The Syndicate

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 8:18 pm**

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 7:51 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:18 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:12 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:21 pm I haven't played with INH since The Old Times, has he played a lot in recent history?
He's a fairly regular player around these parts lately, yeah. Why do you ask?
he just seems very familiar to how he was back then lol

it's like deja vu
I’m assuming you’re referring to my incredible intellect and perception, which have not dulled over time.

actually I feel like you've tunnelled me like you were doing earlier before, in a game many moons ago, it felt very familiar

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:44 pm**

A Knife in the Dark

Somebody had a knife. They took it and used it on an unknown substance found in the dark.

Novaselinenever has been nightkilled. He was...

Spoiler: show

Day 2 has begun. You have 72 hours to lynch somebody

I will be out of town on a climbing trip this weekend, and unavailable until Monday, hence the elongated day period.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:25 pm**

Oh, I didn't realize he or she was playing.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:26 pm**

He, lol, sorry I should read better.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:22 pm**

Hi. I'm putting a vote on Epignosis. He broke the tie yesterday but refused to justify the vote he cast. I don't like that.

I just worked 11 hours and I'm fried. I'm doing the same again tomorrow. I don't have the energy to play mafia right now. Sorry.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:29 pm**

I voted for nutella for weird Mac reasons that nobody would agree with

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:32 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:29 pm I voted for nutella for weird Mac reasons that nobody would agree with

Feel free to at least share those weird mac reasons

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:44 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:22 pm Hi. I'm putting a vote on Epignosis. He broke the tie yesterday but refused to justify the vote he cast. I don't like that.

I just worked 11 hours and I'm fried. I'm doing the same again tomorrow. I don't have the energy to play mafia right now. Sorry.

The lynched ended in a tie, no?

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:48 pm**

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:22 pm Hi. I'm putting a vote on Epignosis. He broke the tie yesterday but refused to justify the vote he cast. I don't like that.

I just worked 11 hours and I'm fried. I'm doing the same again tomorrow. I don't have the energy to play mafia right now. Sorry.
The lynched ended in a tie, no?

It did. But before that day there was a bigger tie. Epi moves his vote from me to Long Con right before the deadline. LC saved himself by voting for DFaraday after this.
I asked Epi why he chose Long Con and he called me a filthy fat hobbitses instead of answering.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:50 pm**

Well I guess that was an answer, just not the kind I was hoping for.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:54 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:22 pm Hi. I'm putting a vote on Epignosis. He broke the tie yesterday but refused to justify the vote he cast. I don't like that.

I just worked 11 hours and I'm fried. I'm doing the same again tomorrow. I don't have the energy to play mafia right now. Sorry.

I broke the tie.

Spoiler: show

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:58 pm**

Ah yes, I recall.

I voted LC, breaking the tie there, but LC voted last second, making it a tie again.

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:59 pm**

what's your read on Long Con?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am**

And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:02 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:59 pm what's your read on Long Con?

I won't be voting for him today.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:06 am**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE

An analogy is like a thought with another thought's hat on. I am looking for subtantial reasons for your Long Con vote.
Or substantial reasons why you won't be voting him today.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:07 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:06 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE
An analogy is like a thought with another thought's hat on. I am looking for subtantial reasons for your Long Con vote.
Or substantial reasons why you won't be voting him today.

Name one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:17 am**

Oh I forgot this is the game with Darth Sloonei in it

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:20 am**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:07 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:06 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE
An analogy is like a thought with another thought's hat on. I am looking for subtantial reasons for your Long Con vote.
Or substantial reasons why you won't be voting him today.
Name one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.

We've just had an extended discussion about the reasons timmer and DFaraday cast their votes. I based my vote off things that happened in the thread. Others probably had reasons for their votes. I assumed it was more than just pure randomness that compelled you toward Long Con.

Who do you think you might vote for today and why won't it be Long Con?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:28 am**

Long Con just got 86ed in MK and you want to kill him today? Truly evil.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:28 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:20 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:07 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:06 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE
An analogy is like a thought with another thought's hat on. I am looking for subtantial reasons for your Long Con vote.
Or substantial reasons why you won't be voting him today.
Name one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.
We've just had an extended discussion about the reasons timmer and DFaraday cast their votes. I based my vote off things that happened in the thread. Others probably had reasons for their votes. I assumed it was more than just pure randomness that compelled you toward Long Con.

Who do you think you might vote for today and why won't it be Long Con?

None of the fucking votes had "substantial reasons." I don't care who you are. It was Day 1. People made shit up to vote. That's fine.

I don't know why you would "assume" (your word) that it was "more than pure randomness" why I voted Long Con. Long Con was my strongest suspect Day because of how he went at nutella over what I perceived to be bullshit. I said as much, albeit earlier in the Day. I did not have "substantial reasons" (let alone one) to vote for him.

You voted Long Con.

Care to share with the class why you voted there? What were your SUBSTANTIAL REASONS? What were the things THAT HAPPENED IN THE THREAD?

"Others probably had reasons for their votes."

