Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
No. Do you think lorab was?aapje wrote:Nope, I was not involved in his death? Were you?Sorsha wrote:Did you kill him so you wouldn't have to keep trying to get him lynched?aapje wrote:Looks like maybe I was wrong about him
Interesting thought. If LR was bad I can see her wanting to keep Rico around in case the TH stuff doesn't work out. If their earlier back and forth is anything to go by people wouldn't touch their discussion with a 10 ft pole. Therefore I am leaning no.Sorsha wrote:No. Do you think lorab was?aapje wrote:Nope, I was not involved in his death? Were you?Sorsha wrote:Did you kill him so you wouldn't have to keep trying to get him lynched?aapje wrote:Looks like maybe I was wrong about him
Keep in mind LoRab was on Rico's ass the day before he died, and when he was rezz'd, I seem to remember LoRab held back a bit. Besides you, aapje, I would equate LoRab as the biggest detractor of Rico in the game as a whole.aapje wrote:Interesting thought. If LR was bad I can see her wanting to keep Rico around in case the TH stuff doesn't work out. If their earlier back and forth is anything to go by people wouldn't touch their discussion with a 10 ft pole. Therefore I am leaning no.Sorsha wrote:No. Do you think lorab was?aapje wrote:Nope, I was not involved in his death? Were you?Sorsha wrote:Did you kill him so you wouldn't have to keep trying to get him lynched?aapje wrote:Looks like maybe I was wrong about him
I trust your judgment, though I'm not a fan of dead players coming back in. I realize you wouldn't do so unless you had no other choice.Black Rock wrote:Turns out I need several replacements and this game needs it to work properly. I have thought about it a lot and I am going to choose dead to replace. I have also chosen my dead wisely. None of them have a bone to pick and everyone will know their old roles. Thank you in advance for your understanding.
I think Boomslang took offense to the attempted nightkill.Black Rock wrote:birdwithteeth11 will be replacing Boomslang effective immediately. He will not be able to be lynched today while he gets comfortable in his new skin.
No chance for me then.Black Rock wrote:Turns out I need several replacements and this game needs it to work properly. I have thought about it a lot and I am going to choose dead to replace. I have also chosen my dead wisely. None of them have a bone to pick and everyone will know their old roles. Thank you in advance for your understanding.
I like this post. I'm thinking the two Ahriman kills looks really bad for Boomslang personally.aapje wrote:People who I am suspicious of:
Boomslang: His last post 5(!) days ago pinged me and it seems I am not alone in that, seeing as Ahriman tried to kill him.
llama: SD made an interesting case on him here. Since then Wilgy has mentioned him in one of his last posts as someone to look into.
Roxy: She sounded frustrated at DH. At this point in the game I expect that the baddies will be a bit annoyed with his knack of survival so I wonder if that was the cause.
People who largely have been missing lately:
Bass
Boomslang
Tranq
Come out and play
I also like this post. I feel like Rox is being all kinds of weird over the night 9 stuff.LoRab wrote:One of these things is not like the others:
Roxy wrote:DH - that only says it has been restarted not that we went back to the beginning off the previous night. No where is it stated for you to NOT to use your ability again.Do you think the baddies will not send in a kill target? Do you think everyone else is not submitting night their night action? Do you think it will all remain what it was going to be before the restart? Do you think it would be double targeting if they repeat actions?Roxy wrote:Also yes isubmitted another night action - didn't you?Roxy wrote:Oh well I changed mine bc it was a new night.Roxy wrote:Yeah you already said this before and like before I just don't care - I am entitled to my own opinion.nutella wrote:Roxy I think you are just plain wrong. It is still night 9. It is not a separate night, although actions have to be re-sent. They can be the same target as they were originally.
I was told I could not use my power
This. I can't see Ahriman trying to kill DH, which is what makes me feel suspicious of Boomslang.aapje wrote:Well so much for Rico
That second Ahriman kill for DH just doesn't make sense at all. I highly doubt he would want to take out DH.
I don't understand, was the highlighted supposed to be baddie?aapje wrote:Since the last recruitment opportunity for the baddies is out of the way all unrecruited player will either stay that way or they will be recruited by one of the baddie teams. So I suggest everyone playing the neutral game to channel their inner civvie
Who do you think is bad?DharmaHelper wrote:I wonder who is bad.
