Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:40 pm
He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Page 2 of 34
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:40 pm
Or Day 0, I mean, if you can swing it, why not?
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:41 pm
I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:21 pm
They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:55 am
Why does Wilgy do anything?S~V~S wrote:I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
I'm voting for her pantsuits, because she really does pull off the pantsuit look.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:16 am
YesQuin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Hiii Jaaaaaaack, do you want to conquer the world with me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.
DFaraday wrote:Why does Wilgy do anything?S~V~S wrote:I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Why does Wilgy do anything?
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:59 am
I think Wilgy is bad.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:50 am
Don't you always?MacDougall wrote:I think Wilgy is bad.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:28 am
No.DrWilgy wrote:Don't you always?MacDougall wrote:I think Wilgy is bad.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:30 am
I mainly asked because if its that red peek/faux red peek business, info dumping and role claiming are forbidden in this games rules. So I was wondering why he would start off like this unless it's an inside joke with Epi or something.DFaraday wrote:Why does Wilgy do anything?S~V~S wrote:I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
I'm voting for her pantsuits, because she really does pull off the pantsuit look.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:29 am
I voted for personality - Hillary Clinton is the One True President, and she's a great gal to boot!
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:44 am
I picked the sexist option.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:21 am
DrWilgy wrote:Hiii Jaaaaaaack, do you want to conquer the world with me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:24 am
Hey guys. Had people over last night, so I just caught up. I LOVE Hillary's outfits that she gets from Kim-Jong Un, but voting for that would be sexist, so I'm going with her husband. That dude is a pimp with a capital "P."
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:31 am
What did you learn from your 2 page catch-up?notsawyer540 wrote:Hey guys. Had people over last night, so I just caught up. I LOVE Hillary's outfits that she gets from Kim-Jong Un, but voting for that would be sexist, so I'm going with her husband. That dude is a pimp with a capital "P."
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:35 am
[quote="Scotty"
What did you learn from your 2 page catch-up?[/quote]
That people like pantsuits, mostly. What have you learned?
What did you learn from your 2 page catch-up?[/quote]
That people like pantsuits, mostly. What have you learned?
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:51 am
A lot actually!notsawyer540 wrote:That people like pantsuits, mostly. What have you learned?Scotty wrote: What did you learn from your 2 page catch-up?
Quin doesn't know what he's doing.
Marmot is bad, via Mac.
Llama and SVS are here to playnotargue, while Elo is here to playnotdebate.
I checked FZ's rolecard per marmot's request and he's a she.
Epi is bad, via Wilgy.
Wilgy is bad, via Mac.
You like pantsuits.
Sounds like we got a good chunk of mafia already sniffed out to me!
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:03 pm
Why does anyone say anything? Because in silence, we are forced to confront the deepest, darkest recesses of ourselves.S~V~S wrote:I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:07 pm
And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:36 pm
That really wasn't that wild.thellama73 wrote:And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:37 pm
Epignosis was pushing hard for a game to start. I find his lack of activity suspicious. 
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:45 pm
I am not afraid of myself. The darker the better.thellama73 wrote:Why does anyone say anything? Because in silence, we are forced to confront the deepest, darkest recesses of ourselves.S~V~S wrote:I know what he's saying. But why?Quin wrote:He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.S~V~S wrote:What is the point of this?DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
But I am going to guess he was fake claiming because if he really had such info, the host would have withdrawn party support from him for contravening congressional policy, and his career in politics would be over.
So whoever said, Wilgy being Wilgy, I am gonna go with that.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:46 pm
Don't worry- if he's good, mafia will surely kill him night 1. And if he's bad, then we'll just lynch him! See how easy it is?Marmot wrote:Epignosis was pushing hard for a game to start. I find his lack of activity suspicious.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:49 pm
Heads we win, tails he loses - I like it!Scotty wrote:Don't worry- if he's good, mafia will surely kill him night 1. And if he's bad, then we'll just lynch him! See how easy it is?Marmot wrote:Epignosis was pushing hard for a game to start. I find his lack of activity suspicious.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:32 pm
Hey, sorry it took me so long to check in. Wasn't around.
Sorry for the odd question, but maybe I missed this. Is this a regular heist game, as in a portion of baddies and the rest are good, or is this actually a red vs. blue game where there are two groups fighting each other?
I need to refresh my memory on some of the players' game styles. Wilgy to me is being Wilgy. He's done this before. Plenty.
