The Syndicate

Fair enough.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I idiot of the day

Awesome!

Typhoony wrote:Don't bother too much. LC made the damn thing and he says that it's basically impossible.

Whoa, that's actually pretty cool that LC made it, good job! Decoding stuff is so much fun though, I wish there was a way to figure it out. But yeah, after messing with it for a little while, it does seem mostly random. I could keep trying to find some patterns in it but I'm not sure how well that will work out.

Typhoony wrote:I'm assuming they are using this insanitygenerator?

http://www.mikesteffler.com/InsanityGenerator.html

infatuated don't know what NotInOxford talking Crude Yacht.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Typhoony wrote:I'm assuming they are using this insanitygenerator?

http://www.mikesteffler.com/InsanityGenerator.html

infatuated don't know what NotInOxford talking Crude Yacht.

Does this mean you're not using that link?

Rose Venomous Imp kidding. I protecting actually using this insanifier. :P Cheshire Cat

The insanifier always takes me to fond memories, lost people and old games.

I don't know why i'm waiting, Voting now.

That which significative made them drunk hath made me ambulance. Dusty Spoon quenched them halter given me fire.

I would love to respond to why you find me suspicious, but I have no idea what you are saying

Typhoony wrote:

a2thezebra wrote: Typhoony voted for Boulders right before Eke's and gave pretty much the same reasoning, with the added scummy bonus of mentioning that he's partially voting for Boulders because his two ideal choices aren't getting any traction.

Why is this an added scummy bonus?

To me, you mentioning that your Boulders vote is partially because your ideal choices weren't getting any traction comes across as disingenuous because the votes were already spread so thin that it didn't matter.

Typhoony

All of your posts in this current phase are either dodgy or opportunistic.

You're being a nub

a2thezebra wrote:

Typhoony wrote:

a2thezebra wrote: Typhoony voted for Boulders right before Eke's and gave pretty much the same reasoning, with the added scummy bonus of mentioning that he's partially voting for Boulders because his two ideal choices aren't getting any traction.

Why is this an added scummy bonus?

To me, you mentioning that your Boulders vote is partially because your ideal choices weren't getting any traction comes across as disingenuous because the votes were already spread so thin that it didn't matter.

Typhoony

What would be the point in spreading it out even thinner?

At this point, Typh looks like Typh to me. I have a bit of an eye on LC again for saying he was suspish since Typh did not vote right away, but Typh was always known for holding his vote till the end.

I am not liking the bandwagon forming on him.

What is your opinion on nutella SVS?
I know you have a really hard time reading her normally, but I'd still like to know

Typhoony wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Typhoony wrote:

a2thezebra wrote: Typhoony voted for Boulders right before Eke's and gave pretty much the same reasoning, with the added scummy bonus of mentioning that he's partially voting for Boulders because his two ideal choices aren't getting any traction.

Why is this an added scummy bonus?

To me, you mentioning that your Boulders vote is partially because your ideal choices weren't getting any traction comes across as disingenuous because the votes were already spread so thin that it didn't matter.

Typhoony

What would be the point in spreading it out even thinner?

Not everything has a point. Not everything scum-related has a point either.

So what you're saying is that my actions are actually not indicative of being a baddie, yet you voted for me anyway.

Makes sense.

Typhoony wrote:

Long Con wrote: Six hours later and you didn't vote for nutella. Since when do you need other people to vote before you do?

I'm sorry. I forgot that we don't want any discussion before we place our votes.

Good answer. I do find nutella more suspicious than I find you, so I'll vote there and give you a place to plant your "Stop the Typhoony Lynch Train" flag.

nutella wrote:Now there's crack theories about me being on Scotty's team? Whaaa?? No.

Posts like this one kind of set me off about her. "Crack theories" is extreme to say, it's a weird reaction to being accused of being Indy.

Typhoony wrote:Don't bother too much. LC made the damn thing and he says that it's basically impossible.

