The Syndicate

DFaraday had 8 posts and his role is still around Day 11. Bass subbed in for him and self-voted Day 5. It would seem he missed each vote after that until G-Spice stepped in for him. I would need to see (and not smell) more from him before I can form an opinion.

Tranq has 44 posts here, compared to 83 in RM3 when he was recruited bad Night 3 (and killed by another team Night 7). Despite the post count, I'm detecting a consistent tone. In RM3, every other posts of his has a , and after he was recruited, he was not shy about gunning for Boogs, who was good and got lynched (I also note that when I called out bea, his own team captain, he said "Very interesting theory about bea" (there's that word, haha)). I think Tranq also would have no qualms taking out Typhoony Night 1. However, what stands out most for me is Tranq's Day 7 vote for timmer after Tranq had arrived at the conclusion that timmer was neutral. I get he was silenced, but Tranq never explained the vote later. Am I to believe that Tranq was silenced and forced to vote timmer?

I'll still be around for a few more hours but I'm putting my vote on BWT now as I mentioned I might earlier.

I'm voting for Tranq now. I don't want three votes on birdwithteeth to prompt a runaway train.

I'm going to vote for Tranq. The less he says the more I think he could be bad.

I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.

nutella wrote:I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.

Then you could try voting Tranq.

nutella wrote:I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.

I'm glad you posted this, as a matter of fact. Analyzing it linguistically, it's rotten. Regarding bwt, you "haven't been feeling good about him lately."

What does that mean? If you thought Boomslang was "bad for a while," then why would you feel anything else but bad regarding bwt?

What has birdwithteeth said or done "lately" (your word) to make you not feel good about him?

Here's his only post since coming back:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry everyone. Just realized I had replaced back into this game. Too tired to read anything tonight, but I'll start catching up again tomorrow afternoon/evening after work.

That's it. Please tell me what is bothering you.

I'm switching my vote to nutella, and I encourage the other bwt voters to do likewise.

Spacedaisy wrote:Bwt replaced boomslang. I believe boomslang was bad. He was already under suspicion from players, then Night 9s came along and Ahriman attempted to kill 2 people, DH and boomslang. Both failed. It has generally been agreed upon that DH would be a freaking weird choice of kill for Ahriman, all things considered. I had looked over the list to see if there was a reason that Ahriman might have ended up with two kills showing up in one night. The only thing I could see was that Boomslang (because I am operating under the belief that Ahriman wouldn't have targeted DH) might be either the jilted lover or the warden. We know now that Gman was the jilted lover in his previous incarnation,so we can scratch that. So if he was the warden, and the power was used by him, targeting DH seems like a decidedly baddie move. Then the only sense I can make of Roxy's weirdness over the restarted night was that she was trying to obfuscate the truth about what occurred in order to provide some cover for boom/bwt. I really think this would be the best choice for a lynch today.

ˆ

Not ^ ?

Hello players. As well as hosts, non-players, bots, and the mighty sequoias of the redwood forests. As you can see, I have returned. And it's not because I forgot my hat. Actually, my wildly exaggerated ego and its ability to create cheeky ways to post in mafia games makes creating such a garment an impossibility. As when all hatmakers see the correct fabric pattern that would fit my inflated head, they cry both tears of joy and total confusion until they pass out but are delicately caught by their own memories of my memorably unmatched posts.

No, the real reason that I'm back is I have been on a campaign to catch up on what happened after my tragic and premature first death while also infomring the people of this dual-color-scheme-optioned forum that we call The Syndicate how they or the men in their life can use Old Spice to smell as fresh as the freshest smelling places on the internet. Along with being educational, this reading/information campaign carries an entertainment value that is second to none. I know because I write them and have a strong memory of them in my brain. If you'd like a sneak peek, try staring through my striking brown eyes and looking at them as I currently remember them in my brain.
While you're helplessly lost in my seas of brown warmth and satisfaction, let me take this time to tell you that I see why people are suspicious of both Birdwithteeth and Tranq. I'd go into more detail but I am still something like 15 pages behind and need to keep reading.
You can't get past the striking brown eyes, can you? Don't worry. It's helpless.

Spacedaisy, a word please?

What word did you have in mind?

Is Devin a replacement for someone, or has he been here from the beginning?


*goes to check...*

Here from the beginning

Epi, I didn't like the fact that boom had basically stopped participating, like I know he said he was busy but even when he was around he only paid attention to certain things and conveniently ignored others. When I suspected him earlier in the game he briefly reassured me with some good participation but then it fell off again and I thought that may have indicated recruitment. Then that survival happened and Daisy's theory strikes me as a real possibility.

I did consider voting for Tranq as well but my suspicion of him is less concrete.

Spacedaisy wrote:What word did you have in mind?

Given nutella's last post, has your opinion of her changed?

I think she is likely bad. I've gone back and forth about her all game, but lately I have felt mostly bad vibes where she is concerned and she and tranq jumping on makes me feel even more. However, there are also two bad teams, so it doesn't clear bwt IMO.

Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??

I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....

