Pikachu Tribe - Day 9

[speedchuck]

And now that my life doesn't depend on it, I can reveal...

That I totally did submit a poem, guys. I'm just weird.

[Long Con]

I find it hard to take any of it too seriously. DH, the WIFOM of your Epi accusations is totally off the charts in this situation. Despite the last-minute nature of the Quin wagon, the reality that any non-sprityo player was likely to survive unscathed diminishes the impact.

To put it another way: it seems like the endgame of your accusation would be that Epi and/or speedchuck were last-second voting Quin to save a teammate who was in trouble. What other reason would a baddie have to pull such shenanigans? But who were they saving? No one needed saving today. Almost everyone was safe. The most likely baddie play was to blend in, lay low, secure in the knowledge that they're lynchproof.

Maybe I'm just not seeing the motivation for a baddie to act as they did. Help me out.

At this point, accusing the Quin voters should involve accusing Quin. The charge: distancing. Vote for your teammate now, while the gettin's good - don't worry, they won't die or be exposed to the public!

[Dom]

And I still HATE your reaction to the RR.

Sorry, I didn't mean it personally.

I don't think she thinks you meant it that way.

And I think you know that.

Dom's entire post history here could almost be a haiku.

I bet he didn't submit one.

k k k k k
k k k k k k k
k k k k k

I'd rather lynch DDL or Dom, but I'm okay with a Quin lynch.

literally what the fresh hell is this post and why hasn't speedchuck cared to explain the shit out of it?

[Quin]

I find it hard to take any of it too seriously. DH, the WIFOM of your Epi accusations is totally off the charts in this situation. Despite the last-minute nature of the Quin wagon, the reality that any non-sprityo player was likely to survive unscathed diminishes the impact.

To put it another way: it seems like the endgame of your accusation would be that Epi and/or speedchuck were last-second voting Quin to save a teammate who was in trouble. What other reason would a baddie have to pull such shenanigans? But who were they saving? No one needed saving today. Almost everyone was safe. The most likely baddie play was to blend in, lay low, secure in the knowledge that they're lynchproof.

Maybe I'm just not seeing the motivation for a baddie to act as they did. Help me out.

At this point, accusing the Quin voters should involve accusing Quin. The charge: distancing. Vote for your teammate now, while the gettin's good - don't worry, they won't die or be exposed to the public!

you're not part of my family.

[speedchuck]

I'd rather lynch DDL or Dom, but I'm okay with a Quin lynch.

literally what the fresh hell is this post and why hasn't speedchuck cared to explain the shit out of it?

What's wrong with it?

[DharmaHelper]

I'm sure Chuck and Epi simultaneously deciding to abandon their logical suspicions and put votes on a person who was not here to defend themselves at literally the last second of the day phase is completely not suspicious you guys are right and you have convinced me and this is certainly the last you'll hear of it.

[Epignosis]

I'm sure Chuck and Epi simultaneously deciding to abandon their logical suspicions and put votes on a person who was not here to defend themselves at literally the last second of the day phase is completely not suspicious you guys are right and you have convinced me and this is certainly the last you'll hear of it.

What was I attempting to accomplish by voting Quin at the last minute?

[DharmaHelper]

I'm sure Chuck and Epi simultaneously deciding to abandon their logical suspicions and put votes on a person who was not here to defend themselves at literally the last second of the day phase is completely not suspicious you guys are right and you have convinced me and this is certainly the last you'll hear of it.

What was I attempting to accomplish by voting Quin at the last minute?

That's my question to you. If I knew the answer to that I would find you maybe less suspicious.

[Epignosis]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

[Long Con]

Sorry DH - I get where you're coming from, but... maybe if it happened on a later day, with a real lynch?

[Epignosis]

I'm sure Chuck and Epi simultaneously deciding to abandon their logical suspicions and put votes on a person who was not here to defend themselves at literally the last second of the day phase is completely not suspicious you guys are right and you have convinced me and this is certainly the last you'll hear of it.

