Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
No you and me are invited with the cool kids quin. :PQuin wrote:C-c-can I come?
You're not invited to the squad because you wasted your vote.thellama73 wrote:This is why we should have lynched Quin. RIP Ika.
Well It could be worse. I could have not voted. :PPrisoner 509378 wrote:sis you're 5 for 5 on mislynches. Incredible resume.
The Hole in the Sock Gang lolPrisoner 509378 wrote:We need a name for the coalition of town power.
Super Civ Squad (Members Only)® is my submission.
S~V~S wrote:The Hole in the Sock Gang lolPrisoner 509378 wrote:We need a name for the coalition of town power.
Super Civ Squad (Members Only)® is my submission.
I am taking my rope to the rope sharpening store right now.sig wrote:Well It could be worse. I could have not voted. :PPrisoner 509378 wrote:sis you're 5 for 5 on mislynches. Incredible resume.
HOWEVER, I went with majorly lead bandwagons on both Gleam and DDL neither of which I pushed so I shouldn't be blamed for those.
Just one?Silverwolf wrote:Sigh................
I have one little thing that concerns me about this...................
YesEpignosis wrote:Just one?Silverwolf wrote:Sigh................
I have one little thing that concerns me about this...................
I'm guess it'll be more than 1, tbqh. So, I'm glad we closed ranks a bit today. Whoever survives the night, just keep doing that. I really think it's our best strategy. We do know more than we think, and if we stick together it gives scum no place to hide. Or, less places, at least.Scotty wrote:So which of us obvious townies will die tonight? I'm guessing Prisoner 509.
Cops, if I am right, can I get a donut?
Then can i ram it down your throat? Kthnx
After trying to lynch me for what three phases I'd think it would be sharp enough.Epignosis wrote:I am taking my rope to the rope sharpening store right now.sig wrote:Well It could be worse. I could have not voted. :PPrisoner 509378 wrote:sis you're 5 for 5 on mislynches. Incredible resume.
HOWEVER, I went with majorly lead bandwagons on both Gleam and DDL neither of which I pushed so I shouldn't be blamed for those.
Now serving number 72... Now serving number 72...Epignosis wrote:I am taking my rope to the rope sharpening store right now.sig wrote:Well It could be worse. I could have not voted. :PPrisoner 509378 wrote:sis you're 5 for 5 on mislynches. Incredible resume.
HOWEVER, I went with majorly lead bandwagons on both Gleam and DDL neither of which I pushed so I shouldn't be blamed for those.
sig wrote: Also I dislike Th last minute vote.
This is the one thing that concerned me I was talking about.sig wrote:
MAYBE Ika was the seemer in fact I'm kind off certain he might be the seemer.
Seemer is undercover cop right?Silverwolf wrote:This is the one thing that concerned me I was talking about.sig wrote:
MAYBE Ika was the seemer in fact I'm kind off certain he might be the seemer.
Oh no, we have tools to sharpen serrated knives, they're just at our sister store currently. He can drive across town and get it done tonight, or he can wait and we can do it in the AM. No problem.sig wrote:Aw poor Epi guess he can't lynch me he didn't get it sharpened enough. Guess you need to sit this next one out buddy.
linki: lol
Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
Your opinion of ika- was it black and white?Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
WTF? You think that's an outlandish theory?indiglo wrote:Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
Or, Occam's Razor... you were wrong. Doesn't make you scum, lord knows that. I've been wrong plenty. But coming up with outlandish stories to try to fit the facts as you want them to be seems far fetched. I will try to say no more on the subject, as I don't wish to upset. I just want my thoughts out there as clear as can be.
And now, let us make way in the thread, for wit is coming our way. JOY!
Prisoner 509378 wrote:Inglorious Hole in the Sock Squad
Well, I think it's possible but whatever.........................Prisoner 509378 wrote:I think indiglo's point about who voted where is sound. I don't think ika was the seemer.
It's almost an anagram of the "shits"indiglo wrote:Prisoner 509378 wrote:Inglorious Hole in the Sock Squad
IHitSS
The acronym is one of the funniest ones I've seen in a while. So that counts for something.
Juliets Fucking Coffee isn't playing this game, but you can PM her.Silverwolf wrote:WTF? You think that's an outlandish theory?indiglo wrote:Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
Or, Occam's Razor... you were wrong. Doesn't make you scum, lord knows that. I've been wrong plenty. But coming up with outlandish stories to try to fit the facts as you want them to be seems far fetched. I will try to say no more on the subject, as I don't wish to upset. I just want my thoughts out there as clear as can be.
