The Syndicate

I don't think we've ever had a Golden vs. Dom lynch battle. This should be interesting.

@Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

Do you have any reason to trust any of these reads?
Did you plan on following up on those reads?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

Care to answer the question?

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:48 am I don't think we've ever had a Golden vs. Dom lynch battle. This should be interesting.

Get me lynched and I'll do my best to make sure it's you the day after.

If it's a lynch battle, it's a lynch battle. I think it's in your best interests not to turn it into that.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

Do you have any reason to trust any of these reads?
Did you plan on following up on those reads?

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.


A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

Care to answer the question?

Would your read of me be affected if I cared not to?

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:05 pm I thought Marcus was nutella for similar reasons and this was clearly incorrect, but I still think the overall philosophy that Marcus would be careful in a tight vote isn't flawed.

"Incorrect, clear-lyyyy"??
Golden's bad, clear-lyyyy
Team knowledge, clear-lyyyy
Lynching you's now easy

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:15 pm
Epignosis
insertnamehere
Long Con
speedchuck
sprityo
timmer

These men all knew Pop-pyyyy
One is clearly bad-dieeee
'Cause they won't let me be freeee
And keep stalking me

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

Do you have any reason to trust any of these reads?
Did you plan on following up on those reads?

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.


A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

His entire contribution to the game is one big no u. Dom is trying to shield his lack of actual content behind a single case that he's only picked up because I voted for him.

I've been on a scum team with Dom a lot. I've seen his brain from the inside. Nothing about this Dom looks remotely town to me.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:27 am P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:05 pm I thought Marcus was nutella for similar reasons and this was clearly incorrect, but I still think the overall philosophy that Marcus would be careful in a tight vote isn't flawed.

"Incorrect, clear-lyyyy"??
Golden's bad, clear-lyyyy
Team knowledge, clear-lyyyy
Lynching you's now easy

Well, I suppose it's possible she was killed by herself, but unlikely I would say.

Anyone who actually suspects me, please just vote for me. Let's expose the bullshitters for what they are. There is literally zero chance Dom thinks I'm on my bad game, he knows me far too well for that, and I'm beginning to worry about ricos persostance as well.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.

So... can you summarize what Golden's case on me was prior to my return to the game?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

1) Golden's reasons for suspecting me are shifty. He claims it stems from two separate things that are incompatible. He has not claimed that the latter action (*defense* of nutella) encourage the former (still not sure what this was). He seems to just shift to what is most rhetorically convenient.
2) Golden claimed nutella was non-committal, and thus, bad. He later made a post where he said, "Dom could be bad, or not".
3) Golden still has not answered the questions that others posed to him. The questions he answered with dismissive questions of his own were designed to avoid having a record of accountability. When this was brought to him, he simply said that the others had not answered his questions either-- which entirely misses the point.


These are my main points against Golden. I'd love to see him discuss them in full rather than claim they are *no u's* or dismissing them otherwise like he did to the questions posed to him.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:20 am

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:34 am INH, gth who is bad?

The whole entire world...

Care to answer the question?

Would your read of me be affected if I cared not to?

A bit.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:40 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:13 am

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:03 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:58 am @Dom's kinda question

1. I noted that I thought that you were acting kinda suspicious.
2. Of a consensus from players who know your meta was saying something was off, of course I'd take that into consideration. If everyone is suspicious of someone and could provide reasons why, I'd probably be suspicious too.

Do you have any reason to trust any of these reads?
Did you plan on following up on those reads?

At the time Golden was accusing you, you were MIA and I leaned town on Golden. So I trusted those reads a bit.

You started talking and the reasons behind those reads dissipated. And then you and Golden started your giant lynch battle and some new ones potentially arose. I'll have to read over your guys' interactions with Nut and each other after I get some much deserved sleep.


A question for now: Dom, what do you think points most to Golden being bad? Golden, what points most to Dom being bad?

His entire contribution to the game is one big no u. Dom is trying to shield his lack of actual content behind a single case that he's only picked up because I voted for him.

I've been on a scum team with Dom a lot. I've seen his brain from the inside. Nothing about this Dom looks remotely town to me.

Wanna detail this or just say platitudes without substantiating them?

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:42 am Anyone who actually suspects me, please just vote for me. Let's expose the bullshitters for what they are. There is literally zero chance Dom thinks I'm on my bad game, he knows me far too well for that, and I'm beginning to worry about ricos persostance as well.

This is a false dilemma if I've ever seen one.
I can suspect you, but want to save my vote for many reasons.

