again now. I can't in good conscience vote for a contributor when I don't have time to do my due diligence. There was no secondary thought process, nothing else to be dug into. I had no time for extraneous thought about mafia yesterday.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:41 pm
by Turnip Head
I'm nut soospecteeng yuoo fur beeeng ebsent. Um de hur de hur de hur. Und yuoo eren't ebsent unyveys, yuoo're-a reeght here-a. Meybe-a leeffe-a is boosy fur yuoo, I beleeefe-a thet. Um de hur de hur de hur. Boot meybe-a yuoo elsu sveetched teems Neeght 2 und yuoo ere-a eccleemeting tu yuoor noo veen cundeeshun. It vuoold be-a fuuleesh ooff me-a tu roole-a thet oooot es a pusseebility. Bork bork bork!

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:43 pm
by Golden
Turnip Head wrote:I'm nut soospecteeng yuoo fur beeeng ebsent. Um de hur de hur de hur. Und yuoo eren't ebsent unyveys, yuoo're-a reeght here-a. Meybe-a leeffe-a is boosy fur yuoo, I beleeefe-a thet. Um de hur de hur de hur. Boot meybe-a yuoo elsu sveetched teems Neeght 2 und yuoo ere-a eccleemeting tu yuoor noo veen cundeeshun. It vuoold be-a fuuleesh ooff me-a tu roole-a thet oooot es a pusseebility. Bork bork bork!
So, your experience of me is that when I switch teams, I suddenly and drastically change my approach to the game in the thread?

Did I do anything transparently different to jeopardise my civ cred in World Reborn, TH? You were on my team.

If anything, I'd think the most likely conclusion you could draw is the fact that I wasn't the slightest bit worried about taking an entirely different approach is that you can virtually rule me out from recruitment that night.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:44 pm
by MacDougall
Nobody voted for TH and Joker is dead, so the curse must be in someone's secrets...

Maybe Riddler has the brain scrambling device he has in Batman Forever in this game?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:46 pm
by Turnip Head
Golden wrote: I can't in good conscience vote for a contributor when I don't have time to do my due diligence.
Golden wrote:And I'll probably have to do it soon.

Interested in input on voting Floyd or Equivocate. Not going to vote Bubbles.

Open to people giving me short and sharp reasons for other options.
Yuoo keep seyeeng "dooe-a deeligence-a". I feel leeke-a thet durectly cunffleects veet eskeeng fur shurt und sveet ceses. Um gesh dee bork, bork! Tu me-a it luuks leeke-a yuoo vunted sumeune-a tu feleedete-a yuoor fute-a, und THET'S vhet stunds oooot tu me-a.

Boot I'll geefe-a yuoo zee seme-a chellenge-a I'fe-a geefee iferyune-a ilse-a thet I soospect. Um de hur de hur de hur. Prufe-a me-a vrung.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:46 pm
by Dom
Golden wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Hey so all of the "Mac was bullshitting about his crumb" now have Dutch Turnip to contend with. Knock yourselves out.
Tulip Head?
lol

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:47 pm
by Golden
I meant other non/low contributors. Such as Bass, Ekeknat.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:48 pm
by Turnip Head
Golden wrote:So, your experience of me is that when I switch teams, I suddenly and drastically change my approach to the game in the thread?

Did I do anything transparently different to jeopardise my civ cred in World Reborn, TH? You were on my team.

If anything, I'd think the most likely conclusion you could draw is the fact that I wasn't the slightest bit worried about taking an entirely different approach is that you can virtually rule me out from recruitment that night.
Deefffferent curcoomstunces. Um gesh dee bork, bork! Ve-a recrooeeted yuoo neer indgeme-a und yuoo elreedy knoo must ooff us vere-a bed. Bork bork bork!

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:49 pm
by MacDougall
I can't wait to see what Matt's posts are going to be like.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:50 pm
by Scotty
Scotty wrote:RIP sig. I honestly think you were good, or at least town-centric. :sigh:

So glorf. You have used the argument "I don't know why anyone would view me as bad because I'm obviously good" twice now. That's like walking into McDonalds, standing in the line for 10 minutes without saying anything, tapping your foot and going, "Well? Why is my food not out yet?"

What makes you so obviously civ, Glorf?
This is a rhetorical question, btw Glorf. Because you're no more obviously civ than I am.

I just cringe when I hear that as an argument, and it doesn't make you seem any more civ than I you make yourself out to be.
Now that sig is gone and out of your hair, any better suspicions?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 pm
by MacDougall
But I am obviously civ Scotty.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:52 pm
by Golden
Turnip Head wrote:Boot I'll geefe-a yuoo zee seme-a chellenge-a I'fe-a geefee iferyune-a ilse-a thet I soospect. Um de hur de hur de hur. Prufe-a me-a vrung.
Doesn't sound much like a challenge. What, we lynch one of the Falcone family, I assume you mean by that? So, I have a possibly 3 in 27 chance or something. Now, if I WAS recruited, that would be pretty easy, since I'd know who to bus. A bit harder when I only have a 1/9 shot.

How about I prove you wrong just by catching up with the thread and continuing to contribute how I normally do. You didn't think I was bad before. Why does the fact I had a busy day make a difference?

@TH - so, you think the fact I already knew you were bad... and therefore had to virtually BACKTRACK on existing known suspicions in the thread most uncomfortably and somehow figure out how to not lynch you when I'd already given the symbol for having caught you in the thread, it makes sense that I look no different. But a game where I have no idea who is bad, it makes sense for me to act completely differently?

Maybe we need to go back to first principles here - explain ANY thought process that would lead me to say "I've been recruited. Better act weird and different now."

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 3]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:56 pm
by Turnip Head
I nefer seeed yuoo luuked nu deefffferent effter ve-a recrooeeted yuoo in Vurld Reburn. Bork bork bork! I knoo yuoo vere-a bed zeere-a, it's impusseeble-a tu hefe-a un unbeeesed oopeeniun oon thet. Um de hur de hur de hur. Tu me-a it DID luuk leeke-a yuoo hed chunged boot ooff cuoorse-a I knoo yuoo hed. Bork bork bork!

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:58 pm
by Turnip Head
Und I'm nut eskeeng yuoo tu leed a lynch oon Felcune-a boot I'll teke-a it. Um de hur de hur de hur. I vunt tu see-a zee seme-a Guldee I sev beffure-a Dey 3.

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:59 pm
by sprityo
@Host: Does Renee Montoya have to jail each night?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 3]

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:01 am
by bea
Golden wrote:Since I'm entirely non-contributory at the moment, I thought I would at least let everyone know what happens when Metalmarsh dies.

Image

I'll have a chance to get up to date and start contributing again later today or tomorrow.
He can die???!!!! :faint:

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:01 am
by sprityo
i havent really read too much yet, but: with the joker now being dead, what is now wrong with TH?

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 4]

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:03 am
by sprityo
and i mean, no one voted him either so????