The Syndicate

Vesta wrote:I am still a bit hung up on Artemis. Looking back at votes, she voted for Eros early, when it would make the most sense to hold your vote to defend yourself since she was a top candidate all day. The only way that makes sense is if she knew she would be saved. Lynch switch, votes stolen, etc. The insanification of Artemis also makes no sense. When I went back to see how she defended herself yesterday, it became clear there is no rhyme or reason. She's posting literally anything. It's not a story or specific video and not an insanifier, so I don't see how it isn't faked. Has anyone else been insanified like this so far?

I normally don't like to vote people insanified, but Artemis did have a chance to defend herself and would have been voted again if not for this insanification. Makes me rethink my possible vote for Fortuna today.

Chronos wrote:

Medusa wrote:Pluto and Eros, not contributing is not a jab at low posters. It means, not giving opinions or asking questions about posts, not actively searching for suspects, etc. can you two give reasons why you think it's more likely that Fortuna is a civ? Can you give reasons why you think that being suspicious of Fortuna makes someone bad?

And no, the only point I saw brought up about Artemis was a 'possible' slip, which she defended, and was even defended by another civ, Prometheus. Admittedly, I was a bit suspicious of Prom, but when he flipped civ, I stopped debating the whole 'possible slip' thing. If there was something more compelling about Artemis, then I must have missed it. Surviving a lynch could be due to a civ role, so Im holding off on her. The slip idea just didn't cut it for me.

Linki- Chronos, I have no clue. I don't know how to interpret Fortuna's silence. She apparently has defenders, which could also be a civ situation. It might be coming down to one group of defenders vs. another.

Just wondering if you thought it was possible....

I'm placing my vote on Athena today... but tomrorow I'd like to ehar from ARtemis.

Vesta wrote:I am still a bit hung up on Artemis. Looking back at votes, she voted for Eros early, when it would make the most sense to hold your vote to defend yourself since she was a top candidate all day. The only way that makes sense is if she knew she would be saved. Lynch switch, votes stolen, etc. The insanification of Artemis also makes no sense. When I went back to see how she defended herself yesterday, it became clear there is no rhyme or reason. She's posting literally anything. It's not a story or specific video and not an insanifier, so I don't see how it isn't faked. Has anyone else been insanified like this so far?

I normally don't like to vote people insanified, but Artemis did have a chance to defend herself and would have been voted again if not for this insanification. Makes me rethink my possible vote for Fortuna today.

Medusa wrote:Eros, I looked at your link to your Artemis suspicion. What did that mean? And you never mentioned her again. So it seems odd that you are suspicious of her, and question why I don't see the case on her. So far, there isn't one.

But I'm willing to wait until she is no longer pranked to decide on whether there is a case or not.

I think I'm going to wait on Fortuna and vote Eros instead. He's entirely too deceptive for my taste.

Persephone wrote:Eros: no need to get your panties in a twist. But again I will ask why are you defending someone that you do not know the alignment of?

Why isn't Fortuna answering herself tbqh your last post feels overly defensive of someone YOU do not even know is civ.

I do not understand your vehemence against me still but I guess that does not matter to you.

Defend herself against what is just laughable at this point. Obviously there is something to defend against since you have been doing all day lol

This was not the way to prove she is townie. All you have proven is she will not cannot or won`t defend herself. Which I absolutely do not understand.

Eros wrote:

Medusa wrote:Eros, I looked at your link to your Artemis suspicion. What did that mean? And you never mentioned her again. So it seems odd that you are suspicious of her, and question why I don't see the case on her. So far, there isn't one.

But I'm willing to wait until she is no longer pranked to decide on whether there is a case or not.

I think I'm going to wait on Fortuna and vote Eros instead. He's entirely too deceptive for my taste.

You asked a question. Would you like a response before voting?

Ceres wrote:I think Eros' defense of Fortuna sounded pretty reasonable. Could you elaborate on your Medusa and Persephone cases?

Mars wrote:

Vesta wrote:I am still a bit hung up on Artemis. Looking back at votes, she voted for Eros early, when it would make the most sense to hold your vote to defend yourself since she was a top candidate all day. The only way that makes sense is if she knew she would be saved. Lynch switch, votes stolen, etc. The insanification of Artemis also makes no sense. When I went back to see how she defended herself yesterday, it became clear there is no rhyme or reason. She's posting literally anything. It's not a story or specific video and not an insanifier, so I don't see how it isn't faked. Has anyone else been insanified like this so far?

I normally don't like to vote people insanified, but Artemis did have a chance to defend herself and would have been voted again if not for this insanification. Makes me rethink my possible vote for Fortuna today.

No, they haven't. And it seems odd to have an insanifier that prevents the victim from apparently making any contribution at all, especially when we've seen at least two other, more expected, insanifications this game. I think Artemis is faking. And since I'd better vote now to make sure... *votes Artemis*

I don't trust Persephone either. I really don't see the case on Fortuna; the whole thing about "she voted Atlas, and then he died!" sounds more likely to be setup than bad playing, and at any rate screams WIFOM. I don't like how several people are going after her for, in my view, almost nothing.

