Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
My sister and I joke that we share a brain because we think alike. But our personalities are vastly different. Just like Alex she is an INTJ. The E/I and the J/P affect the personality while the S/N and the F/T affect the way we think about things. It makes sense really. E/I is pretty clear why. The J/P really is about how you handle your everyday life, are you a planner or spontaneous? S/N is more about do you focus on the details or do you focus on the big picture? F/T, do you make decisions influenced by emotions or do you rely on cold logic? My point being, brain twins don't aways have the same full on personality. You can't escape me brain twin! Nice try though.Golden wrote:Not my brain twin after all!MovingPictures07 wrote:Daisy is an E for sure.thellama73 wrote:So far all Is. Are there any extroverted mafia players?
People Mastery is very fitting for me.MovingPictures07 wrote:That's a good question. I've never seen that distinction before. It appears there's more information about it in the "Our Theory" page.thellama73 wrote:What does turbulent versus assertive mean? I got assertive and MP got turbulent.
Here's what I found:
Strategies
The Strategy layer shows our preferred ways of doing things and achieving goals. There are four strategies:
Confident Individualism (Introverted and Assertive)
People Mastery (Extraverted and Assertive)Spoiler: show
Constant Improvement (Introverted and Turbulent)Spoiler: show
Social Engagement (Extraverted and Turbulent)Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
oh golden...Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
Interesting that one dynamic makes such a difference, i.e., INTJ (19% Dem) vs. INFJ (49% Dem).G-Man wrote:I was not surprised to see Democrats leaning more F than T. I don't mean that as a swipe against Dems/Libs. It's just confirms a long-held suspicion.
Did I get it completely wrong?Dom wrote:oh golden...Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
I knew we'd be almost complete opposites, but hey, at least we're both N's!Dom wrote:ENFP
i'm sure none of you are surpised there
Could it be why, given I'm so close to the border on that, I see myself as a swing voter with politics I can't find a label for?MovingPictures07 wrote:Interesting that one dynamic makes such a difference, i.e., INTJ (19% Dem) vs. INFJ (49% Dem).G-Man wrote:I was not surprised to see Democrats leaning more F than T. I don't mean that as a swipe against Dems/Libs. It's just confirms a long-held suspicion.
No. You're right mostly, but I was jokingGolden wrote:Did I get it completely wrong?Dom wrote:oh golden...Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
I thought it was pretty obvious 
The INTJ description is too much me. I plan out every little and big decision in my life.Golden wrote:I just read the descriptions and INFP and INTP definitely both describe me very well in part. I suspect I swing between them.
ISFP does not describe me at all. I think it interpreted a lot of my answers to questions about keeping schedules or to-do lists as evidence of spontaneity and flexibility. In fact its not, it's just that I have a well-structured and organised brain for these things so I don't need to put that effort in to do it. If it had instead asked questions about whether I'd do things at the drop of a hat it would have realised I am not that. It takes me to be particularly relaxed and have no plans in my head to be spontaneous.
MovingPictures07 wrote:For better or worse.
That was what I said...I love you too.Spacedaisy wrote:I will go through and read everyone else's responses but first I want to post that despite taking the official MB test a couple weeks ago, my husband harassed me into taking this one. So to make him happy I did. The results were the same and it is no surprise to me at all. I am quite solidly an ENTP. There is no letter that even comes near a gray area. It was as follows:
E - 91%
N - 90%
T - 73%
P - 83%
I was at 90% Assertiveness.
Happy now Alex?
As a side note, I've been aware of my personality type and weaknesses for a long time. So I answered the questions as I naturally tend to be, as opposed to the way I have learned to adapt to others. For example, I am not a naturally compassionate or thoughtful person, but I have learned that others need that and tried to cultivate it more. Or at least pretend it's there, lol. Anyway, yeah, tl;dr: I'm a loud, outgoing (and probably annoying) woman. Poor Alex.
Yeah, I definitely have that. It's a weird conundrum to have with the INTJ personality type, which tends to be self-confident, but it's because I always overanalyze myself into oblivion and worry about pretty much everything.Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
what??? you????MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, I definitely have that. It's a weird conundrum to have with the INTJ personality type, which tends to be self-confident, but it's because I always overanalyze myself into oblivion and worry about pretty much everything.Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.Dom wrote:Really? Whta about me makes you think that?Golden wrote:I could have told you that you were T!Dom wrote:For the record:
87% Extroverted
51% Intuitive
65% Feeling
75% "Prospecting" (I've seen it as Perceiving)
70% Turbulent
Took the survey for the A or T y'all were talking about.
Makes sense to me.Golden wrote:Could it be why, given I'm so close to the border on that, I see myself as a swing voter with politics I can't find a label for?MovingPictures07 wrote:Interesting that one dynamic makes such a difference, i.e., INTJ (19% Dem) vs. INFJ (49% Dem).G-Man wrote:I was not surprised to see Democrats leaning more F than T. I don't mean that as a swipe against Dems/Libs. It's just confirms a long-held suspicion.
