The Syndicate

I don't like tea so I guess I'll pick fruity herbal. Maybe some flavor would make it not taste as bad.

I just picked six at random. I don't drink tea all that much.

llama - that excuse is old and boogs is not the only person you could have voted for to try and save yourself!

First you paint a target then deny the target was painted then vote out a basically confirmed civ.

Roxy wrote:llama - that excuse is old and boogs is not the only person you could have voted for to try and save yourself!

First you paint a target then deny the target was painted then vote out a basically confirmed civ.

I respectfully disagree.

Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

DFaraday wrote:Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

Elohcin only had 2 votes, since Made misvoted. To save myself I had to eiether vote for you or Boogs, and I repeatedly said that I found Boogs suspicious. It is true that I momentarily had pause after Keterman was lynched, but I ultimately thought Boogs' behavior was suspicious enough to overcome that. I am confident that whether I had voted for you or Boogs, we would have lynched a civ, and if I had allowed myself to be lynched, we would have lost a civ, so I had to go for the lesser of three evils.

I would really like to lynch Hedgeowl, and I hope I have the opportunity today instead of being forced to vote for someone I think is civilian.

thellama73 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

Elohcin only had 2 votes, since Made misvoted. To save myself I had to eiether vote for you or Boogs, and I repeatedly said that I found Boogs suspicious. It is true that I momentarily had pause after Keterman was lynched, but I ultimately thought Boogs' behavior was suspicious enough to overcome that. I am confident that whether I had voted for you or Boogs, we would have lynched a civ, and if I had allowed myself to be lynched, we would have lost a civ, so I had to go for the lesser of three evils.

I would really like to lynch Hedgeowl, and I hope I have the opportunity today instead of being forced to vote for someone I think is civilian.

I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are that's fair, I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are teammates with Hedge? I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I suppose think are think are teammates with Hedge? I hadn't realized

thellama73 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

Elohcin only had 2 votes, since Made misvoted. To save myself I had to eiether vote for you or Boogs, and I repeatedly said that I found Boogs suspicious. It is true that I momentarily had pause after Keterman was lynched, but I ultimately thought Boogs' behavior was suspicious enough to overcome that. I am confident that whether I had voted for you or Boogs, we would have lynched a civ, and if I had allowed myself to be lynched, we would have lost a civ, so I had to go for the lesser of three evils.

I would really like to lynch Hedgeowl, and I hope I have the opportunity today instead of being forced to vote for someone I think is civilian.

Your posts are getting that slick politician feel to them that Timmer's do when he is not civ.

I was feeling pretty good about you until these last 2 lynches. You are acting like you had no clue that Boogs was bts with Keterman when you painted the target to begin with. He was deffo way less suspicious than Elo, DF or you for sure!

Roxy wrote: Your posts are getting that slick politician feel to them that Timmer's do when he is not civ.

Good thing I am not Timmer!

DFaraday wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

Elohcin only had 2 votes, since Made misvoted. To save myself I had to eiether vote for you or Boogs, and I repeatedly said that I found Boogs suspicious. It is true that I momentarily had pause after Keterman was lynched, but I ultimately thought Boogs' behavior was suspicious enough to overcome that. I am confident that whether I had voted for you or Boogs, we would have lynched a civ, and if I had allowed myself to be lynched, we would have lost a civ, so I had to go for the lesser of three evils.

I would really like to lynch Hedgeowl, and I hope I have the opportunity today instead of being forced to vote for someone I think is civilian.

I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are that's fair, I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are teammates with Hedge? I hadn't realized about Made misvoting. Who do you think are think are teammates with Hedge? I suppose that's fair, I suppose think are think are teammates with Hedge? I hadn't realized

I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

You are not Timmer but your posts sound very slick and politician-y.

Roxy wrote:You are not Timmer but your posts sound very slick and politician-y.

Well, I do work in politics.

You make me laugh - which I adore in mafia

I will still be voting elo or you.

Roxy wrote:
You make me laugh - which I adore in mafia

I will still be voting elo or you.

Okay, but I urge you to go in alphabetical order. It's only logical.

thellama73 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Elo, so why pick the guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have voted for me or me or me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he guy he said was civ earlier? I would have to agree. Llama could have to agree. Llama could have voted for me or Elo, so why pick the guy he guy he said was civ earli

Elohcin only had 2 votes, since Made misvoted. To save myself I had to eiether vote for you or Boogs, and I repeatedly said that I found Boogs suspicious. It is true that I momentarily had pause after Keterman was lynched, but I ultimately thought Boogs' behavior was suspicious enough to overcome that. I am confident that whether I had voted for you or Boogs, we would have lynched a civ, and if I had allowed myself to be lynched, we would have lost a civ, so I had to go for the lesser of three evils.

I would really like to lynch Hedgeowl, and I hope I have the opportunity today instead of being forced to vote for someone I think is civilian.