Other people should have a look and tell me what they think

I have suspected Devin for a while and would be happy to vote him as well.

Honestly I trust very few people at this point, so

Spacedaisy wrote:I think she is likely bad. I've gone back and forth about her all game, but lately I have felt mostly bad vibes where she is concerned and she and tranq jumping on makes me feel even more. However, there are also two bad teams, so it doesn't clear bwt IMO.

No, it doesn't clear him. But, again, Henry Fonda style...reasonable doubt and all.

Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??

I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....

Other people should have a look and tell me what they think

I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.

Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.

Spacedaisy wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??

I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....

Other people should have a look and tell me what they think

I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.

Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.

You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.

No, I have no more concrete evidence for Nutella. I looked at her more closely because she posted something that, in my opinion, was flimsy and weak. I now believe she should be lynched.

If you lynch bwt, and he comes back not bad, what then?

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??

I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....

Other people should have a look and tell me what they think

I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.

Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.

You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.

No, I have no more concrete evidence for Nutella. I looked at her more closely because she posted something that, in my opinion, was flimsy and weak. I now believe she should be lynched.

If you lynch bwt, and he comes back not bad, what then?

Then I was wrong and we try again, that is the risk that is run in every lynch. I'm aware there isn't hard and fast evidence for bwt, I've never claimed there was. what answer are you looking for from me here?

Spacedaisy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??

I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....

Other people should have a look and tell me what they think

I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.

Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.

You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.

No, I have no more concrete evidence for Nutella. I looked at her more closely because she posted something that, in my opinion, was flimsy and weak. I now believe she should be lynched.

If you lynch bwt, and he comes back not bad, what then?

Then I was wrong and we try again, that is the risk that is run in every lynch. I'm aware there isn't hard and fast evidence for bwt, I've never claimed there was. what answer are you looking for from me here?

"Whoopsie" isn't it. I 100% believe you have a side. If it's a bad side, then fine. Ignore me. But if it's not a bad side, then "I would consider voting elsewhere" would be a nice start.

I did say I would consider voting elsewhere, more than once in the last handful of posts.

Spacedaisy wrote:I did say I would consider voting elsewhere, more than once in the last handful of posts.

I know you did, but I don't think I've read enough to say an intelligent enough thing to get you to vote someone else. I do feel like I'm right about nutella. Her verb tense made it sound like new bwt has done something suspicious, but he hasn't. So she voted for him.

That's rotten.

Will anyone else consider my quest to lynch nutella based on this misstep?

Alright Epi. You know what, I trust you. I don't understand you right now, but I trust you. Mark this day on your calendar. I will switch my vote to Nutella.

vote registered for Nutella

And if she flips bad, tranq should be a serious contender for a lynch.

Spacedaisy wrote:Alright Epi. You know what, I trust you. I don't understand you right now, but I trust you. Mark this day on your calendar. I will switch my vote to Nutella.

vote registered for Nutella

And if she flips bad, tranq should be a serious contender for a lynch.

I'm grabbing a neon pen now.

I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.

So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?

Just got done from work. Epi you sound pretty confident. I can put my vote on la and back burner tranq.

Ebwop votes LA

Spacedaisy wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.

So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?

Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.

Why are people voting for birdwithteeth?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.

So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?

Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.

Why are people voting for birdwithteeth?

I'm not sure what that even means, but cool.

I made a convincing case, they already suspected boomslang for being shady anyway. Now Epi has convinced me to vote Nutella instead though. In a nut shell.

LAME INTERNET IS LAME!!!! I've tried voting 4 times now. Let's see of the 5th time works!

Spacedaisy wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.

So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?

Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.

Why are people voting for birdwithteeth?

I'm not sure what that even means, but cool.

I made a convincing case, they already suspected boomslang for being shady anyway. Now Epi has convinced me to vote Nutella instead though. In a nut shell.

Interesting.

If the lynch switcher is still around, it may not even matter.

'Bout #*&$@ING time!

For the record I would have been the second vote for nutella. I am not voting there because SD is there
I'm ready for a change of pace. I hope you'remember right Epi. But I take full responsibility for my vote either way.

Devin the Omniscient wrote:'Bout #*&$@ING time!

For the record I would have been the second vote for nutella. I am not voting there because SD is there
I'm ready for a change of pace. I hope you'remember right Epi. But I take full responsibility for my vote either way.

Then maybe I'll switch my vote to give your vote zero responsibility.

Are right. Not remember right.

Fucking phone.

Mmmm Kay

Let's hope the Druidic elder is gone or that they are not recruited bad and we can actually learn something this lynch.

Something else I thought about was the poison, could come into play if the first person to be poisoned is still alive.

Vote registered for birdwithteeth

Look what you've done Epignosis, you've created a monster.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Vote registered for birdwithteeth

Look what you've done Epignosis, you've created a monster.

Power play there?

you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!

Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.

Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!

Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.

I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.

wow a ton of votes on me just for one little post, amazing Since Epi is back I see that literally nothing I say will be taken seriously.

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!

Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.

I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!

Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.

I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.

that would have been hysterical!