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am**

I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:46 am**

Rip nova.

So im feeling better about faraday atm, no immediate replacement ping. I'll be around here and there for the next 24 hours with more activity after the Patriots win the Super Bowl!

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:49 am**

timmer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:46 am Rip nova.

So im feeling better about faraday atm, no immediate replacement ping. I'll be around here and there for the next 24 hours with more activity after the Patriots win the Super Bowl!

what is an "immediate replacement ping"

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:49 am**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:49 am
timmer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:46 am Rip nova.

So im feeling better about faraday atm, no immediate replacement ping. I'll be around here and there for the next 24 hours with more activity after the Patriots win the Super Bowl!
what is an "immediate replacement ping"

nevermind i figured it out

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:52 am**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:49 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:49 am
timmer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:46 am Rip nova.

So im feeling better about faraday atm, no immediate replacement ping. I'll be around here and there for the next 24 hours with more activity after the Patriots win the Super Bowl!
what is an "immediate replacement ping"
nevermind i figured it out

K good lol

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:00 am**

RIP nova.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am**

Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:13 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

townread nutella

scumread jack

I have a question for you as well actually. This games day 0 and 1 have been the least focused starter phases of any game I've seen since returning. Do you have any ideas on why that might have been?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:14 am**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?
That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?

I'd prefer it, yes.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:20 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:14 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?
That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?
I'd prefer it, yes.

I will judge you once there has been a mafia lynched. So keep doing your thing.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:21 am**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:13 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.
townread nutella

scumread jack

I have a question for you as well actually. This games day 0 and 1 have been the least focused starter phases of any game I've seen since returning. Do you have any ideas on why that might have been?

I felt it was a pretty slow start, for me and for the thread in general. I know on my end I'm a little bit more distracted by real life things than I had anticipated for this game, but you're not asking about me. Lack of focus is gonna be a product of a slow starting game, unfortunately. To me it felt like things were starting to take shape around the end of Day 1, but then I was barely around for those final hours.

How do you feel the end of the day went, and is there anything in particular you'd like us to focus on?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:23 am**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:20 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:14 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?
That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?
I'd prefer it, yes.
I will judge you once there has been a mafia lynched. So keep doing your thing.

This is my thing. I'm doing it now. I'd ask why you're being so combative of it, but that's your thing.

Talk about your suspects, if you please.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:24 am**

i need to sleep. do your thing without me.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:26 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:24 am i need to sleep. do your thing without me.

Shit I'm going to bed too.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:27 am**

I'll move my vote to timmer. I haven't paid attention to him. This is me paying attention to timmer while I sleep and leave the thread for ~20 hours.

linki: our things are more similar than we realized
uh
yeah i need to sleep

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am**

Enough of the pillow talk fellas

[mention]Kylemii[/mention] current thoughts on ambray, if any?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am**

I want to elaborate on my jack read. He's been Wilgying, and that's fine. He's also expressed suspicions and that's good, but I haven't seen him trying to actually push any of his reads. every player that isn't Wilgy who starts out with a self-imposed limitation ends up dropping it as soon as it actually starts to inhibit their play.

if the language used in his one actual text post were accurate to the way he felt about me then why didn't he push for my lynch, specially when he said "eyeroll emoji" and "wolf emoji" about me

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:21 amI felt it was a pretty slow start, for me and for the thread in general. I know on my end I'm a little bit more distracted by real life things than I had anticipated for this game, but you're not asking about me. Lack of focus is gonna be a product of a slow starting game, unfortunately. To me it felt like things were starting to take shape around the end of Day 1, but then I was barely around for those final hours.

How do you feel the end of the day went, and is there anything in particular you'd like us to focus on?

well in a way i kinda was asking about you. i think the thing that gave previous games such early focused efforts was the sort of.... early ice water splash reads that got people talking. In this game our closest equivalent was Mac's transparent prod at Nutella and my prod at glorfindel neither of which caused many strong reactions or interactions.... idk. It just seems like there's some kind of imbalance.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am**

maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:53 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?
That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.
Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

We are playing mafia and the roles are randomly drawn

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:56 am**

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am Enough of the pillow talk fellas

@Kylemii current thoughts on ambray, if any?

ambray is in a more neutral spot rn. she responded well to explaining her vote on glorfindel, I want to hear more thoughts and reads from her before I can really move her up or down. idk any of her views outside of Kyle-good LC-bad

do you have a read on her yet?

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:59 am**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:56 am
nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am Enough of the pillow talk fellas

@Kylemii current thoughts on ambray, if any?
ambray is in a more neutral spot rn. she responded well to explaining her vote on glorfindel, I want to hear more thoughts and reads from her before I can really move her up or down. idk any of her views outside of Kyle-good LC-bad

do you have a read on her yet?

I wasn't 100% swayed by her response so she's still one of the few players I feel I have more reason to suspect than most. Could change.

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am**

Let’s lynch nutella

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:04 am**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am Let’s lynch nutella

Why

The Syndicate

[ENDGAME] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [NIGHT 1] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Re: [DAY 2] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)