The Syndicate

Ricochet wrote:Holy shit, Scotty might have been hit by the Goochi-Goochi-Goo as well.

balloonery Can you dig it? lostaddict12! Your legacy lives on tim!

linki: Planter get it sugarplum you magic like me in this game.

I fossils mastermind surveying. teeth bye

Ricochet wrote:Voting BWT, but also watching any votes coming that way closely. I made my case, but everyone else should have their own take on it.
Except baddies, they are welcome to wagon.

Does this look like a wagoner to you?

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

Could be. I don't get what he meant with the "by choice" stuff, either.

Isolated, his low posting gave me the slight detached-neutral vibe and his Wilgy angle was as common as others', but if BWT will flip bad + Boom staying away from Bubbles lynch + hunting Wilgy, he'll look far worse.

Ricochet wrote:MM, why did you vote Llama?

Because he is not Supatown.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:MM, why did you vote Llama?

Because he is not Supatown.

Is he Supabad?

And why?

Voted the birdman. Cuz I said I would

Good job not dying dh and la! Rip timmer.

I had my doubts about teefies day 1. Rico made some very strong points yesterday. I wasn't so moved by teefies defense. I'm cool with voting teefies

I'm also going to vote BWT, to nobody's surprise. Having thought a bit about it I think the strangest thing is his vote for Synonym to save himself, and then later coming back to claim he was totally going to switch his vote to himself. I don't believe him, but I'm not sure what exactly he was trying to pull with that move. I think we're onto something with him anyway, so that's where my vote is going to go.

Rico, I'm sorry if your found my last line insulting it wasn't intended as such. All I meant by it was most people work first shift and then fit their mafia in sometime when I am stuck working second shift. I am able to fit in mafia before or on breaks, it limits the amount of time I have. It was not meant to pass judgement on anyone else and their use of their time.

Adios BWT!

Spacedaisy wrote:
Rico, I'm sorry if your found my last line insulting it wasn't intended as such. All I meant by it was most people work first shift and then fit their mafia in sometime when I am stuck working second shift. I am able to fit in mafia before or on breaks, it limits the amount of time I have. It was not meant to pass judgement on anyone else and their use of their time.

No worries, I most likely got the wrong impression as well.

I forgot to mention that I'm out of town on business today and tomorrow. I'll do what I can.

For what it is worth, bwt did apparently change his vote sometime in the last ten or fifteen minutes, because his vote registered as being the last one on syn even though I was the last one who actually said I was voting for syn. It really confused me at first. Apparently he changed his vote and then changed it back. I don't really get why though. Or why he waited until after the vote was over to say so.

Ricochet wrote: Keeper of Gossips is not helpful one bit. Gee, I wonder who he might be.

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

The insanifier!! Yay!!!!!

I am fairly good at understanding insanified posts--although less so after LC tweaked it and made it harder. But I'll give a shot at summarizing what I think he's saying. Scotty, please correct me if I'm wrong. Or nod or agree with parts/disagree with parts or something.

I think Scotty is saying that he wants to look at new folks, and specifically the people Rico named last night? And that he's ok with a BWT lynch.

LoRab wrote:The insanifier!! Yay!!!!!

I am fairly good at understanding insanified posts--although less so after LC tweaked it and made it harder. But I'll give a shot at summarizing what I think he's saying. Scotty, please correct me if I'm wrong. Or nod or agree with parts/disagree with parts or something.

I think Scotty is saying that he wants to look at new folks, and specifically the people Rico named last night? And that he's ok with a BWT lynch.

You instanter pursy correct, don't me in charge buddy!.

This is Red Bishop far clientship biggest landslide itemize Zelda in this nullity gimlet Will O' The Wisp lucific so if BWT is actually fonctionnaire his investigated Dream Walker bussing bussing bussing all macaronic livelong day!

Ahahhaaaaaaaaa Hahahaaaaaaa theophobist

Scotty wrote:don't me in charge buddy!.

So funny this should show up on the insanifier. I actually used this quote today IRL.

Scotty wrote:

LoRab wrote:The insanifier!! Yay!!!!!