I like this post too, you may be changing my mind about you Scotty.Scotty wrote:Do you think the hosts would notify us if the baddie teams in fact recruited? Because based on BR's last post, it sure seemed like no one was biting.aapje wrote:Since the last recruitment opportunity for the baddies is out of the way all unrecruited player will either stay that way or they will be recruited by one of the baddie teams. So I suggest everyone playing the neutral game to channel their inner civvie
I'm currently involved in setting up wedding stuff for my aunt, with events all over this week. Tis why I am not around as much
looking at Wilgy and Synonym interactions and voting patterns might be a good way to start weeding through who might be bad. Especially considering Wilgy's pattern. On phone right now, but he mentioned in one of his last posts to "lynch SVS, llama, possibly Tranq and bea"
To "lynch" someone as opposed to just "suspect" someone is a strong choice of words. He had to have gotten info from his role for at least one or some of those players.
Oh is he off the poll?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boomslang/birdwithteeth is out of the question though Spacedaisy.
Black Rock wrote:birdwithteeth11 will be replacing Boomslang effective immediately. He will not be able to be lynched today while he gets comfortable in his new skin.
Could be because the talkative players keep getting killed. Rez Jay and I'm sure that stagnation will change.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I get a sense of stagnation today. Unlike many days before today, (most) players are not committing to reads or votes today. This is likely to end badly.
).....and I honestly don't see that changing.I'm in agreement here. But at the same time, Rico wasn't going after her anymore either was he? Would she have reason to have killed him?aapje wrote:Interesting thought. If LR was bad I can see her wanting to keep Rico around in case the TH stuff doesn't work out. If their earlier back and forth is anything to go by people wouldn't touch their discussion with a 10 ft pole. Therefore I am leaning no.Sorsha wrote:No. Do you think lorab was?aapje wrote:Nope, I was not involved in his death? Were you?Sorsha wrote:Did you kill him so you wouldn't have to keep trying to get him lynched?aapje wrote:Looks like maybe I was wrong about him
This. Seeing as how Boomslang/bwt is not lynchable today. I'm putting my vote here as well because of reasons I've already stated plus Wilgy's statements.Turnip Head wrote:I'm putting my vote on thellama73 for now. Regardless of him being busy and traveling, he hasn't felt like the same Llama that I know and love. He characterized MM as careful and placating, and Llama compared that to his own baddie game, and I think that's exactly how Llama has been playing this game.
Someone didn't want Roxy talking today, wonder why? Perhaps a read through of who she was vocal about...Metalmarsh89 wrote:Roxy appears to be silenced and has already voted for Tranq.
Sure enough, you are right TH. she posted this today.Roxy wrote:nutella wrote:Roxy I think you are just plain wrong. It is still night 9. It is not a separate night, although actions have to be re-sent. They can be the same target as they were originally.
Yeah you already said this before and like before I just don't care - I am entitled to my own opinion.
I was told I could not use my power
Ah, you're right. It says Night 9 in the title, but the post came on Day 10.Turnip Head wrote:Didn't Roxy post toDay?
Did you mean to say that your laziness is disguised as neutral? Because that's what you just said. Makes it sound like you've been playing neutral, but not actually neutral.Canucklehead wrote:I'm feeling a bit moorless in this game right now, tbh, which is entirely my fault for not doing enough to role research/keeping track of powers and missed things and all that Apple Monkey type stuff (
But I agree with apples that even the most neutral of neutrals need to essentially play as civvies now, because all the kills floating around are not great for the neutral win con, and helping the Cubs find the killers means we're less likely to be both nk'd and lynched....
But since I've been neutrality grand central for the game thus far, I'm a bit hooped for actually forming opinions on who's bad......damn my laziness-disguised-as-neutrality!
All that to say, I want to look at bea. She just has not been Civ bea this game AT ALL, and I think that the guilty conscience she's feeling and all her apologies stem from feeling like she's letting her teammates down. I haven't done a read-through of her yet, so no idea if I suspect her of one team more than the other yet....but my gut says baddie bea is afoot, and I need to follow my gut (if only as an attempt to get my head actually into the game....)
