The Syndicate

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:50 pm**

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:33 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:29 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 11:24 pm Only real immediate thoughts without context is that there is a world where LC OR Delta was saved here, but this would need to be checked against when Epi moved their vote.
i.e. Delta/Epi becomes real if Epi moved to DM after LC/Pyx voted Delta.

I moved precisely to save Delta. Delta is the one individual I trusted Day 1.
Do you still feel this way?

Nothing has changed for me regarding Delta. We were mafia together once though and I don't remember how Delta played in that capacity. Certainly nothing against Delta- I am old and feeble these days, and I'm not going back to reread stuff.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm**

I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:05 pm**

Yeah, Long Con sounds like a crotchety civilian. Won't vote there.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:11 pm**

Caitlin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:41 pm Epi's posting D2 isnt great honestly

I strive for decent, not great.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:16 pm**

I don't think I'm voting for S~V~S either. While I understand the enthusiasm for national parks, I wasn't thrilled about the lack of engagement outside of that, but S~V~S is not the sort to just leave her teammate hanging.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:17 pm**

Caitlin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:22 pm Yes I'm using the Caitlinian catch up method on a diff forum than MU!

What is this method?

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:17 pm**

This leaves me with a vote on Caitlin, DrWilgy, or pyxxy.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:22 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:11 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:17 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:15 pm Working through today with a core of Epi/Pyxxy/Cait and hoping it does not burn me later :,)
Why is pyxxy in that list?
Covered it yesterday but if he's mafia, he's adding so many extra steps to how he's approaching things to the point it feels unnecessary. Like the vote on me being because he found I blanked him over just saying he's shielding DM; as mafia I'd assume the latter would be the explanation given. Backreading EOD1 his defence does feel genuine so shrug
I have also liked his d2 and how he's approached things.

Do you believe mafia members only do the bare minimum to get by?

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:27 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:17 pm This leaves me with a vote on Caitlin, DrWilgy, or pyxxy.

And, if this is correct, one of these two is throwing the other under the bus.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:37 pm**

Caitlin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:29 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:18 pm Man my issue is I read Wilgy's D1 and like

I dont have an issue with him? Like.

I dunno what's stopping me from throwing him in that list really? Had a similar vibe d1 where it's like 'I should probably just town him and I dont know whats preventing that' other than pure gut vibe
Yes, Wilgy is posting fine, but how do you explain why Wilgy/Epi/Pyxxy all survived the night if theyre all town?

This question baffles me.

The mafia only pick one out of half a dozen names. We weren't picked. Q.E.D.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:39 pm**

Reading through Caitlin's posts, all I got is "I'm voting Wilgy because of NKA" after Night 1 while asking that ^.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:43 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:24 pm hmmm lemme see how this feels [VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

How does it feel, pyxxy?

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:45 pm**

[VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:54 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.

As someone who is never in the townxore, I strongly disagree. Look what it took to get any consideration, I had to cry like a bitch.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:27 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:17 pm This leaves me with a vote on Caitlin, DrWilgy, or pyxxy.
And, if this is correct, one of these two is throwing the other under the bus.

I was going to say the same, it would be some bussing.... if Wilgy is wolf. Not so much if it's Cait-pyxxy?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:43 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:24 pm hmmm lemme see how this feels [VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

How does it feel, pyxxy?

LOL beat me to it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:55 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:22 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:11 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:17 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:15 pm Working through today with a core of Epi/Pyxxy/Cait and hoping it does not burn me later :,)
Why is pyxxy in that list?
Covered it yesterday but if he's mafia, he's adding so many extra steps to how he's approaching things to the point it feels unnecessary. Like the vote on me being because he found I blanked him over just saying he's shielding DM; as mafia I'd assume the latter would be the explanation given. Backreading EOD1 his defence does feel genuine so shrug
I have also liked his d2 and how he's approached things.
Do you believe mafia members only do the bare minimum to get by?

Not necessarily? But considering EOD was v/v wagons it's more 'why add all these extra steps when the current state of things is good for mafia anyway?'

At best he could be mafia with LC? In that situation I can kinda see why he deflects onto me there since I believe LC was at risk at that point too. But I dont see him being mafia independently so it's tough

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:56 pm**

Wilgy has the most psycho bussing ability I have heard of, for the record.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:57 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:54 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.
As someone who is never in the townxore, I strongly disagree. Look what it took to get any consideration, I had to cry like a bitch.

I think that as someone who never gets into that list, it's a testament to how amazing your skills as mafia are.

Or...you know...

...you're just polarized.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:58 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:55 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:22 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:11 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:17 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:15 pm Working through today with a core of Epi/Pyxxy/Cait and hoping it does not burn me later :,)
Why is pyxxy in that list?
Covered it yesterday but if he's mafia, he's adding so many extra steps to how he's approaching things to the point it feels unnecessary. Like the vote on me being because he found I blanked him over just saying he's shielding DM; as mafia I'd assume the latter would be the explanation given. Backreading EOD1 his defence does feel genuine so shrug
I have also liked his d2 and how he's approached things.
Do you believe mafia members only do the bare minimum to get by?
Not necessarily? But considering EOD was v/v wagons it's more 'why add all these extra steps when the current state of things is good for mafia anyway?'