"I'm Poppy"

Fuck

We also have a decent theory on who Marcus is. So.. like... that's another avenue I'd like to explore.

Golden, why force a false dilemma like that?
What is the civ gain?

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:56 am We also have a decent theory on who Marcus is. So.. like... that's another avenue I'd like to explore.

Golden, why force a false dilemma like that?
What is the civ gain?

Good question. Why did you force a false dilemma?

I wouldn't know, since it wasn't me that did it. I actively told you I don't think it's in your interests to force one. But you seem solely interested in talking about me so far.

If you come after me and succeed, it's not going to look good afterwards. It will look like what I think it is - a defensive no u based on nothing except my vote for you.

Vague platitudes are fine with me.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:48 amI want you to answer questions that are asked of you because you seem to not want to have any sort of accountability in this game.

Well, you're going to end up sorely disappointed then! I'm not answering questions just cos. I'm not fussed about having no accountability

I have no intention of playing this game the way others would like me to play it.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:40 am

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:27 am P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:05 pm I thought Marcus was nutella for similar reasons and this was clearly incorrect, but I still think the overall philosophy that Marcus would be careful in a tight vote isn't flawed.

"Incorrect, clear-lyyyy"??
Golden's bad, clear-lyyyy
Team knowledge, clear-lyyyy
Lynching you's now easy

Well, I suppose it's possible she was killed by herself, but unlikely I would say.

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Oh right, now I seeee
Roles just flew by meeee
Sad as that may beeee
You're still bad, guarantee

Your guarantee isn't worth very much, then.

Fuck, man. Fuck! I'm more than a little drunk right now, and I can't believe that Poppy came back. Rico, your blob emoji thing was fresh and new, and carried none of the annoying subdrama that Poppy did. I'm so sad right now.

Here's the post I was gonna post before I caught up on the Poppy situation.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:19 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:58 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:56 pm My universally panned vote for Wilgy didn't go anywhere after Made came back civ, so I'm no longer pinged by him.

Could you re-explain the connection here real quick

It was when Wilgy and Made were going "You're going to get me lynched!" "No, you're going to get me lynched!" I thought it might be teammates having fun in-thread, but apparently it was nothing.

I can't really recall an instance of teammates doing that. It sounds fun on paper, but does that really happen?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:22 pm@Epi new stuff
I don't get it. Why would voting last minute suggest that to you? I knew I wasn't voting for one of the leading three and I had said that earlier my vote would be inconsequential even if I was Marcus. Since I was voting for the lead. I'd think the people who didn't vote are more likely to be Marcus.

I would respond by putting a vote on someone early today, but I don't know if that would change your mind.

Actually, you proving you aren't Marcus would be a good move. I'd like to see a situation where that can happen. "I'd think the people who didn't vote are more likely to be Marcus. ", you say... perhaps you should delve more deeply into that train of thought, if you are actually not Marcus. Who are these people?

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:26 pm Long Con, I'm happy to make any kind of statement that people would ask me to make. There is no statement I could make which would ever point a lie detector to me being mafia.

But I also think I've made plenty of statements which are lie detectable. I think I put out a statement earlier on who I thought could fit into each team... this ought to be appreciably false if I was in either one of them.

I'm 95% satisfied with your responses here. It's not 100% because I can imagine situations where you could be bad and say these things and still clear a lie detect. Do you see what I mean?

I was going to post that I was satisfied completely with it, but then a voice in my head said "Yeah, but what if...?" and it's not airtight.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:40 pm Here's one:

"I had no hand in deciding that Nutella should die, nor do I know her affiliation"

And for the record, I don't think that's what Dom was doing, LC. If he was, he would have said so.

That could still be true if you're on that baddie team, and your teammates decided on the nutella kill without your input. Like I said. 95%.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:36 am Meh, Epi and LC too.

Golden and TonyStarkPrime based on current goings-on.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:48 am I don't think we've ever had a Golden vs. Dom lynch battle. This should be interesting.

Put me on Team Vote Golden, if that's the case. As much as I hate to be there - Golden always looks like the Shining Knight Civvie to me, and he does this time as well.

Of course it can't be airtight. If it was, it wouldn't meet the LD rules (like how 'I'm not mafia' doesn't). That's the idea. The other 5% is the part where you look at the edge cases and go 'yeah, I'm satisfied'. For example, knowing me as you do, do you ever believe I would not have input into a kill? A might not (so LD statement works) but in actual fact I would always. It's part of what's required of me when I sign up.