What was I attempting to accomplish by voting Quin at the last minute?

That's my question to you. If I knew the answer to that I would find you maybe less suspicious.

I told you why I voted Quin at the last minute.

[DharmaHelper]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

[nutella]

guys. epi didn't want sprityo to get lynched. because sprityo is a civilian. this is not fucking complicated

[Epignosis]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

[DharmaHelper]

guys. epi didn't want sprityo to get lynched. because sprityo is a civilian. this is not fucking complicated

Right ok sure but like speedchuck, whom epi suspected more than quin, had enough votes to make sure, should epi vote for chuck, that sprityo would not be lynched.

so like, its not that epi didn't vote for sprityo. I get that.

[DharmaHelper]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

I believe this explanation.










Said an idiot.

[Epignosis]

Two typos. Fuck me. I need sleep.

[Quin]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

but like...why was speedchuck more likely to have submitted a haiku than me?

[Epignosis]

guys. epi didn't want sprityo to get lynched. because sprityo is a civilian. this is not fucking complicated

Right ok sure but like speedchuck, whom epi suspected more than quin, had enough votes to make sure, should epi vote for chuck, that sprityo would not be lynched.

so like, its not that epi didn't vote for sprityo. I get that.

I had no assurance that the lynch would not move on to the person with the next votes.

Question, hosts or players. I don't expect a host answer honestly, but worth discussing.

The opening post says haiku senders are immune to lynch. Does that mean if the top vote getter is immune, then there is NO lynch, or that it falls back to the top NON immune vote getter?

I have been operating on the assumption of the first option, no lynch. The other does not seem immensely fair, but that does not mean it is not possible.

Linki @ LC, I am not sure if that is possible to know until we have had a result? Are you suggesting a no lynch, like all voting for Bob or something?

You are correct in your assessment that you will not get a host answer to this question.

So I put two people ahead of sprityo.

It isn't that complicated.

[DharmaHelper]

At least you agree Speedchuck is suspicious. For the thing that you also did, but are not suspicious for.

[Quin]

I'm satisfied.

[Epignosis]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

but like...why was speedchuck more likely to have submitted a haiku than me?

He wasn't. Nobody was more likely to have submitted a haiku. That wasn't relevant. I wanted to get another person ahead of sprityo. speedchuck had more votes than him already, so another vote from me on him would have been irrelevant if the host resolved the lynch in such a way that someone was guaranteed to be lynched.

You were my only option at the time, and my quick read-through of your posts didn't have me believing your were a civilian.

So you ended up with my vote.

Who else got questions.

[Epignosis]

At least you agree Speedchuck is suspicious. For the thing that you also did, but are not suspicious for.

If you have a reason to suspect me, spell it out.

I am too tired to deal with vague commentary.

[DharmaHelper]

Yesterday didn't matter. It was and is and will be forever irrelevant, from a lynching/no lynching perspective. Impossible to determine anything from that day whatsoever.


Except that my top suspects are now

Speedchuck
DDL
Epignosis

[Quin]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

but like...why was speedchuck more likely to have submitted a haiku than me?

He wasn't. Nobody was more likely to have submitted a haiku. That wasn't relevant. I wanted to get another person ahead of sprityo. speedchuck had more votes than him already, so another vote from me on him would have been irrelevant if the host resolved the lynch in such a way that someone was guaranteed to be lynched.

You were my only option at the time, and my quick read-through of your posts didn't have me believing your were a civilian.

So you ended up with my vote.

Who else got questions.

why won't you love me?

[Quin]

Yesterday didn't matter. It was and is and will be forever irrelevant, from a lynching/no lynching perspective. Impossible to determine anything from that day whatsoever.


Except that my top suspects are now

Speedchuck
DDL
Epignosis

DDL?

[Epignosis]

To be clear, don't say you don't know. Say what you think I was doing. Accuse me of something. Don't just point to something everyone can see that I did and say it's suspicious. Tell everyone why it is suspicious.

