The Syndicate

First off, I'd like to direct as many people as possible to what could be my magnum opus in terms of mafia posting, where I took a post explaining my complicated stance on Sloonei, (warily reading as town, but definitely not taking my eyes off of him) ran it through an insanifier, and sang the results into my phone. I then spent twenty minutes in Garageband making whatever the hell this is:

SLOONEI {INH REMIX}

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:14 pm Daisy’s post is weak and doesn’t answer questions I asked her.

How many of the recent Wilgy mislynches was Daisy around for? I wanna say “not many.”

What questions are you referring to?

Hell, if we keep it up spreadin the vote, we may never lynch anyone until the merge.

May not be a bad idea...I would like to at least make the merge with you fine people

RE: ninja’s thought that we may not be all bad-
Highly doubt it, that would be a rough structure and highly unfair I feel. Golden knows what he’s doing with the structure.

ninja dying N1 gives me no hope in that regard- the only other option is a vigi but honestly that was a bad choice for a vigi shot if so.

Nah, there’s at least an SK or what have you.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:28 pm First off, I'd like to direct as many people as possible to what could be my magnum opus in terms of mafia posting, where I took a post explaining my complicated stance on Sloonei, (warily reading as town, but definitely not taking my eyes off of him) ran it through an insanifier, and sang the results into my phone. I then spent twenty minutes in Garageband making whatever the hell this is:

SLOONEI {INH REMIX}

this is brilliant! I know Marmot posted it earlier but I missed it the first time and just now listened to it.

I kinda hope you become insane again

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:31 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:28 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:29 pm Marmot, you placed a joke vote on me and then removed it. This leads me to believe you think I'm town. Why?

Why would this lead you to believe that I think you're civilian.

This and that are not the same thing.


Linki: Oops, got distracted by work. Meant to post this a while ago.

You had a chance to vote for me but did not. What is your read of me?

Currently, I think you're abstracting my vote for you into something bigger. I voted for you as a joke. That's it. I also don't understand what you mean by "I had a chance to vote for you". You're really reaching on this one.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:41 pm Hmm. If baddies are split randomly, that means their thread support is split randomly, too. That must be...interesting.

This game is a mindfuck. (Sorry, I've said "fuck" like fourteen times today already. I'll stop.)

You're a mindfuck.

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 8:33 pm

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:41 pm Hmm. If baddies are split randomly, that means their thread support is split randomly, too. That must be...interesting.

This game is a mindfuck. (Sorry, I've said "fuck" like fourteen times today already. I'll stop.)

You're a mindfuck.

A damned good one, at that

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:52 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:50 pm

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:35 pm And by funny I mean terrible. It would be like the last GoC ending.

what was the last GoC ending?

No one knows.

The thread was deleted.

But the civilians won.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:51 pm Hell, if we keep it up spreadin the vote, we may never lynch anyone until the merge.

May not be a bad idea...I would like to at least make the merge with you fine people

RE: ninja’s thought that we may not be all bad-
Highly doubt it, that would be a rough structure and highly unfair I feel. Golden knows what he’s doing with the structure.

ninja dying N1 gives me no hope in that regard- the only other option is a vigi but honestly that was a bad choice for a vigi shot if so.

Nah, there’s at least an SK or what have you.

I heart you too Scotty.

Are you a member of the mafia?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:38 pm balloonery Moving PIctures look at sig, itemize player who Tribunal of Judgment caught some heat apparently. Don't obstetrics get the Knave of Hearts or Boomslang wagons. Holding off don't Jack Torrence. assistance post_id=414085 time=1519478705 Golden post_id=413995 osmanli user_id=174]
One thing that I'm worried about is the idiot of the day Haiku luteous thing. Trusty John we don't know who did lostaddict12 did not optimates in a haiku, and people fossils an incentive to lie about doing so in order to protect themselves. particulars BTSC scum failed liliputian an even Lucy Saxon lackadaisical Hot Soup pointless harrowing 1 than usual, where not only does everyone not know who contriving hell somnus scum, but we also founder even know who we can actually Mongoose. instanter Achilles Jabberwocky would be chorea dumping to say who bending trocar haiku? While people digenesis lie Titan it Quaro don't think many would so we White Knight antifebrile crier kill we did.