Gah, that didn't come out right. The point is, I left the 5% intentionally to insure it would be LDable and you could bridge the gap with meta.

Thanks for quoting where Dom made this a false dilemma right before accusing me of doing the same

TIMMER!!!!!!

Get in here buddy.

Shit, I'm so sorry guys, I'm here, I didn't even remember that I had signed up for this. Reading now!

Annnnd apparently I'm too drunk and tired to read righ tnow. I'l get into the game tonorrow

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:27 am Fuck, man. Fuck! I'm more than a little drunk right now, and I can't believe that Poppy came back. Rico, your blob emoji thing was fresh and new, and carried none of the annoying subdrama that Poppy did. I'm so sad right now.

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Darling, what can I doooo
If INH is so shrewwww
Hexing in plain-viewwww
Lynch him, it'll be true

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:59 pm DF, name four players you think are town and two you don't.

Golden
Epi
Rico (because hindering yourself with such a prohibitive obligation doesn't seem as likely to be a baddie move)
Speed


Tony (because Marcus)
Lorab (I don't necessarily think she's bad, but none of her posts have made me feel more civ about her)

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:27 am Fuck, man. Fuck! I'm more than a little drunk right now, and I can't believe that Poppy came back. Rico, your blob emoji thing was fresh and new, and carried none of the annoying subdrama that Poppy did. I'm so sad right now.

What's all this about Poppy? I know she's a creepy character on Youtube, didn't know she'd reached Mafia.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:32 am Gah, that didn't come out right. The point is, I left the 5% intentionally to insure it would be LDable and you could bridge the gap with meta.

Thanks for quoting where Dom made this a false dilemma right before accusing me of doing the same

What false dilemma did I create?
I just observed that I don't recall us both trying to lynch each other at the same time.

Notice that Golden has ignored the posts I make on him, only calling it a no u.

LD rules?

JackofHearts2005 voted but hasn't posted yet.

I wanted to say the below (well, not exactly the below), but Ricochet beat me to it.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:36 am P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:15 pm
Epignosis
insertnamehere
Long Con
speedchuck
sprityo
timmer

These men all knew Pop-pyyyy
One is clearly bad-dieeee
'Cause they won't let me be freeee
And keep stalking me

All I can say in my own defense is that I would never bring back this foolishness (not to mention that it is a clearer avenue for communication than what you had been doing).

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:28 amLD rules?

Yeah, could someone familiar with lie detection explain the rules? I was about to throw crap at Golden for making a terrible waste of a lie-detector statement, considering that his worst post of the game.

linki: yeah it doesn't make much sense for a post limitation to be placed on the only person who already was using a post limitation

speedchuck (Elohcin)
Golden (DrWilgy)
sprityo (JackofHearts2005)
Dom (Golden) (Epignosis)
Made (speedchuck) (Neverwhere) (insertnamehere) (Boomslang)
DrWilgy (DFaraday) (Long Con)
Ricochet (Made) (sprityo) (Lorab)
DFaraday (TonyStarkPrime)

Nut, Dom, timmer, and Rico didn't vote for anyone. We know Nut and Rico were around, but Nut is unlikely Marcus because that would mean a misdirect and I don't see one on the roles list.

Elo voted early but for someone who received little lynch attention for the rest of the day.

DF popped in and also voted for someone who it seemed was not in lynch contention.

Epi, Boom, and TSP all voted in the last minute for people either not in lynch contention or already ahead.

Marcus could be any of these easily, and with two teammates it could make sense for Marcus to throw down a vote on even a suspect and direct their team to make sure that person doesn't get lynched (why I included DF and Elo, two who could have done this easily).

Really, Lorab is the only one cleared from Marcus suspicion.

Lie Detector rules. The concept that Carlos can't Lie Detect statements that are made for Lie Detection, like "I am one of the Citizens of Night Vale", "I am Civilian", "I'm not Mafia", etc. I don't know if such rules are in place for this game.

Dom, were you not making the point that Golden was skirting answering your questions to him as LD avoidance? I thought I was agreeing with you, but maybe it's entirely my idea.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:32 amGah, that didn't come out right. The point is, I left the 5% intentionally to insure it would be LDable and you could bridge the gap with meta.

I don't believe that, that sounds like something you made up after the accusation.

Thanks for quoting where Dom made this a false dilemma right before accusing me of doing the same

Accusing you of making a false dilemma?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 3:46 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:27 am Fuck, man. Fuck! I'm more than a little drunk right now, and I can't believe that Poppy came back. Rico, your blob emoji thing was fresh and new, and carried none of the annoying subdrama that Poppy did. I'm so sad right now.