I've explained why it's suspicious. You helped someone you suspected "Moderately" vote for someone you suspected "Mildly".

I've got zero clue why you did it, or what you hoped to gain from it, but it was either a very suspicious thing to do or a very foolish thing to do. Like, there was a very very very very very very low chance your vote mattered at all. So the abrupt, conspicuous collaboration between Chuck and Yourself raised several flags. Why go through the trouble of voting for someone you didn't suspect until you cast your vote.

Why did you not vote for Speedchuck, if your sole objective was to make sure sprityo didn't risk getting lynched?

I explained this. Neither S~V~S nor colonialbob were around to move their votes of sprityo. That gave him two votes, and speedchuck had three. The host did not explain how the lynch would work, and I did not want sprityo lynched if speedchuck had indeed submitted a damn poem.

Therefore, I tied the lynch by voting Quin, hoping to provide a measure of insurance that sprityo would not be ultimately lynched.

I was not expecting speedchuck to vote alongside me. His vote astounds me if he was indeed safe from being lynches AND cool with a no-lynch.

but like...why was speedchuck more likely to have submitted a haiku than me?

He wasn't. Nobody was more likely to have submitted a haiku. That wasn't relevant. I wanted to get another person ahead of sprityo. speedchuck had more votes than him already, so another vote from me on him would have been irrelevant if the host resolved the lynch in such a way that someone was guaranteed to be lynched.

You were my only option at the time, and my quick read-through of your posts didn't have me believing your were a civilian.

So you ended up with my vote.

Who else got questions.

why won't you love me?

I am too tired to love anyone.

[DharmaHelper]

At least you agree Speedchuck is suspicious. For the thing that you also did, but are not suspicious for.

If you have a reason to suspect me, spell it out.

I am too tired to deal with vague commentary.

What part of the last eight pages of my suspicion of you was vague? Also you can relax I don't suspect you as much as I suspect Speedchuck, whom you also suspect, and would be comfortable lynching because you aren't his teammate.

[DharmaHelper]

Yesterday didn't matter. It was and is and will be forever irrelevant, from a lynching/no lynching perspective. Impossible to determine anything from that day whatsoever.


Except that my top suspects are now

Speedchuck
DDL
Epignosis

DDL?

His initial response to the round robin plan felt off.

[Epignosis]

Yesterday didn't matter. It was and is and will be forever irrelevant, from a lynching/no lynching perspective. Impossible to determine anything from that day whatsoever.


Except that my top suspects are now

Speedchuck
DDL
Epignosis

"Irrelevant Day"
Except he names three suspects
With no reasons named

[Epignosis]

At least you agree Speedchuck is suspicious. For the thing that you also did, but are not suspicious for.

If you have a reason to suspect me, spell it out.

I am too tired to deal with vague commentary.

What part of the last eight pages of my suspicion of you was vague? Also you can relax I don't suspect you as much as I suspect Speedchuck, whom you also suspect, and would be comfortable lynching because you aren't his teammate.

Eight pages? Holy shit.

[Epignosis]

DH: You didn't vote for speedchuck, who probably wouldn't have been lynched anyway, but you're his teammate for trying to save him.

Your game has deteriorated in a major way.

[DharmaHelper]

Go to sleep old man you've lost the ability to understand hyperbole and sarcasm. My main ingredients.

[DharmaHelper]

DH: You didn't vote for speedchuck, who probably wouldn't have been lynched anyway, but you're his teammate for trying to save him.

Your game has deteriorated in a major way.

Oh no you're definitely not his teammate, why would I assume that? All you did was name him as a moderate suspect of yours and then work with him to possibly lynch a less prominent, completely brand new, suspect of yours. Which is what you would normally do in a game where you were genuinely hunting for suspects that you could defend with facts and evidence.

[DharmaHelper]

Also what are you talking about arguing in circles with you for a half dozen pages is exactly my brand please retract your previous barb.

[Epignosis]

Go to sleep old man you've lost the ability to understand hyperbole and sarcasm. My main ingredients.