LOL did I say that? It's true that there is no decoding process. It just randomly substitutes words for words from a random list. No rhyme or reason.

Typhoony wrote:So what you're saying is that my actions are actually not indicative of being a baddie, yet you voted for me anyway.

Makes sense.

Don't play dumb, you know what I mean.

You're telling me that because there wouldn't be a point to spreading the votes out even thinner, your vote and subsequent vote post therefore isn't suspicious and shady? That's your defense?

im not gonna miss today i swear

making post hold your horses

a2thezebra wrote:

Typhoony wrote:So what you're saying is that my actions are actually not indicative of being a baddie, yet you voted for me anyway.

Makes sense.

Don't play dumb, you know what I mean.

You're telling me that because there wouldn't be a point to spreading the votes out even thinner, your vote and subsequent vote post therefore isn't suspicious and shady? That's your defense?

Don't play dumb, you know what I mean.

I am saying that "I did not want to spread the vote out any further" is not a valid reason to find my vote suspicious. That does not mean that you can not find other reasons to find my vote suspicious, you just haven't produced any. So my actions are not indicative of me being bad. If you can find something that is indicative of me being bad, I'd love to hear it from you. Good luck.

Voted nutella.

I won't be around until after the poll ends so I'm going to have to vote within the next 15 minutes or so even though I'm not really that suspicious of anyone. Spacedaisy surviving the last lynch and the posts she made just before that day ended made me even more convinced that she's civ. So I'm not sure if I want to vote for her again because of that or not. I agree that nutella has been acting a little odd, but I don't really want to vote when I'm so unsure about her. I also thought Typhoony's vote against boulders was a little too fast and lacked some justification, but like I said earlier, I'm not really sure if that's enough to go on.

i agree with the above ill be holding my vote for another hour or two

Typhoony wrote:What is your opinion on nutella SVS?
I know you have a really hard time reading her normally, but I'd still like to know

Well the post where she said (paraphrase), "yeah, I have been more involved than usual, but will now fall back to the disinterest & lackof opinons you generally expect of me" kind of got my attention. This one.

nutella wrote:lol I am definitely not organized. As usual I have no idea what's going on or who to suspect. My style may have felt different during the Scotty debacle because I ended up having some conviction about that, and of course I was wrong. Now I don't have any opinions

Now she does not have any opinions. Those pesky opinions always cause trouble!

I can vote there, for sure.

Was that the post you were going to make sprityo?

S~V~S wrote:

nutella wrote:lol I am definitely not organized. As usual I have no idea what's going on or who to suspect. My style may have felt different during the Scotty debacle because I ended up having some conviction about that, and of course I was wrong. Now I don't have any opinions

Now she does not have any opinions. Those pesky opinions always cause trouble!

I can vote there, for sure.

How did she know she was wrong? We don't know who Scotty was. Super fishy.

I actually think I will have a chance to check in and vote from my phone between meetings tonight, so I'll come back in about an hour. I want to give Nutella a chance to respond. I didn't notice when she said she knew she was wrong about Scotty, I don't understand where that came from.

Heading to a movie with MP. I have not seen anything to convince me Nutella is good so I am voting there again and urge other to consider it too.

Unfortunately today happens to be incredibly busy for me schedule-wise and I don't have much time to post. Sad to see I'm probably getting lynched without much chance to defend myself. I'm really just being sincere here, I know I don't look good but I'm innocent.

Dana, I thought we had more or less figured out that Scotty was most likely one of the indies. There is a slim possibility he was bad but I'd pretty much conceded that I was most likely wrong about him.

I'm voting for Typhoony I guess, partly out of self-preservation and partly because I didn't think he looked like his civ game early on.

How would you describe his civ game?

I don't remember figuring that out Nutella but I also can't really talk since I wasn't really around. Hmm. Hard decision. I think I'm going to vote typhoony because I still don't trust that boulders vote and also to make it a tie.