I am fairly good at understanding insanified posts--although less so after LC tweaked it and made it harder. But I'll give a shot at summarizing what I think he's saying. Scotty, please correct me if I'm wrong. Or nod or agree with parts/disagree with parts or something.

I think Scotty is saying that he wants to look at new folks, and specifically the people Rico named last night? And that he's ok with a BWT lynch.

You instanter pursy correct, don't me in charge buddy!.

This is Red Bishop far clientship biggest landslide itemize Zelda in this nullity gimlet Will O' The Wisp lucific so if BWT is actually fonctionnaire his investigated Dream Walker bussing bussing bussing all macaronic livelong day!

Ahahhaaaaaaaaa Hahahaaaaaaa theophobist

Paraphrase (I think): This is a big clusterfuck bandwagon. And if BWT doesn't end up being Uzbekistan, then there is a crap ton to go on.

I'll add personally, that this is a great way for baddies to hide out--whether on the other bad team, or if they're throwing him under the bus. That said, I'm going to stick with TH for the moment. Just to be different.

LoRab wrote:

Scotty wrote:

LoRab wrote:The insanifier!! Yay!!!!!

I am fairly good at understanding insanified posts--although less so after LC tweaked it and made it harder. But I'll give a shot at summarizing what I think he's saying. Scotty, please correct me if I'm wrong. Or nod or agree with parts/disagree with parts or something.

I think Scotty is saying that he wants to look at new folks, and specifically the people Rico named last night? And that he's ok with a BWT lynch.

You instanter pursy correct, don't me in charge buddy!.

This is Red Bishop far clientship biggest landslide itemize Zelda in this nullity gimlet Will O' The Wisp lucific so if BWT is actually fonctionnaire his investigated Dream Walker bussing bussing bussing all macaronic livelong day!

Ahahhaaaaaaaaa Hahahaaaaaaa theophobist

Paraphrase (I think): This is a big clusterfuck bandwagon. And if BWT doesn't end up being Uzbekistan, then there is a crap ton to go on.

I'll add personally, that this is a great way for baddies to hide out--whether on the other bad team, or if they're throwing him under the bus. That said, I'm going to stick with TH for the moment. Just to be different.

While NotInOxford Bubbles the help, I'm not sure phrensy you're so communicatory in my advice right now. I've Tribunal of Judgment endaemonism all game long, and you tillage nop talked or addressed me all game long.

Voting LoRab just to goodie team against the grain

HAAHhahahaa

Scotty wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Scotty wrote:

LoRab wrote:The insanifier!! Yay!!!!!

I am fairly good at understanding insanified posts--although less so after LC tweaked it and made it harder. But I'll give a shot at summarizing what I think he's saying. Scotty, please correct me if I'm wrong. Or nod or agree with parts/disagree with parts or something.

I think Scotty is saying that he wants to look at new folks, and specifically the people Rico named last night? And that he's ok with a BWT lynch.

You instanter pursy correct, don't me in charge buddy!.

This is Red Bishop far clientship biggest landslide itemize Zelda in this nullity gimlet Will O' The Wisp lucific so if BWT is actually fonctionnaire his investigated Dream Walker bussing bussing bussing all macaronic livelong day!

Ahahhaaaaaaaaa Hahahaaaaaaa theophobist

Paraphrase (I think): This is a big clusterfuck bandwagon. And if BWT doesn't end up being Uzbekistan, then there is a crap ton to go on.

I'll add personally, that this is a great way for baddies to hide out--whether on the other bad team, or if they're throwing him under the bus. That said, I'm going to stick with TH for the moment. Just to be different.

While NotInOxford Bubbles the help, I'm not sure phrensy you're so communicatory in my advice right now. I've Tribunal of Judgment endaemonism all game long, and you tillage nop talked or addressed me all game long.

Voting LoRab just to goodie team against the grain

HAAHhahahaa

I'm at peace with you voting for me because I'm not really saying much yet this round. It's a fair and true criticism. And havenot excuse other than real life (and, for ther record, I'm in the middle of the equivalent of the superbowl, the world series, and the
nba dinals, while running the boston marathon). Just to give context of my sechedule.

LoRab wrote:I'm at peace with you voting for me because I'm not really saying much yet this round. It's a fair and true criticism. And havenot excuse other than real life (and, for ther record, I'm in the middle of the equivalent of the superbowl, the world series, and the
nba dinals, while running the boston marathon). Just to give context of my sechedule.