This post machinal pingy to me. My sabulous was that lying about writing a haiku would give mafioso saving Knave of Hearts immunity that wants why wouldn't cirrocumulus digenesis advantage of that? Fried_Frogurt seems Crude Yacht sig was bighead to get people to believe others in case it became under the bus important topic.

About his reaction to Sloonei's case against me, traitor thanks just agreed with all of my points: I do think White Queen it's incredibly block miscompute him to not at least try to state rapparee original reason why he Dodo Pequeninos Sloonei's case, which even Sloonei knew was March Hare. anglicize post_id=414673 time=1519594589 user_id=411]
[VOTE: Sig] aubergine

I'm bored, lets osmanli it.

Plus amour about 70% LaezyDaezy epacme submitted a haiku and it's team track nobody followed Formics whap answered when I King of Town if they did.
[/quote]

I side vlei Blooper over Kyle about supportance post. The whole 70% thing is something that annoyed witworm conjuring when Kate infliction it, NotInOxford Jack Torrence of Sig's flip-floppiness over panoplied haiku anagoge. Plus, the necessitous guinde attitude is sudorific something DooberDoes I like.

After SeptemberValentine he shifts around from civreading Sloonei to scumreading him. Immediately after accusing Sloonei executed flip-flopping too. More than a little fingersplints. Dodo there's enough here, fonctionnaire so phr significative everyone else that irreprovable moresque to vote Sig today.

sig aubergine
[/quote]
inh would you mind rehashing this post for me now that you can talk good? :0

oh fuck

I was gonna ebwop that but it's kind of a spaghetti nightmare

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 8:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:51 pm Hell, if we keep it up spreadin the vote, we may never lynch anyone until the merge.

May not be a bad idea...I would like to at least make the merge with you fine people

RE: ninja’s thought that we may not be all bad-
Highly doubt it, that would be a rough structure and highly unfair I feel. Golden knows what he’s doing with the structure.

ninja dying N1 gives me no hope in that regard- the only other option is a vigi but honestly that was a bad choice for a vigi shot if so.

Nah, there’s at least an SK or what have you.

I heart you too Scotty.

Are you a member of the mafia?

No, but thanks for asking.

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 8:26 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:31 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:28 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:29 pm Marmot, you placed a joke vote on me and then removed it. This leads me to believe you think I'm town. Why?

Why would this lead you to believe that I think you're civilian.

This and that are not the same thing.


Linki: Oops, got distracted by work. Meant to post this a while ago.

You had a chance to vote for me but did not. What is your read of me?

Currently, I think you're abstracting my vote for you into something bigger. I voted for you as a joke. That's it. I also don't understand what you mean by "I had a chance to vote for you". You're really reaching on this one.

I'm just trying to extract a read out of you.

Crapweasel. I thought I had more time on the vote and missed it. Sorry to hosts and other players. I really hate missing votes.

I'm a little bit drunk, because drinking jewish holiday, so not going to even try to think too much about mafia. Will check in from jury duty tomorrow.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:33 pm

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:29 pm Ok, I just caught up on everything from my last post to the end, now I need to catch up on the stuff before that I missed, lol.

At the moment, I don't understand why Sloonei is getting any suspicion.

But then I don't really get any of the cases right now. I still only feel a mild ping of Boomslang and I would want to do an ISO of him before I see if my feelings about him from Day 1 have changed.

Wow, lots of linki.

You don’t understand it or you disagree with it?

Tell me about your opinions on my Sloonei/Sig w/w case.

[mention]Spacedaisy[/mention] plz

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:48 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:33 pm

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:29 pm Ok, I just caught up on everything from my last post to the end, now I need to catch up on the stuff before that I missed, lol.

At the moment, I don't understand why Sloonei is getting any suspicion.