At best he could be mafia with LC? In that situation I can kinda see why he deflects onto me there since I believe LC was at risk at that point too. But I dont see him being mafia independently so it's tough

I was saving myself just fine when pyxxy came along and really pushed and cajoled me to vote you. My self-save would have been DM-voting, which pyxxy knew.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:00 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:57 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:54 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.
As someone who is never in the townxore, I strongly disagree. Look what it took to get any consideration, I had to cry like a bitch.
I think that as someone who never gets into that list, it's a testament to how amazing your skills as mafia are.

Or...you know...

...you're just polarized.

That's like the latest cool slang, isn't it?

I do like that angle, I've been beleaguered town so often since my return... I just don't know.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:01 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:55 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:22 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:11 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:17 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:15 pm Working through today with a core of Epi/Pyxxy/Cait and hoping it does not burn me later :,)
Why is pyxxy in that list?
Covered it yesterday but if he's mafia, he's adding so many extra steps to how he's approaching things to the point it feels unnecessary. Like the vote on me being because he found I blanked him over just saying he's shielding DM; as mafia I'd assume the latter would be the explanation given. Backreading EOD1 his defence does feel genuine so shrug
I have also liked his d2 and how he's approached things.
Do you believe mafia members only do the bare minimum to get by?
Not necessarily? But considering EOD was v/v wagons it's more 'why add all these extra steps when the current state of things is good for mafia anyway?'

At best he could be mafia with LC? In that situation I can kinda see why he deflects onto me there since I believe LC was at risk at that point too. But I dont see him being mafia independently so it's tough

Oh, okay. I think I misunderstood what you were staying.

In that case, you're operating under the premise that anybody who lifts a finger at the end of the Day phase when it's unnecessary to secure a good lynch for the mafia is probably good. I get that idea, but would submit that it's not always right.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:02 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:00 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:57 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:54 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.
As someone who is never in the townxore, I strongly disagree. Look what it took to get any consideration, I had to cry like a bitch.
I think that as someone who never gets into that list, it's a testament to how amazing your skills as mafia are.

Or...you know...

...you're just polarized.
That's like the latest cool slang, isn't it?

I do like that angle, I've been beleaguered town so often since my return... I just don't know.

You're a good civilian. Some of us are just shit at seeing it because we've had our asses handed to us too many times.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:04 pm**

@Epignosis can I get your thoughts on Wilgy here?

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:05 pm**

Well, as I said, if I had three lynches today, it's Wilgy, Caitlin, pyxxy.

Wilgy has two votes from the latter, and I don't understand why either are voting him.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:06 pm**

Wilgy looks more like he's trying to work things out. Caitlin and pyxxy? I don't get that impression compared to him.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:08 pm**

And just to be clear, if Wilgy IS mafia, neither of those two get any credit from me for that reason.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:09 pm**

Mild dilemma; I think Wilgy is more likely to be a hit than Pyxxy, but think the Pyxxy wagon is 100% pure. So it's like. Sheep more certain townreads or go with reads? ;_;

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:11 pm**

I think LC towntold hard earlier and that's a read I'm more sure on going into EOD, but in saying that it's like 'damn was the wagon on me pure? that sucks lol' because I'm unsure on Pyxxy flipping wolf

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:12 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:09 pm Mild dilemma; I think Wilgy is more likely to be a hit than Pyxxy, but think the Pyxxy wagon is 100% pure. So it's like. Sheep more certain townreads or go with reads? ;_;

Do me a solid and list those people (trust, don't trust). Suppertime here.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:12 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:12 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:09 pm Mild dilemma; I think Wilgy is more likely to be a hit than Pyxxy, but think the Pyxxy wagon is 100% pure. So it's like. Sheep more certain townreads or go with reads? ;_;
Do me a solid and list those people (trust, don't trust). Suppertime here.

It'll be a brief outline but on it \o/ give me a bit of time

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:36 pm**

waddap gamers

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:37 pm**

If it's Caitlin and Wilgy, how do we get past their cross-voting right now? There are so few players. If we get one wolf today, does that earn us two mistakes? Or is there just one no matter what? My brain is tired
My everything is tired
Last day at Disney.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:37 pm**

@Epignosis can I help you

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:38 pm**

You could kill me.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:39 pm**

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:41 pm**

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 4:10 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:12 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:35 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:58 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 9:06 pm Hm

If I take my 3 main townreads and set them into a safe lil corner, it leaves me with 2 in Wilgy/SVS/LC

Wilgy/SVS dont work because of how SVS reacted to pressure from Wilgy - felt very reactive, compared to how I expect a wolf would view pressure from a partner which wouldn't be as worried

