The Syndicate

I'm gonna start with the terribad devious marmot. You go squish now marmot.

MacDougall wrote:I'm gonna start with the terribad devious marmot. You go squish now marmot.

Reciprocated.

Sorry I am tup cursed and didn't read my PM groveling I started posting. My TokyoRose. amour don't mod-kill me mafioso SVS.

To whomever did this you shall feel my wrath vile fiend.

Why Dom? Didn't he have enough heat on him for being bad?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I'm gonna start with the terribad devious marmot. You go squish now marmot.

Reciprocated.

The vile Achilles dareth no u me with such blatant OMGUS. What Descolada you SCUM votograph something. For this you shall pay. You better Knave of Hearts intermittence gonna liar.

The mafia seems to take pleasure in killing my top suspects to prove that I am an incompetent fool.

Why have so many people gone this long without cases being presented on them? I mean, does anyone else find it odd that we have lynched a total of one baddies?

DharmaHelper wrote:Why have so many people gone this long without cases being presented on them? I mean, does anyone else find it odd that we have lynched a total of one baddies?

Cases require casers. Are you a caser?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Why have so many people gone this long without cases being presented on them? I mean, does anyone else find it odd that we have lynched a total of one baddies?

Cases require casers. Are you a caser?

Am I the only one playing? Is it my responsibility to build every case?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Why have so many people gone this long without cases being presented on them? I mean, does anyone else find it odd that we have lynched a total of one baddies?

Cases require casers. Are you a caser?

Am I the only one playing? Is it my responsibility to build every case?

No and no.

But if you're not willing to do it, you are in no position to fault others for not doing it.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Why have so many people gone this long without cases being presented on them? I mean, does anyone else find it odd that we have lynched a total of one baddies?

Cases require casers. Are you a caser?

Am I the only one playing? Is it my responsibility to build every case?

No and no.

But if you're not willing to do it, you are in no position to fault others for not doing it.

Like, cases don't come out of thin air, man.

What's your case?

How many people feel comfortable with Dr. Wigly, Motel Room, Blooper, Juliet, or Sorsha? Who is willing to bet me one or more of these individuals is mafia? Can we please lynch one of them today to put my mind at east?

Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

Dom wrote: Anyway, I have listed suspects: Mac, MM, Matt.
Wilgy just earned a spot on that list because of his last post as well.

Dom wrote:#1) Wilgy
#2) Metalmarsh
#3) Mac
#4) Boomslang

None have given substantiated reasons to vote or suspect me.

Dom wrote: The lynch train on me is so desperate and transparent. I don't think everyone who suspects me is bad, but there's gotta be a baddie in there. It's comprised of FZ (someone I've suspected for a while), MM (someone who took two or three days to come up with a reason to suspect me), Tranq (who barely played and was wrong), and Wilgy (who has yet to really acknowledge my questions to him).

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Dom wrote:Oh and I've clearly never trusted you. [FZ]

Bye mafiosos, you played a good game.

What the hell are you two arguing about?

Ricochet wrote:What the hell are you two arguing about?

DharmaHelper wrote:How many people feel comfortable with Dr. Wigly, Motel Room, Blooper, Juliet, or Sorsha? Who is willing to bet me one or more of these individuals is mafia? Can we please lynch one of them today to put my mind at east?

I feel ok about wilgy and mostly ok about juliets. But since the last 3 deaths have all taken me by surprise (that they were civ, I thought they were bad) I don't know how well I'm trusting my own judgement this game. Lorab was the only one I was sure of.

Motel room and blooper are to me. I don't have time to do a case on them.... Not tonight at least. And sorsha... She's 100% not a baddie.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

You ask why some folks are not being cased against.

I ask you to case them.

You respond they are too difficult to case due to blendiness.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

Has something happened to you? I notice something different about you today don't you?

juliets wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

Has something happened to you? I notice something different about you today don't you?

What do you mean?

Anyway, I'm going to go along with DH's ideology and vote for Dr Wilgy, who is most definitely not a doctor.

DharmaHelper wrote:

juliets wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

Has something happened to you? I notice something different about you today don't you?

What do you mean?

Both of you?

Ricochet wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

juliets wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Step forward! Be a leader. Be your own Game of Champions hero and MVP.

Make the case of all cases to nab that baddie (if that's what you're going for).

Linki: west side, baby.

Would it not be fun to do another 4-Way Tie? Didn't the first one grab a baddie? Don't you think the odds of finding a baddie in that pool of players is worth the coordination of a tie? How am I supposed to build a case on players who have blended so far into the background it is difficult to tell when or if they are playing?

Has something happened to you? I notice something different about you today don't you?

What do you mean?

Both of you?

Reposting for awareness.

Ricochet wrote:

Dom wrote: Anyway, I have listed suspects: Mac, MM, Matt.
Wilgy just earned a spot on that list because of his last post as well.

Dom wrote:#1) Wilgy
#2) Metalmarsh
#3) Mac
#4) Boomslang

None have given substantiated reasons to vote or suspect me.

Dom wrote: The lynch train on me is so desperate and transparent. I don't think everyone who suspects me is bad, but there's gotta be a baddie in there. It's comprised of FZ (someone I've suspected for a while), MM (someone who took two or three days to come up with a reason to suspect me), Tranq (who barely played and was wrong), and Wilgy (who has yet to really acknowledge my questions to him).

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Dom wrote:Oh and I've clearly never trusted you. [FZ]

Bye mafiosos, you played a good game.