What's all this about Poppy? I know she's a creepy character on Youtube, didn't know she'd reached Mafia.

Rico posted like that for the whole game until we had to kill him out of annoyance last game we played together.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:05 am speedchuck (Elohcin)
Golden (DrWilgy)
sprityo (JackofHearts2005)
Dom (Golden) (Epignosis)
Made (speedchuck) (Neverwhere) (insertnamehere) (Boomslang)
DrWilgy (DFaraday) (Long Con)
Ricochet (Made) (sprityo) (Lorab)
DFaraday (TonyStarkPrime)

Nut, Dom, timmer, and Rico didn't vote for anyone. We know Nut and Rico were around, but Nut is unlikely Marcus because that would mean a misdirect and I don't see one on the roles list.

Elo voted early but for someone who received little lynch attention for the rest of the day.

DF popped in and also voted for someone who it seemed was not in lynch contention.

Epi, Boom, and TSP all voted in the last minute for people either not in lynch contention or already ahead.

Marcus could be any of these easily, and with two teammates it could make sense for Marcus to throw down a vote on even a suspect and direct their team to make sure that person doesn't get lynched (why I included DF and Elo, two who could have done this easily).

Really, Lorab is the only one cleared from Marcus suspicion.

Also: "Made (speedchuck) (Neverwhere) (insertnamehere) (Boomslang)"... those guys could be Marcus hiding in the big pileup.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:36 am P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:15 pm
Epignosis
insertnamehere
Long Con
speedchuck
sprityo
timmer

These men all knew Pop-pyyyy
One is clearly bad-dieeee
'Cause they won't let me be freeee
And keep stalking me

Whoa, just hold on a sec. I didn't quite pick this up last night, but I'd like to say for the record that I did not curse you. No goddamn way I resurrected Poppy.

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:15 am Whoa, just hold on a sec. I didn't quite pick this up last night, but I'd like to say for the record that I did not curse you. No goddamn way I resurrected Poppy.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:54 am All I can say in my own defense is that I would never bring back this foolishness (not to mention that it is a clearer avenue for communication than what you had been doing).

All it takes is in-teeent
For the team to as-seeent
And send the hexer my waaaay
To torment me every day

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:05 am Nut, Dom, timmer, and Rico didn't vote for anyone. We know Nut and Rico were around, but Nut is unlikely Marcus because that would mean a misdirect and I don't see one on the roles list.

I was sound as-leeeep
Couldn't hear a beeeep
Don't turn me in a sheeeep
Like a wolfie creep

Shame he dodged Q&A

Golden that is...

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:46 am P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:15 am Whoa, just hold on a sec. I didn't quite pick this up last night, but I'd like to say for the record that I did not curse you. No goddamn way I resurrected Poppy.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:54 am All I can say in my own defense is that I would never bring back this foolishness (not to mention that it is a clearer avenue for communication than what you had been doing).

All it takes is in-teeent
For the team to as-seeent
And send the hexer my waaaay
To torment me every day

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:05 am Nut, Dom, timmer, and Rico didn't vote for anyone. We know Nut and Rico were around, but Nut is unlikely Marcus because that would mean a misdirect and I don't see one on the roles list.

I was sound as-leeeep
Couldn't hear a beeeep
Don't turn me in a sheeeep
Like a wolfie creep

I put you on the same level of suspicion I put myself: not very much. You almost definitely would have voted for Made if you were Marcus, as it would have saved you the trouble of worrying about potentially being lynched.



I'm feeling worse about Golden and better about Dom.
A question to Golden: if Dom is bad, who is bad with him?
A question to Dom: if Golden is bad, who is bad but not on the same team?

Why is it clear that it was INH - because Poppy originated in his Blue Velvet game?

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:25 pm Why is it clear that it was INH - because Poppy originated in his Blue Velvet game?

Rico thought INH was bad before. This is just the icing on the cake. If I have time today, I'll probably do an INH iso.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:25 pm Why is it clear that it was INH - because Poppy originated in his Blue Velvet game?

P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y I'm Poppy!
P O P P Y That's me!

If none who knew Pop-pyyy
Wished her again to seeee
Then INH re-maiiins
Sadistic in his ways

Of course, it could still be youuuu
Or anyone so cuc-koooo
But he is the safe beeeet
That a wolfie you'll get

One way to figure out who Marcus is: everyone votes for themself. Whoever dies is Marcus.