You are very wrong about me and I hope you will have a change of heart. Your vote for Boogs really didn't look good at all though, but considering Vomps' death I dont want to make the same mistake twice, if you know what I mean. I am still considering whether you or DF are the biggest threat in this game however.

Hedge - no thoughts on Elo?

I feel so lost. Why was boogs obviously felt samples???? I read boogs post from day 1 and he never defend keterman directly, but did attack Llama. Llama mentioned the next day that he thought that maybe boogs and keterman were teammates, but he gave no support and even later changing his mind! People (Bulls and Df) then cited Llama as the reason they thought boogs was felt samples. The way I see it, Bullz, DF, and Roxy are all suspcious for thinking boogs was obviously civvie, because he wasn't.

Made wrote:I feel so lost. Why was boogs obviously felt samples???? I read boogs post from day 1 and he never defend keterman directly, but did attack Llama. Llama mentioned the next day that he thought that maybe boogs and keterman were teammates, but he gave no support and even later changing his mind! People (Bulls and Df) then cited Llama as the reason they thought boogs was felt samples. The way I see it, Bullz, DF, and Roxy are all suspcious for thinking boogs was obviously civvie, because he wasn't.

Where did I say he was obviously/definitely civ? I only ever said it was pointed out he was possibly a specific role which is why I didn't vote for him on day 2. It isn't even why I didn't vote for him in this lynch.

Made wrote:I feel so lost. Why was boogs obviously felt samples???? I read boogs post from day 1 and he never defend keterman directly, but did attack Llama. Llama mentioned the next day that he thought that maybe boogs and keterman were teammates, but he gave no support and even later changing his mind! People (Bulls and Df) then cited Llama as the reason they thought boogs was felt samples. The way I see it, Bullz, DF, and Roxy are all suspcious for thinking boogs was obviously civvie, because he wasn't.

Idc if you find me suspicious for it tbh. I find your votes this game very suspicious.

I cannot help what you do not see. You made a case on boogs so you are reading his posts with cloudy judgement. You should totes reread the Keterman lynch with an open mindbc the case against him and who voted and led the lynch is quite enlightening.

Boogs wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

Finally found it, I just wish y'all would of pointed out he did, albeit without even saying his name, defended keterman. Wouldn't call this obvious, or even that significant enough to warrent even probable civvieness, especially since I'm the first to bring this up specifically, but noted...

The way I see it, DF and Bulls are still the most suspicious, and one of them should die tomorrow.

Made wrote:

Boogs wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

Finally found it, I just wish y'all would of pointed out he did, albeit without even saying his name, defended keterman. Wouldn't call this obvious, or even that significant enough to warrent even probable civvieness, especially since I'm the first to bring this up specifically, but noted...

The way I see it, DF and Bulls are still the most suspicious, and one of them should die tomorrow.

So I'm 'the most suspicious' for thinking someone might be a civ after a player whose civvieness I'm quite confident of pointed out how he could be a specific role? Which he actually turned out to have? Seems legit.

If you trusted Llama's read, you would of changed as Llama's opinion changed right? Why didn't you?

Made wrote:If you trusted Llama's read, you would of changed as Llama's opinion changed right? Why didn't you?

Just because I trust someone doesn't mean I have to go along with every little thing they do or say. Llama is no more infallible than the rest of us, despite what he might tell you. Besides, I felt that DF was the most suspicious yesterday so would have voted regardless of what I thought about Boogs.

Bullzeye wrote: Llama is no more infallible than the rest of us, despite what he might tell you.

He'd probably tell you that no one can be more infallible than anyone else.

Bullzeye wrote:

Made wrote:If you trusted Llama's read, you would of changed as Llama's opinion changed right? Why didn't you?

Just because I trust someone doesn't mean I have to go along with every little thing they do or say. Llama is no more infallible than the rest of us, despite what he might tell you. Besides, I felt that DF was the most suspicious yesterday so would have voted regardless of what I thought about Boogs.

Regardless of your vote, this directly conflicts with:

Bullzeye wrote: So I'm 'the most suspicious' for thinking someone might be a civ after a player whose civvieness I'm quite confident of pointed out how he could be a specific role? Which he actually turned out to have? Seems legit.

Either you trust Llama's reads on Boogs or you don't. Pick one.

Epignosis wrote:

Bullzeye wrote: Llama is no more infallible than the rest of us, despite what he might tell you.

He'd probably tell you that no one can be more infallible than anyone else.

Pssssh, linguists. You know what I mean .

Linki: I don't even understand you right now Made. I didn't vote Boogs on day two because of Llama's comment and I didn't vote him on day 3 because I find DF to be more suspicious. I don't just follow people around parroting their opinions and doing everything they do. I can agree with a thing someone says and then disagree with the next thing they say as often as I please while still overall trusting that person.

