Page 2 of 29
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:34 pm
by Mister Rearranger
Melissa Auf der Maur was my 90s celebrity crush (or was it the early 2000s when she jumped into Smashing Pumpkins? icr)
Oh, and Neve Campbell too. But who didn't love Neve Campbell back then? 
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:34 pm
by boo
Hedgeowl wrote:Host- is there a Card czar selected Day 0 or will that be you this round? In future rounds when we do know the Card Czar's identity we are trying to select what they would think funny yes?
Me this round. Yes, the best strategy is to go with what you think any given Czar will find funniest (imo).
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:38 pm
by Marmot
Epignosis wrote:Sorsha wrote:Try to get awesome points so you can lock into a cool role otherwise the roles switch each night. That's what I'm going with.
Is that what the kids are calling them now?
I remember they used to call them "cool points." If you did something awkward or stupid, they'd say, "Gimmie 10 cool points, bro."
Ah, the 90s.

All you really have to remember is that the points don't matter.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:40 pm
by DharmaHelper
Are we allowed to be tastefully offensive without using cards? :P
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:45 pm
by thellama73
90s bad! 80s good! Derail!

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:46 pm
by Marmot
DharmaHelper wrote:Are we allowed to be tastefully offensive without using cards? :P
As long as one person finds it funny and one person finds it utterly disrespectful I think.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:11 am
by DharmaHelper
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Sorsha wrote:Try to get awesome points so you can lock into a cool role otherwise the roles switch each night. That's what I'm going with.
Is that what the kids are calling them now?
I remember they used to call them "cool points." If you did something awkward or stupid, they'd say, "Gimmie 10 cool points, bro."
Ah, the 90s.

All you really have to remember is that the points don't matter.

That's right, the show where everything's made up and the point's don't matter. Just like a strippers name.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:12 am
by kneel4justice
S~V~S wrote:thellama73 wrote:If that's going to be your host color, I'm going to have to switch back to the black color scheme.
I switch back and forth all the time due to this, in one game they were posting in freaking yellow, lol. Thats why the invisitext thing they had going on in the other game was so funny, it was totally visible in the prosilver scheme ha ha.
And i have not done 3 games at once in a looooong time, so I will try to wrap my head around this one in the AM when i am fresh and caffeinated. I have never played this game, and even without that boo games are intensely complex

Well, this is the one thing that has caught my attention right now.
Its just something about the way you kind of make an excuse, I am not saying it is unreasonable to wait until the morning but the fact that you add how you have not done 3 games in a long time pings me. I just don't know if that's necessary, or if it is more of a way to say: "don't expect too much out of me".
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:00 am
by reywaS
SVS is always bad....always.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:07 am
by insertnamehere
kneel4justice wrote:S~V~S wrote:thellama73 wrote:If that's going to be your host color, I'm going to have to switch back to the black color scheme.
I switch back and forth all the time due to this, in one game they were posting in freaking yellow, lol. Thats why the invisitext thing they had going on in the other game was so funny, it was totally visible in the prosilver scheme ha ha.
And i have not done 3 games at once in a looooong time, so I will try to wrap my head around this one in the AM when i am fresh and caffeinated. I have never played this game, and even without that boo games are intensely complex

Well, this is the one thing that has caught my attention right now.
Its just something about the way you kind of make an excuse, I am not saying it is unreasonable to wait until the morning but the fact that you add how you have not done 3 games in a long time pings me. I just don't know if that's necessary, or if it is more of a way to say: "don't expect too much out of me".
The fact that you immediately jump to suspicions is pretty suspicious to me. Also you post in blue. I don't trust the color blue. It's a very devious color.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:08 am
by DharmaHelper
Blue. B-L-U-E 4 letters but two vowels what the fuck.
What kind of fucked up satanic twisted psycho bitch word has 50% vowels. That's demonic shit right there and I does NOT fucks with no demons.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:21 am
by kneel4justice
insertnamehere wrote:kneel4justice wrote:S~V~S wrote:thellama73 wrote:If that's going to be your host color, I'm going to have to switch back to the black color scheme.
I switch back and forth all the time due to this, in one game they were posting in freaking yellow, lol. Thats why the invisitext thing they had going on in the other game was so funny, it was totally visible in the prosilver scheme ha ha.
And i have not done 3 games at once in a looooong time, so I will try to wrap my head around this one in the AM when i am fresh and caffeinated. I have never played this game, and even without that boo games are intensely complex

