Clue: The Movie [Day 10]

#51

That Llama, always being such a gentleman.
3

#52

I agree, he was kind to allow us a restart.
2

#53

Oh Sherry, you sweet lady you. You couldnt be the killer.. Could you??
4

#54

Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?

3

#55

S~V~S wrote:Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?

3

I do declare, I did see a giant sock moving through the library about 11 pm with a giant Daisy shaped knife.
5

#56

There are a lot of excellent murder mystery films. Like Murder on the Orient, for example.

4

#57

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Llamas discipline has frightened us all away
Now that's just elephant talk.

LOL, this made me laugh way too hard.

Boogs wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?

3
I do declare, I did see a giant sock moving through the library about 11 pm with a giant Daisy shaped knife.
5

Wasn't me.

6

#58

I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."

5

#59

Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."

5

Can you elaborate?

7

#60

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."

5
Can you elaborate?

7

Yes. The man with info on the poll is not bad, so we know the killers have no info on the poll. I think it is now no secret the purpose of this poll. Therefore, I think the killers would have spread out. Examining the group that voted the same way I did is my way of narrowing my focus (and, of course, exempting myself).

6

#61

Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."

5
Can you elaborate?

7
Yes. The man with info on the poll is not bad, so we know the killers have no info on the poll. I think it is now no secret the purpose of this poll. Therefore, I think the killers would have spread out. Examining the group that voted the same way I did is my way of narrowing my focus (and, of course, exempting myself).

6

Seems pretty logical to me. What about the non-voters though?

8

#62

The non-voters probably didn't know the game had started.

7

#63

Mongoose wrote:The non-voters probably didn't know the game had started.

7

But couldn't a baddie have missed the vote?

9

#64

This is fun already. Loving the posts llama.

Why the knockers Epic?

Boo...every time I try to post with a number...it is taken and I wait and then the next is taken. Shut up will ya?

8

#65

Yee hee got one in!

#66

Elohcin wrote:This is fun already. Loving the posts llama.

Why the knockers Epic?

Boo...every time I try to post with a number...it is taken and I wait and then the next is taken. Shut up will ya?

8

I was wondering the same thing myself, since he mentioned baddies spreading out. If they're spread out, why focus on a particular group?

1

#67

Well, I like epic knockers. What can I say?

Seriously, I already answered this question. Also, I feel sorry for you nijuu.

9

#68

Epignosis wrote:Well, I like epic knockers. What can I say?

Seriously, I already answered this question. Also, I feel sorry for you nijuu.

9

I feel sorry for me, too.

2

#69

@MP - Yeah, literally anyone of any alignment coulda missed the vote.

10

#70

And I just re-re-re-read your post (Epi) and finally got it. Whew. I already need a vacation.

3

#71

Elohcin wrote:This is fun already. Loving the posts llama.

Why the knockers Epic?

Boo...every time I try to post with a number...it is taken and I wait and then the next is taken. Shut up will ya?

8

Can you post of pic of Epi's knockers plz?

10

#72

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Mongoose wrote:The non-voters probably didn't know the game had started.

7
But couldn't a baddie have missed the vote?

9

Yeah, I think a Mafia member could have miss a vote. What the hell does this question accomplish?

"No, MP- a mafia member could NOT have possibly missed the vote because the two people who missed the vote could NOT possibly be bad."

I keep warning you about these empty statements and questions.

Addendum: Thank ye Mongoose.

11

#73

My only point was that it could throw a wrench into your analysis.

11

#74

MovingPictures07 wrote:My only point was that it could throw a wrench into your analysis.

11

It doesn't.

12

#75

Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.

#76

You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?

12

#77

Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.

It's here on this page.

MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?

12

No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.

13

#78

Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!

4

#79

Epignosis wrote:
Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.
It's here on this page.

MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?

12
No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.

13

It's not an empty question if you don't know the answer.

13

#80

nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!

4

You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.

Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.
It's here on this page.

MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?

12
No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.

13
It's not an empty question if you don't know the answer.

13

When the answer is "yes" to "could" the question is almost assuredly an empty one.

14

#81

Epignosis wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!

4
You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.

Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.

A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!

MP, what question are you waiting on for an answer?

5

#82

I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.

14

#83

nijuukyugou wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!

4
You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.

Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.
A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!

MP, what question are you waiting on for an answer?

5

Who are you suspicious of?

And by the way, the meeting thing won't help, since I'll be in there with you.

15

#84

I'm curious what kpence and kevin have to say!

15

#85

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.

14

Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?

16

#86

Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.

14
Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?

16

I didn't say it IS flawed; I just said it could be flawed, you could be incorrect. Given what little we know at this stage in the game, I don't see anything particularly illogical with your theory, though I doubt I'll be using it to cast my vote.

15

#87

Oops. Dammit. Sorry guys.

#88

This is why I generally don't participate in these kinds of contests.

#89

Epignosis wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!

4
You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.

Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.
A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!

MP, what question are you waiting on for an answer?

5
Who are you suspicious of?

And by the way, the meeting thing won't help, since I'll be in there with you.

15

Honestly, no one yet. I hate answering like that, but I haven't gotten a ping from anyone at this point. MP seems to be nitpicking/re-hashing the same point that's been addressed, but I don't find it particularly suspicious. I'll have to look at the thread when I'm less tired and when there's more stuff to read.

My kids have laptops tomorrow

Aaaaand going to bed. Remember kids, fuck up your numbers or God kills a puppy.

6

#90

Yay, God saved a puppy! Thanks, MP!

#91

Well, I guess we weren't likely to win anyway, but there's no point in giving up.

1

#92

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.

14
Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?

16
I didn't say it IS flawed; I just said it could be flawed, you could be incorrect. Given what little we know at this stage in the game, I don't see anything particularly illogical with your theory, though I doubt I'll be using it to cast my vote.

15

Of course it could be flawed. Did I say my thinking was perfect? Empty statement.

17

Tee hee.

#93

Hello friends! Sorry I missed the first vote, I was sleeping for most of the day and it completely flew over my head. :P What do the numbers in your posts mean?

#94

Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2

#95

Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2

Are the two of you on a team?

18

#96

kevin wrote:Hello friends! Sorry I missed the first vote, I was sleeping for most of the day and it completely flew over my head. :P What do the numbers in your posts mean?

Hello there! Glad to be playing the game with you!

The numbers are associated with a contest we were given based on who voted what in the Day 0 poll.

Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2

Yes, sorry about failing, I still feel terrible about that.

And no, Epig, we are not on a team, unless Boogs is a civvie, and unless you count "Bell Ringers" as a team.

3

#97

If you HAD to decide on a knocker who was bad, who would be your choice and why?

19

#98

Epignosis wrote:If you HAD to decide on a knocker who was bad, who would be your choice and why?

19

I'm going to assume this was directed at me!!

Hmmmm... good question. It's really hard to tell with what little has gone on so far, but we do know that a civvie would have known what the poll was about, right? So, under that assumption, I doubt that person would have voted early... so I suppose Elohcin?

I know that's not amazing reasoning, but it seems logical based on eliminating someone at least from being that one role... since I don't really have any reads on anyone yet.

How about you?

4

#99

Why do you think he's bad? Theorizing? As a knocker, I don't love that theory, but it does make sense.

20

#100

Well hey, I can finally post.

Epignosis wrote:
Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2
Are the two of you on a team?

18

Funny, I was just about to ask you the same question Vis-à-vis MP...

5

Who is not supatown?