The Syndicate

juliets wrote:

Ricochet wrote:What a surprise. juliets picks up a foreign case and wants to pressure vote.

I don't understand what "foreign case" means.

Should have said external, maybe. Someone else's.

Rico can you plz look at it as well.

How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:I don't have time to try and persuade you I'm not bad. If I need to, and I get votes, I will. For the time being, you can believe whatever you want. I change my mind on people based on gut reading, and Drac's recent post saying "if Bea is bad, I quit" made me feel it was genuine. His actions during the end of that LC lynch felt good to me too. I don't think MM is bad so I don't think he was trying to save Drac either.


linki: Sorry DH, I wasn't sure it was for me. I don't know what to make of the Wilgy case. At the moment, it's the best one out there, but Mac and Bea keep saying LC trusted him, so I'm still hesitant

So that's a soft yes that you agree he was full of shit?

You can call it soft. I don't know if he's full of shit. I'd have to go back and read everything, and also hear his side. Sometimes, we interpret things in a way that is not representative of the actual truth, so sorry, I can't say he's full of shit until he answers back. I will say he found a funny time to disappear.

Things currently players won't look into or reply to me

1) That follow-up question I posted after juliet's ISO.

2) "LC trusting Wilgy" / "Wilgy trusting LC", yet Wilgy not bothering to vote.
2b) Same with Matt.

3) Any input on Mac - how you read him vs. how much inconsistencies do you see or not in his game, based on what I've reported.

linki: I'll try to, Mac.

linki: state your connections, MM

linki: LET ME POST

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Apparently, you forgot to add me to one of the groups

I'm tired of this game.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Team 2 sounds good except I'd swap Juliets out and put you in it. Team 1 looks like a bunch of crap.

Can I just post my stuff on Matt and then look at other things? Trying not to die of ISOhaustion here.

Of course

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Team 2 sounds good except I'd swap Juliets out and put you in it. Team 1 looks like a bunch of crap.

Can I ask you a question, since you say you'd hide behind people you don't trust and leave hints. Would you do it from the start and not care that you don't continue the game at all? Or would you go that route at later stages?

FZ. wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Team 2 sounds good except I'd swap Juliets out and put you in it. Team 1 looks like a bunch of crap.

Can I ask you a question, since you say you'd hide behind people you don't trust and leave hints. Would you do it from the start and not care that you don't continue the game at all? Or would you go that route at later stages?

I think it would occur to me pretty early that if I went the protect myself by hiding behind supatown players route that if I died I'd leave behind no breadcrumbs.

Motel Room is still here.

I say again. I am going to be the worst player ever next time I am scum and I will never die.

MacDougall wrote:

FZ. wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Team 2 sounds good except I'd swap Juliets out and put you in it. Team 1 looks like a bunch of crap.

Can I ask you a question, since you say you'd hide behind people you don't trust and leave hints. Would you do it from the start and not care that you don't continue the game at all? Or would you go that route at later stages?

I think it would occur to me pretty early that if I went the protect myself by hiding behind supatown players route that if I died I'd leave behind no breadcrumbs.

You'd still be able to say who you can trust, which is quite a lot. And if later on, it became better, you'd switch to finding baddies

I just didn't like Juliets last posts. It felt a little too convenient. So I wonder whether HB really hid behind her like Mac suggests

FZ. wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

FZ. wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Team 2 sounds good except I'd swap Juliets out and put you in it. Team 1 looks like a bunch of crap.

Can I ask you a question, since you say you'd hide behind people you don't trust and leave hints. Would you do it from the start and not care that you don't continue the game at all? Or would you go that route at later stages?

I think it would occur to me pretty early that if I went the protect myself by hiding behind supatown players route that if I died I'd leave behind no breadcrumbs.

You'd still be able to say who you can trust, which is quite a lot. And if later on, it became better, you'd switch to finding baddies

Hmmm...

Valid.