But then I don't really get any of the cases right now. I still only feel a mild ping of Boomslang and I would want to do an ISO of him before I see if my feelings about him from Day 1 have changed.

Wow, lots of linki.

You don’t understand it or you disagree with it?

Tell me about your opinions on my Sloonei/Sig w/w case.

@Spacedaisy plz

I can see why you might believe it, since Sloonei has gone back and forth and sig frankly has done little to seem like he has an actual real suspicion of Sloonei. However, I just ISOed all of sig's posts and all of Sloonei's post that contain the word "sig" and I came out with some pretty clear opinions on this. After reading the progression of Sloonei's posts on sig, his suspicions of sig and then by extension Lorab seems pretty natural to me. His actions seem more sincere in trying to feel out sig. But reading sig's posts, it felt like his responding "no u" seems to have only come when pushed by Jack. Nothing in his "case" for Sloonei seems sincere. Additionally, I think the fact Sloonei is eyeing Lorab as well seems interesting since she seemed to have made a stray post in the middle of the Sloonei/sig stuff. Which is part of why Sloonei looks more sincere to me. I don't believe you're seeing w/w here. I think it's either Sloonei town vs sig wolf, or town/town. I'm not convinced of sig, like i wouldn't feel comfortable voting him, knowing his kind of history for early mislynches. But I would put him as a light orange at the moment perhaps.

To be fair, I read their posts and not your case yet... I'll go back and find that now.

Sig isn't mafia and he is very very unhappy with everyone who voted for him your all very mean people very mean.

Also Oops I switched this games EOD with Jack's.

Also Oops I switched this games EOD with Jack's. Which is why i didn't vote.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:35 pm Fuck it. sig's all over the place. I'm re-reading interactions between him and Sloonei, and he's floundering like crazy. He might be weird, but not usually floundery. I want to have more time to look at the Lorab comparison before I make an uninformed vote in her direction. Pulling the trigger and vote sig. (Did I do that right? Friggin' tags.)

I'm not floundering? I'm just not playing super seriously yet, taking a more laid back approach. I also have very little to say atm, don't have many strong reads. ect

Someone mentioned me flipflopping on Sloonie or something, I think I explained that reasoning very well.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:26 pm Mmmmk so my thought process is this from reading so far:

Sloonei takes suspicion for coming out Sloonei (guns a'blazin', that is) and for flip-flopping a lot. This thought crossed my mind as big fat WIFOM, but I'm thinking he's good and doing the civ thing right now. We don't have enough being said to not play around with words and cast suspicion in places for reaction gauges, so this appears more civ than bad. And it stands out.

sig is being weird and avoiding a lot of simple questions. Is there something else I'm missing? Or are people latching on to whatever weirdness they can get? I totally understand if so, but if that's all it is, I'm not inclined that way, either.

Lorab is, according to Jack, apparently acting like she does when she's bad? How so?

Ugh. Votes and decisions. It's amazing I'm able to play this game at all.

I don't recall ignoring any questions?


Also since Speed was lynched and revealed does that mean he's died twice? Since I seem to recall it saying you don't flip on your first lynch.

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 1:52 pm <snip>

he has a mister rearranger right within my mind

<snip>

but i'd like to fork my pleasure to zap his fierce style

<snip>

This is my read of Sloonei.

sig wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:44 pm Also Oops I switched this games EOD with Jack's. Which is why i didn't vote.

Me, too, which is why there’s no host post.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:33 am

So not only did you get the times mixed up, but you're like 6 hours late too.

“sig” wrote:Also since Speed was lynched and revealed does that mean he's died twice? Since I seem to recall it saying you don't flip on your first lynch.

Your alignment isn’t revealed in your 1st death, only your role.

Which is why people were wondering if nijuu was a mafia sacrifice.

Speedchuck is most definitely town or at least civ-leaning, because there aren’t enough people in the game to warrant a mafia doctor.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 4:43 pm Hi all

The lynch post WILL be late today. Regardless, night will officially begin from the moment the poll ends.

