The Syndicate

OMG Neil Hartley is here! I was wondering when he'd enter a mafia game.

Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

a2thezebra wrote:

Scotty wrote:Suspicious of Glorf for voting in the poll but not commenting.

Glorfindel? More like Skaglorfindel.

To be fair,he said this before Glorfindel said is Mom was sick. I had the same thought, too, until I read Glorfindels post.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I view S~V~S as good.

Give yourself a hand, gentleman. You and Neil see eye to eye.

Epi & JaggedJimmyNeil, you are making me nervous saying this kind of thing, lol.

I don't love policy lynches, but I don't love low posters either. I would rather give the Host a cycle to see if he can get a replacement if it is known that Mac is not coming back.

Hope it all works out for your family, Glorfindel

Votes are changeable.

S~V~S wrote:Epi & JaggedJimmyNeil, you are making me nervous saying this kind of thing, lol.

I know it can be a little overwhelming when such a celebrity like Neil Hartley puts the spotlight on you, even when it's something nice. Let me tell you, gal. The way you kept your eye on Epignosis's Day 0 voting behavior for such a specific reason... I like the cut of your jib. Neil is on your side.

MovingPictures07 wrote:OMG Neil Hartley is here! I was wondering when he'd enter a mafia game.

You're right on the money, kid. Neil Hartley is present and accounted for, and this one is gonna be a doozy. Just sit back, enjoy your chardonnay, and let me croon the evening away for you and yours.

Tell me, buddy. What do you think of this thing? What do you think of all these people in the audience?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:OMG Neil Hartley is here! I was wondering when he'd enter a mafia game.

You're right on the money, kid. Neil Hartley is present and accounted for, and this one is gonna be a doozy. Just sit back, enjoy your chardonnay, and let me croon the evening away for you and yours.

Tell me, buddy. What do you think of this thing? What do you think of all these people in the audience?

I think it's awesome! So glad to be playing again.

As far as the audience, well, they all seem like nice folks but we know some of them aren't. Since the show just started, I find it difficult to make any assessments on those folks, but I can dig what you and Epi are throwing down about S~V~S. On a tone perspective, I also think her most recent post seems genuine to me. I also am feeling good about you so far, but maybe that's because your latest album just rocked my socks off.

Scotty wrote:Suspicious of Glorf for voting in the poll but not commenting.

Glorfindel? More like Skaglorfindel.

that joke was so awful, im voting just because of that

Oh, and I'm tentatively feeling good about zebra as well. Her willingness to throw a vote on Scotty for a perceived moment seemed natural and not forced.

Not feeling those bad vibes from anyone just yet, but I'm sure they will come.

It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

JJNeil, what is your opinion on policy lynching Mac?

S~V~S wrote:JJNeil, what is your opinion on policy lynching Mac?

Neil Hartley does not "policy lynch" anybody. It is not a good strategy and nor is it very nice. I don't mind seeing how Mac feels when he joins the game buried in votes though. That should be a hoot.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't mind seeing how Mac feels when he joins the game buried in votes though. That should be a hoot.

This is exactly why I'm keeping my vote there for now.

Neil Hartley and The Sock. Let's jam.

(OK, now I'm just clearly beyond procrastinating.)

INH is bad.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

MovingPictures07 wrote:INH is bad.

Right back atcha.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

Uhm, no sir. That's the vote intention. You explicitly said you'd hop on the policy lynch that was underway (moi, Glorfindel). I certainly voted with a policy in mind. Glorfindel appears to have done so, in his own way. So how is your vote based on policy, then?

LEME POST.

insertnamehere wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

OK, this was the best response imaginable. INH is not getting my vote today.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

Uhm, no sir. That's the vote intention. You explicitly said you'd hop on the policy lynch that was underway (moi, Glorfindel). I certainly voted with a policy in mind. Glorfindel appears to have done so, in his own way. So how is your vote based on policy, then?

LEME POST.

Mine isn't. I'm hopping on. I'm a hop on.

Ah.

MP if you are voting for me for shits and giggles or to see a reaction from me then posting it kind of nullifies any pointed post I could make. Yet again you are bad in a game I am in.

Ricochet's "policy lynch" is based on the fact that I policy night killed him in the previous game. That won't be happening here by virtue of the fact that I do not have the power of night kills.

Glorfindel is probably also voting for me because I night killed him last game.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

OK, this was the best response imaginable. INH is not getting my vote today.

Did you sigh audibly when G-Man sent you a Mafia rolecard?

MacDougall wrote:
Ricochet's "policy lynch" is based on the fact that I policy night killed him in the previous game. That won't be happening here by virtue of the fact that I do not have the power of night kills.

Guess I'll take your word for it.

Oh wait, no.