FZ. wrote:I just didn't like Juliets last posts. It felt a little too convenient. So I wonder whether HB really hid behind her like Mac suggests

Well he hit the brakes on a scum read of her pretty hard... But there's a strong chance I'm wrong because I'm not the guy from The Mentalist.

Ricochet wrote:

juliets wrote:

Ricochet wrote:What a surprise. juliets picks up a foreign case and wants to pressure vote.

I don't understand what "foreign case" means.

Should have said external, maybe. Someone else's.

Some of us just aren't case makers. I very rarely feel I have the evidence to do it. Call me a bad player (which i think you've pretty much done) but it doesn't make me bad.

MacDougall wrote:Motel Room is still here.

I say again. I am going to be the worst player ever next time I am scum and I will never die.

So he's baddie that a sudden vigi tried to kill or baddie that a different team tried to kill?

Ricochet wrote:Things currently players won't look into or reply to me

1) That follow-up question I posted after juliet's ISO.

2) "LC trusting Wilgy" / "Wilgy trusting LC", yet Wilgy not bothering to vote.
2b) Same with Matt.

3) Any input on Mac - how you read him vs. how much inconsistencies do you see or not in his game, based on what I've reported.

linki: I'll try to, Mac.

linki: state your connections, MM

linki: LET ME POST

Sorsha and DrWilgy because of DH's case. I add Mac to that mix because after the scrutiny Wilgy has come under, Mac has gone to posting a case against and pushing a Draconus-FZ connection. Also, Mac has been trying to discredit DH's case by calling out the people voting alongside him (rather than discount DH directly).

As for the other camp, Draconus, Matt and juliets: This one is more of a stretch in my mind. Matt is just a guess. But Draco fits the bill more. I think that Mac is trying to point in the direction of the other team, especially Draco. Draco also tends to pay attention more in games where he is bad. He has posted a lot this game. I believe he has already set a personal record in post count by a ton, and it's Day 8 (compared to say Recruitment or World Reborn where he lived to the final day). Juliets hasn't had much to say about Draco. She is almost as much of a guess as Matt, but I put the two most likely names, in my mind, that could fit here.

MacDougall wrote:

FZ. wrote:I just didn't like Juliets last posts. It felt a little too convenient. So I wonder whether HB really hid behind her like Mac suggests

Well he hit the brakes on a scum read of her pretty hard... But there's a strong chance I'm wrong because I'm not the guy from The Mentalist.

Hmm... If that were true, my follow up question on her ISO would be moot.

FZ. wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How do these sound for 2 baddie teams?

Team #1

• Macdougall
  Sorsha
  DrWilgy

Team #2

• Matt
  Draconus
  juliets

Apparently, you forgot to add me to one of the groups

I'm tired of this game.

Why would I put you in one of these groups?

FZ. wrote:I just didn't like Juliets last posts. It felt a little too convenient. So I wonder whether HB really hid behind her like Mac suggests

What was it about the last posts did you not like? What do you mean convenient?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Things currently players won't look into or reply to me

1) That follow-up question I posted after juliet's ISO.

2) "LC trusting Wilgy" / "Wilgy trusting LC", yet Wilgy not bothering to vote.
2b) Same with Matt.

3) Any input on Mac - how you read him vs. how much inconsistencies do you see or not in his game, based on what I've reported.

linki: I'll try to, Mac.

linki: state your connections, MM

linki: LET ME POST

Sorsha and DrWilgy because of DH's case. I add Mac to that mix because after the scrutiny Wilgy has come under, Mac has gone to posting a case against and pushing a Draconus-FZ connection. Also, Mac has been trying to discredit DH's case by calling out the people voting alongside him (rather than discount DH directly).