This is not how things happened. I remained active for a while and then recently I've disappeared again. I'm not going to tell anyone why. Personal shit I had to deal with, and if that explanation isn't good enough I don't care. I'm still around, I just don't think I have much to add. Considering I've been wrong about practically everything so far, I don't think people are missing out on much. Am I the only quiet player?Turnip Head wrote:Hey Bullz, you gave someone (can't remember who) a lot of shit for harping on your non participation as soon as you were finally able to participate, and then you gave us a huge chunk of content in response to that, and then you went right back to not participating. How should we feel about that?
I'm still unsure of what raised your suspicions in the first place. You have continued to ignore me on that matter, while simultaneously bringing up your opinion of me.Spacedaisy wrote:I like this post too, you may be changing my mind about you Scotty.Scotty wrote:Do you think the hosts would notify us if the baddie teams in fact recruited? Because based on BR's last post, it sure seemed like no one was biting.aapje wrote:Since the last recruitment opportunity for the baddies is out of the way all unrecruited player will either stay that way or they will be recruited by one of the baddie teams. So I suggest everyone playing the neutral game to channel their inner civvie
I'm currently involved in setting up wedding stuff for my aunt, with events all over this week. Tis why I am not around as much
looking at Wilgy and Synonym interactions and voting patterns might be a good way to start weeding through who might be bad. Especially considering Wilgy's pattern. On phone right now, but he mentioned in one of his last posts to "lynch SVS, llama, possibly Tranq and bea"
To "lynch" someone as opposed to just "suspect" someone is a strong choice of words. He had to have gotten info from his role for at least one or some of those players.
I would say based on Wilgy and last night's events that my top choices for a vote would be boomslang, llama, tranq or bea. At the moment anyway.
I've noticed that llama seemed much more laid back this game. That's not quite how I remember him being before but I haven't played in a year... Wasn't sure if this is a new llama or what.Turnip Head wrote:I'm putting my vote on thellama73 for now. Regardless of him being busy and traveling, he hasn't felt like the same Llama that I know and love. He characterized MM as careful and placating, and Llama compared that to his own baddie game, and I think that's exactly how Llama has been playing this game.
He killed Typhoony and Dom I know from the first page. Who were his other attempts?Scotty wrote: @Anyone
Do you think the Brutal Executioner is civ, baddie, or unrecruited?
Yeeaaaah. I'm pretty sure it read that the baddies wouldn't be recruiting anymore after that, and that the civvies would only be recruiting for non-btsc teammates going forward.Spacedaisy wrote:I don't understand, was the highlighted supposed to be baddie?aapje wrote:Since the last recruitment opportunity for the baddies is out of the way all unrecruited player will either stay that way or they will be recruited by one of the baddie teams. So I suggest everyone playing the neutral game to channel their inner civvie
Yes, I meant to say that I have been using the fact of my neutrality to disguise what, in any other game, would have looked like sheer laziness. This does not "make it sound like I've been playing neutral, but not actually neutral".... it makes it sound as if I've been using my neutrality opportunistically to not have to actually stick my head too deeply into the game.Scotty wrote:Did you mean to say that your laziness is disguised as neutral? Because that's what you just said. Makes it sound like you've been playing neutral, but not actually neutral.Canucklehead wrote:I'm feeling a bit moorless in this game right now, tbh, which is entirely my fault for not doing enough to role research/keeping track of powers and missed things and all that Apple Monkey type stuff (
But I agree with apples that even the most neutral of neutrals need to essentially play as civvies now, because all the kills floating around are not great for the neutral win con, and helping the Cubs find the killers means we're less likely to be both nk'd and lynched....
But since I've been neutrality grand central for the game thus far, I'm a bit hooped for actually forming opinions on who's bad......damn my laziness-disguised-as-neutrality!
All that to say, I want to look at bea. She just has not been Civ bea this game AT ALL, and I think that the guilty conscience she's feeling and all her apologies stem from feeling like she's letting her teammates down. I haven't done a read-through of her yet, so no idea if I suspect her of one team more than the other yet....but my gut says baddie bea is afoot, and I need to follow my gut (if only as an attempt to get my head actually into the game....)
Also, I would argue that you have looked opinionated all game. I don't know why you seem to think you haven't been.