Hercules wrote:Persephons. Voted Persephone previous reasone for the previous reasone for the for the for the for the for the previous revious revious revious reasons. Voted Persephons. Voted Persephons. Voted Persephons. Voted Persephons. Voted Persephone for the for the for the previous reasone for the previous reasone for the for the preasone for the preasone preasons. Voted Persephone for the previous reasons. Voted Persephone for the previous revious reasone preasons. Voted Persephone preasons. Voted Perseph

Eros wrote:

Persephone wrote:Eros: no need to get your panties in a twist. But again I will ask why are you defending someone that you do not know the alignment of?

Why isn't Fortuna answering herself tbqh your last post feels overly defensive of someone YOU do not even know is civ.

I do not understand your vehemence against me still but I guess that does not matter to you.

Defend herself against what is just laughable at this point. Obviously there is something to defend against since you have been doing all day lol

This was not the way to prove she is townie. All you have proven is she will not cannot or won`t defend herself. Which I absolutely do not understand.

Answering your volley of questions and suspecting you is now vehemence?

Persephone wrote:

Eros wrote:

Persephone wrote:Eros: no need to get your panties in a twist. But again I will ask why are you defending someone that you do not know the alignment of?

Why isn't Fortuna answering herself tbqh your last post feels overly defensive of someone YOU do not even know is civ.

I do not understand your vehemence against me still but I guess that does not matter to you.

Defend herself against what is just laughable at this point. Obviously there is something to defend against since you have been doing all day lol

This was not the way to prove she is townie. All you have proven is she will not cannot or won`t defend herself. Which I absolutely do not understand.

Answering your volley of questions and suspecting you is now vehemence?

Thats how your response read to me. No need for eyerolling but it is what I feel.
I am sorry I suspect someone who has 3 people defending her but she has not posted one word about it herself. If it is suspicious to try and find baddies then I am very guilty. You do not find it odd that 3 people are defending one person who hasn't posted?

Persephone wrote:Cere:s tbh Idk wtf to think after today. I cannot believe I am getting votes because I was suspicious of someone who has yet to respond at all not just to me but to anyone. What do you think of the reasons for voting me?
Who do you think you will vote for?

I have the same gut feeling about Apollo still too.

Eros wrote:And Persephone's timbre rattles me.

Ceres wrote:As far as Artemis goes, I'm not sure she's faking insanification, because if she did, she'd have my posts or Mars' or Phoenix's to copy. Athena suggested a curse in response to Mars' post who was talking about insanification, not a curse. I wonder if this isn't some sort of a slip from Athena. This is just too convenient. It would be beyond obvious that if Athena was targeted for a NK Artemis was the first person everyone would look at. What sort of baddie does that? It's too irresponsible and frankly, too stupid. And yet, what if that was the idea? One survived a lynching and one survived an NK. And I'm tempted to believe Athena had a curse slip. Fuck!

I don't have an actual case on Apollo, just my gut feeling for now. I wonder if Poseidon will conveniently show up to vote in this poll.

Ceres wrote:

Persephone wrote:Cere:s tbh Idk wtf to think after today. I cannot believe I am getting votes because I was suspicious of someone who has yet to respond at all not just to me but to anyone. What do you think of the reasons for voting me?
Who do you think you will vote for?

I have the same gut feeling about Apollo still too.

I don't have anything on you right now, but maybe that's just the thing - you come across as way too civ. That's why I was curios to hear from Eros.

Eros wrote:Artemis voted for me claiming to be drunk. We have been told that one team of evildoers is not American. Unless Artemis was drunk at 6:22 EST or earlier (somewhat unlikely, I think), then it would make sense that Artemis is from the UK, where it would have been very late at night.

And Persephone's timbre rattles me.

Eros wrote:

Ceres wrote:

Persephone wrote:Cere:s tbh Idk wtf to think after today. I cannot believe I am getting votes because I was suspicious of someone who has yet to respond at all not just to me but to anyone. What do you think of the reasons for voting me?
Who do you think you will vote for?

I have the same gut feeling about Apollo still too.

I don't have anything on you right now, but maybe that's just the thing - you come across as way too civ. That's why I was curios to hear from Eros.

That's the kind of timbre I mean, Ceres. Offensive over little and defensive over little.

Persephone wrote:I give up really.

You are only responding to a small suspicion of Fortuna blowing into maddening proportions to encompass Mars, Hercules and me. All she had to do was answer herself, but instead you answered for her, still are.

You still have not shown why she is a civ.

I have never said I was voting for her I still have yet to vote. I do have other suspicions you know. I am still waiting to be convinced but I guess that will not happen.

Persephone wrote:Well it is the truth I received vote and I dont know wtf to think.

I have given my reasons (several times today) why she is bad now give me reasons why she is good.

Damn right I am defensive.

Medusa wrote:Eros, do you believe everything wise ass jack says? You haven't discussed it much.

Persephone wrote:Well I guess we will have to disagree and wait (if we can be so fortunate) to hear from Fortuna herself. That would be ever so nice.

Sorry I miss typed but I hadn't checked votes so I really thought I had more than one. My bad.

Eros wrote:

Medusa wrote:Eros, do you believe everything wise ass jack says? You haven't discussed it much.

Do we have a reason not to believe it?

Medusa wrote:

Eros wrote:

Medusa wrote:Eros, do you believe everything wise ass jack says? You haven't discussed it much.

Do we have a reason not to believe it?

Your only post about Artemis was on the word of wj. That made you suspicious of her, but vote forcing never occurred to you. Mm-hmm.