The Syndicate

Chris wrote:It's not murdering I don't think.

It specifically says "Except night kills", so "murdering" doesn't seem to fit.

Murderous, even. but yeah, it doesn't really go. It's not "different" because we have the Ns and there isn't one in the word.

Murderous rage, that's perfect. Nice work, I am sure that's right.

Long Con wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:LC, what do you think is the best direction for today's lynch?

I dunno... lynch someone bad? I'm still mostly on Team Chris, until it's proven that he's not right. He's done a lot of leg work, and his suspects are suspicious to me.

Do you know why Dana survived last night?

Yes, I do.

Hosts, here: If you are targeted by a baddie, there is a fifty percent chance of you entering a murderous rage and redirecting their night action back onto them. This does not include nightkills.

Long Con wrote:Murderous rage, that's perfect. Nice work, I am sure that's right.

Don't think its out of place with nightkills not included?

zeek wrote:

Long Con wrote:Murderous rage, that's perfect. Nice work, I am sure that's right.

Don't think its out of place with nightkills not included?

No, I think it fits just fine. If they're dead, they can't telepathically change it.

LC, you think every single one of Chris's suspects is suspicious?

Long Con wrote:

zeek wrote:

Long Con wrote:Murderous rage, that's perfect. Nice work, I am sure that's right.

Don't think its out of place with nightkills not included?

No, I think it fits just fine. If they're dead, they can't telepathically change it.

Yeah, but then how does murderous rage work? They aren't murdering anyway.

But it does seem to be the only thing that fits.

Let's see what the hosts say.

*anyone

I know it's useless, but here's this:

Dalek Sec:
If someone targets a member of your team with a night action, you can conduct a -a----- experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action does not work and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player will not be able to effectively target your team in any way (outside of being voted) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action still does not work, but there are no other effects.

HOSTS: Is the last unknown word correct? It looks like it should be "random", but it doesn't fit.

MovingPictures07 wrote:LC, you think every single one of Chris's suspects is suspicious?

Yes... but it's more like, I can't see any reason why they're particularly Civvie, and I don't have anyone that I am sure is a baddie, so I'm willing to follow along with Chris' very sure suspicions because I trust Chris is a Civvie.

HOSTS: Can you check Mickey Smith's reveals? Some thing aren't lining up, and some of the letters feel like they should be revealed.

Chris wrote:HOSTS: Can you check Mickey Smith's reveals? Some thing aren't lining up, and some of the letters feel like they should be revealed.

Snowy might be able to help us with that one.

Chris wrote:I know it's useless, but here's this:

Dalek Sec:
If someone targets a member of your team with a night action, you can conduct a -a----- experiment on them. A coin is then tossed. If heads, the night action does not work and you flip a coin again. If tails, nothing happens. If the coin lands heads on the second flip, that player will not be able to effectively target your team in any way (outside of being voted) for the remainder of the game. If tails, the night action still does not work, but there are no other effects.

HOSTS: Is the last unknown word correct? It looks like it should be "random", but it doesn't fit.

It's not "does not work," its "does nothing."

Has anyone suggested painful. Thats what I have.

Long verjuice Red King it possible that Chris Seemer good killing some of interlocutor theories theogony not good?

zeek wrote:

It's not "does not work," its "does nothing."

Has anyone suggested painful. Thats what I have.[/quote]

That looks to be it.

juliets wrote:Long verjuice Red King it possible that Chris Seemer good killing some of interlocutor theories theogony not good?

Sure, it's possible, but I don't have any better theories right now, and we have to lynch somebody. I have to be satisfied right now with NOT lynching someone I trust... all others are fair game to me.

Chris wrote:

zeek wrote:

It's not "does not work," its "does nothing."

Has anyone suggested painful. Thats what I have.

That looks to be it.

Quote fail.

Shipment arrived.

Back back after work.

Chris wrote:And Dom, like people are suggesting, if I am The Master, I only have one life left, since I was targeted with a NK twice. So if everyone really feels that I'm The Master, it won't be that hard to kill me after the Cybers are killed.

But I'm not The Master. And when going after the recruiter, they really should be lynched, since that's the only way we'll know if we got them or not.

Chris we don't know who the Master is... I'm leaning away from you being the Master at this point, if I'm honest. I'm just saying your philosophy on dealing with the Master is really unsound and a good way to let him win. Snow Dog was very eager to follow you on this.

Chris wrote:Not doing that again TH.

As a matter of fact, since me putting thoughts in the thread is being used against me, I'm not releasing anything until I'm ready to present it as a case.

If that sucks, which I think is does, blame people like Dom and Epig.

I am going to kindly ask you to not.
I didn't ask that you post less. I asked that you don't sling mud everywhere and freak out if people don't clamp to your suspects right away because it's harmful to the civvies.
Honestly, I need a break from this game, I think.

zeek wrote:

Chris wrote:HOSTS: Can you check Mickey Smith's reveals? Some thing aren't lining up, and some of the letters feel like they should be revealed.

Snowy might be able to help us with that one.

Mickey Smith: Rose's on/off boyfriend in the series. A bit of a goof and a clown, he ends up losing Rose for a significant period and struggles with coping with the dangers involved with her newfound friend. He grows and matures however and ends up proving himself later on. If he is targeted by a night action, a coin is flipped. *Secrets* If heads, he proves his heroic ability by absorbing the action, but gaining the ability to switch one of his lynch votes privately via PM if he so desires. If tails, he goofs it all up, absorbs the night action, and his vote is worth 0 the following day.

zeek wrote:

Chris wrote:HOSTS: Can you check Mickey Smith's reveals? Some thing aren't lining up, and some of the letters feel like they should be revealed.

Snowy might be able to help us with that one.

Why did you know that?