I know, right? Who would have thought?Dom wrote:what??? you????MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, I definitely have that. It's a weird conundrum to have with the INTJ personality type, which tends to be self-confident, but it's because I always overanalyze myself into oblivion and worry about pretty much everything.Golden wrote:Hmm, I don't think I could it put it to words. I think you have a sort of duality of thought that comes out often, that I associate with this T. Like, maybe, there is a fight between two sides of you within the single thought - the emotional and rational sides maybe? I could have that wrong. I'm probably not a good analyst of why actually lol. But just instinct! The A's definitely seem more like people like me and J, the T's people like you and MP. It just makes sense in my head.
Lol, too bad he isn't a J.Golden wrote:Funny that I accidentally called Jay "J"
INTJay.
I don't really think I could it myself into such a correlation.MovingPictures07 wrote:I would be intrigued to know how much association exists between Myers-Briggs personality type and political affiliation.thellama73 wrote:Confident Individualism definitely describes me. Interestingly, although it only occurs in 2% of the population, INTJ is overwhelmingly overrepresented in libertarian circles. A statistically improbable majority of the people I worked with at FreedomWorks were INTJ., and I'm very interested to learn that MP continues the trend!
I have been before.MovingPictures07 wrote:Lol, too bad he isn't a J.Golden wrote:Funny that I accidentally called Jay "J"
INTJay.
I'll guess a close balance between ISFP and ESFP.Glorfindel wrote:Out of curiosity, anyone want to hazard a guess?
Nope!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll guess a close balance between ISFP and ESFP.Glorfindel wrote:Out of curiosity, anyone want to hazard a guess?
I wold have said ENFP-T.Glorfindel wrote:Nope!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll guess a close balance between ISFP and ESFP.Glorfindel wrote:Out of curiosity, anyone want to hazard a guess?
INFP-T (Mediator)
I've done this test a lot and whilst there is often significant levels of fluctuation in the percentage scores, it ALWAYS turns out comfortably INFP. The description of this personality type (in my opinion) is highly and uncannily accurate. I have a suspicion that this is potentially one of the least effective personality types for playing Mafia games from my experience, but there you go...
Scores:
Introverted: 82%
Intuitive: 67%
Feeling: 71%
Prospecting: 72%
Turbulent: 72%
Hello fellow Defender. Who shall we defend today?Quin wrote:I thought I answered. I did it a few hours ago and I got ISFJ this time.
The Defender
i could've told you thatVompatti wrote:INTP k
99% Introverted
68% Intuitive
64% Thinking
75% Prospecting
53% Turbulent
Let's do it!Metalmarsh89 wrote:Also, who's getting started on a Myers-Briggs personality mafia?
what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
Vompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
post-structuralists aren't just trolls okVompatti wrote:troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
name one (1) that isn'tA Person wrote:post-structuralists aren't just trolls okVompatti wrote:troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
(i don't even have any interest in psychoanalysis tho)
Yes he was, he just started out as a structuralist. Instead I will say that Derrida probably enjoyed his trollish nature but that doesn't invalidate anything kVompatti wrote:name one (1) that isn'tA Person wrote:post-structuralists aren't just trolls okVompatti wrote:troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
(i don't even have any interest in psychoanalysis tho)
foucault doesn't count because he isn't one
Butt deconstruction is counterproductive without reconstruction kA Person wrote:Yes he was, he just started out as a structuralist. Instead I will say that Derrida probably enjoyed his trollish nature but that doesn't invalidate anything kVompatti wrote:name one (1) that isn'tA Person wrote:post-structuralists aren't just trolls okVompatti wrote:troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
(i don't even have any interest in psychoanalysis tho)
foucault doesn't count because he isn't one
counterproductive to wut q.m.Vompatti wrote:Butt deconstruction is counterproductive without reconstruction kA Person wrote:Yes he was, he just started out as a structuralist. Instead I will say that Derrida probably enjoyed his trollish nature but that doesn't invalidate anything kVompatti wrote:name one (1) that isn'tA Person wrote:post-structuralists aren't just trolls okVompatti wrote:troll kA Person wrote:what does Lacan doVompatti wrote:There shoudl be a psychology flavoured mafia where Jung can use alchemy and Freud can have sex with his mother.
(i don't even have any interest in psychoanalysis tho)
foucault doesn't count because he isn't one
to making anything useful out of whatever it is you're deconstructing kA Person wrote:counterproductive to wut q.m.Vompatti wrote:Butt deconstruction is counterproductive without reconstruction k
In the sense of four particular personality types.Vompatti wrote:Explorers in what sense, q.m.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:We need more data tbh.
Not even me. Although, I'm super obviously a very social introvert.thellama73 wrote:So far all Is. Are there any extroverted mafia players?
