The Syndicate

Peekaboo, I see you!

1

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ... What was Sig cover for?

Me, though he probably didn't know exactly who. By conclusively rejecting me as the cop he made himself look like the cop.

Guess who has a red peek?

I'll just let y'all stew on that one for a while and reveal the name later.

Odd because I was thinking the same thing.

JJJ what are your thoughts on Elohchin?

Gman who did you see? I checked SVS, you'll never guess her color.

I checked Wilgy, and he came across as this weird brown colour. Kind of like a potato.

sig seems to be an odd choice for a night kill, imo.

2

Quin wrote:I checked Wilgy, and he came across as this weird brown colour. Kind of like a potato.

sig seems to be an odd choice for a night kill, imo.

2

Really now? I thought that he was one of 3 people would have a higher chance to die.

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ what are your thoughts on Elohchin?

Generally I've seen her more in a town light than not. I think in recent memory when she has been bad there has been visible evidence, like in Transistor in her interactions with Matt, and I haven't been terribly perturbed by her content so far in this game. I could say that she has participated at a higher clip than usual; I've been content to attribute that to this being a heist game. She prefers smaller games. What are your thoughts on Elohcin?

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:I checked Wilgy, and he came across as this weird brown colour. Kind of like a potato.

sig seems to be an odd choice for a night kill, imo.

2

Really now? I thought that he was one of 3 people would have a higher chance to die.

I actually forgot that as a result of 3J's check he was almost a confirmed civ. So I half-take it back. The other half is me wondering why 3J wasn't killed since he's the one people are considering to be a cop.

I don't think this is an indication that 3J is bad, though. It all depends on whether the baddies believe he's the cop, as opposed to just having a check.

Actually Wilgy, who are the other 2 you're referring to?

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:I checked Wilgy, and he came across as this weird brown colour. Kind of like a potato.

sig seems to be an odd choice for a night kill, imo.

2

Really now? I thought that he was one of 3 people would have a higher chance to die.

I actually forgot that as a result of 3J's check he was almost a confirmed civ. So I half-take it back. The other half is me wondering why 3J wasn't killed since he's the one people are considering to be a cop.

I don't think this is an indication that 3J is bad, though. It all depends on whether the baddies believe he's the cop, as opposed to just having a check.

Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.


2.02

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ what are your thoughts on Elohchin?

Generally I've seen her more in a town light than not. I think in recent memory when she has been bad there has been visible evidence, like in Transistor in her interactions with Matt, and I haven't been terribly perturbed by her content so far in this game. I could say that she has participated at a higher clip than usual; I've been content to attribute that to this being a heist game. She prefers smaller games. What are your thoughts on Elohcin?

She had similar patterns to Sig and that bothered me early game, but what you say is something I've noticed as well. Her baddie game in transistor showed and I would think to see something similar, but they aren't there.

Rabbit is playing cutthroat and I don't know how to react to it, since I don't think I have any baddie rabbit experience. His comment regarding swapping to SVS had it been an option feels uneeded. It pinged me somewhat.

What are your thoughts on him JJJ?

Linki @ Quin - INH and SVS

G-Man wrote:

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:I checked Wilgy, and he came across as this weird brown colour. Kind of like a potato.

sig seems to be an odd choice for a night kill, imo.

2

Really now? I thought that he was one of 3 people would have a higher chance to die.

I actually forgot that as a result of 3J's check he was almost a confirmed civ. So I half-take it back. The other half is me wondering why 3J wasn't killed since he's the one people are considering to be a cop.

I don't think this is an indication that 3J is bad, though. It all depends on whether the baddies believe he's the cop, as opposed to just having a check.

Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.


2.02

I know that, but they don't know whether he's the cop or just playing the role.

DrWilgy wrote:Rabbit is playing cutthroat and I don't know how to react to it, since I don't think I have any baddie rabbit experience. His comment regarding swapping to SVS had it been an option feels uneeded. It pinged me somewhat.

What are your thoughts on him JJJ?

I don't have any baddie rabbit experience either. I thought his interaction with S~V~S on Day 1 looked mostly authentic and believed him when he said he had to vote then and might not be able to return (he wasn't able to return). I thought his comment about swapping was a response to Quin's blurb about his Vompatti vote. Why do you think that pinged you?

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ what are your thoughts on Elohchin?

Generally I've seen her more in a town light than not. I think in recent memory when she has been bad there has been visible evidence, like in Transistor in her interactions with Matt, and I haven't been terribly perturbed by her content so far in this game. I could say that she has participated at a higher clip than usual; I've been content to attribute that to this being a heist game. She prefers smaller games. What are your thoughts on Elohcin?

