Re: [DAY 5] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 5:50 pm
He walked away from this phase, in case you missed his post.Turnip Head wrote:Someone else who hasn't posted today: Dragon D. Luffy
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
He walked away from this phase, in case you missed his post.Turnip Head wrote:Someone else who hasn't posted today: Dragon D. Luffy
Perhaps he's accepted his fate and doesn't want to leave anymore interactive crumbs for us to pick at after his baddie flip?Turnip Head wrote:Someone else who hasn't posted today: Dragon D. Luffy
Yeah I saw it. But it spookily syncs up with the Warden's post times, except for that 4am outlier.Prisoner 740359 wrote:He walked away from this phase, in case you missed his post.Turnip Head wrote:Someone else who hasn't posted today: Dragon D. Luffy
Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
I love this "because obvi" approach to reasoning. It's like when the great minds gathered to explain how the world works, they just said "because it's obvi so".Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Wut? Please explain both parts of this read.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
That's how I imagine it went down.Prisoner 740359 wrote:I love this "because obvi" approach to reasoning. It's like when the great minds gathered to explain how the world works, they just said "because it's obvi so".Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Why do you say that (pulling teeth here Matt)? Enri reaction to the Fuzz wagon was pretty pissy.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
I wish I had a ketchup smiley.Sloonei wrote:My observation of indiglo at the time was that she was participating in a number of the big bandwagons/lynches throughout the game, but she always seems to come in late, after things have I already been discussed. I was not, and still am not, totally sure whether this was opportunistic scum piggybacking, or just a genuine case of a player who is constantly in ketchup. I am leaning towards the latter, but it never hurts to ask.Prisoner 413022 wrote:why with that limitation? What has she done that we have not seen that makes her behavior this phase so call out worthy?Sloonei wrote:Speaking of indiglo, I want her to name a suspect or two who is/are not currently being widely suspected in the thread.
Enrique doesn't strike me as a player who would be "caught red handed" the way some of you think he was, and then ditch out and get replaced. I think he'd man up and take the lynch.S~V~S wrote:Why do you say that (pulling teeth here Matt)? Enri reaction to the Fuzz wagon was pretty pissy.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
I like where your head is at with all this business. And agree.S~V~S wrote:Ebwop, and I am not as sold on ika being bad as I am on Enrislang.
Nothing wrong with asking to be replaced if the thrill is gone, Matt.Matt wrote:Enrique doesn't strike me as a player who would be "caught red handed" the way some of you think he was, and then ditch out and get replaced. I think he'd man up and take the lynch.S~V~S wrote:Why do you say that (pulling teeth here Matt)? Enri reaction to the Fuzz wagon was pretty pissy.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Plus, he asked to be replaced long before then.S~V~S wrote:Nothing wrong with asking to be replaced if the thrill is gone, Matt.Matt wrote:Enrique doesn't strike me as a player who would be "caught red handed" the way some of you think he was, and then ditch out and get replaced. I think he'd man up and take the lynch.S~V~S wrote:Why do you say that (pulling teeth here Matt)? Enri reaction to the Fuzz wagon was pretty pissy.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
I've never played with him before, but I'd like to know what others who are familiar with him have to say.Matt wrote:Enrique doesn't strike me as a player who would be "caught red handed" the way some of you think he was, and then ditch out and get replaced. I think he'd man up and take the lynch.S~V~S wrote:Why do you say that (pulling teeth here Matt)? Enri reaction to the Fuzz wagon was pretty pissy.Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Or, you know, opinions can change as things continue to unfold in the thread... and others can start looking like better options.Epignosis wrote:I'm not talking just votes. I'm talking suspicion in general. This marks three days of "sig's bad" to "nah, not going to vote sig today." If sig is bad, I'm going to tear this thread apart looking for the people who kept their kid gloves on and why.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't think sig lost more than one or two votes after that. Most of the "scampering" has been from people moving off of people other than sig, or from people placing their first votes of the day.Epignosis wrote:While I'm fine voting DDL, just be aware that Norton comes in, votes sig, and people scamper away from sig like they just found out he has TB (the disease, not Bubbles formerly known as TinyBubbles).
Go on and think about that for a minute.![]()
Time permitting.
That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Have you met Matt?Prisoner 740359 wrote:That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Yes. Doesn't mean I should let his remarks slide by.Turnip Head wrote:Have you met Matt?Prisoner 740359 wrote:That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Would you be able to match up the other prisoners with their suck?Prisoner 740359 wrote:I tried to monitor players that way in a game once. Couldn't actually match up one single player with their suck, really.Epignosis wrote:I mean looking at the posting times and narrowing down who the warden is.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Can you be more specific, Epignosis?