Well, this is the one thing that has caught my attention right now.
Its just something about the way you kind of make an excuse, I am not saying it is unreasonable to wait until the morning but the fact that you add how you have not done 3 games in a long time pings me. I just don't know if that's necessary, or if it is more of a way to say: "don't expect too much out of me".
The fact that you immediately jump to suspicions is pretty suspicious to me. Also you post in blue. I don't trust the color blue. It's a very devious color.
So would you prefer I just keep quiet then?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:24 am
by Mister Rearranger
DharmaHelper wrote:Blue. B-L-U-E 4 letters but two vowels what the fuck.
What kind of fucked up satanic twisted psycho bitch word has 50% vowels. That's demonic shit right there and I does NOT fucks with no demons.
Our lovely host's screenname is somewhere around 66.6% vowels.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:28 am
by DharmaHelper
Mister Rearranger wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Blue. B-L-U-E 4 letters but two vowels what the fuck.
What kind of fucked up satanic twisted psycho bitch word has 50% vowels. That's demonic shit right there and I does NOT fucks with no demons.
Our lovely host's screenname is somewhere around 66.6% vowels.

Holy. Shit.
THE POWER OF COMPELS YOU!
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:36 am
by thellama73
kneel4justice wrote:insertnamehere wrote:kneel4justice wrote:S~V~S wrote:thellama73 wrote:If that's going to be your host color, I'm going to have to switch back to the black color scheme.
I switch back and forth all the time due to this, in one game they were posting in freaking yellow, lol. Thats why the invisitext thing they had going on in the other game was so funny, it was totally visible in the prosilver scheme ha ha.
And i have not done 3 games at once in a looooong time, so I will try to wrap my head around this one in the AM when i am fresh and caffeinated. I have never played this game, and even without that boo games are intensely complex

Well, this is the one thing that has caught my attention right now.
Its just something about the way you kind of make an excuse, I am not saying it is unreasonable to wait until the morning but the fact that you add how you have not done 3 games in a long time pings me. I just don't know if that's necessary, or if it is more of a way to say: "don't expect too much out of me".
The fact that you immediately jump to suspicions is pretty suspicious to me. Also you post in blue. I don't trust the color blue. It's a very devious color.
So would you prefer I just keep quiet then?
Yes, let's all just keep quiet, shall we? This can be a nice low-key game.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:47 am
by Dom
thellama73 wrote:90s bad! 80s good! Derail!


Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:06 am
by Marmot
DharmaHelper wrote:Blue. B-L-U-E 4 letters but two vowels what the fuck.
What kind of fucked up satanic twisted psycho bitch word has 50% vowels. That's demonic shit right there and I does NOT fucks with no demons.
I bet you drive an Audi.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:10 am
by Dom
What about the word "queue", amirite ladies?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:13 am
by DharmaHelper
makeitstopmakeitstopmakeitstop
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:44 am
by Mister Rearranger
Metalmarsh89 wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:Blue. B-L-U-E 4 letters but two vowels what the fuck.
What kind of fucked up satanic twisted psycho bitch word has 50% vowels. That's demonic shit right there and I does NOT fucks with no demons.
I bet you drive an Audi.
If he doesn't, then he audi.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:45 am
by Dom
this is getting out of hand.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:45 am
by FZ.
thellama73 wrote:Hedgeowl wrote:Epignosis wrote:I'm still on chapter 17 of the instructions.
I just realized the downside of this format is that we can't all sit around a table having boo read the instructions to us, while some pay attention, some zone out when they get it, others just figure it out as the games starts, and the rest never quite figure it all out, but still manage to win somehow.

Well, since I'm not reading any of the host posts, this should be interesting.

I just mark the whole thing with the cursor so background turns blue and I can then read it.
I'll be back for the actual game later. Posting from work
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:11 am
by Flyin' High
Best conversation to wake up to. Let's find more ways to drive DH insane!

How do you feel about the word syzygy, DH?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:13 am
by S~V~S
insertnamehere wrote:kneel4justice wrote:S~V~S wrote:thellama73 wrote:If that's going to be your host color, I'm going to have to switch back to the black color scheme.
I switch back and forth all the time due to this, in one game they were posting in freaking yellow, lol. Thats why the invisitext thing they had going on in the other game was so funny, it was totally visible in the prosilver scheme ha ha.
And i have not done 3 games at once in a looooong time, so I will try to wrap my head around this one in the AM when i am fresh and caffeinated. I have never played this game, and even without that boo games are intensely complex