Just wait until Day 19 when I spend a literal nine hours classifying every single post you've made in both of your incarnations (because I've already lynched you once, you see), and come to the unmitigated conclusion that you are bad.

[DharmaHelper]

FWIW I thought it was pretty dang clear that the haiku protection meant that there would be no lynch, not that whomever got protected would pass the lynch on to the next (potentially protected) person. So shifting votes around made no sense to me in that context. A futile gesture.

[sprityo]

Alright what they hey did I miss

I took one day off and surely nothing terrible has happened

I only have 7 notifications from this game

[DharmaHelper]

Alright what they hey did I miss

I took one day off and surely nothing terrible has happened

I only have 7 notifications from this game

Why did you vote for me bud.

[sprityo]

Alright what they hey did I miss

I took one day off and surely nothing terrible has happened

I only have 7 notifications from this game

Why did you vote for me bud.

sorry pal, i thought you had suggested the round robin, im actually catching up right now, quoting posts as i read etc. so bear with me

[Long Con]

FWIW I thought it was pretty dang clear that the haiku protection meant that there would be no lynch, not that whomever got protected would pass the lynch on to the next (potentially protected) person. So shifting votes around made no sense to me in that context. A futile gesture.

I agree. I was surprised to hear other theories about how it might play out. That might just mean that we are ill-prepared for the unexpected, DH.

[DharmaHelper]

FWIW I thought it was pretty dang clear that the haiku protection meant that there would be no lynch, not that whomever got protected would pass the lynch on to the next (potentially protected) person. So shifting votes around made no sense to me in that context. A futile gesture.

I agree. I was surprised to hear other theories about how it might play out. That might just mean that we are ill-prepared for the unexpected, DH.

Let us hope that Day 2 brings more challenges.

[sprityo]

*Donald Trump voice* I should vote whoever suggested round robin in the first place. Terrible!

I think it was DH

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

It was me.

i shouldve voted you then

*Donald Trump voice* I should vote whoever suggested round robin in the first place. Terrible!

I think it was DH

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

Is this becasue you were the one who would have suffered from it, kind of like the "no u" element, or is it becasue of your "I suck" narrative, that you think suggesting this plan makes one a baddie? Can you explain why this suggestion makes one bad?

Did you form an opinion on Chuck yet, or read back on DDL as you had suggested you might?

I would have suffered from it yes, but i mean i still never saw the logic in it. the only one who gains the benefit from the round robin wouldve been the mafia

And uhhh ill do that now that the day is over

My problem with Sprit (and maybe those of you with more experience than I with him can fill me in) his first direct response to me was a reminder of how freaking awesome his instincts can be, in the game in question, he subbed in one day, and made a right call at great cost to him.

SNIP

And ever since then he keeps talking about how he sucks as a player, his opinion is worthless, etc. I am just getting the heebies from him and the jeebies. Maybe even the jm jams. So not sure how the totality of his posts gives you a blanket "civ", BUT don't see you saying that about a bad teammate so directly.

I have good gut reads

not good playstyle. If i were to just throw gut reads left and right i would be frowned upon

And you know, now that I look at this, he KNEW it wasn't DH who had the RR idea, but he voted for him anyhow for that reason. Why?

Rather, i was too lazy to check and My memory had DH sounding more passionate about is than you SVS

Hey Sprityo, it looks like it's a battle between me and you.

YOU READY FOR THIS!?!???

(actually, I don't want you lynched if you have a cool role, which you're acting like you do. Hm.)