Because Snowy 1.0 was lynched and his role was Mickey

Yeah... that's not right.

and what I mean by that, is he should not have revealed that information because it was based on a previous role he had.

zeek wrote:Because Snowy 1.0 was lynched and his role was Mickey

Heh... I was suspicious for nothing... and mildly annoyed for nothing. I forgot Snowy 1.0 was Mickey, and I thought he was smugly "claiming" the role now with a fantastic sudden reveal, prompted inexplicably by you.

So that was fun.

Chris wrote:and what I mean by that, is he should not have revealed that information because it was based on a previous role he had.

I don't think it's a big deal at all. The role is dead, we all know ( ) he was it. What should we have done, tried to guess it and prod Snowy for small clues?

zeek wrote:MM, you're totally getting lynched soon so you might as well tell us whether you were recruited by the Master or the secret recruiter. My thoughts on the recruiter role are that its possibly either the Great Intelligence or Davros. Both of those are big characters that haven't been included so it'd make sense one of them was the recruiter.

1) I'm pretty sure that's info-dropping.

2) You probably wouldn't believe me anyway. I'll try to let my play do the talking instead.

zeek wrote:Woah guys, I'm not connected to MM in the slightest. I was killed first attempt by a cyberman. Can't be any of the baddies left.

There are secrets am stuff I'm sure. You were rezzed after all. But yes, zeek and I are not connected on this rezz, that I'm aware of.

S~V~S wrote:In any case, both zeek & MM are off the table today, so

Faraday surviving a Strax kill makes me less inclined to suspect him rather than more. He does seem a bit blendier than is usual even for him, though, so maybe he needs a reread.

Tomorrow, since I am out for the night

xox happy mafia players

It read to me that Strax's kill failed, not that DF survived it.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:In any case, both zeek & MM are off the table today, so

Faraday surviving a Strax kill makes me less inclined to suspect him rather than more. He does seem a bit blendier than is usual even for him, though, so maybe he needs a reread.

Tomorrow, since I am out for the night

xox happy mafia players

It read to me that Strax's kill failed, not that DF survived it.

Is that a distinction the hosts would make in a night post?

Oh Hosts: is there game info to be interpreted in the wording of your night posts?

MP, I'd like a little more reassurance re: DF, if it's not too much trouble.

Chris wrote:And zeek, I totally get the urge to vote MM out right away... but I think we've got more pressing matters to attend to.

Do it. I dare you. See what happens.

zeek wrote:

Chris wrote:MP, you say you know exactly why no one was lynched last night. Can you share? Also, you never mentioned how you were rezzed? Any idea how that happened?

You don't know why MP was rezzed? Surely it's pretty obvious by now.

I do not think it is obvious, do explain.

zeek wrote:I presume he doesn't need to be rezzed by anyone. The Doctor regenerates when he dies.

The Doctor regenerates when he is "lynched" (based on MP's revelations), and MP was NK'd. These are not the same.

Try reading the rest before replying to every post that I've made or been mentioned in.

The Doctor does regenerate whether he's NK or lynched. I'd solved it while dead after BWT corrected the hangman error.

Never mind, still catching up and responding.

Linki: I can accept that.

Btw, why was Chris worried about being NK'd last night if he has has a role that surives NK's? Did I miss something on this subject?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Btw, why was Chris worried about being NK'd last night if he has has a role that surives NK's? Did I miss something on this subject?

well, I was either worried about the other 50 percent, or that we did not get through night 8 yet.

Bass has still not responded to the allegations that he is Sabie's teammate.

Blooper who do you think could be the remaining Cybermen?

Keys I see you've got your vote on Hedgie atm, what're your thoughts there?

Long Con wrote:

Chris wrote:and what I mean by that, is he should not have revealed that information because it was based on a previous role he had.

I don't think it's a big deal at all. The role is dead, we all know ( ) he was it. What should we have done, tried to guess it and prod Snowy for small clues?

Plus when mickey dies his secrets should have been revealed. I mean, that's the normal practise right?

Chris wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Btw, why was Chris worried about being NK'd last night if he has has a role that surives NK's? Did I miss something on this subject?

well, I was either worried about the other 50 percent, or that we did not get through night 8 yet.

Only one of the two roles you claim has a 50%. I thought you were claiming the one that didn't.

S~V~S wrote:

Chris wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Btw, why was Chris worried about being NK'd last night if he has has a role that surives NK's? Did I miss something on this subject?

well, I was either worried about the other 50 percent, or that we did not get through night 8 yet.

Only one of the two roles you claim has a 50%. I thought you were claiming the one that didn't.

He's saying that either he's Sarah JAne with a 50%, or he's Captain Jack who didn't get another protection until after Night 8 was done.

I'm not naming a specific role. That's not allowed. I'm one of those two.

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Chris wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Btw, why was Chris worried about being NK'd last night if he has has a role that surives NK's? Did I miss something on this subject?

well, I was either worried about the other 50 percent, or that we did not get through night 8 yet.

Only one of the two roles you claim has a 50%. I thought you were claiming the one that didn't.

He's saying that either he's Sarah JAne with a 50%, or he's Captain Jack who didn't get another protection until after Night 8 was done.

I missed the captain secret part as the first page is not updated.

Turnip Head wrote:Bass has still not responded to the allegations that he is Sabie's teammate.

This is the most worrisome thing about Bass to me, tbh.

Hosts:

I was thinking while I was driving for work today... It's really unfair that there are two roles that we know absolutely nothing about. So I propose a compromise.

How about you do the hangman thing for the secret roles? THAT sounds really fair...



For bea...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tjSUA9f1GuQ/T ... 0-0-01.gif

SHHH!!! Don't tell Diggz...

Awww....

suckupfail.jpg