The Syndicate

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

And your point is? :P

I actually never use that term IRL. Epi does and I thought it was fitting.

I also think this means BWT probably didn't read the thread before posting. What does that say about him? I don't know.

That sucked, I'm considering voting for MM, I'll go over his and Dom's post.

Also Scotty wanted us to lynch Matt, he had Matt in prison with him. I believe we might want to do that tomorrow.

Now that I'm released from captivity due to the jailor's death, I have some thoughts about all that transpired yesterday.

Hindsight is 20/20, and I could BS everyone and say that if I was able to post and vote, I obviously would have seen through the case on Scotty and the resulting bandwagon. But, to be honest, I probably would have just joined it myself.

Anywho, here we are, Night 3, with Scotty's blood on our hands. Catching up on the thread gave me 2 real suspects for the upcoming future.

1 - Russtifinko 2.0

Strike 1: Coming back from the dead to enthusiastically and passionately lynch a civilian. Strike 2: His whole kerfuffle with Epi and general blame gamemanship. He also suspected Matt of being Scotty's teammate, but now is just barrelling against him, due to his Scotty vote. Strike 3: Him backtracking on his 1.0 opinions as noted by Scotty:

Scotty wrote:May I direct you to your Russell 1.0 Day 2 post:

Russ'el and Flo wrote:This is a really compelling case. I agree with you and Sokoth that the Dom suspicion seems to have a lot of traction given how little substance it has, and I also think Scotty's not reading his role card is not suspicious, but you do a good job of showing that his behavior since is.

My only reservation right now is that I'm not sold on it being a save, because I still don't think that's the optimal play. However, as sig pointed out, opinions are divided on that stance, so it's entirely possible the baddie team disagrees with me on that and did try to save.

You seem pretty "sold" that it was a save now, in your new skin. Right out of the gate.

2 - sig

Sig, sig, sig. None of his posts have been inspiring in the least bit as far as my opinion of his alignment. His constant NO U's, his constant overhyping of himself, (e.g. "If you wanna lynch me go ahead." "If the baddies wanna kill me, I'd like to see them try") and his posts about Yin/Yang, (i.e. saying that they're not baddies and casting shade on anyone who talks about them too much) seem less like Shawn and more like somebody else.

Maybe a serial killer someone else.

The question is now, how do you solve a problem like sig? Lynches ostensibly don't work, and I'd be shocked if the cops haven't tried to NK him.

I may risk being apropos of nothing, but I'd honestly like people to consider trying to lynch him. He claims to be utterly invulnerable to any attack, but that just seems impossible as per the rules. Most likely, he's used an item or two over the course of the game so far. Hopefully, he used one that stopped his lynch during Day 1.

But that's a big assumption to make, and I don't want to make an ass out of you and me. At the same time, I think there's a very high chance he's a baddie, and I'm not gonna sit on my hands and hope that the other mafia team takes him out. I want to be somewhat proactive.

sig wrote:Also Scotty wanted us to lynch Matt, he had Matt in prison with him. I believe we might want to do that tomorrow.

Just because Scotty wanted it, doesn't mean it's a good idea. Even though he arrested Matt, he wouldn't have gained any info from doing so. So we'd purely be going on Scotty's instincts...which didn't prove to be too great since his play style led to him getting himself lynched.

So before we all jump on the bullet train to Lynchville, we may wanna reassess things with a more scrutinizing .

It also concerns me that you are so quick to get us to jump on the Matt-lynch train especially since there's MUCH scrutiny over your own allegiance.

linki @INH: I've honestly thought about trying to lynch sig again. If it garnered the same results as Day 1, it would basically CONFIRM our suspicions, but at the same time, we really can't afford another botched lynch. Civs need a win in the worst possible way right now.

I never once hinted that I was invulnerable to lynches, also I only did that a bit, don't overplay my hyping.

Scotty had a chat with Matt, if his last wish was to lynch Matt then I think it is pretty damning. I've had BTSC chat a few times and you can usually tell if someone is acting squirrel.