She had similar patterns to Sig and that bothered me early game, but what you say is something I've noticed as well. Her baddie game in transistor showed and I would think to see something similar, but they aren't there.

Rabbit is playing cutthroat and I don't know how to react to it, since I don't think I have any baddie rabbit experience. His comment regarding swapping to SVS had it been an option feels uneeded. It pinged me somewhat.

What are your thoughts on him JJJ?

Linki @ Quin - INH and SVS

Interesting lineup. Why those two?

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

I would infer that i means that you are bad JJJ. I've been thinking it as well.

@Quin because I trusted INH and SVS. In total that makes 3 players that were trusted.

I can confirm that both the players I trusted are civilian.

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

I would infer that i means that you are bad JJJ. I've been thinking it as well.

It'd be for the best if you let G-Man answer my questions without your aid.

Why do you suspect I'm bad?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

Best foot forward. Reveal your peek.



2.03

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

Best foot forward. Reveal your peek.

Why would you like for me to reveal my peek?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

Best foot forward. Reveal your peek.

Why would you like for me to reveal my peek?

Because if you have info that is relevant, you shouldn't be a tease about it.


2.04

G-Man wrote:Because if you have info that is relevant, you shouldn't be a tease about it.

You think I'm teasing? You don't see any reason I might be handling it this way?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

I would infer that i means that you are bad JJJ. I've been thinking it as well.

It'd be for the best if you let G-Man answer my questions without your aid.

Why do you suspect I'm bad?

Sorry, felt like being a smart ass.

I would suppose that it's not that I think you are bad. More so it's that I want you to be bad. When applying logic over gut to my thoughts on you, you feel like a coinflip.

Linki JJJ don't pick on GMan. Obscure tactics that you want others to figure out before you reveal the plot is my thing.

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Baddies know who the civvies are in heist games. Never forget that.

What is the implication here?

I would infer that i means that you are bad JJJ. I've been thinking it as well.

It'd be for the best if you let G-Man answer my questions without your aid.

Why do you suspect I'm bad?

Sorry, felt like being a smart ass.

I would suppose that it's not that I think you are bad. More so it's that I want you to be bad. When applying logic over gut to my thoughts on you, you feel like a coinflip.

Linki JJJ don't pick on GMan. Obscure tactics that you want others to figure out before you reveal the plot is my thing.

Hurry up then. It took me like two seconds.

But I do agree with you in that reading JJJ is a struggle this time around. I'm less confident that he's civ than I was in the Office, which is ironic, because he was indie.

Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

I understand I am scary, but if you're on my side you should just let me do my thing and it'll all be okay in the end.

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

For the sake of conversation. I GTH him as bad, too.

Until now, the top 5 posters all had "4" in the last digit of their post count.

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

For the sake of conversation. I GTH him as bad, too.

What do you feel triggered the bad gth?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I understand I am scary, but if you're on my side you should just let me do my thing and it'll all be okay in the end.

But I don't think you had a peek last night. How about that?


2.05

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I understand I am scary, but if you're on my side you should just let me do my thing and it'll all be okay in the end.

But I don't think you had a peek last night. How about that?

Oh really?

What makes you think so?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I understand I am scary, but if you're on my side you should just let me do my thing and it'll all be okay in the end.

But I don't think you had a peek last night. How about that?

Oh really?

What makes you think so?

No GMAN don't fall for it!!

Voting JJJ now.

Because unless there are multiple roles that can investigate at night, you couldn't have had a peek last night.


2.06

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

For the sake of conversation. I GTH him as bad, too.

What do you feel triggered the bad gth?

In his original ISO he said I 'Took my time getting into meaty discussions, leaving most of his posts as light responses and fluff'. I questioned him about that but never got an answer. I think it's a hard stretch to ever suggest what he did about me, no matter my alignment.

He's welcome to elaborate with examples and prove me wrong, though.

DrWilgy wrote:No GMAN don't fall for it!!

Voting JJJ now.

Your train of thought is confusing me. What?

G-Man wrote:Because unless there are multiple roles that can investigate at night, you couldn't have had a peek last night.

You never answered my question:

You don't see any reason I might be doing this at all beyond just "teasing"?

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

For the sake of conversation. I GTH him as bad, too.

What do you feel triggered the bad gth?

In his original ISO he said I 'Took my time getting into meaty discussions, leaving most of his posts as light responses and fluff'. I questioned him about that but never got an answer. I think it's a hard stretch to ever suggest what he did about me, no matter my alignment.

He's welcome to elaborate with examples and prove me wrong, though.

Bothered by that still? For what it's worth, I was wrong about you for the most part. When I was speeding through your ISO, I saw a bunch of one-liner posts. After thorough review of your ISO, I realized that most of them were answering questions or responding in kind with questions.