Then I will vote for you too.

Is anyone here as familiar and skilled in understanding insanified text as LoRab?

I see I'm getting lynched today. Alright.

Too be honest, it's probably for the better this way. Work suddenly picked up and is crazy busy, and this coming week is going to get even worse. I'd feel bad asking for a replacement at this point, so I figure it's better if I just get lynched. So I'm self-voting to stir that along.

Take a look at the people who latched onto the case on me that others had built. That's where you'll find your baddies I bet.

I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

LoRab wrote:I'm at peace with you voting for me because I'm not really saying much yet this round. It's a fair and true criticism. And havenot excuse other than real life (and, for ther record, I'm in the middle of the equivalent of the superbowl, the world series, and the
nba dinals, while running the boston marathon). Just to give context of my sechedule.

Then I will vote for you too.

Uhhhh...ok.

@Rico: A lot of the LP/Piano players also have experience with the insanifier. I don't remember off hand who is good at reading it. Since LC bumped up the percentage of words that get changed, it became harder to understand.

BWT's self vote, and lack of denial of being bad makes me consider moving my vote in that direction. aaple voting Rico makes me consider a Rico vote, also (no, my suspicion of him hasn't let up).

I believe Scotty is saying something along the lines of "You have not cared at all about what I've said all game long LoRab, and suddenly you are interesting in reading and transcribing my insanified text. I don't understand this sudden reversal in attitude, but I suspect you for it. Ha ha ha ha ha."

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

I haven't lied about missing my PM N5, Synonym could have still been wrong about missing his.

So what's there to be called for? You were the one who pushed this angle on suspecting Syn.

Also, I don't recall the Hosts confirming or clarifying things past this post of yours.

---

aapje wrote:

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

Boomslang pings you like hell, but you vote me. Yup.

Also, are you still suspecting me for an event that in your mind looks suspicious, for reasons you know better, as well as for a response of mine to that event that did not live up to your standards...for reasons you know better? Yeah, still don't know what I'm supposed to argue/defend here.

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

"seems to"

"imply"

LoRab wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

LoRab wrote:I'm at peace with you voting for me because I'm not really saying much yet this round. It's a fair and true criticism. And havenot excuse other than real life (and, for ther record, I'm in the middle of the equivalent of the superbowl, the world series, and the
nba dinals, while running the boston marathon). Just to give context of my sechedule.

Then I will vote for you too.

Uhhhh...ok.

@Rico: A lot of the LP/Piano players also have experience with the insanifier. I don't remember off hand who is good at reading it. Since LC bumped up the percentage of words that get changed, it became harder to understand.

BWT's self vote, and lack of denial of being bad makes me consider moving my vote in that direction. aaple voting Rico makes me consider a Rico vote, also (no, my suspicion of him hasn't let up).

Understood. You were also cheerfully exclamatory at an insanifying taking place. Do you think insanifying is a good thing or sign?

As for voting me, you haven't let up, I have nothing to add since the previous time you voted (or intended to vote) for me, so I'll use this instead:

What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I believe Scotty is saying something along the lines of "You have not cared at all about what I've said all game long LoRab, and suddenly you are interesting in reading and transcribing my insanified text. I don't understand this sudden reversal in attitude, but I suspect you for it. Ha ha ha ha ha."

Not to be wait nevermind. I don't think the ha ha ha's needed translating. :P

Ricochet wrote:What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?

Isn't Jay dead? Should we still be suspecting him?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?

Isn't Jay dead? Should we still be suspecting him?

No. I should have rather put it "after [suspecting them] the early Days".

Read my re-read of her. That's what I'm referencing. For a player never letting up on suspicions, she suspected them and then the suspicions vanished.

Rico, I just searched "rey" within Lorab's posts and found nothing (technically one result but it was within a nested quote). I don't remember her suspecting him. But I would certainly not be surprised if they were on a team together.

"reywas" as well for that matter, the search seems to be an exact-string match. Also I don't think it accounts for quoted posts of that username, so it's possible she responded directly to a post of rey's and I missed it.