So BigDamnHero you're thinking of lynching me to see if I can be lynched? This is a waste for two reasons.
1. You'd spend a phase lynching a civ.
2. If I couldn't be lynched you'd waste a phase doing nothing.

For Russ he could be mafia, but in hindsight I see what he is doing as more of a revenge thing for Russ 1.0.

Okay so we don't have much content wise from MM, even though he has 15 posts many are fluffy.

Looking bad Dom is the same, he did mention talking more but never really did, he defended Eloh a bit and accused me of not responding to him quick enough. So overall he had some soft defense of Eloh and went after me a bit. He had a brief back and forth with Wilgy, but besides that didn't say much about who he suspected or thought was innocent.

Speaking of Eloh I really really dislike the narrative she is pushing that the baddies are inactive. This sets off major alarms in my mind since it is something I think mafia members are more likely to do.

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

DrWilgy wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

His posts read as bad. Especially the one where he said "I haven't lied once in this game. YET." He really wasnt acting civ at all, IMO. Plus there was the little tidbit where he saved his own ass by throwing Buzz under the bus in his place...not very civ minded, on the surface.

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

His posts read as bad. Especially the one where he said "I haven't lied once in this game. YET." He really wasnt acting civ at all, IMO. Plus there was the little tidbit where he saved his own ass by throwing Buzz under the bus in his place...not very civ minded, on the surface.

Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Bull testicles.

DrWilgy wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

OK, hindsight 20/20 and all, but if a mafia team knew that their teammate had a save, there is no reason to not jump on that bandwagon. Not to mention that mafia vote for teammates all the time. As it was, Scotty looked suspicious for several reasons, including that he chose someone to kill in his place that had no stated supsicion on him. We happened to be wrong about the conclusion, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't acting in an un-civ-like manner.

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

You are wrong about at least 1 of those.

DrWilgy wrote: Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

Follow the logic here...Scotty read as bad (which you just said you could understand) and so we voted to lynch him. That lynch resulted in Scotty, presumably the baddie, switching the lynch to save himself and throwing a civ player under the bus. Under those sets of circumstances, it was easy for the narrative to continue being written that it was a baddie trying to save himself, hence why a 2nd lynch attempt was made.

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

This might worry me more had u been more active thus far...

Quin wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Bull testicles.

Ecaxtly!

Damn, gotta go to work...and I really haven't had enough coffee today...

:coffee;

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote: Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

Follow the logic here...Scotty read as bad (which you just said you could understand) and so we voted to lynch him. That lynch resulted in Scotty, presumably the baddie, switching the lynch to save himself and throwing a civ player under the bus. Under those sets of circumstances, it was easy for the narrative to continue being written that it was a baddie trying to save himself, hence why a 2nd lynch attempt was made.

This is the exact problem though. Lynching a mafia member isn't easy. There is a faction working against that outcome.

Why did everyone go with the easy option. When the easiest option is always to lynch a civ?

@Lorab, since when do mafia members vote each other all the time?

DrWilgy wrote:

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote: Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

Follow the logic here...Scotty read as bad (which you just said you could understand) and so we voted to lynch him. That lynch resulted in Scotty, presumably the baddie, switching the lynch to save himself and throwing a civ player under the bus. Under those sets of circumstances, it was easy for the narrative to continue being written that it was a baddie trying to save himself, hence why a 2nd lynch attempt was made.

This is the exact problem though. Lynching a mafia member isn't easy. There is a faction working against that outcome.

Why did everyone go with the easy option. When the easiest option is always to lynch a civ?

@Lorab, since when do mafia members vote each other all the time?

Since I've been playing mafia. In case where there is a clear majority, mafia throw each other under the bus or vote for the clear winner all the time.

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote: Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

Follow the logic here...Scotty read as bad (which you just said you could understand) and so we voted to lynch him. That lynch resulted in Scotty, presumably the baddie, switching the lynch to save himself and throwing a civ player under the bus. Under those sets of circumstances, it was easy for the narrative to continue being written that it was a baddie trying to save himself, hence why a 2nd lynch attempt was made.

This is the exact problem though. Lynching a mafia member isn't easy. There is a faction working against that outcome.