Are you usually watching the thread and responding to questions addressed to you so quickly?Bullzeye wrote:This is not how things happened. I remained active for a while and then recently I've disappeared again. I'm not going to tell anyone why. Personal shit I had to deal with, and if that explanation isn't good enough I don't care. I'm still around, I just don't think I have much to add. Considering I've been wrong about practically everything so far, I don't think people are missing out on much. Am I the only quiet player?Turnip Head wrote:Hey Bullz, you gave someone (can't remember who) a lot of shit for harping on your non participation as soon as you were finally able to participate, and then you gave us a huge chunk of content in response to that, and then you went right back to not participating. How should we feel about that?
Night 1 - Typhoony - succeededSorsha wrote:I've noticed that llama seemed much more laid back this game. That's not quite how I remember him being before but I haven't played in a year... Wasn't sure if this is a new llama or what.Turnip Head wrote:I'm putting my vote on thellama73 for now. Regardless of him being busy and traveling, he hasn't felt like the same Llama that I know and love. He characterized MM as careful and placating, and Llama compared that to his own baddie game, and I think that's exactly how Llama has been playing this game.
He killed Typhoony and Dom I know from the first page. Who were his other attempts?Scotty wrote: @Anyone
Do you think the Brutal Executioner is civ, baddie, or unrecruited?
I'm voting for Metalmarsh. You should join me.Turnip Head wrote:I'm putting my vote on thellama73 for now. Regardless of him being busy and traveling, he hasn't felt like the same Llama that I know and love. He characterized MM as careful and placating, and Llama compared that to his own baddie game, and I think that's exactly how Llama has been playing this game.
I just learned what bae was yesterday. I feel old.Canucklehead wrote:Yes, I meant to say that I have been using the fact of my neutrality to disguise what, in any other game, would have looked like sheer laziness. This does not "make it sound like I've been playing neutral, but not actually neutral".... it makes it sound as if I've been using my neutrality opportunistically to not have to actually stick my head too deeply into the game.Scotty wrote:Did you mean to say that your laziness is disguised as neutral? Because that's what you just said. Makes it sound like you've been playing neutral, but not actually neutral.Canucklehead wrote:I'm feeling a bit moorless in this game right now, tbh, which is entirely my fault for not doing enough to role research/keeping track of powers and missed things and all that Apple Monkey type stuff (
But I agree with apples that even the most neutral of neutrals need to essentially play as civvies now, because all the kills floating around are not great for the neutral win con, and helping the Cubs find the killers means we're less likely to be both nk'd and lynched....
But since I've been neutrality grand central for the game thus far, I'm a bit hooped for actually forming opinions on who's bad......damn my laziness-disguised-as-neutrality!
All that to say, I want to look at bea. She just has not been Civ bea this game AT ALL, and I think that the guilty conscience she's feeling and all her apologies stem from feeling like she's letting her teammates down. I haven't done a read-through of her yet, so no idea if I suspect her of one team more than the other yet....but my gut says baddie bea is afoot, and I need to follow my gut (if only as an attempt to get my head actually into the game....)
Also, I would argue that you have looked opinionated all game. I don't know why you seem to think you haven't been.
Also, as regards my opinionatedness or lack thereof, I would argue that my impression of my own mindset at any given time is likely more accurate than your impression of my mindset, especially since I think you've played with me once before.....But hey, you do you, bae.
What are your thoughts on bea, since you completely ignored that part of my post?
No, not usually. Never deliberately.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you usually watching the thread and responding to questions addressed to you so quickly?Bullzeye wrote:This is not how things happened. I remained active for a while and then recently I've disappeared again. I'm not going to tell anyone why. Personal shit I had to deal with, and if that explanation isn't good enough I don't care. I'm still around, I just don't think I have much to add. Considering I've been wrong about practically everything so far, I don't think people are missing out on much. Am I the only quiet player?Turnip Head wrote:Hey Bullz, you gave someone (can't remember who) a lot of shit for harping on your non participation as soon as you were finally able to participate, and then you gave us a huge chunk of content in response to that, and then you went right back to not participating. How should we feel about that?
I hope Bass and DH replace each other.Scotty wrote:I hope Bass replaces DH. And DFaraday replaces Bass.
Don't hold your breath, junior.Scotty wrote:Also not looking forward to Ubzakmanfa;l nnsds%asmd changing the lynch today. I hate this position.