Mac is usually more talkative, though it's still the first day, and sadly I can't remember if he's more talkative as mafia or civ. Though I didn't like his "I think you're bad" to Wilgy, because if I can remember Wilgy saying he's a doctor a lot, and pulling the someone is bad card in past games, I find it odd that he doesn't.
That's all I have for now.
Good to be back
Sorry for the odd question, but maybe I missed this. Is this a regular heist game, as in a portion of baddies and the rest are good, or is this actually a red vs. blue game where there are two groups fighting each other?
I need to refresh my memory on some of the players' game styles. Wilgy to me is being Wilgy. He's done this before. Plenty.
Mac is usually more talkative, though it's still the first day, and sadly I can't remember if he's more talkative as mafia or civ. Though I didn't like his "I think you're bad" to Wilgy, because if I can remember Wilgy saying he's a doctor a lot, and pulling the someone is bad card in past games, I find it odd that he doesn't.
That's all I have for now.
Good to be back
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:43 pm
Feigning ignorance of the rules. Classic FZ move.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:00 pm
well, indulge me please.thellama73 wrote:Feigning ignorance of the rules. Classic FZ move.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:34 pm
As far as I'm concerned, we're looking for a handful of baddies.
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:55 pm
... is this a troll?FZ. wrote:Hey, sorry it took me so long to check in. Wasn't around.
Sorry for the odd question, but maybe I missed this. Is this a regular heist game, as in a portion of baddies and the rest are good, or is this actually a red vs. blue game where there are two groups fighting each other?
I need to refresh my memory on some of the players' game styles. Wilgy to me is being Wilgy. He's done this before. Plenty.
Mac is usually more talkative, though it's still the first day, and sadly I can't remember if he's more talkative as mafia or civ. Though I didn't like his "I think you're bad" to Wilgy, because if I can remember Wilgy saying he's a doctor a lot, and pulling the someone is bad card in past games, I find it odd that he doesn't.
That's all I have for now.
Good to be back
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:31 pm
RISE UP
(SATURDAY, JANUARY 21, 2017)
Several men sat around a conference room table in a dimly-lit room. The door opened and another man walked in. He surveyed those in attendance and made a sour look as he counted the number of empty chairs.
"Thank you all for attending. Perhaps we should invite a few more people to be in on this?"
"I think the most loyal of us have showed up," another man said.
"Bill," the standing man said, "what about Martha, Ainsley, or Jenna? Couldn't we bring them in on this?"
"Don't go soft on us," Bill replied. "The major players are here. Let's leave it at that. Besides, if we never invited Greta or Megyn, then why would we even think of inviting those three?"
"Our numbers are just thinner than I'd have hoped," the standing man said.
"As the senior member of this establishment," another man said, "I understand your concern but our dwindling numbers makes it imperative for us to proceed as is. We don't want to dilute the purity of thought here. The time to act is now. The harder and more successful our strikes, the more hearts and minds we'll change. They'll start crawling back to us and begging to be a part of this. This disruption at the inauguration gives us ammunition on many different levels. Let's use it to our advantage while it's hot."
"Very well," the standing man said. "Let's get down to business."
-----------------------------------
Hillary Clinton sat in the Oval Office, reviewing the events of the day and the stories being spun in the media. This was supposed to be a good day; a day of vindication even. Now there were questions, rumors, and outright lies all over the airwaves and internet.
"Any luck on tracing the source of that transmission?" Hillary asked?
"Not yet, Madam President," said one of her aides. "Interpol is looking into it on their end as well."
"How can something broadcast globally not be traced?" Hillary asked.
"It's complicated and very technical, Madam President."
"Then never mind. I don't have time for a tutorial. We need to act fast to find the source of this transmission and bring them to justice."
"And what about the press, Madam President? Everyone is waiting to hear more from us about the claims in the video."
"What more do they want? I don't know anything about this Operation Cobalt thing and we've already said so. I'll repeat it until I'm blue in the face. Have we located Pamela Brown yet?"
"No, Madam President. She's been on leave of absence from CNN for months."
"Well if it's true that she was masquerading as Tiffany Trump, why don't we start with obtaining information on her whereabouts after that accident. We're the federal government for crying out loud. Let's use our investigative tools and figure this mess out!"
-----------------------------------
Day 1 has begun.
You have 48 hours to lynch someone.
You have 48 hours to lynch someone.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:40 pm
Hillary Clinton appreciates those who exercise their right to vote. After all, votes got her elected president. +1 Hillary Points to everyone who voted in the Day 0 poll.