Day 2. She didn't like rey's "ain't that dandy" reaction to Team Caelia and she found his rebuttal "talking around an answer here". To be blunt, I'm particularly interested in why this didn't go anywhere afterwards, because reading into people's statements and then disbelieving that their reactions are well-intended is exactly what she did to me for Days, with my count mistake. So yeah, what happened to this quite similar suspicion she developed on rey?

reaction to Team Caelia recruiting*

Ah yes I remember that now.

Possibly another side-effect of his completely dropping off the map. And/or she got recruited to his team.

Idk, rey only exited after D3's mislynch on Golden. Meanwhile, she suddenly joined the Golden suspecting committee on D3.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Still dead?

Still dead.

llama hasn't been killed yet?

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?

Isn't Jay dead? Should we still be suspecting him?

No. I should have rather put it "after [suspecting them] the early Days".

Read my re-read of her. That's what I'm referencing. For a player never letting up on suspicions, she suspected them and then the suspicions vanished.

I could see the LoRab and Rey being recruited to the same team angle but I don't feel strongly about it; Rey fell off the face of the earth. But I'm sure you've noticed Rico that LoRab's opinion of you and me is completely static: nothing I say ever changes her opinion one way or the other, there's never anything new. "My thoughts haven't changed", she says... Since Day 3. I get the feeling that nothing I say will change LoRab's thoughts for better or worse. LoRab isn't accounting for my posts anymore, she's just paying lip service to her suspicion of me.

Now she could just be a lazy neutral, or she could be a coasting baddie, but either way I think she's full of bullsuit.

Ricochet wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

I haven't lied about missing my PM N5, Synonym could have still been wrong about missing his.

So what's there to be called for? You were the one who pushed this angle on suspecting Syn.

Also, I don't recall the Hosts confirming or clarifying things past this post of yours.

Well in that case let me refresh your memory:

Black Rock wrote:

aapje wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Ah, so LC's first Host Post was edited after he rain-checked on how many PMs are missing? I'd need a confirmation of that.

Well I doubt he originally wrote one missing pm when he was missing several.

@Hosts:
How many missing PM's on night 5? (and maybe the other nights as well while you are at it :P )

Also Rico you are 100% sure you didn't send in a PM while you had a power that night?

DharmaHelper wrote:This seems like a shit reason to suspect someone.

Eh, I think it looks like it could be a classic slip up. That being said if the hosts don't come back in time I will probably look at someone else for today.

I thought that was listed at the bottom of the night post

Ricochet wrote:

aapje wrote:

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

Boomslang pings you like hell, but you vote me. Yup.

Also, are you still suspecting me for an event that in your mind looks suspicious, for reasons you know better, as well as for a response of mine to that event that did not live up to your standards...for reasons you know better? Yeah, still don't know what I'm supposed to argue/defend here.

Your reaction to your rez didn't add up for me and now it certainly looks like you could have set up Synonym to be lynched. Is this supposed to make me feel you are a civvie? Because it certainly doesn't look like you are. I'm comfortable with my vote for you

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

"seems to"

"imply"

Fine so let's say SVS was Ubzargan, what do you think is going on DH?

aapje wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

"seems to"

"imply"

Fine so let's say SVS was Ubzargan, what do you think is going on DH?

I don't know.

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

"seems to"

"imply"

Fine so let's say SVS was Ubzargan, what do you think is going on DH?

I don't know.

Should we lynch SVS? Or llama?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

DH seems to imply SVS was Ubzargan, which doesn't seem to match MM's numbers. Is one of them lying or was the TB lynch messed with? Something doesn't add up there.

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

"seems to"

"imply"

Fine so let's say SVS was Ubzargan, what do you think is going on DH?

I don't know.

Should we lynch SVS? Or llama?

We should lynch you tbqh

aapje wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

aapje wrote:I'm surprised nobody has called out Rico yet after the Synonym lynch. Did Synonym lie about missing all of his PMs or did Rico lie about missing his?
So Rico, what do you think has happened?

I haven't lied about missing my PM N5, Synonym could have still been wrong about missing his.

So what's there to be called for? You were the one who pushed this angle on suspecting Syn.

Also, I don't recall the Hosts confirming or clarifying things past this post of yours.