Well, this is the one thing that has caught my attention right now.
Its just something about the way you kind of make an excuse, I am not saying it is unreasonable to wait until the morning but the fact that you add how you have not done 3 games in a long time pings me. I just don't know if that's necessary, or if it is more of a way to say: "don't expect too much out of me".
The fact that you immediately jump to suspicions is pretty suspicious to me. Also you post in blue. I don't trust the color blue. It's a very devious color.
That's just how they play where he plays, they come out of the gate swinging at trivia, stuff we would call mud slinging. As for the blue, it was jarring for me at first too as it is supposed to be reserved for non player posts, but meh. The players use personsl colors where they play, and perhaps people felt rude pointing out that here color posting is only used in game related ways. I figure so long as it is not green or red I am good.
And K4J, have you read the mechanics, the roles, the rules? Hella complex, eh? Boos games always are and one needs to read and understand them well, because in boo games, ignorance is death. Personally I would prefer to read them when I am under the influence of 8 hours of sleep and a nice cuppa coffee than the influence of a glass of wine and cottage pie, Lol. And three games IS hard to manage, ask anyone who has done it.
Linki~ that word is beautiful

Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:34 am
by thellama73
S~V~S wrote:Boos games always are and one needs to read and understand them well, because in boo games, ignorance is death.

Is that why everyone seems to care so much whether I read the host posts? I guess I should be flattered thta you don't want my ignorance to result in my death.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:45 am
by S~V~S
Um yeah. He does not write posts just for storytelling. I have played most of his games, i was on break during Viral One, and i have won a few. I LOVE boos games, but they are intense and require attention and concentration. Not easy when you don't read the posts, lol.
Just be glad he did not do the Mechanics posts in aqua lol.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:32 pm
by Dom
I usually die in Boo games, so I guess I'm pretty ignorant.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:48 pm
by FZ.
First of all, glad you're playing, K4J

I can't handle these nut cases alone
And you people leave his blue font alone. He's been doing it for ages. He likes standing out
SVS, since you said it is crucial to pay attention to stories, what did you take out of the first one?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:06 pm
by S~V~S
It's a metaphorical explanation of how the Card Czar role in particular works, and how the game in general works, an explanation of how this game works irl for those who have never played it. Like me. It explains the basic way it works, and how it may transition into an online Mafia style version
At least thats how I read it.
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:09 pm
by Mongoose
S~V~S wrote:
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too


Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:10 pm
by S~V~S
FZ. wrote:First of all, glad you're playing, K4J

I can't handle these nut cases alone
And you people leave his blue font alone. He's been doing it for ages. He likes standing out
i forgot to reply to this part.
I know, that is why I think no one said anything. Here that color is reserved for non players, basically a fluff color, so he does run the risk of not having his posts read by people who have never played at this site before. The see that color and breeze right past it, which I would guess is the opposite of what K4J wants people to do with his posts.
Just a culture thing, not an important one.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:25 pm
by thellama73
S~V~S wrote:
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too

Keep dreaming, S~V~S.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:16 pm
by S~V~S
Also, not a fan of crap. Carp Mafia, maybe, i like fishies. Crap, no.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:17 pm
by kneel4justice
S~V~S wrote:
That's just how they play where he plays, they come out of the gate swinging at trivia, stuff we would call mud slinging. As for the blue, it was jarring for me at first too as it is supposed to be reserved for non player posts, but meh. The players use personsl colors where they play, and perhaps people felt rude pointing out that here color posting is only used in game related ways. I figure so long as it is not green or red I am good.
And K4J, have you read the mechanics, the roles, the rules? Hella complex, eh? Boos games always are and one needs to read and understand them well, because in boo games, ignorance is death. Personally I would prefer to read them when I am under the influence of 8 hours of sleep and a nice cuppa coffee than the influence of a glass of wine and cottage pie, Lol. And three games IS hard to manage, ask anyone who has done it.
Linki~ that word is beautiful

I did not know that blue was anything, I thought only orange/red/green were things. If it is trouble for anyone that I am posting in this color, then I will certainly stop. Just let me know, okay?
Anyways, the game does look complex, I wasn't arguing with that statement or the fact that 3 games is a lot. It seems you're missing my point. My point was that it was coming across more of an excuse to me. Although, I feel a little better knowing it was about the set-up, as I at first took it as just getting into the game in general.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:17 pm
by reywaS
what about Carp crap mafia
Re: Cards Against Humanity [SETTING UP]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:27 pm
by S~V~S
kneel4justice wrote:S~V~S wrote:
That's just how they play where he plays, they come out of the gate swinging at trivia, stuff we would call mud slinging. As for the blue, it was jarring for me at first too as it is supposed to be reserved for non player posts, but meh. The players use personsl colors where they play, and perhaps people felt rude pointing out that here color posting is only used in game related ways. I figure so long as it is not green or red I am good.
And K4J, have you read the mechanics, the roles, the rules? Hella complex, eh? Boos games always are and one needs to read and understand them well, because in boo games, ignorance is death. Personally I would prefer to read them when I am under the influence of 8 hours of sleep and a nice cuppa coffee than the influence of a glass of wine and cottage pie, Lol. And three games IS hard to manage, ask anyone who has done it.
Linki~ that word is beautiful