As for the other camp, Draconus, Matt and juliets: This one is more of a stretch in my mind. Matt is just a guess. But Draco fits the bill more. I think that Mac is trying to point in the direction of the other team, especially Draco. Draco also tends to pay attention more in games where he is bad. He has posted a lot this game. I believe he has already set a personal record in post count by a ton, and it's Day 8 (compared to say Recruitment or World Reborn where he lived to the final day). Juliets hasn't had much to say about Draco. She is almost as much of a guess as Matt, but I put the two most likely names, in my mind, that could fit here.

Really? That's Drac posting a lot? Maybe he is bad. I was under the impression he didn't care that much, and since I didn't think you were trying to save him, I thought he was okay. But this kind of changes things


linki: I don't know Juliets. You come in, after reading the cases. No questions to ask either side, just saying it all adds up and tied nicely in a neat bow. Doesn't sound like the civ Juliets I know that likes to look at things from all angles.

Ugh. Time fore work. I will try to keep up as best I can.

Double-checked Draco's post count comparison, I was wrong. He's got 162 here and had 175 in the other game.

Well, he'll probably set a record if he doesn't die soon. (Same with Papryco).

Hey Mac:

Your threads tying FZ and Draconus together make sense. Here are some highlights from your post I'd like to give my commentary on.

The suspicion she raises on the Draco vote is incredibly valid. Why would he vote for FZ at this point for attempting to save someone he thought was bad (JJJ) when JJJ had more votes. Unless they were distancing?

I assume by "they" you mean Drac and FZ. This is a pretty good starting point for tying them together as distancing usually starts with a light little back-and-forth such as this. Also, the contradiction of logic (voting FZ instead of JJJ) is something you'd expect to see in a distancing tactic. One person inventing a reason to place a throwaway/harmless vote on another person, often in contradiction of a more viable option.

HamburgerBoy raises doubts about the validity of her point so she quotes a few Draco posts to justify it. Pretty haphazardly thrown together post. I don't think FZ had any intention of actually getting Draco lynched here.

I can agree partway with this. I don't think FZ's post was as slapdash as certain other posts I've seen recently, but I do agree it doesn't ring true to me. It doesn't have the weight behind it I was expecting. Though where HB's death is a plus tick for you, I think I'm leaning more minus tick.

For someone such as FZ who is a little bit tinfoily to not even entertain the idea that HB was kamikaze mode and stood behind a player who she had just read as manipulatively trying to chain her to a mislynch... There is a disconnect there. It makes her previous suspicions look fabricated.

I quite agree here. Another flag of distancing is behavior that is atypical of a persons usual strategies. Such as a usually speculative FZ to not be speculative.

We've gone from her establishing a scum read earlier in the game from no case, to now having a civ read on him with no interaction at all?

Another flag, early pecking followed by a cooldown period, followed by a change of heart, usually with little to no reason.

All of her interaction around Draco is suspicious. They are scum together.

A solid conclusion with reasonable evidence. Still not going to change my vote tho.

FZ. wrote:

I'd feel better about you if you didn't allegedly forget we had an entire conversation.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Things currently players won't look into or reply to me

1) That follow-up question I posted after juliet's ISO.

2) "LC trusting Wilgy" / "Wilgy trusting LC", yet Wilgy not bothering to vote.
2b) Same with Matt.

3) Any input on Mac - how you read him vs. how much inconsistencies do you see or not in his game, based on what I've reported.

linki: I'll try to, Mac.

linki: state your connections, MM

linki: LET ME POST

Sorsha and DrWilgy because of DH's case. I add Mac to that mix because after the scrutiny Wilgy has come under, Mac has gone to posting a case against and pushing a Draconus-FZ connection. Also, Mac has been trying to discredit DH's case by calling out the people voting alongside him (rather than discount DH directly).