Why did everyone go with the easy option. When the easiest option is always to lynch a civ?

@Lorab, since when do mafia members vote each other all the time?

Since I've been playing mafia. In case where there is a clear majority, mafia throw each other under the bus or vote for the clear winner all the time.

To be fair, usually the baddies at least try to make a case on someone else if a teammate is under suspicion. Everyone pretty much jumped on the Scotty train without a moment's notice.

Russ, Matt, and Wilgy are now my three lynches.

DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

Epignosis wrote:Russ, Matt, and Wilgy are now my three lynches.

Russ I'm unsure
Matt I wanna reevaluate (and hear more from)
DrWilgy I think is bad

BigDamnHero wrote:

Quin wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Bull testicles.

Ecaxtly!

Damn, gotta go to work...and I really haven't had enough coffee today...

:coffee;

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

Yep. Sounds like something baddie teammates would do.

*Votes self and Elohcin*

Elohcin wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

And your point is? :P

I actually never use that term IRL. Epi does and I thought it was fitting.

I also think this means BWT probably didn't read the thread before posting. What does that say about him? I don't know.

Or maybe I post as I'm reading along and thoughts come to me?

DrWilgy wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

1) From what I can tell, he used an item to re-direct a lynch on him against Russ 1.0. Which I don't get unless he really thought Russ 1.0 was bad and I don't remember seeing any evidence of that.

2) He kept saying we would regret lynching him. That always comes off to me as veiled threats over a pleading civ.

3) I figured the baddies knew he was caught and were simply throwing a teammate under the bus to avoid suspicion on themselves.

Who would you have proposed for a Day 3 lynch?

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Epignosis wrote:Russ, Matt, and Wilgy are now my three lynches.

Russ I have no read on yet, so curious about that one. Unless you think it's still about the narrative aspect instead of the case-building.

Matt just seems to me like someone who hasn't been active, so not sure on him.

Wilgy I could see though. Even after he got several explanations as to how the lynch of Scotty went down yesterday, he's either being willfully obtuse about the logic behind it, or he knows something else and is hiding it.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

And your point is? :P

I actually never use that term IRL. Epi does and I thought it was fitting.

I also think this means BWT probably didn't read the thread before posting. What does that say about him? I don't know.

Or maybe I post as I'm reading along and thoughts come to me?

You should be writer.

I wish thoughts just came to me.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

rabbit8 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

Is that a rhetoric?

SokothQultuq wrote:So you know that "When it rains it pours, and bad things come in 3's" thing? Well yeah. So I spent the last several days pretty much moving furniture and cleaning as my parents heater broke and then our Washer exploded. Well it might as well have. So we just spent the last several days trying to clean up that mess and get ready for both of those installs. WIth our house full of my late grandfathers stuff that was difficult to say the least as we have 50 years of stuff all over the place while my mom goes through all of it to decide what has to be done. So needless to say my last few days have been busy. So I apologize for not being able to post, but family has to come first. I'm sure you understand. With that being said, I've managed to catch up and will be working out some kind of posts here today. Thanks for your understanding.

Just tell the washer to get a hold of itself. It's a washer, not a bomb, dammit!
And yeah... liquidating items from an entire life is a hefty task. I can only imagine having to deal with my pack rat of a stepdad when he passes. Best of luck man- You guys holding a yard/estate sale?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We missed one part of the post, ????? survived a kill by Yin & Yang.

Sorry about that, it has been a chaotic evening for me.

We are going to end the Night at 11:00 PM EST tomorrow, please get your night actions to both myself and MP by 10 PM EST. I'm going to go get out any PMs I still need to.

It's awesome that we are surviving baddie kills. But we're doing a piss-poor job of finding said baddies. I am thinking they are inactive.

@ Host - If no one sent in a PM nightkill, would it say "????? survived a kill" or "no one was killed"?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well that was a piss-poor result. RIP Scotty!

Well look at you two, using the same words to describe the game and stuff.

And your point is? :P

I actually never use that term IRL. Epi does and I thought it was fitting.

I also think this means BWT probably didn't read the thread before posting. What does that say about him? I don't know.