I did not know that blue was anything, I thought only orange/red/green were things. If it is trouble for anyone that I am posting in this color, then I will certainly stop. Just let me know, okay?
Anyways, the game does look complex, I wasn't arguing with that statement or the fact that 3 games is a lot. It seems you're missing my point. My point was that it was coming across more of an excuse to me. Although, I feel a little better knowing it was about the set-up, as I at first took it as just getting into the game in general.
Not a problem, Mp would have said something (or told me to say something, lol) if it was. It is the non player colr, and you run the risk of having posts not read by people who don't know you. It's cool
I only said it as someone (INH, I believe) said they found it suspicious.
And, no, I got your point. Which is why i explained it literally, it is a real thing for me, not an excuse. I would have problems being a low poster, lol. Ask anyone who knows me. I never shut up.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:29 pm
by FZ.
S~V~S wrote:It's a metaphorical explanation of how the Card Czar role in particular works, and how the game in general works, an explanation of how this game works irl for those who have never played it. Like me. It explains the basic way it works, and how it may transition into an online Mafia style version
At least thats how I read it.
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too

I didn't really mean for you to answer my question. You were just asking for it, but thanks for the explanation
And you seem keen to get llama to agree with you

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:32 pm
by thellama73
FZ. wrote:S~V~S wrote:
And you seem keen to get llama to agree with you

My approval is apparently a valued commodity around here.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:39 pm
by S~V~S
FZ. wrote:S~V~S wrote:It's a metaphorical explanation of how the Card Czar role in particular works, and how the game in general works, an explanation of how this game works irl for those who have never played it. Like me. It explains the basic way it works, and how it may transition into an online Mafia style version
At least thats how I read it.
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too

I didn't really mean for you to answer my question. You were just asking for it, but thanks for the explanation
And you seem keen to get llama to agree with you

Um, we have a reputation for...spirited disagrement
And if you ask a question, you should expect answers. What was it that i was asking for?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:45 pm
by thellama73
S~V~S wrote:
And if you ask a question, you should expect answers. What was it that i was asking for?
Answers!
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:48 pm
by FZ.
thellama73 wrote:FZ. wrote:S~V~S wrote:
And you seem keen to get llama to agree with you

My approval is apparently a valued commodity around here.
I'll keep it in mind and do my best to get it.
S~V~S wrote:FZ. wrote:S~V~S wrote:It's a metaphorical explanation of how the Card Czar role in particular works, and how the game in general works, an explanation of how this game works irl for those who have never played it. Like me. It explains the basic way it works, and how it may transition into an online Mafia style version
At least thats how I read it.
i also made a big point of it as i would like Llama to CONCEDE that i may have said something he could AGREE with for once in our lives. yeah, theres that too

I didn't really mean for you to answer my question. You were just asking for it, but thanks for the explanation
And you seem keen to get llama to agree with you

Um, we have a reputation for...spirited disagrement
And if you ask a question, you should expect answers. What was it that i was asking for?
Maybe I was wrong, maybe you're not looking for his approval but rather trying to distance yourself from him ...
And you just said that every story is really important and you can't miss a word. Just wanted to make sure you actually stood behind what you said. Glad to know you did

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:56 pm
by S~V~S
Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:02 pm
by thellama73
FZ. wrote:
Maybe I was wrong, maybe you're not looking for his approval but rather trying to distance yourself from him ...
S~V~S, FZ thinks we're on a team! Isn't that funny? I don't think we've ever been a team, have we?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:03 pm
by kneel4justice
Wait, FZ, are you being serious about them possibly distancing themselves?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:05 pm
by FZ.
S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.
I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do.
I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me
@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:06 pm
by thellama73
FZ. wrote:
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
Yes, that's why she gets upset f you don't use sarcastic orange or smilies to signal your intentions. I, on the other hand, have a sense of humor.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:14 pm
by S~V~S
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:18 pm
by FZ.
thellama73 wrote:FZ. wrote:
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
Yes, that's why she gets upset f you don't use sarcastic orange or smilies to signal your intentions. I, on the other hand, have a sense of humor.
A sense of humor, and popular. You must be one hell of a catch
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:20 pm
by S~V~S
Now see, i would have put that in sarcastic orange :nod:
FZ says:A sense of humor, and popular. You must be one hell of a catch[/quote]
Fixed

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 0]
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:24 pm
by FZ.
S~V~S wrote:
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
You and K4J would make quite a pair
I'll keep it in mind. I agree that suspicions are serious business, and if you don't contribute, why bother playing. That said, sarcasm is a serious business too
@linki: That would paint most of the thread orange. By the way, is that how you do the linki, or is there an actual feature for that?