As for the other camp, Draconus, Matt and juliets: This one is more of a stretch in my mind. Matt is just a guess. But Draco fits the bill more. I think that Mac is trying to point in the direction of the other team, especially Draco. Draco also tends to pay attention more in games where he is bad. He has posted a lot this game. I believe he has already set a personal record in post count by a ton, and it's Day 8 (compared to say Recruitment or World Reborn where he lived to the final day). Juliets hasn't had much to say about Draco. She is almost as much of a guess as Matt, but I put the two most likely names, in my mind, that could fit here.

I have been defending Wilgy for days. I have been suspecting Draconus for days. To tie my 30 minute old case to that is trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. FZ pinged me today so I analysed her ISO and noticed a lot of issues around her interactions with Draconus. You just took my case that I think is awesome and didn't even observe the relevance of it instead just saying it makes me bad. You fucking suck you vile Marmot.

I haven't been trying to discredit DH's case. His case on Wilgy is compelling. I just have a strong reason to think Wilgy is not bad that is hard for me to put down. He isn't doing a great job backing me up at all.

And if you think Draconus is scum why are you letting him hide his vote behind you and DH so blatantly? Why are you, Rico and DH letting him get away with such blatant buddying?

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Motel Room is still here.

I say again. I am going to be the worst player ever next time I am scum and I will never die.

So he's baddie that a sudden vigi tried to kill or baddie that a different team tried to kill?

I have no idea. I'm just saying that for him to survive and still have no votes on him today is annoying as fuck.

MacDougall wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Motel Room is still here.

I say again. I am going to be the worst player ever next time I am scum and I will never die.

So he's baddie that a sudden vigi tried to kill or baddie that a different team tried to kill?

I have no idea. I'm just saying that for him to survive and still have no votes on him today is annoying as fuck.

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:

I'd feel better about you if you didn't allegedly forget we had an entire conversation.

Um, i dont know what you are talking about.

Matt

Sparing or fighting attitude vs. the great Papryco
agrees with MM on the great Papryco's desire to be lynched... and nothing else

Matt - zebra - Matt
N0 comments with zebra on being the only Duncan voters (position 5, I think)
banter about tendency to vote the same way D0
D1/D2 keeps posting occasionally on players messing up zebra's former or current gender
D3.0 implies zebra could put a curse on JJJ as his teamie
ISO's zebra and implies she might have helped MM in the "which team"-gate

Matt - LoRab - Matt
D1 banter-criticism of players attacking LoRab's "twirls"
D3 inquires a lot of folks about LoRab or about Epig's and BR's suss on LoRab
--
LoRab suss'd and voted him D2

votes
D1 votes MM because of MM's "team" comments
D2 votes MM again for lack of better options
D3 votes Llama between JJJ and him
D3.5 back on MM
D4 Boomslang (anti-his-theory); then Llama (old suss, I suppose?)
D5 Sorsha (dissension)
D6 misses the vote; would have voted Draco over LC
D7 votes MM because Dom said so