Or maybe I post as I'm reading along and thoughts come to me?

You should be writer.

I wish thoughts just came to me.

I do want to write a novel someday. Either science fiction or historical fiction. I just don't have any inspiration for it yet.

rabbit8 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

Well, yeah. I get that. Did you have anything you could direct us to specifically though?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

Is that a rhetoric?

Eloquence.

rabbit8 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

Could you perhaps be more specific?

LoRab wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think Quinn, BDH and Lorab are bad.

Do you have anything to back this up?

Their posts?

Could you perhaps be more specific?

Probably not...poor guy is probably tuckered out after all his lengthy diatribes...

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

It depends on the player. The fundamental rule of mafia being harder to lynch than civilian will be unchanging due to the nature of the game.

Probably not. Unless someone has any means of knowing my alignment. The only reason why I knew Scotty most likely wasn't bad was due to vote pattern analysis which I pointed out previously here:

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

This makes me wonder why you would say I didn't kick up any fuss when I did disagree. (I'm currently catching up in the thread to become more involved in the game)

Scotty wrote:

SokothQultuq wrote:So you know that "When it rains it pours, and bad things come in 3's" thing? Well yeah. So I spent the last several days pretty much moving furniture and cleaning as my parents heater broke and then our Washer exploded. Well it might as well have. So we just spent the last several days trying to clean up that mess and get ready for both of those installs. WIth our house full of my late grandfathers stuff that was difficult to say the least as we have 50 years of stuff all over the place while my mom goes through all of it to decide what has to be done. So needless to say my last few days have been busy. So I apologize for not being able to post, but family has to come first. I'm sure you understand. With that being said, I've managed to catch up and will be working out some kind of posts here today. Thanks for your understanding.

Just tell the washer to get a hold of itself. It's a washer, not a bomb, dammit!
And yeah... liquidating items from an entire life is a hefty task. I can only imagine having to deal with my pack rat of a stepdad when he passes. Best of luck man- You guys holding a yard/estate sale?

LOL - Yeah, it held itself together enough it didnt damage anything. The bathroom held all the water. Which was a good thing.
I'm not sure what my Mom has planned for all their stuff, likely they will liquidate the majority of it and store the rest. But it takes time to go through everything and do all that needs to be done. But I doubt it will go to a Yard sale. There's some old antiques and stuff so probably not.

So though I'm caught up on reading, my post analysis is going to take a bit longer than I thought. It was busier at work then I expected. We'll see if I can get something off later today.

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

It depends on the player. The fundamental rule of mafia being harder to lynch than civilian will be unchanging due to the nature of the game.

Probably not. Unless someone has any means of knowing my alignment. The only reason why I knew Scotty most likely wasn't bad was due to vote pattern analysis which I pointed out previously here:

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

This makes me wonder why you would say I didn't kick up any fuss when I did disagree. (I'm currently catching up in the thread to become more involved in the game)

Wilgy, to attempt to put a finer point on what Epi said: you seem plenty happy to say "I told you so" and throw in snarky comments about how we're headed down the wrong path, but when it comes to the actual work of proposing a better option/building a case/even actually trying to convince people to move their votes rather than just saying they're poor votes, you've fallen woefully short. So your condescension rings hollow.

lol BDH

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

It depends on the player. The fundamental rule of mafia being harder to lynch than civilian will be unchanging due to the nature of the game.

Probably not. Unless someone has any means of knowing my alignment. The only reason why I knew Scotty most likely wasn't bad was due to vote pattern analysis which I pointed out previously here:

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

This makes me wonder why you would say I didn't kick up any fuss when I did disagree. (I'm currently catching up in the thread to become more involved in the game)

Single token post.

Spacedaisy wrote:So, I got caught up last night making goodies for Alex's birthday today and clear forgot that the night ended last night. I will write the post now. Thanks for your patience guys!

I'm calling baddie tricksteryness on this...enough so that SD is probably getting my vote Day 4....if it ever comes.

It's like friggin ALASKA up in here, amirite?

BigDamnHero wrote:It's like friggin ALASKA up in here, amirite?

It's so cold in Alaska.