And now, let us make way in the thread, for wit is coming our way. JOY!
JFC, Whatever. Town can just lose then.
I agree that it's possible. I just don't think it's the most likely scenario. I'm inclined to judge the lynch as a mislynch.Silverwolf wrote:Well, I think it's possible but whatever.........................Prisoner 509378 wrote:I think indiglo's point about who voted where is sound. I don't think ika was the seemer.
I am not.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I agree that it's possible. I just don't think it's the most likely scenario. I'm inclined to judge the lynch as a mislynch.Silverwolf wrote:Well, I think it's possible but whatever.........................Prisoner 509378 wrote:I think indiglo's point about who voted where is sound. I don't think ika was the seemer.
Right. I'm not saying it's impossible. I just don't think that's what happened - it seems improbable and unlikely. So, I'm going to carry on thinking & playing as if that were a mislynch.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I agree that it's possible. I just don't think it's the most likely scenario. I'm inclined to judge the lynch as a mislynch.Silverwolf wrote:Well, I think it's possible but whatever.........................Prisoner 509378 wrote:I think indiglo's point about who voted where is sound. I don't think ika was the seemer.
Fuck offEpignosis wrote:Your opinion of ika- was it black and white?Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
I rest my case.
Why are you assuming the scum bussed him today? Maybe everyone on the other wagon is scum. His flip know will cause another string of mislynches. Plus it isn't like he wanted to get lynched so?indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
No ma'am. There can only be one infallible person around here, and that person is me, except when I'm wrong.Silverwolf wrote:Fuck offEpignosis wrote:Your opinion of ika- was it black and white?Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
I rest my case.
ika is dead now. Who is bad? And why?Silverwolf wrote:Like, everyone just wants to say I was wrong and I should accept that and not consider I might have reasons for thinking ika was the seemer. Like, not only dismissing it outright but making snide remarks to me about being wrong and yet ANOTHER assumption I don't know ika.
Town is gonna lose this game. It makes me sad.
OMG, ika would totally do this!!Quin wrote:I needed a distraction from writing this report. Thanks guys.
It was only a matter of time before someone brought up ika being the seemer. I wish I could agree, but I think you're wrong. He hinted him being the stool pigeon a while ago, so unless hes really playing us, I think he was civ.
Id find the post, but I'm on my phone.
#soznotsoz
No he's not. He's arrested. I still think there's a chance he's the seemer.Epignosis wrote:ika is dead now. Who is bad? And why?Silverwolf wrote:Like, everyone just wants to say I was wrong and I should accept that and not consider I might have reasons for thinking ika was the seemer. Like, not only dismissing it outright but making snide remarks to me about being wrong and yet ANOTHER assumption I don't know ika.
Town is gonna lose this game. It makes me sad.
sig wrote:Why are you assuming the scum bussed him today? Maybe everyone on the other wagon is scum. His flip know will cause another string of mislynches. Plus it isn't like he wanted to get lynched so?indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
@SW yes it is.
Silverwolf wrote:No he's not. He's arrested. I still think there's a chance he's the seemer.Epignosis wrote:ika is dead now. Who is bad? And why?Silverwolf wrote:Like, everyone just wants to say I was wrong and I should accept that and not consider I might have reasons for thinking ika was the seemer. Like, not only dismissing it outright but making snide remarks to me about being wrong and yet ANOTHER assumption I don't know ika.
Town is gonna lose this game. It makes me sad.
Scum is in the group of Soneji, Draconus, Serge, you, Boomslang, Chaindeath, Nerolunar. Black
Everyone else is town. White
Silverwolf wrote:Discounting this possibility outright is foolish. And just because ika didn't play how you'd expect the seemer to play, doesn't mean he isn't. Like I've said over and over, making everything black and white is how town loses.indiglo wrote:Ok, but how does it make sense that the scum team would bus their Seemer when most of the obvious civs are NOT on board with said lynch? It is illogical. The Seemer's strength (as I see it) is that when all the civs get real suspish of him, and decide to lynch him, he throws a wrench in their thinking by Seeming civ. That was not the case here.
The Inglorious Civsters (pardon me for using that, even though it hasn't been voted on or notorized) were not on board with the ika vote. It makes zero sense to me that ika was the Seemer. ZERO.