other notes
pressures Papryco on talking about the usefulness of meta
N0 wants MM to go
D1 keeps MM voting banter at full intensity
clarifies suss on MM
questions JJJ for suspicions, after he snaps out of his curse
N1 goes back to inquire Draco on who would curse him
D2 inquires if juliets would fake gender-slipping on Ketterman/zebra or not
dismisses two-curse idea (too much design trimming to leave them in the game)
questions players looking at Draco
stays clear of sig (simply notices "he's always getting lynched. lol"), names Draco, MM and juliets as suspects
D3 calls Golden "obvi bad", intends to ISO
slight suss on FZ for "reasons"
inquires Epig on reads on Golden, FZ., JJJ and MM
inquries Llama on Mac, Mac on Llama; later, rebuttal to Mac on demanding reads
inquires Golden on Epig... twice
apologetic post on missing out because of playing another game in the meantime
calls Epig mafia. Because "reasons"
GTH's llama as bad, LC as civ, JJJ as bad, Wilgy as huh
oddball explanation of suss'ing FZ (statement of conflict on never having played baddie sig and questioning civ Rico's thoughts)
would vote Epi, but is ok with big two wagons (JJJ, Llama). Votes Llama
GTH's Boom as good
D3.5 inquires on MM, Epig, ISO'd zebra to look at MM's "team" angle
doesn't find Dom bad for either "suspishing" or for staying quiet
odd vibes about Llama defending JJJ's claim
D4 in reply to Dom, suss's FZ, JJJ or MM, but considers moving from MM
spins a "theory" requiring Sorsha, Ninja, Wilgy, Llama and Tranq to post; reveals looking for silenced players
votes Boomslang based on his theory (and Boom interrupting it)
feels his theory is dying
switches to Llama
(ugh enough with the theory; did it even have a resolution?)
N4 inquires bea on Sorsha/BR being good
D5 vibes that Sorsha and MM are scheming to paint him as subdued (?)
down with MM and Sorsha lynch
inquires MM on Sorsha noticing the same thing about Matt's case on him; states Sorsha being opportunistic in suss'ing him [Matt]
votes Sorsha for trying to pick a fight
suss's Mac for never clarifying his thoughts on LoRab; banters on Mac's change of suss from LoRab
rebuttal to LC on him pushing LoRab change of perception as a teammate (would not make annoyed remarks about small suss's on a teammate - LoRab's "twirl"; LoRab would allegedly not paint him as bad)
(rather testy) rebuttal to JJJ on voting Sorsha
reads LC civvie and finds merit in his case against JJJ
expresses annoyance at not being taken seriously
not sure what to make of MM claiming neutral; inquires again about Sorsha
N5 considers LC being right about JJJ or MM (also suss's FZ for that), after Tranq flips as Golden's teamie
D6 inquires LC and Mac on reads on each other
posits that Boom was cursed to lobby for LC's lynch
N6 focuses on Fuzz being...someone's? (HB's?) checks, Pikmin crumbs, if Ninja is a rule breaker
rebuttal to FZ on cooking the "Boom was cursed" theory in tandem with LC
launches BTSC checker theory, backs it up with Tranq's death; reiterates genuine defense of Boom
D7 denies being bad despite being suss'd by Dom, post Dom NK
comes back suspecting MM, because of Dom's neutral statement
curious about Dom's remarks on FZ.
curious about DH being double cursed
inquires Mac and Drac on voting Boomslang; reiterates theory on Boom being BTSC checker
round of rebuttals
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pinged by MM "conceding" he's indy, not neutral
N7 denies distancing from MM; pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM; considers Sorsha's take on Boom's flip "on to somethign"
talk and banter with DH about his double curse (going nowhere)
inquires MM on not commenting on Mac's allegation that him and Matt are distancing; again asks if Ninja and juliets are known as rule breakers
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM; inquires DH on MM
reread on DH
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
calls MM and DH scum teamies
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM (down DH's throat)
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM, endorses MM, followed by DH lynch
pushes further Dom's neutral diss on MM



Well, this was a frustrating ISO, and I'm definitely calling it a day, considering that another Wacky Gamer is up next. TBH, in my mind, I started this with expectations of confirming a lot of scumcrumbs on Matt: weird theory making, focusing (relentlessly) on his own angles, tunnelling, skating the game with this mindset, bad judgement calls, ideas going nowhere etc. But it doesn't quite show up in the actual material, at least not with such intensity or gravity. Sure, the first few days, he's rather annoyingly making use of "because reasons" angles and seeming like he's just 'doing his thang", instead of collaborating with the rest of the thread. Then, after investing full-time in the game, he truthfully reads more focused and some of his theories gel better with what's going on in the game.

Of course, Matt was a lunatic civ theory maker in THM and I'm seeing nothing as "bad" in what he's pulling as that in here. He's surprisingly got the most "alternative" vote record of most around here, meaning both devoid of mislynches, but also not on any mafia person, as far as we can tell from reveals so far. I normally would have mixed feelings out of this, overall. A baddie could be in a bit more control, as to not misstep too much inside the game. But I'm not fully reading Matt as such, either. The worst looking moment, as I've already said, is missing D6 when it mattered for LC, a player he read as civ.