But the thing is you supported his GUT OPINION but then didn't. It'd be different if it was his opinion of boogs you trusted, but not his of

Pressed send on accident.....
Opinion of Roxy, for example

Made wrote:But the thing is you supported his GUT OPINION but then didn't. It'd be different if it was his opinion of boogs you trusted, but not his of

Gut opinion? All he did was bring up the possibility Boogs was Keterman's partner. I thought he had made a good point and agreed. It doesn't mean I only thought it because he did, he just made me aware of the possibility. It's like if someone introduces you to food you've never had before and you like it. Your enjoyment of the food isn't tied to the other person's. They probably liked it at one point because it's thanks to them that you became aware of it but if they stop liking it you can carry on enjoying it.

Well this isentertaining.

Also, Epi and Bulls: re infallibility: The Pope.

thellama73 wrote:Well this isentertaining.

Also, Epi and Bulls: re infallibility: The Pope.

Who doesn't speak Hebrew either.

Epignosis wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Well this isentertaining.

Also, Epi and Bulls: re infallibility: The Pope.

Who doesn't speak Hebrew either.

I know, lame, right?

The first Pope spoke Aramaic, that's close.

And I don't see what Made is getting at. We can't think someone has a good point, then develop our own ideas from there?

It's fairly common for people to follow my crazy theories and then blame me when they don't work out. Hazards of being a natural leader.

thellama73 wrote:It's fairly common for people to follow my crazy theories and then blame me when they don't work out. Hazards of being a natural leader.

But this is people agreeing with one thing you said and being blamed for not mindlessly following everything else you say. Also for not lynching a civ I think? Different thing anyway.

DFaraday wrote:The first Pope spoke Aramaic, that's close.

And I don't see what Made is getting at. We can't think someone has a good point, then develop our own ideas from there?

My issue is you never shared these ideas past a "oh yeah, Llama man, he's the best #TeamBoogs"

thellama73 wrote:
I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

Why do you suspect her so strongly, other than the fact that you always suspect her?

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:
I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

Why do you suspect her so strongly, other than the fact that you always suspect her?

The way she jumped onto the suspicion of me bandwagon read really false to me. She knows me quite well IRL, and I do not believe she thinks I am bad, because I think I have been quite obviously civ to someone who knows me. I think she is faking, since I am a convenient target this game.

thellama73 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:
I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

Why do you suspect her so strongly, other than the fact that you always suspect her?

The way she jumped onto the suspicion of me bandwagon read really false to me. She knows me quite well IRL, and I do not believe she thinks I am bad, because I think I have been quite obviously civ to someone who knows me. I think she is faking, since I am a convenient target this game.

Don't you know her quite well in real life though? Doesn't that criticism work both ways?

Epignosis wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:
I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

Why do you suspect her so strongly, other than the fact that you always suspect her?

The way she jumped onto the suspicion of me bandwagon read really false to me. She knows me quite well IRL, and I do not believe she thinks I am bad, because I think I have been quite obviously civ to someone who knows me. I think she is faking, since I am a convenient target this game.

Don't you know her quite well in real life though? Doesn't that criticism work both ways?

No, because I always think she's bad, and she doesn't always think I'm bad. Also I am easier to read than she is.

thellama73 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:
I don't know who Hedge's teammates are, but I suspect her more strongly than anyone else right now.

Why do you suspect her so strongly, other than the fact that you always suspect her?

The way she jumped onto the suspicion of me bandwagon read really false to me. She knows me quite well IRL, and I do not believe she thinks I am bad, because I think I have been quite obviously civ to someone who knows me. I think she is faking, since I am a convenient target this game.

Don't you know her quite well in real life though? Doesn't that criticism work both ways?

No, because I always think she's bad, and she doesn't always think I'm bad. Also I am easier to read than she is.

So statically speaking you have to be right sometimes? Also, if you're easier to read and I don't always think your bad, then maybe this time I am reading you right. I am actually trying to remember games we have played where you were bad I and wasn't too.

I just checked the Hall of fame and there literally hasn't been a game where you were bad and I was civ. So far my record of reading you correctly is better than yours with me then it seems. So maybe your are right. You are an easier read than I am.

Gonna derail for a split second, What even is white tea?

Made wrote:Gonna derail for a split second, What even is white tea?

It's a kind of tea that has only very little oxidation, whereas black tea is fully oxidized.

Made wrote:Gonna derail for a split second, What even is white tea?

White tea is nothing worth being concerned about. Like people.

here is a chart that shows the processing methods for different kinds of tea.

A Person wrote:here is a chart that shows the processing methods for different kinds of tea.

huh, I want to try this now....ok back on topic. Hedgie has never seen a civvie Llama as civvie....what does this mean.

(also because i think i screwed this up, what is boog's gender?)

Made wrote:(also because i think i screwed this up, what is boog's gender?)

Male and in a relationship with blindfaeth, who is also male.

Epignosis wrote:

Made wrote:(also because i think i screwed this up, what is boog's gender?)

Male and in a relationship with blindfaeth, who is also male.

Ok, that's what i thought. I don't know where I thought i read he was a girl.

Made wrote:Gonna derail for a split second, What even is white tea?

Where did you hear that word?