juliets
Sparing or fighting attitude vs. the great Papryco
D1 considers voting Papryco, but finds Mac's thoughts on Rico's irrational game worthwhile
votes the great Papryco after all, but it's all good juliets
juliets - zebra - juliets
N0 questions Papryco's "confirmed baddie" reasoning for zebra
D1 questions being on zebra's List of Six
rebuttal to zebra
D2 surprised at zebra's flip, didn't read her bad at all
rebuttal at Mac at soft interacting with zebra
juliets - LoRab - juliets
D1 finds Epig's argument compelling (and Sorsha's follow up as well)
defends herself against Papryco saying she's coattailing players with input
waiting to hear from LoRab
feels better about her
N1 clarifies her initial agreement with the pings on LoRab, reiterates being satisfied with the answer
D3
ISOs her
stops ISOing LoRab upon FZ. requesting current thoughts from her
votes
D1 on the LV wagon by voting Papryco, after careful evaluation of his spaghetti; EoD vote
D2 more LV as she votes sig for different gameplay vibes, clearing JJJ and posting oddball seemer arguments; relatively late vote
D3 votes JJJ, persuaded by Mac; earlier voted Tranq for his silent move; EoD vote, then literally last vote in the chain
D3.5 votes MM in light of old suss and JJJ's reads; midst tie chaos vote; already commented on being a potential third wagon saver for LoRab
D4 votes Llama for JJJ's case
D5 votes Tranq, end phase; voted MM earlier, until his indy claim
D6 Draconus, to counter LC wagon; EoD vote
D7 couldn't vote
other notes
D1 pinged by MM's 'which team' comment, considering it a hint that MM knows how many teams there are
defends her usual game to zebra, Rico, HB
ketch-up: feels better about LoRab, doesn't suspect her chasers (Sorsha, BR), considers MM or Rico as vote options
BOTD's MM for possibly missing his answers, votes Rico
N1 keeps pressuring MM for answers
clarifies to Rico what she saw in Epig's case on LoRab
D2 considers rethinking her civ reads
inquires HB on his DH suspicion; considers his input
rebuttal at Mac about making a waffly D1 vote post;
further rebuttals
further rebuttal at Mac on buddying to JJJ
N2 short ISO on BR, finding her genuine
D3
full ISO on BR --
cont.
ISOs LoRab
doesn't read JJJ bad, no read on LC, leaning good on Llama; later reads Llama neutral
finishes read on LC in positive fashion, but plans to re-read JJJ based on that
questions HB's top pick
rebuttal against Epig
questions DH choosing Sorsha over Llama; take on Llama worsens as he pushes further on Golden
plans to read Boomslang; later, willing to vote him, based on people she trusts voting him
questions Mac's Matt vote?
may vote for Tranq; does so, after his silent vote move
suddenly persuaded by Mac to vote JJJ and negate Tranq's vote on LoRab
when suss'd by Rico, points out
vote manipulation that "we have seen" [???]

in reply to motel, defends her vote and acknowledges chance of being fooled by Mac;
further rebuttal
D3.5 reads DH sincere, pending thoughts on JJJ, would vote him again
rebuttals to JJJ
reads JJJ genuine after talk; not invested in voting Tranq either, after he showed up
goes back on MM for his jokey posts and JJJ's interaction read on him and Zebra; votes him
N3 considers LoRab + Kubrick angle in regards to JJJ
D4 rebuttal against pushing the MM wagon
momentarily votes Tranq to make him post
questions case on DH
votes Llama for JJJ's case
rebuttal against being sketchy in her votes
rebuttal on changing her votes and views
D5 again suspicious of MM, but holds on voting
rebuttal against Boom: Tranq votes ar pressure votes
votes MM
leand bad on Tranq, switches to him
D6 unsure of FZ. baddie tagging Dom for wanting votes on him to be reasoned
considers ISOing Wilgy and motel
inquires Boom on his LC claim
again confused by Mac suspecting her; also by FZ.
returns with ISO on motel: has contributed more than Tranq, doesn't see anything
rebuttal to FZ on her ISO tactics and her being perceived as bad
agrees with LC on Matt's theory about Boom (being cursed); questions DH on it
questions Ninja being under the radar
couldn't ISO Wilgy properly, but willing to vote him for more content; inquires on deal with Draconus; doesn't read LC or Dom as bad
votes Dracons to save LC
N6 defends against FZ sussing her;
further rebuttal
claims never having had BTSC with LC, civ read on him independent; denies buddying Mac and bea
questions MM's vote that lynched LC
D7 senses something different in DH's game
questions MM's self-vote, Wilgy's read on Dom's suspects; couldn't vote
N7 engages in semantic talk with MM over indy vs. neutral
questions DH on finding Sorsha bad
Well, nothing here makes me surprised to have suspected you throughout the game.
a) Lending an ear to LoRab's hunters only to let it die out after LoRab's crafted response, plus voting on D3.5 in what I still believe could have been a viable third wagon on MM to rescue LoRab don't show up well at all.
b) The rest of your votes are either following others in voting someone or pressure votes to get slackers / low posters active, which is a bit too obstinate as a tendency, considering the bad results we've had hunting down Tranq.
c) You have been making ISOs and inquries, yet I never feel very strong, determined leads from you, from one Day to another.
Combine a, b, c + the usual RIP or "you had me foold" elaborate posts for every victim involved and it feels kinda mechanical.
I'm going to ask non-juliets players as non-direct as I conceivably feel able to:
We know zebra, despite getting killed N1, could have had her power delivered post-mortem.
Do you think that, if she send her power N1, it could actually involve juliets or nah?