So the response she made made a difference to you, Dana?

Not really. I mean, she's still just as suspicious but typhoony was equally as suspicious to me and I would rather tie the vote than not.

So she is not less suspicious to you, you just want to force a tie?

Why?

I voted LA.

no tie

It's not that I wanted to force a tie in the end, I just figured if they are equally suspicious to me (which isn't even all that suspicious in general, just more than the rest of everyone), then I will let the fates decide. Or other people who vote after me. I am equally as okay with lynching either of them. If Nutella had 3 votes and typhoony had 4 at the time of my voting then I would have voted for Nutella, but it didn't work out that way.

And MM snuck in at the end there as well.

Long Con wrote:And MM snuck in at the end there as well.

BLAH missed it. Sorry guys I know I suck at these things regularly but it's especially hard now with work + having the busiest college time ever.

Where's that day Valentine so I can post groveling team enthrall rusticate sense cookshop?

Sorry I didn't post anglicize inky gimlet earlier. communicatory sorely pragmatical White Knight phone (and barely made it at that).

I had to work both jobs back to back, hence my missing today.

The Typh votes don't sit well with me. If I'd been here, I'd likely have voted Nutella.

Ayyyyyyy we did the thing! Good job guys.

That is not the baddie team I expected her to flip. This means I am wrong about either DFaraday or Long Con being her teammate. My bet is Long con right now. His early vote on her looked like an attempt to distance the crap out of something that was probably a lost cause. The thing that makes me suspect him right now was his response to my question regarding what he thought of her. Looked like a soft defense if ever I saw one.

Additionally, according to the role they can recruit someone who they insanity once in the game? Have we seen anyone other than MM insanified? If not this would be bad news for MM, as I would think they would want to get that recruit in as soon as possible since she has been a suspect since Day 0. My question is, why would Enrique create a role that outs itself though? Seems a bit imbalanced.

I'll admit I have not read well over the last page or so, I'll try to read it either when I get done posting or tomorrow morning.

DFaraday is not off my suspect list, but it was mainly based on what looked to me like an attempt to make Nutella look like an Indy when it didn't make sense. But going on read alone of their responses, I suspect LC a lot more. That said, DF coming in and saying he "would have voted Nutella" does nothing for my read. I dunno, I'm open to thoughts from everyone. I still think at least one of these two is bad.

Also, I think I could really use a protection tonight, please and thanks!

Typhoony wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Typhoony wrote:So what you're saying is that my actions are actually not indicative of being a baddie, yet you voted for me anyway.

Makes sense.

Don't play dumb, you know what I mean.

You're telling me that because there wouldn't be a point to spreading the votes out even thinner, your vote and subsequent vote post therefore isn't suspicious and shady? That's your defense?

Don't play dumb, you know what I mean.

I am saying that "I did not want to spread the vote out any further" is not a valid reason to find my vote suspicious. That does not mean that you can not find other reasons to find my vote suspicious, you just haven't produced any. So my actions are not indicative of me being bad. If you can find something that is indicative of me being bad, I'd love to hear it from you. Good luck.

Correct, I do know what you mean, which makes it all the more suspicious that you would twist my words to make it seem like I don't think your actions are indicative of you being a baddie yet I voted for you anyway. That's literally what you said, yet you're acknowledging now that I do in fact find you suspicious while still trying to use the lack of motivation for vote-spreading as a baddie move as an actual defense.

I still don't understand why anyone found nutella suspicious (and more importantly, why people didn't find Typhoony suspicious) but I'm glad we got a baddie today all the same.

Probably because you're a nub and the the people who voted nutella aren't.

DFaraday wrote:I had to work both jobs back to back, hence my missing today.

The Typh votes don't sit well with me. If I'd been here, I'd likely have voted Nutella.

What happened to your "I have the LC voters top of my list right now"? I voted LC that day.