Re: Buffy the Vampire Slayer: At the Hellmouth (Day 2)
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:16 pm
rabbit, timmer is dead lol and was adam
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
No but I think you should at least read the first post and/or all phase-end host posts so you have the slightest idea of who is even still in the game much less what is going on.
Does speedchuck not fit that? Though I guess you mean for the second person as well. I just ask that it's not me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:21 pm Tbh Nova and DF have the scent of that random player who gets chinese fire drill lynched at the end of day because the actual candidates manage to somehow wriggle themselves off the hook that results in everyone posting "oh dang" and such after the day is over.
For once can we lynch someone that it takes balls to lynch? I often daydream about just somehow convincing half the thread to vote Jimmy or Sloonei just because it's so random that it's likely to work. All the same old players always getting knocked off gets boring.
Hey, keep in mind that the top 2 people will be lynched, so chuck is already up there and if you don't want me to be lynched too it would be more helpful if you vote for nova at the moment.LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:21 pm rabbit8 Eye me all you want.
And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.
In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.
I could lynch Kyle. I have not been at all inspired by his play so far.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:23 pm Let's talk about Kyle. He's a big name, capable of a big game and I barely feel like he's posted in this game. I find that lame.
That makes more sense, actually. Moving vote now.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:23 pmHey, keep in mind that the top 2 people will be lynched, so chuck is already up there and if you don't want me to be lynched too it would be more helpful if you vote for nova at the moment.LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:21 pm rabbit8 Eye me all you want.
And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.
In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.
But srsly, the lack ofLoRab wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:21 pm rabbit8 Eye me all you want.
And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.
In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.
the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
I want to survive, so at this point I am hoping people will vote for anyone who is likely to get more votes than me. I don't have much reason to think DF is town. I know that I am town and I really, really, really do not want to get lynched.
Srsly, and I am not the only one it seems.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 pmthe only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
Your vote is on DF?MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:21 pm Tbh Nova and DF have the scent of that random player who gets chinese fire drill lynched at the end of day because the actual candidates manage to somehow wriggle themselves off the hook that results in everyone posting "oh dang" and such after the day is over.
For once can we lynch someone that it takes balls to lynch? I often daydream about just somehow convincing half the thread to vote Jimmy or Sloonei just because it's so random that it's likely to work. All the same old players always getting knocked off gets boring.
Kyle, bad?Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 pmthe only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
I believe nutella is a civ. DFaraday was my first ping in the game. I don't want to lynch nutella. Speedchuck I am meh on and he already has a ton of votes.
disagreeing with you doesnt make me mafiaS~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:32 pmSrsly, and I am not the only one it seems.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 pmthe only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.
Say what? I fucking hate to defend SVS here, but huh?Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:38 pmdisagreeing with you doesnt make me mafiaS~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:32 pmSrsly, and I am not the only one it seems.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 pmthe only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.
tunneling is assuming you're right about something and ignoring all evidence indicating that your opinion might be wrong.
I have 4 more pages to catch up on. brb
I knew i, I thought I had more time. lol. I'm almost finished.
It has nothing to do with disagreeing with me. Sig doesn't agree with me, I feel great about him. It has to do with you have no valid opinions other than saving Chuck.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:38 pmdisagreeing with you doesnt make me mafiaS~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:32 pmSrsly, and I am not the only one it seems.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 pmthe only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?
because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.
seriously svs?So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.
And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.
tunneling is assuming you're right about something and ignoring all evidence indicating that your opinion might be wrong.
I have 4 more pages to catch up on. brb
You side with JC and Lorab?
No. Does it?MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:44 pmTheir vote being where it is had no impact on why mine is there. Should it?
It's not important rn but this is an inaccurate portrayal of my playstyle. I have never been known for slinging thoughts without restraint, not since like 2010rabbit8 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:01 pmKylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:21 pmwell i obviously love you, but i didn't see your line of questioning as being something I could personally contribute to so i opted instead to wait and see how other people responded to it.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:10 pmIt's moreso the lack of entertaining me and then answering her instead? You're either teammates or you hate me. Knowing that you love me, it's gotta be the former.
Why do you need other’s opinions of things to make your decisions? I’ve always seen you slinging your thoughts out there without restraint. But now?
Did you though?MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:47 pmI just said it doesn't?
My mind is going. The other day I made coffee. Hours later I asked my wife if it was old.....
Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:50 pmIt's not important rn but this is an inaccurate portrayal of my playstyle. I have never been known for slinging thoughts without restraint, not since like 2010rabbit8 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:01 pmKylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:21 pmwell i obviously love you, but i didn't see your line of questioning as being something I could personally contribute to so i opted instead to wait and see how other people responded to it.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:10 pmIt's moreso the lack of entertaining me and then answering her instead? You're either teammates or you hate me. Knowing that you love me, it's gotta be the former.
Why do you need other’s opinions of things to make your decisions? I’ve always seen you slinging your thoughts out there without restraint. But now?