Re: Clue: The Movie [DAY 1]
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:07 pm
That Llama, always being such a gentleman.
3
3
I do declare, I did see a giant sock moving through the library about 11 pm with a giant Daisy shaped knife.S~V~S wrote:Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?
3
LOL, this made me laugh way too hard.Epignosis wrote:Now that's just elephant talk.S~V~S wrote:Llamas discipline has frightened us all away
Wasn't me.Boogs wrote:I do declare, I did see a giant sock moving through the library about 11 pm with a giant Daisy shaped knife.S~V~S wrote:Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?
3
5
Can you elaborate?Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."
5
Yes. The man with info on the poll is not bad, so we know the killers have no info on the poll. I think it is now no secret the purpose of this poll. Therefore, I think the killers would have spread out. Examining the group that voted the same way I did is my way of narrowing my focus (and, of course, exempting myself).MovingPictures07 wrote:Can you elaborate?Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."
5
7
Seems pretty logical to me. What about the non-voters though?Epignosis wrote:Yes. The man with info on the poll is not bad, so we know the killers have no info on the poll. I think it is now no secret the purpose of this poll. Therefore, I think the killers would have spread out. Examining the group that voted the same way I did is my way of narrowing my focus (and, of course, exempting myself).MovingPictures07 wrote:Can you elaborate?Epignosis wrote:I am narrowing my suspicion to the group the voted "knock."
5
7
6
But couldn't a baddie have missed the vote?Mongoose wrote:The non-voters probably didn't know the game had started.
7
I was wondering the same thing myself, since he mentioned baddies spreading out. If they're spread out, why focus on a particular group?Elohcin wrote:This is fun already. Loving the posts llama.
Why the knockers Epic?
Boo...every time I try to post with a number...it is taken and I wait and then the next is taken. Shut up will ya?
8
I feel sorry for me, too.Epignosis wrote:Well, I like epic knockers. What can I say?
Seriously, I already answered this question. Also, I feel sorry for you nijuu.
9
Can you post of pic of Epi's knockers plz?Elohcin wrote:This is fun already. Loving the posts llama.
Why the knockers Epic?
Boo...every time I try to post with a number...it is taken and I wait and then the next is taken. Shut up will ya?
8
Yeah, I think a Mafia member could have miss a vote. What the hell does this question accomplish?MovingPictures07 wrote:But couldn't a baddie have missed the vote?Mongoose wrote:The non-voters probably didn't know the game had started.
7
9
It doesn't.MovingPictures07 wrote:My only point was that it could throw a wrench into your analysis.
11
It's here on this page.Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.
No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?
12
It's not an empty question if you don't know the answer.Epignosis wrote:It's here on this page.Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.
No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?
12
13
You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!
4
When the answer is "yes" to "could" the question is almost assuredly an empty one.MovingPictures07 wrote:It's not an empty question if you don't know the answer.Epignosis wrote:It's here on this page.Elohcin wrote:Epi I never saw your explanation of why you would go after the knockers. Of the door that is. Not mine...hehe.
No. I am saying you ask empty questions, and empty questions make me want to vote for the asking party.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're saying you're confident both people who missed the vote aren't bad?
12
13
13
A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!Epignosis wrote:You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!
4
Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.
Who are you suspicious of?nijuukyugou wrote:A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!Epignosis wrote:You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!
4
Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.
![]()
MP, what question are you waiting on for an answer?
5
Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.
14
I didn't say it IS flawed; I just said it could be flawed, you could be incorrect. Given what little we know at this stage in the game, I don't see anything particularly illogical with your theory, though I doubt I'll be using it to cast my vote.Epignosis wrote:Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.
14
16
Honestly, no one yet. I hate answering like that, but I haven't gotten a ping from anyone at this point. MP seems to be nitpicking/re-hashing the same point that's been addressed, but I don't find it particularly suspicious. I'll have to look at the thread when I'm less tired and when there's more stuff to read.Epignosis wrote:Who are you suspicious of?nijuukyugou wrote:A tempting suggestion (the day off, not the helping). I'll just post during the useless totally useful meeting during my incredibly necessary completely disposable planning period tomorrow. By then I might be up to double digits!Epignosis wrote:You misunderstand your beautiful purpose in this design.nijuukyugou wrote:Damn all of you. Fuck up your numbers already!
4
Your purpose in this tripartite event is to keep posting as long as I am awake. When I crap out, you may go to sleep. Instead of working tomorrow, take off and continue to post. I will ensure that the Knockers pull out a W.
![]()
MP, what question are you waiting on for an answer?
5
And by the way, the meeting thing won't help, since I'll be in there with you.![]()
15
Of course it could be flawed. Did I say my thinking was perfect? Empty statement.MovingPictures07 wrote:I didn't say it IS flawed; I just said it could be flawed, you could be incorrect. Given what little we know at this stage in the game, I don't see anything particularly illogical with your theory, though I doubt I'll be using it to cast my vote.Epignosis wrote:Then, if you would like to place you weight on that last scenario, you are welcome to do so, and vote one of the two who missed the vote. Is that what you would like to do? If not, then how is my thinking flawed?MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not waiting on an answer from somebody; I just was trying to make a point that Epig's analysis, while interesting and logical, could be flawed since there were two players who missed the vote, and we don't know whether neither, one, or both are baddies, therefore in the last scenario only living one other baddie to "spread" their vote.
14
16
15
Are the two of you on a team?Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2
Hello there! Glad to be playing the game with you!kevin wrote:Hello friends! Sorry I missed the first vote, I was sleeping for most of the day and it completely flew over my head. :P What do the numbers in your posts mean?
Yes, sorry about failing, I still feel terrible about that.Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2
I'm going to assume this was directed at me!!Epignosis wrote:If you HAD to decide on a knocker who was bad, who would be your choice and why?
19
Funny, I was just about to ask you the same question Vis-à-vis MP...Epignosis wrote:Are the two of you on a team?Boogs wrote:Mp we have to work together, sockalicious one.
2
18