I'd place him right now no lower than a weirdly (and annoyingly) self-centered yellow, pressuring on the same issues, angles and theories, but some of them don't read out as far-fetched or manipulatory.

So help me out, players who suss him out. What has he been sinning with, in your view? I got little to nothing out of this ISO, honestly.

I'm going to bed. I'll try to look at things with fresh eyes tomorrow. I'm not bad, but have no idea how to prove I'm not related to Drac in any way.


One last question to everyone. If there's only one mafia team, who does the killing pattern, of taking out the people that are suspects and those who aren't making a lot of noise, fit?


linki: DH, what conversation did I forget?

juliets wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:

I'd feel better about you if you didn't allegedly forget we had an entire conversation.

Um, i dont know what you are talking about.

Mostly cuz I wasn't talking about you.

MacDougall wrote:I have been defending Wilgy for days. I have been suspecting Draconus for days. To tie my 30 minute old case to that is trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. FZ pinged me today so I analysed her ISO and noticed a lot of issues around her interactions with Draconus. You just took my case that I think is awesome and didn't even observe the relevance of it instead just saying it makes me bad. You fucking suck you vile Marmot.

I haven't been trying to discredit DH's case. His case on Wilgy is compelling. I just have a strong reason to think Wilgy is not bad that is hard for me to put down. He isn't doing a great job backing me up at all.

And if you think Draconus is scum why are you letting him hide his vote behind you and DH so blatantly? Why are you, Rico and DH letting him get away with such blatant buddying?

We can only lynch one person each day. Many of us think it should be DrWilgy today.

You say you find DH's case compelling, but your own reason trumps that case, I can respect that.



But I think you are arguing not that we are wrong for voting DrWilgy, but that we are wrong for letting Draconus vote alongside us. This sort of argument looks like a connection to DrWilgy.

FZ. wrote:I'm going to bed. I'll try to look at things with fresh eyes tomorrow. I'm not bad, but have no idea how to prove I'm not related to Drac in any way.


One last question to everyone. If there's only one mafia team, who does the killing pattern, of taking out the people that are suspects and those who aren't making a lot of noise, fit?


linki: DH, what conversation did I forget?

The first time I tried to get your thoughts on Wilgy.

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:I'm going to bed. I'll try to look at things with fresh eyes tomorrow. I'm not bad, but have no idea how to prove I'm not related to Drac in any way.


One last question to everyone. If there's only one mafia team, who does the killing pattern, of taking out the people that are suspects and those who aren't making a lot of noise, fit?


linki: DH, what conversation did I forget?

The first time I tried to get your thoughts on Wilgy.

I didn't act like I forgot. I read your post and was thinking. I didn't have a straight answer for it. it's not how I work.

Whoa, all the votes on Sorsha vanished.

DH, if I were bad, I'd be sure to answer every question that came my way.

FZ. wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Things currently players won't look into or reply to me

1) That follow-up question I posted after juliet's ISO.

2) "LC trusting Wilgy" / "Wilgy trusting LC", yet Wilgy not bothering to vote.
2b) Same with Matt.

3) Any input on Mac - how you read him vs. how much inconsistencies do you see or not in his game, based on what I've reported.

linki: I'll try to, Mac.

linki: state your connections, MM

linki: LET ME POST

Sorsha and DrWilgy because of DH's case. I add Mac to that mix because after the scrutiny Wilgy has come under, Mac has gone to posting a case against and pushing a Draconus-FZ connection. Also, Mac has been trying to discredit DH's case by calling out the people voting alongside him (rather than discount DH directly).