Please note the poll end time was 5:45 pm eastern standard time which means night will end at 5:45 pm eastern standard time today, March 1. This means your night actions are due by 3:45 pm eastern standard time approximately 6 1/2 hours from now.

I have dancing queen stuck in my head. Help.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:35 am I have dancing queen stuck in my head. Help.

Anybody could be that guy, Wilgy.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:35 am I have dancing queen stuck in my head. Help.

Does this help?

Typical. At least it wasn’t N1 this time, so thanks and shit

Aaaaanyway

Vote LoRab auberine

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:31 pm Aaaaanyway

Vote LoRab auberine

why?

vote kylemii aubergine

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:34 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:31 pm Aaaaanyway

Vote LoRab auberine

why?

I have a question for you, Sloonei:
Do you have a good reason not to vote her, based on what she’s given us? Granted, I know she’s been busy and we still haven’t lynched anyone but let’s talk about her conviction and way of speech.

I’d like to draw attention to the similarities between her baddie game that you graciously linked. There’s not too much to go on in posts in this game, but in both games she unsubstatiates reads. It’s like she’s presenting a pasta dish in a cooking show but she doesn’t know how much salt or tomato sauce or spaghetti to put in the pot so instead she just UberEats McDonalds. There’s just not a lot there.

Also seeing reproductions in syntax such as “honestly, ...”

Here’s the trouble with comparing this game to any other- there’s still not a lot to nab her on. It’s a lot of gut based on perception but I don’t have a definite case. That would require some actual reads.

“I don’t really suspect anyone” is lazy and could be either civ or mafia but I feel like she’s holding back

It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

I don't disagree that comparisons can be drawn to LoRab in this game and Fiddler, but I would hesitate to pounce on them. There has been next to no consensus in this thread and very little in the way of strong reads from anyone. LoRab probably stands out as being the most off the radar, though, and that worries me some. She's provided reasons for this which make her absence understandable, but do not tell me anything about her alignment.

In a sort of answer to your question, Scotty, I have no reason to town read LoRab. I'd consider voting for her today. I'm not eager to settle on her for being the easiest target.

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

Do you have any loose ideas or thoughts about the other players in this game?

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

Understandable. I’ve had those moments. But in those moments, I still feel like civ LoRab would have more conviction and would at least stick to her guns.

You’ve hinted that you think Boom is off, but only a slight extent. And I can see that you’re at least reading the thread when you do have downtime, but here again you don’t offer any reads of people other than defending your meta.

Scotty's first role was the insanifier. That seems like it'd be an independent role. It was linked to the Reapers in Mass Effect. The Citadel Council (also from Mass Effect) are bad guys in the flavor text, but the Reapers and the Citadel are not buddies in ME. I do not think Scotty 1.0 was aligned with town. What that means for Scorty 2.0, I'm unsure.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:10 pm I don't disagree that comparisons can be drawn to LoRab in this game and Fiddler, but I would hesitate to pounce on them. There has been next to no consensus in this thread and very little in the way of strong reads from anyone. LoRab probably stands out as being the most off the radar, though, and that worries me some. She's provided reasons for this which make her absence understandable, but do not tell me anything about her alignment.

In a sort of answer to your question, Scotty, I have no reason to town read LoRab. I'd consider voting for her today. I'm not eager to settle on her for being the easiest target.

There are no easy targets because we’ve learned nothing from our side aside from ninja having a mason and my old insanifying role.

If we ever want to lynch someone we will need more votes than the other tribe, which means more consensus. I’d still treat this as a D1. I hate D1s but someone should go, cause someone be killing and I’m pissed

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:14 pm Scotty's first role was the insanifier. That seems like it'd be an independent role. It was linked to the Reapers in Mass Effect. The Citadel Council (also from Mass Effect) are bad guys in the flavor text, but the Reapers and the Citadel are not buddies in ME. I do not think Scotty 1.0 was aligned with town. What that means for Scorty 2.0, I'm unsure.

Poor Scorty.

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:13 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

Understandable. I’ve had those moments. But in those moments, I still feel like civ LoRab would have more conviction and would at least stick to her guns.