MacDougall wrote:MP if you are voting for me for shits and giggles or to see a reaction from me then posting it kind of nullifies any pointed post I could make. Yet again you are bad in a game I am in.

Ricochet's "policy lynch" is based on the fact that I policy night killed him in the previous game. That won't be happening here by virtue of the fact that I do not have the power of night kills.

Glorfindel is probably also voting for me because I night killed him last game.

Lol at you thinking that makes me bad.

Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry to hear about your mom, Glorfindel. Wishing the best!

I'll hop on the MacDougall policy lynch. Why not?

Let's start with "why". What's the policy behind your vote to lynch Mac?

Shits and giggles.

As always, shits and giggles are often in the eye of the shitter and giggler. What makes one man shit and giggle, may not make someone else.

OK, this was the best response imaginable. INH is not getting my vote today.

Did you sigh audibly when G-Man sent you a Mafia rolecard?

Nope, because he didn't give me one. It's a great feeling of relief, actually.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

I'll let the others. Mac is top priority afaic.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

I'll let the others. Mac is top priority afaic.

You're scared.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

I'll let the others. Mac is top priority afaic.

You're scared.

As long as Mac lives, yes.

I'm glad you hold me in such high regard Ricochet but I'm not a baddie.

Mac, what do you think of Neil Hartley?

MacDougall wrote:I'm glad you hold me in such high regard Ricochet but I'm not a baddie.

Bit mistaken there, but whatev.

And I'm town so I've no possible confirmation of that.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Mac, what do you think of Neil Hartley?

I am unsure why Jimmy has decided to roleplay as Neil Hartley out of the blue but I'm not feeling anything ...

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I'm glad you hold me in such high regard Ricochet but I'm not a baddie.

Bit mistaken there, but whatev.

Now now we all know you ship Mac all day and night.

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, you're here now, so I'm switching to BWT.

Oh so you're applying the Scotty philosophy this game.

We can lynch you D1 instead of Scotty, then.

Go for it.

I'll let the others. Mac is top priority afaic.

You're scared.

As long as Mac lives, yes.

Regardless of affiliation?

S~V~S wrote:
Regardless of affiliation?

If I would know he is town, no.

Alas, the game does not work with a priori knowledge.

So you are saying that he makes you so paranoid that you cannot deal with him being alive without factual knowledge that he is a civ?

S~V~S wrote:So you are saying that he makes you so paranoid that you cannot deal with him being alive without factual knowledge that he is a civ?

I am.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

So yeah, it was like after midnight when I posted that response to Epi. Maybe that's why it seems lifeless. Last night was my monthly ladies night out and I didn't come home until I had my fill of caramel apple sangria.

I cannot even remember what emoji I used. Wait....I do remember. Was it was "I'm wacko" one ...I think so. That emoji makes me think of someone being crazy and silly with their post/vote. I actually didn't even look to see he ACTUALLY voted for me. I thought he was kidding at the time. Maybe I ought to vote him back But probably not as I might be voting to save myself with it being so close and all.

I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.

Ricochet wrote:

S~V~S wrote:So you are saying that he makes you so paranoid that you cannot deal with him being alive without factual knowledge that he is a civ?

I am.

What, pray tell, makes Mac such a devious player, that we must lynch him Day 1 every game just to get him out of the way?

As an expert in the subject of Macdougall. Ricochet reads me well anyway so why he needs to lynch me before he can read me I do not know. I fancy he is just making content.

Also, is Neil Hartley going to grace us with a one-man show?

http://www.neillhartley.com/One-Man-Shows.html

I hope he gets around to some Sherlock Holmes, I think we could use it.

Elohcin wrote:I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.

The "trying too hard" argument bothers me, but I'm not sure I find you suspicious for it. I just don't agree. Also, Neil Hartley has nothing to do with Mad Max.

insertnamehere wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

S~V~S wrote:So you are saying that he makes you so paranoid that you cannot deal with him being alive without factual knowledge that he is a civ?

I am.

What, pray tell, makes Mac such a devious player, that we must lynch him Day 1 every game just to get him out of the way?

You tell me, you plotted alongside him the last time, however briefly or barely.

And WIFOM isn't going after someone who has gone after you; that's NO U or OMGUS.

This is WIFOM:



It's a circular argument. "So and so wouldn't do such a thing because it would make them look obviously bad... but that's what they would want me to think so they must be bad!... but that's what they would want me to think..."

MacDougall wrote:As an expert in the subject of Macdougall. Ricochet reads me well anyway so why he needs to lynch me before he can read me I do not know. I fancy he is just making content.

No I don't, actually, so you're getting reachy here a bit here. Of course, any semblance of a proper hunt would be welcomed on my part, not my problem you can't stand the thought of it.