2.07

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:No GMAN don't fall for it!!

Voting JJJ now.

Your train of thought is confusing me. What?

There was no thought that went into that action.

G-Man wrote:

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:Wilgy, GTH on G-Man?

Bad. Why?

For the sake of conversation. I GTH him as bad, too.

What do you feel triggered the bad gth?

In his original ISO he said I 'Took my time getting into meaty discussions, leaving most of his posts as light responses and fluff'. I questioned him about that but never got an answer. I think it's a hard stretch to ever suggest what he did about me, no matter my alignment.

He's welcome to elaborate with examples and prove me wrong, though.

Bothered by that still? For what it's worth, I was wrong about you for the most part. When I was speeding through your ISO, I saw a bunch of one-liner posts. After thorough review of your ISO, I realized that most of them were answering questions or responding in kind with questions.


2.07

Don't forget those posts where I'm just counting numbers to be safe.


...11

DrWilgy wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:No GMAN don't fall for it!!

Voting JJJ now.

Your train of thought is confusing me. What?

There was no thought that went into that action.

Okay. What did you want to ensure G-Man didn't fall for?

RIP sig.

JJJ and Wilgy, there is a lot of back and forth between you two as if you've decided you already trust one another. Am I correct in my analysis? If so, what makes you trusting.

JJJ, I can see where G-man thinks you are teasing a bit by not revealing your peek. You have info he thinks we need right away. However, I can also see why you would want to hold out a bit. I won't reveal what I think my understanding is so I don't ruin it for ya, in case I'm right.

2.01 - stealing G's numbering system because its just plain 'ol practical.

Elohcin wrote:JJJ and Wilgy, there is a lot of back and forth between you two as if you've decided you already trust one another. Am I correct in my analysis? If so, what makes you trusting.

His vote is on me right now.

I've asked him a lot of questions. I might have a strong read on him right now, but I need one more answer.

By when do you plan to post your red peek, JJJ? I must leave soon to watch Jack Bauer kill people while saving the day, eat dessert, and watch a double dose of Trump on TV.


2.08

G-Man wrote:By when do you plan to post your red peek, JJJ? I must leave soon to watch Jack Bauer kill people while saving the day, eat dessert, and watch a double dose of Trump on TV.


2.08

Why do you keep ignoring my question? It's an important question.

Do you think there's a possible town motive for what I'm doing right now apart from "teasing"? It shouldn't take long to answer this.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Elohcin wrote:JJJ and Wilgy, there is a lot of back and forth between you two as if you've decided you already trust one another. Am I correct in my analysis? If so, what makes you trusting.

His vote is on me right now.

I've asked him a lot of questions. I might have a strong read on him right now, but I need one more answer.

I didn't even look at the votes - didn't think to this early.

2.02

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:By when do you plan to post your red peek, JJJ? I must leave soon to watch Jack Bauer kill people while saving the day, eat dessert, and watch a double dose of Trump on TV.


2.08

Why do you keep ignoring my question? It's an important question.

Do you think there's a possible town motive for what I'm doing right now apart from "teasing"? It shouldn't take long to answer this.

Balanced, your possibilities are. Sure, there might be a civvie motive to all this but there is also a very clear and structured baddie plot to all this as well.


2.09

G-Man wrote:Balanced, your possibilities are. Sure, there might be a civvie motive to all this but there is also a very clear and structured baddie plot to all this as well.

What is the civvie motive you assert "might" exist? Be more specific.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Balanced, your possibilities are. Sure, there might be a civvie motive to all this but there is also a very clear and structured baddie plot to all this as well.

What is the civvie motive you assert "might" exist? Be more specific.

Basic cover. Simple as that. The baddie plot option is much juicier though.


2.10

Everyone who has visited this thread without commenting on the matter at hand is more suspicious than before.

G-Man wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

G-Man wrote:Balanced, your possibilities are. Sure, there might be a civvie motive to all this but there is also a very clear and structured baddie plot to all this as well.

What is the civvie motive you assert "might" exist? Be more specific.

Basic cover. Simple as that. The baddie plot option is much juicier though.


2.10

That's not what I am talking about. Claiming to do anything relevant at all to a cop can be "cover". I am talking about withholding a red peek that I claim to have. What is the civilian motive for that beyond teasing?

Wilgy, I mist have missed it. Why did you vote JJJ?

2.03

linki: Much to consider G-man, huh. It could be either he is really helping, or have a scheme against us. I am very on the fence with JJJ.

linki linki linki.can I post now?

guess not....linki

It shouldn't be this difficult to get a straight answer.