As for the other camp, Draconus, Matt and juliets: This one is more of a stretch in my mind. Matt is just a guess. But Draco fits the bill more. I think that Mac is trying to point in the direction of the other team, especially Draco. Draco also tends to pay attention more in games where he is bad. He has posted a lot this game. I believe he has already set a personal record in post count by a ton, and it's Day 8 (compared to say Recruitment or World Reborn where he lived to the final day). Juliets hasn't had much to say about Draco. She is almost as much of a guess as Matt, but I put the two most likely names, in my mind, that could fit here.

Really? That's Drac posting a lot? Maybe he is bad. I was under the impression he didn't care that much, and since I didn't think you were trying to save him, I thought he was okay. But this kind of changes things


linki: I don't know Juliets. You come in, after reading the cases. No questions to ask either side, just saying it all adds up and tied nicely in a neat bow. Doesn't sound like the civ Juliets I know that likes to look at things from all angles.

I think what you're missing is I did look at things from several angles including the Mac and Bea angle. I just didn't do it "out loud" meaning in the thread. I will do that next time. I certainly understand what you mean though and why it looked odd to you.

FZ. wrote:DH, if I were bad, I'd be sure to answer every question that came my way.

FZ.

Okay, now I'm really going to bed. I want to hear Wilgy, Drac and Sorsha.

linki 1:Juliets, why do you care so much what I think? Why don't you consider that maybe I'm the baddie here and am trying to make you look bad? I feel like you're aiming to please a lot this game. I don't remember ever playing with you like that

linki 2: I had a feeling you'd react with something of the sort, DH. But it's the truth.


linki 3: Because that's the new trend MM, I'm bad

I read Mac's case and there are indeed some ping-worthy stuff in it. I'd need a Draco flipping bad, first, though, in order to analyse it in more detail.

One thing I didn't like in FZ's rebuttal was saying Draco going "if bea = bad, ffs" speaking well of Draco. The idea, to me, was his incredulity at bea's game being baddie at heart. I don't think Draco's alignment comes into relevancy here. If he's civ, true, it's a genuine cry. If he's baddie on a different team, it would work the same.

FZ. wrote:Okay, now I'm really going to bed. I want to hear Wilgy, Drac and Sorsha.

linki 1:Juliets, why do you care so much what I think? Why don't you consider that maybe I'm the baddie here and am trying to make you look bad? I feel like you're aiming to please a lot this game. I don't remember ever playing with you like that

linki 2: I had a feeling you'd react with something of the sort, DH. But it's the truth.


linki 3: Because that's the new trend MM, I'm bad

I didn't...react..?

FZ. wrote:Okay, now I'm really going to bed. I want to hear Wilgy, Drac and Sorsha.

linki 1:Juliets, why do you care so much what I think? Why don't you consider that maybe I'm the baddie here and am trying to make you look bad? I feel like you're aiming to please a lot this game. I don't remember ever playing with you like that

linki 2: I had a feeling you'd react with something of the sort, DH. But it's the truth.


linki 3: Because that's the new trend MM, I'm bad

I'm trying to answer all concerns about me FZ not just yours. You seem to have a lot (or it feels that way)so it feels to me like I'm responding to you a lot. But it's not you and nobody else - it's everyone else too. Even if you're a baddie your comments can affect what others think.

How bout Draconus trying to paint DH as the scum out of the LC flip and now arriving where we are him just buddying the fuck out of him?

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:Okay, now I'm really going to bed. I want to hear Wilgy, Drac and Sorsha.

linki 1:Juliets, why do you care so much what I think? Why don't you consider that maybe I'm the baddie here and am trying to make you look bad? I feel like you're aiming to please a lot this game. I don't remember ever playing with you like that

linki 2: I had a feeling you'd react with something of the sort, DH. But it's the truth.


linki 3: Because that's the new trend MM, I'm bad

I didn't...react..?

Sorry, it was Mac. I'm too tired.

Rico, that's my opinion. I realize it could be wrong. It doesn't make me bad. I hope I'm not wrong.