Hillary Points Standings:
Hillary Points Standings:
+4 Points: S~V~S
+3 Points: thellama73
+1 Point: Dfaraday, DrWilgy, Elohcin, FZ., Long Con, MacDougall, Marmot, notsawyer540, Scotty, TheFloyd73
0 Points: Epignosis, Jackofhearts2005
-5 Points: Quin
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:49 pm
If I get enough Hillary points I'm gonna buy another pantsuit
Wonder if that guy, Bill, in the first half of the story is Bill Clinton? I could totally see him sabotaging Hillary.
Wonder if that guy, Bill, in the first half of the story is Bill Clinton? I could totally see him sabotaging Hillary.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:02 pm
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON D.C. 20503January 20, 2017MEMORANDUM FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF SECRET SERVICE PROTECTIONThis Presidential memorandum calls for the extension of a Secret Service protective detail to anyone of the President's choice on the night of January 21, 2017. This memorandum requires the Director of the United States Secret Service to provide a list of qualified and capable service agents not already assigned to other work to the President no later 4:30 p.m. on January 21, 2017. At that time, the President will provide the name of the person to be protect that evening.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:32 pm
Yooo...
I haven't played with FZ in awhile. How are you?
I haven't played with FZ in awhile. How are you?
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:56 pm
Oh, does that make you bad?MacDougall wrote:No.DrWilgy wrote:Don't you always?MacDougall wrote:I think Wilgy is bad.
Good! We'll need afew things before we can begin.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Hiii Jaaaaaaack, do you want to conquer the world with me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.
*Wilgy hands Jack a list of objects*
Spoiler: show
I agree with this, Quin are you bad?thellama73 wrote:And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:57 pm
Wilgy, who should the President protect this evening? 
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:00 pm
Long Con wrote:Wilgy, who should the President protect this evening?
It's too early to say LC. I do think a proper PoE could get this answer, but there's not enough discussion yet.
If you need an answer now, me!
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:08 pm
No, I'm sorry, the correct answer is "Epignosis".
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:11 pm
Why don't you find out?DrWilgy wrote:Oh, does that make you bad?MacDougall wrote:No.DrWilgy wrote:Don't you always?MacDougall wrote:I think Wilgy is bad.
Good! We'll need afew things before we can begin.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Hiii Jaaaaaaack, do you want to conquer the world with me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!
Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.
*Wilgy hands Jack a list of objects*Spoiler: showI agree with this, Quin are you bad?thellama73 wrote:And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:12 pm
I won't be satisfied until I have double digits in negative Hillary points.G-Man wrote:Hillary Clinton appreciates those who exercise their right to vote. After all, votes got her elected president. +1 Hillary Points to everyone who voted in the Day 0 poll.
Hillary Points Standings:+4 Points: S~V~S
+3 Points: thellama73
+1 Point: Dfaraday, DrWilgy, Elohcin, FZ., Long Con, MacDougall, Marmot, notsawyer540, Scotty, TheFloyd73
0 Points: Epignosis, Jackofhearts2005
-5 Points: Quin
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:22 pm
I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:25 pm
Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:27 pm
Why?Long Con wrote:No, I'm sorry, the correct answer is "Epignosis".
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:34 pm
I'll try to lynch you. Idk bout the others.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:03 pm
I didn't lynch you last time because you didn't make 100 posts.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:38 pm
I guess you're just not Presidential enough to know.Quin wrote:Why?Long Con wrote:No, I'm sorry, the correct answer is "Epignosis".
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:46 pm
Damn sure felt that way.Epignosis wrote:I didn't lynch you last time because you didn't make 100 posts.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Haha ok.DrWilgy wrote:I'll try to lynch you. Idk bout the others.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
I have a rule. Long Con is always bad when he starts cracking wise and not being serious.Long Con wrote:Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:51 pm
Emphasis on the 'wisdom' factor, I'd say.MacDougall wrote:I have a rule. Long Con is always bad when he starts cracking wise and not being serious.Long Con wrote:Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:05 am
Is this where I get voted for?Long Con wrote:Emphasis on the 'wisdom' factor, I'd say.MacDougall wrote:I have a rule. Long Con is always bad when he starts cracking wise and not being serious.Long Con wrote:Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:06 am
I led a lynch on you because you didn't have a lot of posts? That's what it felt like to you?MacDougall wrote:Damn sure felt that way.Epignosis wrote:I didn't lynch you last time because you didn't make 100 posts.MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.
If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.
I don't give a shit how many posts somebody has.
I see into your soul.