You’ve hinted that you think Boom is off, but only a slight extent. And I can see that you’re at least reading the thread when you do have downtime, but here again you don’t offer any reads of people other than defending your meta.

I've actually indicated the opposite about boom....

And, honestly, I don't have strong suspicions, nor do I want to make them up.

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:17 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:10 pm I don't disagree that comparisons can be drawn to LoRab in this game and Fiddler, but I would hesitate to pounce on them. There has been next to no consensus in this thread and very little in the way of strong reads from anyone. LoRab probably stands out as being the most off the radar, though, and that worries me some. She's provided reasons for this which make her absence understandable, but do not tell me anything about her alignment.

In a sort of answer to your question, Scotty, I have no reason to town read LoRab. I'd consider voting for her today. I'm not eager to settle on her for being the easiest target.

There are no easy targets because we’ve learned nothing from our side aside from ninja having a mason and my old insanifying role.

If we ever want to lynch someone we will need more votes than the other tribe, which means more consensus. I’d still treat this as a D1. I hate D1s but someone should go, cause someone be killing and I’m pissed

LoRab is the easy target. She's the player who's been in the background without contributing a whole lot and with no outlandish behavior. That's an easy target regardless of how much "information" we have to go off of.

Why is it so important to you that this tribe is responsible for the lynch?

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:13 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

Understandable. I’ve had those moments. But in those moments, I still feel like civ LoRab would have more conviction and would at least stick to her guns.

You’ve hinted that you think Boom is off, but only a slight extent. And I can see that you’re at least reading the thread when you do have downtime, but here again you don’t offer any reads of people other than defending your meta.

I've actually indicated the opposite about boom....

And, honestly, I don't have strong suspicions, nor do I want to make them up.

Any town reads?

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:13 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm It's also honest. If not having any major suspicions makes me suspicious, then I can't do anything about that. I'll add that I'm not the only one withough suspicions.

Also, if you're going to look at my Fiddler game, I'd also suggest you look at my Buffy game, in which I was also bad.

This is my: "I'm seriously busy right now and can only post so much and don't have any suspicions right now" and I'm hoping that I'll find reason to have suspicions as the game goes on, so that I can figure out the baddies.

Understandable. I’ve had those moments. But in those moments, I still feel like civ LoRab would have more conviction and would at least stick to her guns.

You’ve hinted that you think Boom is off, but only a slight extent. And I can see that you’re at least reading the thread when you do have downtime, but here again you don’t offer any reads of people other than defending your meta.

I've actually indicated the opposite about boom....

And, honestly, I don't have strong suspicions, nor do I want to make them up.

I’m not saying to make them up, I’m just trying to get some thoughts on the game from you aside from “dunno”

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:51 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:17 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:10 pm I don't disagree that comparisons can be drawn to LoRab in this game and Fiddler, but I would hesitate to pounce on them. There has been next to no consensus in this thread and very little in the way of strong reads from anyone. LoRab probably stands out as being the most off the radar, though, and that worries me some. She's provided reasons for this which make her absence understandable, but do not tell me anything about her alignment.

In a sort of answer to your question, Scotty, I have no reason to town read LoRab. I'd consider voting for her today. I'm not eager to settle on her for being the easiest target.

There are no easy targets because we’ve learned nothing from our side aside from ninja having a mason and my old insanifying role.

If we ever want to lynch someone we will need more votes than the other tribe, which means more consensus. I’d still treat this as a D1. I hate D1s but someone should go, cause someone be killing and I’m pissed

LoRab is the easy target. She's the player who's been in the background without contributing a whole lot and with no outlandish behavior. That's an easy target regardless of how much "information" we have to go off of.

Why is it so important to you that this tribe is responsible for the lynch?

I hate to continue answering with another question but...why isn’t it important? Obviously someone is killing so it’s not like we’re all goats here

I wonder who targeted inh on Night 1.

RIP Scotty, you were the blurst of us.

Were you a member of the mafia before? Are you now?