LC/SVS you talked about earlier, feels vaguely unlikely but nothing solid considering I spent the past few days thinking one of Epi's posts was said by LC x_x

And LC/Wilgy I havent really looked into at all, though I would like to mention that the Falcon NK is probably favorable to them due to Falcon's vote on LC & it means Wilgy wouldnt then need to shield a townie that potentially votes his buddy today. Aside from that I honestly couldnt tell you if these work or not off the top of my head ;_;
do you read falcon's death as more the LC side of things or the Wilgy side of things?
What is the Wilgy side of things re Falcon's death?
quoth delta in the post you quoted:
"it means Wilgy wouldnt then need to shield a townie that potentially votes his buddy today"
I see.

:\

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:41 pm**

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 4:38 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 4:01 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:44 pm - Caitlin's town reads into choosing to kill in those townreads still scratching at me as it feels inorganic.
Why though

Can you genuinely tell me that if you were say, two of me/SVS/Delta/LC that you'd actually kill Falcon instead of one of the high content slots?
Because your conclusion is very 1 dimensional and goes against your reads keeping your PoE open.

Further it only takes one of those to commit the kill and there plenty of reasons why each would do so even if it's half WIFOM. Most nka is and I've even iterated as to why this level 1 nka of yours is one of many that could be made. The fact that you choose to subscribe to it really feels gross and somewhat arbitrary. Like, why me over the other high posters?

wilgy mad

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:39 pm:/

My other lean is to vote Caitlin.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.

ah

so you're back to pocketing LC then

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.
ah

so you're back to pocketing LC then

Given that LC is in Disney World and I'm working right now, it might be that I don't have a pocket to fit LC in.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:01 pm I never see Long Con as low-hanging fruit. Ever. That's bullshit. BUT, I believe LC sees himself that way here. Probably not voting there today, and I'll admit I do have a bias against Long Con in Mafia.
ah

so you're back to pocketing LC then

He's damn good at it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:43 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:24 pm hmmm lemme see how this feels [VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

How does it feel, pyxxy?

it felt good

it always feels good to vote Wilgy. that's my problem

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:39 pm:/
My other lean is to vote Caitlin.

I would do it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:46 pm**

Sorry Epi I'm kinda just staring at the box not really knowing how to get my thoughts down, I promise I'm not just blanking this ;_;

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:46 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:45 pm [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine

so this is just because I'm in your solve, and not for any specific reason?

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:47 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:43 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:24 pm hmmm lemme see how this feels [VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

How does it feel, pyxxy?
it felt good

it always feels good to vote Wilgy. that's my problem

I don't feel good about it any more, generally. Only recently did I realize how good he is at this game. I thought he was a Goofy Gus.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:47 pm**

+ you're just stacking on me with Long Con

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:48 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:42 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:39 pm:/
My other lean is to vote Caitlin.

Why? I think her trying to analyze a night kill is a good look. Especially in mountainous, when baddies don't have to think about things like, "I want to kill someone who will die, and not be protected etc". Like when I'm bad, I often will pick a somewhat townieish mid poster I doubt will be protected. But in a 9 player mountainous, you don't have the luxury of mystery kills. You have to make it count.

Or did I miss something else she may have done? My catch up has been spotty.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:49 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:55 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:22 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:11 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:17 am
Delta wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:15 pm Working through today with a core of Epi/Pyxxy/Cait and hoping it does not burn me later :,)
Why is pyxxy in that list?
Covered it yesterday but if he's mafia, he's adding so many extra steps to how he's approaching things to the point it feels unnecessary. Like the vote on me being because he found I blanked him over just saying he's shielding DM; as mafia I'd assume the latter would be the explanation given. Backreading EOD1 his defence does feel genuine so shrug
I have also liked his d2 and how he's approached things.
Do you believe mafia members only do the bare minimum to get by?
Not necessarily? But considering EOD was v/v wagons it's more 'why add all these extra steps when the current state of things is good for mafia anyway?'

At best he could be mafia with LC? In that situation I can kinda see why he deflects onto me there since I believe LC was at risk at that point too. But I dont see him being mafia independently so it's tough

I'm mafia with LC if LC miraculously pulls off me before EOD

yes this is a reverse jinx attempt

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:49 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:46 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:45 pm [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine
so this is just because I'm in your solve, and not for any specific reason?

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:43 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:24 pm hmmm lemme see how this feels [VOTE: Wilgy] aubergine

How does it feel, pyxxy?
it felt good

it always feels good to vote Wilgy. that's my problem

Why can't you vote for someone else? Ask people questions? Form new opinions? You voted me for no reason then voted Wilgy for no reason. You have no reason to vote anybody. That's my issue with you.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:50 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:47 pm + you're just stacking on me with Long Con

The Syndicate

US National Parks Mafia [DAY 4]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]

Re: US National Parks Mafia [DAY 2]