Well in that case let me refresh your memory:

Black Rock wrote:

aapje wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Ah, so LC's first Host Post was edited after he rain-checked on how many PMs are missing? I'd need a confirmation of that.

Well I doubt he originally wrote one missing pm when he was missing several.

@Hosts:
How many missing PM's on night 5? (and maybe the other nights as well while you are at it :P )

Also Rico you are 100% sure you didn't send in a PM while you had a power that night?

DharmaHelper wrote:This seems like a shit reason to suspect someone.

Eh, I think it looks like it could be a classic slip up. That being said if the hosts don't come back in time I will probably look at someone else for today.

I thought that was listed at the bottom of the night post

Ricochet wrote:

aapje wrote:

Boomslang wrote:I hate to say this after being quiet (mostly) by choice for the last few days, but I'm headed out of town to Riot Fest in Chicago for the weekend and will certainly not be able to keep up with the thread. But I Looked over Rico's reads, and I'm startled by how good they seem to be. Will be checking in to vote BWT until the dude is dead.

This post set of some major alarm bells for me.

Not sure how I feel about BWT but I don't exactly trust Rico
In face I'll place my vote there.

Boomslang pings you like hell, but you vote me. Yup.

Also, are you still suspecting me for an event that in your mind looks suspicious, for reasons you know better, as well as for a response of mine to that event that did not live up to your standards...for reasons you know better? Yeah, still don't know what I'm supposed to argue/defend here.

Your reaction to your rez didn't add up for me and now it certainly looks like you could have set up Synonym to be lynched. Is this supposed to make me feel you are a civvie? Because it certainly doesn't look like you are. I'm comfortable with my vote for you

Ah. Indeed I seemed to have missed that.

Allow me to clarify though. While that indeed confirms your posts (and your question about how many PMs were missed N5), in a previous post to that (that is actually quoted in that post of yours) I asked for clarification on something slightly different:

Ricochet wrote:Ah, so LC's first Host Post was edited after he rain-checked on how many PMs are missing? I'd need a confirmation of that.

Even you weren't sure about that, but then you asked the Hosts a different question:

aapje wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Ah, so LC's first Host Post was edited after he rain-checked on how many PMs are missing? I'd need a confirmation of that.

Well I doubt he originally wrote one missing pm when he was missing several.

@Hosts:
How many missing PM's on night 5? (and maybe the other nights as well while you are at it :P )

Now you're holding me responsible for missing out a confirmation on a matter that is not mine, but yours? Com'on. My question wasn't confirmed.

----

Again, I can't defend against an accusation based on your perception of things, that you hold on to. Carry on suspecting me, then. I'm still unrecruited, so should I get lynched or killed during this phase, I will have proven to you how rezz's don't always mean what you have in mind and nor do simple explanations of it ("I was rezzed. I don't know why the rezzer chose me. I'm still unrecruited") don't mean or hide something other than that.

Moving on to Syn, you're claiming I set up Synonym to be lynched with a reasoning that belonged to you and that only you focused on in voting Synonym to be lynched? That's rich.

I answered your appeal towards players who might know if, by missing themselves PMs on that night, might prove that Syn is lying about missing his (although, mind you, he was very broad in saying he missed every deadline. It is, again, you, who narrowed it to N4-N5 when his claim might be faulty).

I think I might pull the suspicions and votes on Synonym, so I can show you that the "missing PM" angle pretty much belonged to you, you only and you insisted upon, quite a lot in fact. Or better yet, maybe you'd be so kind as to point out how people voted Syn for the "PM angle", so that you can claim I set him up by addressing on that angle.

I didn't go with that. Furthermore, DH called it lazy suss'ing, after which you suddenly backed away from it, despite still believing it might have been a slip. So if nobody really voted Syn for his PM claim (aka your case), how can you claim I set him up to by lynched for that? I didn't set up Syn with anything, I suspected him for a lot of things, maybe apart from his last to final post, but the PM angle was not something I used, it's something you brought up and insisted upon.

Where have I said I'm a civvie? I never claimed that. I'm unrecruited. Are you after lynching unrecruits, just because they don't fit your 'civvie' category? Wouldn't you rather lynch recruited baddies?