YEAH

(and yeah i do. but im sure you have a cool role too)

Where I am at right now:

Bob, civ. DDL potentially bad, DH not seeing the things that make me worry about him. Dom, I would like to see more, but my opinion on him is worthless it always is, he pulls the wool over my eyes all the time. Epi, talking alot about mechanics and not making left field accusation based on weird little tangents, which is making me nervous. I am hoping for some accusations based on punctuation usage or word counts. LC, like DH, there are things that make me wary of him when he's bad, and I am not seeing them. Nutella, has said some things that could make me go either way, right now I feel fairly OK about her, but it is fairly shoestring cause it's wifom which is pointless this game. Quin, not seeing why he has votes. Chuck, could be bad, not sure yet. Sprit, I think he's bad. SVS, I am not bad, although I apparently am just a tad too touchy. Will work on that

I am hoping the haikus will stop, especially since we have a haiku curser, and with voluntary haikuers it will be harder to see who is cursed.

>:(

Question for the field:

What did i miss huh?
I did not submit a poem
I mean haiku. oops.

If you are mafia, is your first move to admit that you did not submit a poem?

+1 Brownie points for Epi

I think that a player's personality is a much greater factor in deciding how they play. Even if your theory is right, I'd arbitrarily put it at 3% alignment-related, 96% personality-related, 1% zodiac-sign-related.

Im a Leo, so there you go

guys. epi didn't want sprityo to get lynched. because sprityo is a civilian. this is not fucking complicated

----------------------


Overall after catching up, this game is gonna be tough, because everyone talking looks pretty damn civ to me, minus a few transgressions. The most apparent issue was the circa day end when quin got +2 votes.

Also i think the following people are town.

SVS
Epi
Speedchuck
Long Con

JaggedJimmyJay SVS is being the aggressive supertown rn and her suspicion on me is fine, people have their opinions, but it seemed to be the wildy unpopular opinion.

Epi Defending me obviously is cool, using my playstyle to back himself up, as well as speedchuck my long friend. But i felt weird about it, like i was being buttered up with compliments (and im a sucker for compliments)

Long Con..... ill get back to him, but i liked his content because it was similar to Epi, but i didnt feel buttered.

Alright so time to look at speedchuck and DDL's ISOs as per requested of SVS

[sprityo]

RE: Speedchuck

At the time you asked me, he wasnt much in the game because like he said he's "lazy on the weekends"

But SVS you seem to have motivated him into doing work because his later banter with both SVS and Epi look genuine and make him look more town.


RE: DDL

He disagreed with the RR for a good reason and then disappeared. So He's gonna be null.


RE: Dharmahelper (because he actually has a lot of posts but theyre all haikus and for some reason i dont remember reading anything by him that i liked Day 1)

yeah i dont know why i thought DH thought of the Round Robin when he clearly told me that it was SVS's idea.

The round robin plan
has exactly zero flaws
I suspect you now.

So yeah i dont like any of DH's Day One at all. But now that Night 1 is here he's jumping down Epi and Speedchuck's throats because their sudden jump to Quin was suspicious.

Anyone else concur as vehemently as DharmaHelper does about that whole process that happened?

(overall im not sure how to feel about DH, im hoping to formulate something more solid in Day 2, NULL )

[sprityo]

I feel like i didnt explain why DH was null to me as good as i wanted to. but whatever

[DharmaHelper]

I just want to state for the record that if there ARE Survivor-esque Tribe Challenges tomorrow, the other tribe is boned may they rest in peace we are stacked.

[Quin]

hidden immunity idols in this game are actually aubergine

[S~V~S]

[mention]Sprityo[/mention] not strictly game related, but I just skimmed your post where you quoted me and you said you play on but that were you to post strictly on but that would be frowned upon.

By who? Who cares? That's how I play, and people new to me roll their eyes, but they get over their preconceived notions about how Mafia should be played. You do you and to hell with being frowned upon. Your instincts can be awesome, be a force of nature and don't try to be a other than that.

Will read the rest of your posts in depth a bit later, I am just getting up.

[S~V~S]

Lol phone autocorrect ftw "GUT" NOT "BUT" in the first line. Doh.

[colonialbob]

Lol phone autocorrect ftw "GUT" NOT "BUT" in the first line. Doh.

Tbf I often play on butt.

Suspicion of DH growing. He's refusing to engage with Epi's reasoning and instead just repeating his suspicions.