MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm pretty sure I know what's going on with the lynches.
I am sure you do. Like how not voting in one when you don't have a kill that night can make you look better.
The poll ended at 11:06 pm EST last night. Your reaction post came in at 11:09 pm EST.
MovingPictures07 wrote:WTF!!! I thought I still had time?!?!!?
You followed up with this:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry everyone, I had dinner with my PhD cohorts and then had to stop by the grocery store and I thought I'd be back a bit sooner.
RIP Blooper. WTF EVERYONE! How could you lynch Blooper?!?! Will catch up in a second.
That's an unusual alibi for someone who seems like he JUST missed the poll. But never mind. What I am more interested in is your outrage that people lynched Ninja Blooper (we didn't, by the way- we tried to lynch you).
MovingPictures07 wrote:Seriously, what the hell, guys??? Was it not obvious she was that role and why I backed off of her??? Wow, WTF.
This is a blatant fabrication. How was it obvious that she was a role blocker?
MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry, but since you've never been on a team of mine before you'd never know, but I would NEVER be absent for a teammate. I bug the fuck out of my teammates.
Linki: Eye me all you want but it's all true.
We have multiple testimonies that say otherwise.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Bass_the_Clever wrote:How was it obvious that she was that role?
Oh, sorry, I'm an idiot; ignore me. I was getting the Cop and Chief mixed up. Lol.
Bass asks how it was obvious that she was that role.
Now, after this point, I had slept, and I thought that you could be the Chief- beyond that, I have no idea how you survived. That's why I said I would have to trust you. But that cannot be true for two reasons:
First the obvious one: You claim you got the Cop and the Chief mixed up. That means you cannot be either.
Second, and less obvious, you said that you "backed off" her because her role was obvious. Now consider: If you could switch a lynch, and you were good, you would switch to your biggest suspicion. If the lynch got switched to Ninja Blooper, and you would lead us to believe that you are the Chief (and I think you have hinted that; see below), that would mean that you still suspected her. But you claim you backed off.
I read your posts, by the way, and it does not appear that you backed off her in any significant way. But that isn't what's important. Just interesting.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Don't listen to Epig, he's wrong about me. Occam's razor suggests Sabie had an uninvolved teammate. That is NOT me and it would never be me. I would have PMed her at the least, especially in a situation like that. I'd bet at least one of kpence, kevin, and Canuck are her teammates.
I don't see how Occam's razor applies to this situation. Occam's razor states that when there are competing hypotheses, the one that has the least number of assumptions is probably right (not necessarily right).
An uninvolved teammate seems probable, but sabie12 has two teammates, and I would argue that at least one of them is decidedly not uninvolved. Who would try to kill me Night 1? More likely someone who knows me and has experienced me in times past. A "noob" would kill anybody.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Heaven forbid I EVER actually help us find a baddie because when I do, everyone just thinks I'm throwing a teammate under the bus. Seriously, consider another perspective guys! I am not bad. I definitely wouldn't be making this many mistakes if I were bad either.
What mistakes have you made?
(By the way, there are six adverbs in this one little part of a post.)
MovingPictures07 wrote:I may be quick to throw my teammates under the bus, but I cherish my teammates. There's no way Sabie would have posted the way she did because I would have contacted her.
With my thoughts on Blooper being wrong, it's very clear we're dealing with a case of Occam's razor.
How could you control sabie? How could you ensure that she even opened your PM? Which thoughts on Blooper were wrong? The ones when you voted for her or the ones you didn't express in the thread? And how is this a case of Occam's razor? You're offering a lot of assumptions here.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, think very clearly about the fact that I survived that lynch when I was two votes ahead. Think VERY carefully about the fact that there are no "secrets" by baddies and READ THE CIVVIE ROLES and think about how I've been voting. Enough said.
Yes. I'm thinking.
Already I am sure that you are not the Chief, because you would not have confused that role with the Cop. The good news is that if you ARE the Chief and I'm wrong about this, then you can stop the lynch and be okay.
Mongoose wrote:PS Let the record reflect that I'm def getting the civ vibe from Sockface.
Just putting this in here.
