The Syndicate

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:10 pm**

Now date for real bbl

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm**

Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:06 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:05 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:04 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm @leetic

who do you scumread outside of scrappy?

feels kinda odd to focus the sock puppet over talking about people who we know the identities of and feels like a bit of a cop out
Epi, Sloonei, and you since your effort isn't impressive. You still haven't answered my question as far as I can tell.
Which question? ?_?
The one I asked you. It's called an ISO, you can ctrl+F through it.
Or you could. Restate the question?

Why are you reading me based off of one game when you have experience with me in at least three? It doesn't really demonstrate a good-faith effort in reading my slot

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm**

Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:08 pm pyxxy wagon why?

Scrappy vote on pyxxy why?

Nothing about Pyxxy thus far has stood out as towny to me, my bystander reads are at least trying or have something there even if small, but there's no towny flair to Pyxxy at all. I also prefer a vote on him to Delta and Seanzie

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm**

I'd elim Rico.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:08 pm pyxxy wagon why?

Scrappy vote on pyxxy why?
Nothing about Pyxxy thus far has stood out as towny to me, my bystander reads are at least trying or have something there even if small, but there's no towny flair to Pyxxy at all. I also prefer a vote on him to Delta and Seanzie

What is town flair wrt Pyxxy? From re-reading, pyxxy last post at least argued that "flair" proved a wolf-play trait.

Wagons still within shifting range, do you prefer vote on him over falcon or leetic as well?

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:08 pm pyxxy wagon why?

Scrappy vote on pyxxy why?
Nothing about Pyxxy thus far has stood out as towny to me, my bystander reads are at least trying or have something there even if small, but there's no towny flair to Pyxxy at all. I also prefer a vote on him to Delta and Seanzie

$10 this is sloonei

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.

I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.

Why

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:18 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

And I want a toilet made of pure gold!

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:18 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:19 pm**

Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
Why

Because I can remember more AMA's from him than content. Something about that bothers me.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:20 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:18 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

I'm going to assume this was actually supposed to be in response to my toilet post.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:20 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:19 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
Why
Because I can remember more AMA's from him than content. Something about that bothers me.

AMA

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:23 pm**

can I get in on this AMA business

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:23 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:20 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:18 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

I'm going to assume this was actually supposed to be in response to my toilet post.

It was 50/50. I actually had that post quoted, but then thought "no, let's be serious for now".

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:24 pm**

Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:20 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:19 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
Why
Because I can remember more AMA's from him than content. Something about that bothers me.
AMA

No.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:24 pm**

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:23 pm can I get in on this AMA business

It's a pyramid scheme dude

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:25 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:19 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.
Why
Because I can remember more AMA's from him than content. Something about that bothers me.

It also bothered me, like, why don't YOU bring content to US, instead of opening the door and sitting back and waiting.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:25 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:06 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:05 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:04 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm @leetic

who do you scumread outside of scrappy?

feels kinda odd to focus the sock puppet over talking about people who we know the identities of and feels like a bit of a cop out
Epi, Sloonei, and you since your effort isn't impressive. You still haven't answered my question as far as I can tell.
Which question? ?_?
The one I asked you. It's called an ISO, you can ctrl+F through it.
Or you could. Restate the question?
Why are you reading me based off of one game when you have experience with me in at least three? It doesn't really demonstrate a good-faith effort in reading my slot

I'm reading you based on a game I have firsthand experience with you in. Severance I was posting in the opposite thread and didnt keep up with the other thread aside from trying to get any points from potential votes going on. The role madness game I was primarily there for behind the scenes fixes.

I am focusing the game I have the most experience with v!you from because the other two.. I dont really have that, just watching on the sides if anything.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:28 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:40 am I can see 'Invisible Mode' players, as can some other Syndicate staff members. Just wanted to put that reminder out there.

If you want to be 100% stealthy and read the thread, then best to sign out first. I don't want this kind of thing on my mind.

This is probably old hat since I'm six pages behind, but you have to be logged in to see this thread.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:29 pm**

Anyways, I'll be running soon, and while I might occasionally glance at the thread before EoD, I won't be reading everything before EoD, and probably won't be able to answer many prompts, so if you want to know anything about me, now is your chance to AMA.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:25 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?
It's not even "I'm voting there because Epi made a point I agree with", it's just "I'm voting there because Epi said something about them". It's like you're trying to give us as little as possible

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm**

Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:08 pm pyxxy wagon why?

Scrappy vote on pyxxy why?
Nothing about Pyxxy thus far has stood out as towny to me, my bystander reads are at least trying or have something there even if small, but there's no towny flair to Pyxxy at all. I also prefer a vote on him to Delta and Seanzie
What is town flair wrt Pyxxy? From re-reading, pyxxy last post at least argued that "flair" proved a wolf-play trait.

Wagons still within shifting range, do you prefer vote on him over falcon or leetic as well?

Its more of a general thing than a Pyxxy specific thing, while I can find traits in other players that I would call 'townie flair' for some reason or another, I lack that reading through Pyxxy's ISO

If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm**

Oh yeah!

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:05 pmOkay, you can be town.

Carry on, good sir.