There has been no activity for Friday, so I'm starting with that.
Any reason in particular?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
And he pulled Boom out of second place. Ding ding! Ping ping!!Prisoner 740359 wrote:That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Opinions changing is not the same thing.indiglo wrote:Or, you know, opinions can change as things continue to unfold in the thread... and others can start looking like better options.Epignosis wrote:I'm not talking just votes. I'm talking suspicion in general. This marks three days of "sig's bad" to "nah, not going to vote sig today." If sig is bad, I'm going to tear this thread apart looking for the people who kept their kid gloves on and why.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't think sig lost more than one or two votes after that. Most of the "scampering" has been from people moving off of people other than sig, or from people placing their first votes of the day.Epignosis wrote:While I'm fine voting DDL, just be aware that Norton comes in, votes sig, and people scamper away from sig like they just found out he has TB (the disease, not Bubbles formerly known as TinyBubbles).
Go on and think about that for a minute.![]()
Time permitting.
indiglo wrote:Any reason in particular?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Not necessarily the same thing, I mean.Epignosis wrote:Opinions changing is not the same thing.indiglo wrote:Or, you know, opinions can change as things continue to unfold in the thread... and others can start looking like better options.Epignosis wrote:I'm not talking just votes. I'm talking suspicion in general. This marks three days of "sig's bad" to "nah, not going to vote sig today." If sig is bad, I'm going to tear this thread apart looking for the people who kept their kid gloves on and why.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't think sig lost more than one or two votes after that. Most of the "scampering" has been from people moving off of people other than sig, or from people placing their first votes of the day.Epignosis wrote:While I'm fine voting DDL, just be aware that Norton comes in, votes sig, and people scamper away from sig like they just found out he has TB (the disease, not Bubbles formerly known as TinyBubbles).
Go on and think about that for a minute.![]()
Time permitting.
I need to go back and see if Matt has agreed with your Golden suspicion. I have thoughts on the subject if he hasn't.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Yes. Doesn't mean I should let his remarks slide by.Turnip Head wrote:Have you met Matt?Prisoner 740359 wrote:That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Talking about the obvious things you wouldn't do in a thread where you think sloonei would be my baddie teammate if I were bad...Matt wrote:Totes cuz if I knew there was a lynch switch, the smartest thing I could do is announce it in thread right before the lynch is over.
Seriously.
How about this (or has everyone already asked this too???)Matt wrote:Because he's obvi not a cop and I think people voting him are taking the easy way out.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Why?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Yeah cuz Enrique isn't a douche, and if he were bad, he would take a lynch sooner then get replaced, me thinks.indiglo wrote:Any reason in particular?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique
Epignosis wrote:Not necessarily the same thing, I mean.Epignosis wrote:Opinions changing is not the same thing.indiglo wrote:Or, you know, opinions can change as things continue to unfold in the thread... and others can start looking like better options.Epignosis wrote:I'm not talking just votes. I'm talking suspicion in general. This marks three days of "sig's bad" to "nah, not going to vote sig today." If sig is bad, I'm going to tear this thread apart looking for the people who kept their kid gloves on and why.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't think sig lost more than one or two votes after that. Most of the "scampering" has been from people moving off of people other than sig, or from people placing their first votes of the day.Epignosis wrote:While I'm fine voting DDL, just be aware that Norton comes in, votes sig, and people scamper away from sig like they just found out he has TB (the disease, not Bubbles formerly known as TinyBubbles).
Go on and think about that for a minute.![]()
Time permitting.
Look at me, adding an adverb.
Better hurry, we have less than an hour left to CFD Golden.Turnip Head wrote:I need to go back and see if Matt has agreed with your Golden suspicion. I have thoughts on the subject if he hasn't.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Yes. Doesn't mean I should let his remarks slide by.Turnip Head wrote:Have you met Matt?Prisoner 740359 wrote:That's oddly specific.Matt wrote:Eh, maybe you guys are right, but I don't think so. I think Boomrique is civ.
On that note, in case there is some kind of lynch switch shenanigans, I'm going back to ika so he's in front of Boom.
Hey, Matt... as I pointed out. Enrique asked for a replacement LONG before he took any suspicion. As evidenced by sprityo, he may not have even immediately been told he was replaced.Matt wrote:Yeah cuz Enrique isn't a douche, and if he were bad, he would take a lynch sooner then get replaced, me thinks.indiglo wrote:Any reason in particular?Matt wrote:Not likin' the votes on Boomrique