Ricochet wrote:Reposting for awareness.

Ricochet wrote:

Dom wrote: Anyway, I have listed suspects: Mac, MM, Matt.
Wilgy just earned a spot on that list because of his last post as well.

Dom wrote:#1) Wilgy
#2) Metalmarsh
#3) Mac
#4) Boomslang

None have given substantiated reasons to vote or suspect me.

Dom wrote: The lynch train on me is so desperate and transparent. I don't think everyone who suspects me is bad, but there's gotta be a baddie in there. It's comprised of FZ (someone I've suspected for a while), MM (someone who took two or three days to come up with a reason to suspect me), Tranq (who barely played and was wrong), and Wilgy (who has yet to really acknowledge my questions to him).

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Dom wrote:Oh and I've clearly never trusted you. [FZ]

Bye mafiosos, you played a good game.

Don't you just love this post? Does it not look like a perfectly crafted hitlist?

Of baddies? Sure.

Ricochet wrote:Of baddies? Sure.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Anyway, I'm going to go along with DH's ideology and vote for Dr Wilgy, who is most definitely not a doctor.

Does it make sense for me to do the same after some research if I still believe he's bad?

I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Metalmarsh89 wrote: Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Hahahahahahahahaahhahaahahahah

That''s how role checking works.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote: Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Hahahahahahahahaahhahaahahahah

That''s how role checking works.

I guess comparing it to Barry Allen's role, you might be correct.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

I've always sucked at mafia. Deal with it.

I'm a neutral.

I started the game being intentionally all over the place and making intentionally suspicious remarks and claims. But everyone decided to lynch Ricochet instead because he obviously did a better job then I did. After that happened, I didn't have much to do or play for, so I went into post-nothing-but-shit mode. That was fun for a day, but then it got boring. I didn't feel like playing a mafia game where I'm not doing shit, and would feel even worse if I somehow won because of it. Around the same time, the heat finally started coming back from my Day 1 shenanigans (and attitude thereafter), which I knew would eventually happen anyway. I explained my logic, backed myself up with behavior in other games. But I decided I will try to do normal civilian mafia things and start looking around. Not only has that blown up in my face, but whoever the mafia is really enjoys killing off the players I think are bad.

Would you rather I just have kept doing jack-shit? Would you have preferred if I kept coasting along while the civilians keep getting lynched? I too am tired of the civilians always losing on this site, which is part of the reason I decided to change my own tune. I realize civilians do lose sometimes because of the shit that I pull, and I apologize for that. I also realize that civilians lose sometimes because I'm a terrible civilian. I wish there was something I could do about that. But I am still annoyed when players call my cases stupid, or take shots at my ability. I have been trying here the past couple day phases, which is more than can be said for some of you. But it's probably already too late for that anyway.

So I ask you, do you want my help or not? If you don't, just lynch me or leave me alone, or do whatever it is you think is best for you.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm a neutral.

I started the game being intentionally all over the place and making intentionally suspicious remarks and claims. But everyone decided to lynch Ricochet instead because he obviously did a better job then I did. After that happened, I didn't have much to do or play for, so I went into post-nothing-but-shit mode. That was fun for a day, but then it got boring. I didn't feel like playing a mafia game where I'm not doing shit, and would feel even worse if I somehow won because of it. Around the same time, the heat finally started coming back from my Day 1 shenanigans (and attitude thereafter), which I knew would eventually happen anyway. I explained my logic, backed myself up with behavior in other games. But I decided I will try to do normal civilian mafia things and start looking around. Not only has that blown up in my face, but whoever the mafia is really enjoys killing off the players I think are bad.

Would you rather I just have kept doing jack-shit? Would you have preferred if I kept coasting along while the civilians keep getting lynched? I too am tired of the civilians always losing on this site, which is part of the reason I decided to change my own tune. I realize civilians do lose sometimes because of the shit that I pull, and I apologize for that. I also realize that civilians lose sometimes because I'm a terrible civilian. I wish there was something I could do about that. But I am still annoyed when players call my cases stupid, or take shots at my ability. I have been trying here the past couple day phases, which is more than can be said for some of you. But it's probably already too late for that anyway.

So I ask you, do you want my help or not? If you don't, just lynch me or leave me alone, or do whatever it is you think is best for you.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

Should I have phrased this better? Could I have? Did I mean offense?

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

Should I have phrased this better? Could I have? Did I mean offense?

Were you being your normal sarcastic self? I think so, don't you?

juliets wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

Should I have phrased this better? Could I have? Did I mean offense?

Were you being your normal sarcastic self? I think so, don't you?

is it easy to do that Today of all days?

DharmaHelper wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I haven't done any research on Dr Wilgy, so by all means, if you learn anything...

Ricochet, what makes you think the Dom learned the alignment of the roles he discovered (if he took the eye deal)?

Did MetalMarsh give his account to someone who has never played mafia before ever?

Should I have phrased this better? Could I have? Did I mean offense?

No. I know you're just yanking my chain. I'm more annoyed about being wrong so much this game.

Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.

Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.

Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.

Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.

So... Why me 1st?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.

Do you really want to bring back the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record?

juliets wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.

Do you really want to bring back the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record?

I wasn't looking for that particular outcome, though I wouldn't mind it personally.

If honeytongued didn't know any indecorous Ricochet I overconfidence suitable that you intentionally mediant Dom rapparee you could chain mislynch all his bilboes