Unexpected response, but nice to see anyway.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:32 pm**

Spoiler: show

I'll keep this in mind, thank you.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:34 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm Oh yeah!

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:05 pmOkay, you can be town.

Carry on, good sir.
Unexpected response, but nice to see anyway.

You kept doubling down against me. Sometimes wolves do that when they get in over their head and don't know how to back out of suspicion, but your post had a very strong tone of indignance. Scum doesn't feel indignant like that.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:36 pm**

Dislike the pyxxy votes a lot

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm**

Not feeling good about sloonei or leetic uere

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.

OMGUS much?

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm**

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:36 pm Dislike the pyxxy votes a lot

Lame

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:38 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.
OMGUS much?

Yeah
Do something about it

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:38 pm**

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm Not feeling good about sloonei or leetic uere

This doesn't even deserve a response, just a letter

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:39 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:38 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.
OMGUS much?
Yeah
Do something about it

Already am, thank you very much

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:39 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:34 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm Oh yeah!

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:05 pmOkay, you can be town.

Carry on, good sir.
Unexpected response, but nice to see anyway.
You kept doubling down against me. Sometimes wolves do that when they get in over their head and don't know how to back out of suspicion, but your post had a very strong tone of indignance. Scum doesn't feel indignant like that.

Well, yeah, maybe indignant. But you can see why, right? Like, the contradiction about pushing/reluctant, and talking like I was pushing you at all when I wasn't, Seanzie, what am I to think of those things?

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:39 pm**

Can update the takes wrt inactives

Scrappy - the full tier list broke my glasses reaction.gif-style and would town lean off it, as in sensing it as a genuine effort, with neither momentum pressure nor reason for a shady sock to interrupt their shtick and generate comment. Usual allergy at listing and voting first, reasoning only upon asked, couple points off for that. [Side-note, got a ping about of Abigail asking about why some "bystanders" were ranked lower, instead of asking about the bottom lists] Would slot into pass for toDay.

pyxxy - would downgrade into concern zone based off effort. claimed "a catchup" only through memes and fluff. only defense is a meta claim, which I know nothing to validate.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:16 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:11 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:08 pm pyxxy wagon why?

Scrappy vote on pyxxy why?
Nothing about Pyxxy thus far has stood out as towny to me, my bystander reads are at least trying or have something there even if small, but there's no towny flair to Pyxxy at all. I also prefer a vote on him to Delta and Seanzie
What is town flair wrt Pyxxy? From re-reading, pyxxy last post at least argued that "flair" proved a wolf-play trait.

Wagons still within shifting range, do you prefer vote on him over falcon or leetic as well?
Its more of a general thing than a Pyxxy specific thing, while I can find traits in other players that I would call 'townie flair' for some reason or another, I lack that reading through Pyxxy's ISO

If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.

oh wait no I'm wrong

you're Caitlin

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm**

[VOTE: LEETIC] aubergine

Call it OMGUS if you like, you're not townie

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:41 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm [VOTE: LEETIC] aubergine

Call it OMGUS if you like, you're not townie

I'm not not not not not not townie

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:42 pm**

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:41 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm [VOTE: LEETIC] aubergine

Call it OMGUS if you like, you're not townie
I'm not not not not not not townie

Careful, Scrappy, he's a master at this!

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:42 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:41 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm [VOTE: LEETIC] aubergine

Call it OMGUS if you like, you're not townie
I'm not not not not not not townie
Careful, Scrappy, he's a master at this!

Terrifying

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm**

I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.

BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm**

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:00 am "Look, a hole!"

Well, that's not very nice.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm**

I’m having a really hard time developing reads right now so oops.

I’m not really seeing the case on leetic, but I think epi ended up saying they were town anyway.

Abigail, Rico, LC, and Epi are all solid town reads I’d say.

Falcon is playing within his mafia meta, but I’d want more time first to decide.

I don’t even recall seeing the case on Sean?

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm**

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.

Had someone in mind until they stopped capslocking.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:45 pm I’m having a really hard time developing reads right now so oops.

I’m not really seeing the case on leetic, but I think epi ended up saying they were town anyway.

Abigail, Rico, LC, and Epi are all solid town reads I’d say.

Falcon is playing within his mafia meta, but I’d want more time first to decide.

I don’t even recall seeing the case on Sean?

Seanzie case is in my ISO. Just look for Seanzies in there.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm**

Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:47 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info

Free to ignore me if you like, that works for me

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:39 pm
Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:34 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm Oh yeah!

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:05 pmOkay, you can be town.

Carry on, good sir.
Unexpected response, but nice to see anyway.
You kept doubling down against me. Sometimes wolves do that when they get in over their head and don't know how to back out of suspicion, but your post had a very strong tone of indignance. Scum doesn't feel indignant like that.
Well, yeah, maybe indignant. But you can see why, right? Like, the contradiction about pushing/reluctant, and talking like I was pushing you at all when I wasn't, Seanzie, what am I to think of those things?

I must go now. You can think what you want.

The Syndicate

Game of Champions: West Facility (Night 2)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)

Re: Game of Champions: West Facility (Day 1)